Canada: When There's A Choice Of Procedure, Which Is "Preferable"?

Last Updated: February 13 2012
Article by Adrienne Boudreau

In Fischer v IG Investment Management Ltd,1 the Ontario Court of Appeal provides important guidance to class action defendants and their counsel on the impact of an existing alternate dispute resolution procedure when deciding whether to certify a proposed class action. This decision will be of particular interest to persons involved in regulated industries with their own dispute resolution procedures, such as investors in regulated capital markets.

Fischer was a proposed class proceeding brought by investors against certain mutual fund managers. The plaintiffs alleged that the defendant fund managers permitted certain market conduct – "market timing" – to occur in certain mutual funds. Unlike other traded securities, mutual funds are valued only one time per day. This comparatively infrequent valuation means that, for short periods of time, the posted value of a fund may be artificially low. "Market timers" take advantage of this circumstance by buying undervalued funds and then quickly selling once the funds' value increases.

The plaintiffs in Fischer claimed that the fund managers breached their duties to investors by failing to take appropriate steps to stop market timing in affected funds. Although market timing is not illegal, the plaintiffs alleged that by failing to address this conduct the fund managers did not act in the best interest of the fund or in the best interests of investors, caused an annual loss to the value of the funds and increased certain transaction costs.

Prior to the certification motion, the Ontario Securities Commission ("OSC") had investigated the same market timing activity that formed the basis of the Fischer claim and subsequently initiated enforcement proceedings. The OSC reached settlements with the defendant fund managers and held hearings pursuant to section 127 of the Ontario Securities Act2 to determine if the settlements were in the public interest. The OSC provided notice of the hearings to the public, but did not directly notify individual investors. Although the hearings were initially open to the public, they were ultimately held in camera at the request of the fund managers. At the conclusion of the hearings, the settlements were approved.

Following the OSC settlement approvals, the plaintiffs brought a motion to certify their action as a class proceeding. To certify an action as a class proceeding the court must find the following: the claim discloses a cause of action, there is an identifiable class, there are issues common to the class, a class action would be the preferable procedure for the resolution of the common issues and there is a representative plaintiff who would fairly represent the interests of the class.

The only contested issue at certification was whether a class proceeding under the CPA was the "preferable procedure" for the resolution of the issues common to the class. In conducting the preferable procedure inquiry it is well established that a court should consider:

  • whether a class proceeding is a fair, efficient and manageable method for advancing the plaintiffs' claims; and,
  • whether a class proceeding is preferable to any other reasonably available means of resolving the class members' claims.

The preferable procedure inquiry must be conducted with the three goals of the Class Proceedings Act in mind: judicial economy, access to justice and behavior modification.

At the certification hearing, the plaintiffs argued that a class proceeding was the most appropriate procedure to resolve the common issues. As support for their position, the plaintiffs led expert evidence that the OSC settlements did not fully compensate investors for their losses (the settlements represented only 1/7 of the actual loss to CI investors and 1/3 of the total harm to AIC investors). In opposition, the defendants argued the concluded OSC proceedings were the most appropriate procedure to resolve the claims of the class.

The motions judge declined to certify the class proceeding on the basis that the preferable procedure requirement was not met. He found that the OSC proceedings, and the settlements reached in those proceedings, fulfilled the objectives of the CPA so as to make the OSC proceedings "preferable" to a class proceeding under the CPA. In coming to this finding, the motions judge considered the criteria the court applies when determining whether to approve a settlement in a class proceeding, and applied those criteria to the OSC awards. The Court found that as long as the purpose of the alternative proceedings was to obtain compensation for harm, the court should not delve into an inquiry of whether the plaintiffs have been fully compensated or not.

The plaintiffs appealed.

On appeal, the Divisional Court overruled the motions judge and certified the action as a class proceeding. In coming to this decision, the Divisional Court focused primarily on the amount of the recovery obtained through the OSC proceedings. The Court found that the OSC proceedings could not be the "preferable procedure" because the investors' action was for significant monetary damages beyond the amount recovered in the OSC proceedings.

The defendant fund managers appealed.

The Ontario Court of Appeal found that the Divisional Court came to the right result but for the wrong reasons and that both courts below erred in their consideration of the substantive outcome of the OSC enforcement proceedings.

According to the Court of Appeal, the correct approach to a preferable procedure inquiry is to analyze the nature of the alternative procedural mechanism at issue and then compare it to the procedure offered under the CPA. The purpose is to determine which procedure is the preferable procedure for resolving the common issues. The substantive result obtained by another procedure is not relevant. In conducting a preferable procedure inquiry, the judge may consider the following characteristics of the alterative proceeding: the impartiality and independence of the forum; the scope and nature of the alternative forum's jurisdiction and remedial powers; the procedural safeguards that apply in the alternative proceeding; and the accessibility of the alterative proceeding.

In comparing the OSC proceedings with the procedure available under the CPA, the Court of Appeal found the OSC proceedings did not adequately address the CPA goal of providing access to justice with respect to the claims of investors because:

  • the jurisdiction of the OSC under section 127 of the Securities Act is regulatory and not meant to serve as a compensatory or remedial provision with respect to harm done to individual investors; as such, the OSC lacks appropriate powers to fully address class members' claims; and,
  • the investors' participatory and informational access to the OSC proceedings was insufficient.

In so finding, the Court determined that a class proceeding would be the preferable procedure for resolving the investors' claims and dismissed the defendants' appeal.

The Court of Appeal's decision is consistent with the law in this area. It is very well established that certification is procedural only and does not involve a consideration of the substantive merits of the case. It is therefore not appropriate to consider such matters as the substantive result of concluded, alternate proceedings. Instead, the proper focus of the inquiry is on the nature of the alternate process and whether that process furthers the goals of the CPA.

Footnotes

1 2012 ONCA 47.

2 RSO 1990, c S.5.

The foregoing provides only an overview. Readers are cautioned against making any decisions based on this material alone. Rather, a qualified lawyer should be consulted.

© Copyright 2012 McMillan LLP

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions