Canada: International Arbitration Best Practices: The Importance Of Having Experienced Arbitration Counsel On Your Team

Having just returned to Vancouver after almost six years of practicing in the international arbitration group of Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer in Paris, I have noted that an ancient myth still lingers in some Canadian corners. Let me dispel it, in all of its forms, for good: international commercial arbitration is not simply domestic commercial litigation in disguise. It involves a unique skill set, which requires particular training and expertise. Law firms around the world have recognized this by developing distinct, and renowned, international arbitration practices: Borden Ladner Gervais LLP is one of those firms.

My time at Freshfields (with one of the largest international arbitration practices, approximately 100 arbitration lawyers globally) taught me that a company that ignores the highly specialized nature of international arbitration does so at its own peril. It is obvious to arbitrators when counsel are learning as they go.

Many parties have obtained important procedural and substantive advantages because the other's counsel was not familiar with international arbitration practice. For example, in an International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes arbitration (a case in which a company from one Mediterranean country was claiming that its investment in another had been mistreated, to the tune of millions of Euros in damages), counsel for the claimant did not submit detailed witness statements with its submissions because, although they were highly-experienced litigation counsel, they were unfamiliar with international arbitration practice. The respondent was represented by counsel experienced in international arbitration, who exposed this error to the respondent's advantage when the claimant announced its intention to present witnesses at the final hearing. The arbitrator eventually admitted last minute "will say" statements into the record, but the damage to the credibility of claimant's counsel, and the claimant's position, had been done. Ultimately, the weight attributed to the late-submitted evidence was minimal because, among other things, its rushed nature resulted in an unpersuasive presentation and a lack of substance. It did not have to be that way.

This article highlights the importance of involving experienced international arbitration counsel, through a short discussion of some issues that can arise during negotiation of an arbitration agreement and arbitration itself.

As a general reminder, an arbitration agreement is subject to the principle of severability: it is a stand-alone contract within a main contract (or separately made at the time a dispute arises). Generally speaking, only the parties to the arbitration agreement (almost always the parties to the main contract) are bound by its terms.

The days of the last minute call requesting an off-the-shelf arbitration agreement to be inserted into a contract – the subject of which was almost always unknown to the lawyer asked to provide the agreement – are fortunately behind us. In today's global market, it is common for sophisticated parties to turn their minds to the dispute resolution provisions of their contracts early in negotiations. Four issues that are often the subject of negotiations, and later arbitration proceedings, are what should be the substantive law, what should be the seat of arbitration, what arbitration rules and institution's administration should apply, and how should an arbitrator be appointed? (It is also advisable, if the parties are from countries of different languages, to agree on the language of the arbitration.) Whether a specific term is appropriately included in a particular arbitration agreement depends on the circumstances. Important arbitral institutions, like the International Chamber of Commerce, London Court of International Arbitration, Stockholm Chamber of Commerce and International Centre for Dispute Resolution, provide standard arbitration agreements which parties may use. Whether a standard agreement should be used in any given circumstance requires careful thought.


Agreeing on the substantive law to govern the underlying agreement is essential. This identifies the law which an arbitrator will apply to the substance of a dispute, including the interpretation of the contract and available remedies. Without an identified substantive law, a contract is subject to a quagmire of uncertainty, requiring complex legal analysis by the arbitrator (considering, among other things, the nationalities of the parties and where the contract was signed, performed and allegedly breached). It is hard to imagine how facilitating such uncertainty by leaving out a substantive law provision would make commercial sense.

Which substantive law should apply requires thoughtful consideration and is usually a matter of negotiation. Understanding the place of the contract in the context of the parties' overall relationship, and a party's goals, obligations and benefits under a particular contract, is imperative to ensuring the appropriate stance to take in negotiations. A recent example, where conceding the substantive law resulted in an unexpected benefit to a British Columbia party, occurred when a foreign party insisted that its country's civil code apply. The BC party consulted local counsel in that country to confirm that there were no peculiarities in that code which could adversely affect the BC party, and then agreed. The result was a contractual advantage to the BC party: it obtained the benefit of an established concept of good faith performance of contractual obligations, in a contractual relationship in which almost all of the performance obligations fell to the foreign party (unlike in BC law, in which the role of good faith in the performance of contractual obligations is uncertain, the principle is expressly codified in the laws of almost all civil code countries). Significant exposure to, and experience working with, foreign laws equips Borden Ladner Gervais' international arbitration lawyers with valuable perspective and insight into international contractual negotiations, regardless of whether an arbitration agreement is ultimately agreed by the parties. Indeed, the end result of input from them may be that an arbitration agreement is not the best option in the circumstances. Arbitration does not work in all cases.

Once a dispute arises, substantive law issues often require advice from local counsel. Borden Ladner Gervais' lawyers can also assist in identifying whether that is so, and in finding appropriate local counsel if necessary.


Probably the most important issue during negotiation or after a dispute has arisen, is the "seat" or place of arbitration, where it legally (not physically) takes place. The arbitration laws of the seat govern the arbitration, including with respect to issues like grounds for challenge to awards, rules of evidence and the posting of security. The arbitration is also subject to the supervision of the courts of the seat, with respect to these issues and others. The grounds for challenging an award are not uniform: in some jurisdictions courts may be more interventionist than others. Therefore, a principal consideration in choosing the seat may be whether a party expects to be on the winning or losing end of an arbitral award. If the latter, a jurisdiction with broad grounds for challenging an award may be the best option. The point is that a party must consider its options before agreeing to a particular seat. For example, where parties have chosen the popular seat of London, England, and expect a final and binding award, the victorious party may be surprised to learn that the English Arbitration Act provides the English courts with relatively broad powers of intervention. To be clear, the seat is not merely the place of the final hearing (although generally it is that too). Meetings among the arbitrator and counsel may take place anywhere, which does not affect the seat. A procedural hearing on document production may take place in Paris by agreement of the parties or at a tribunal's request, even though the seat of arbitration is New York, Singapore or Vancouver.

The seat may also be a negotiation concession by a party. The issue is most acute when a dispute has arisen and the arbitration agreement is silent on the seat. For example, a party may have designs on an application for security for costs. But that concept is not uniformly addressed in the laws of all seats, making one seat or another a more likely venue for success. Without agreement of the parties, the seat will be determined by the administering institution or the arbitral tribunal itself, usually in light of the parties' submissions and certain factors in the circumstances. Parties should be wary of losing control of this important aspect of international arbitration.


Today, there are numerous international arbitral institutions and procedural rules. For the purposes of this discussion, the principal question is whether the arbitration should be administered by an institution under identified rules or ad hoc (unadministered). Ad hoc arbitrations may still have a place, but more and more parties are keen to have as much certainty as possible when it comes to process and costs. Thus, they generally agree to specific rules and an institution to administer the arbitration.

This issue normally arises during negotiations, rather than after there is a dispute. A common misconception is that the applicable arbitration rules are those of the seat. Often this is the case but, as mentioned above, it is the arbitration laws of the seat that apply, not its rules. For example, the International Chamber of Commerce Rules can apply to arbitrations seated anywhere in the world. Arbitration is based on contract and the concept of consent, thus the parties' agreement to use named arbitration rules will trump most, if not all, procedural rules in the seat's arbitration laws.

In most cases, the arbitration agreement identifies the institution and the rules that apply. Recently however an arbitration agreement provided for a dispute to be submitted to an institution but specified the application of the UN Commission on International Trade Law rules. The tensions between the institution's efforts to administer the arbitration and the tribunal's mandate to adhere to those rules may yet have to be resolved.

There are many options available to parties. Borden Ladner Gervais' arbitration lawyers can provide valuable assistance when it comes to deciding whether, or to what extent, a party may wish to propose or reject a particular arbitral institution or set of rules.


The appointment of arbitrators provides parties with a meaningful say in how the arbitration will unfold and, in some cases, the approach arbitrators are likely to take to the substantive issues. There are two stages to the process: agreeing on the number of arbitrators and the method of appointment, and making the actual appointments.

Issues related to the number of arbitrators and method for their appointment are very often addressed during the negotiation of an arbitration agreement, for example, deciding whether one or three arbitrators will decide the dispute, identifying who appoints the arbitrators (very important in multi-party contracts), setting out what happens if a party does not appoint or the parties cannot agree on a chair (if it is their agreement that they do so). Leaving these issues to be resolved when a dispute has arisen usually results in disagreement, delay and increased costs. Deciding them at the negotiation stage requires taking a careful look at the parties' relationship and the relevant contract. For example, the cost of having three arbitrators, as opposed to one, is significantly higher, so it may matter if one party has deep pockets and the other does not. Or it may matter if the value or importance of the dispute to a party's overall business is significant. Regarding method of appointment – do the parties want to have a say in appointing the chair of a three-member tribunal or would they prefer a particular arbitral institution to appoint from its list of arbitrators?

This leads to the second aspect of appointing arbitrators: who should be appointed? At this stage, a dispute will have arisen and the relative positions (and to some degree, the strengths and weaknesses of those positions) will be known. A respondent may also know who the claimant has appointed. Involving one of Borden Ladner Gervais' arbitration lawyers, who are tapped into the international milieu and key personalities, will shed light on who would be an appropriate candidate. For example, in a recent case, the claimant had appointed an English QC well-known in international arbitration circles. That suggested the respondent might want to appoint someone of equal stature, who would not be overshadowed in deliberations among the arbitrators.

This is only a sampling of the issues that arise in international arbitrations. In many cases, the issues are interrelated. They must always be addressed on a case-by-case basis, with full knowledge of the relevant factual matrix. Borden Ladner Gervais' experienced international arbitration lawyers are a valuable resource on any arbitration-related issue that may arise.

About BLG

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions