"[...] the OPC is of the view that baseline standards
need to be developed to support parents and educators in terms of
knowing that children's personal information is being
protected. A framework needs to be put in place that will better
inform parents and educators and, ultimately, will better protect
the personal information of children [...]"
South of the border, the United States Federal Trade Commission
(FTC) recently issued a staff report regarding the adequacy of privacy
practices disclosures in the mobile app market for kids.
Although the report was focused on disclosures of privacy
practices, the FTC stated that it will be conducting additional
investigations to determine whether any of the mobile apps violate
the U.S. Children's Online Privacy Protection Act of
1998 (COPPA). COPPA regulates the collection, use, and
disclosure of personal information from children and generally
requires verifiable parental consent to the collection, use and
disclosure of such personal information.
Regarding privacy practices disclosure, the FTC Staff report
there was insufficient disclosure of the data collection, data
sharing and interconnectivity of mobile apps for children;
parents should not have to navigate to lengthy privacy policies
collected and used;
disclosure should be provided prior to downloading and use
because by that point the child may already be using the app and
the parent may have already been charged a fee; and
icons and short disclosures should be used to alert parents if
the mobile app (a) permits information to be shared with social
media, (b) allows "in-app" advertising to occur, or (c)
permits "in-app" purchases.
On the subject of "in-app" advertising, the FTC raised
three concerns with what it assessed was an inadequate level of
parents may want to limit the data collected by advertisers and
ad networks about their children;
even if the advertising is not based on any information
collected from the child, parents may want to limit their
children's exposure to ads; and
parents may not want children to be able to call numbers or
visit websites appearing on in-app advertisements.
In Canada, mobile app developers and marketers should seek legal
advice regarding, among other things, the Quebec Consumer
Protection Act restrictions on advertising to children.
With few exceptions, Quebec prohibits commercial advertising
directed at persons under 13 years of age.
FMC is one of Canada's leading business and litigation law
firms with more than 500 lawyers in six full-service offices
located in the country's key business centres. We focus on
providing outstanding service and value to our clients, and we
strive to excel as a workplace of choice for our people. Regardless
of where you choose to do business in Canada, our strong team of
professionals possess knowledge and expertise on regional, national
and cross-border matters. FMC's well-earned reputation for
consistently delivering the highest quality legal services and
counsel to our clients is complemented by an ongoing commitment to
diversity and inclusion to broaden our insight and perspective on
our clients' needs. Visit:
The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.
To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.
Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.
Join our partners Karen Martin and Ryan Chalmers at the Pacific Business & Law Institute’s program, where they will be presenting a session titled "Procurement: Compliance with AIT, NWPTA, TILMA, NAFTA, TPP, CETA and the Statutes." This forum assembles leading government advisors to provide insights on key issues in local government today.
On March 9, 2016, the Canadian Securities Administrators published CSA Staff Notice 51-348 which reports on a study of social media use by reporting issuers and provides guidance for public companies who engage with investors and other stakeholders using those channels.
The B.C. Supreme Court's recent decision in Pritchard v. Van Nes (2016 BCSC 686) serves not only as a reminder that a poster of defamatory comments on social media can be held liable for the damage caused...
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).