Canada: Ontario Court Of Appeal Recognizes New Privacy Tort

Copyright 2012, Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

Originally published in Blakes Bulletin on Privacy, Litigation & Dispute Resolution, February 2012

In a landmark decision, the Ontario Court of Appeal has recognized the existence of a tort of invasion of privacy in a decision released January 18, 2012. In Jones v. Tsige, the court confirmed that a type of invasion of privacy known technically as "intrusion upon seclusion" is a valid cause of action in Ontario, and granted summary judgment in favour of the plaintiff, whose privacy had been invaded by the actions of the defendant.

The implications of the development of a privacy tort on class actions will also be an important issue as the law develops. Previously, the fact that federal Canadian privacy law requires a complaint to the Privacy Commissioner before any application for damages, and requires that such an application be brought in Federal Court (as opposed to provincial courts) had limited the availability of class actions. With the court's decision, plaintiffs' counsel are likely to bring more privacy class actions.

Facts and judicial history

Both parties in this case were employees at a Canadian bank. Although they had never met, the defendant (Tsige) was involved in a relationship with the plaintiff's (Jones) former spouse. It was not disputed that the defendant had improperly accessed the plaintiff's personal banking records at least 174 times over a period of four years, contrary to bank policy. The defendant claimed that she was involved in a financial dispute with the plaintiff's former husband and accessed the accounts to confirm whether he was paying child support to the plaintiff, but she did not publish, distribute or record the plaintiff's banking information. The plaintiff commenced an action against the defendant, alleging (among other things) invasion of privacy.

The parties each brought competing motions seeking summary judgment. The motion judge dismissed the plaintiff's claim on the basis that Ontario law did not recognize a tort of breach of privacy. The plaintiff appealed to the Court of Appeal.

New tort

Justice Sharpe, writing for a unanimous Court of Appeal, reviewed case law in Ontario and concluded that the courts have remained open to the possibility of there being a common law tort of invasion of privacy, although it had never previously been recognized by an appellate court.

The court also noted that causes of action relating to privacy have been recognized in other jurisdictions (including the United States, the United Kingdom, Australia, and New Zealand), and that four Canadian provinces have already enacted legislation creating statutory causes of action for invasion of privacy.

In addition to these trends, the Court of Appeal cited three additional rationales supporting a tort of intrusion upon seclusion. Firstly, the courts have long recognized that a right to privacy underlies certain rights under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms (including the right to be free from unreasonable searches), and further that the common law should be developed in a manner consistent with the Charter. Secondly, technological advancements have led to the routine collection and electronic storage of vast amounts of highly personal information, posing a novel threat to the privacy of individuals. Finally, absent recognition of a new cause of action, the plaintiff would be left without an effective legal remedy since a remedy under the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (PIPEDA) would be restricted to a complaint against the bank. Interestingly, Justice Sharpe stated that as the remedies under PIPEDA do not include damages, it would be difficult to see what the plaintiff may gain from such a complaint. Since PIPEDA does allow for an application to the Federal Court for damages, but only after the Privacy Commissioner has delivered a report after investigating a complaint, or has discontinued her investigation, Justice Sharpe may have been referring to the fact that, in this case, no damages would be available against the defendant (an individual who was not acting for a commercial purpose) under PIPEDA.

Against this background, the Court of Appeal confirmed the existence of a right of action for intrusion upon seclusion. This new tort has three elements:

  • that the defendant's conduct be intentional or reckless;
  • that the defendant must have invaded the plaintiff's private affairs or concerns without lawful justification; and
  • that a reasonable person would regard the invasion as highly offensive, causing distress, humiliation, or anguish.

It is not necessary for the plaintiff to prove any harm to his or her economic interests. It is also not necessary that the plaintiff's personal information have been published or disseminated by the defendant. The tort focuses on the act of intrusion upon the plaintiff's private affairs, not any subsequent use of the information.

The court was careful to emphasize, however, that only "deliberate and significant invasions of personal privacy", which would be viewed as offensive on an objective standard, will ground a cause of action. Accordingly, the court suggested that only intrusion into highly personal matters, for example, a person's financial or health records, sexual practices and orientation, employment, diary, or private correspondence, will meet the standard. Future cases will likely provide clarity as to the types of conduct that will meet this threshold.

Damages for intrusion upon seclusion

Since claims for invasion of privacy will usually involve intangible interests such as humiliation or emotional distress as opposed to pecuniary losses, damages for intrusion upon seclusion will generally be modest. The Court of Appeal imposed a cap of C$20,000 where the plaintiff has suffered no pecuniary loss. While not precluding punitive or aggravated damages awards on top of this amount in "truly exceptional" cases, the court was clear that it would not encourage them.

The factors identified for determining the quantum of damages are:

  • the nature, incidence, and occasion of the defendant's wrongful act;
  • the effect of the wrong on the plaintiff's health, welfare, social, business, or financial position;
  • any relationship, whether domestic or otherwise, between the parties;
  • any distress, annoyance, or embarrassment suffered by the plaintiff arising from the wrong; and
  • the conduct of the parties, both before and after the wrong, including any apology or offer of amends made by the defendant.


The Court of Appeal found that the defendant had committed the tort of intrusion upon seclusion, and granted summary judgment in favour of the plaintiff. Damages were fixed at C$10,000, having regard to the factors set out above. The court noted the deliberate and repeated nature of the defendant's actions, the background of domestic relationships, and the plaintiff's distress at the invasion of her privacy. On the other hand, it noted that the plaintiff had not suffered any public embarrassment or harm to her health, welfare, social, business, or financial position, and that the defendant had apologized for her conduct and attempted to make amends. Despite the deliberate nature of the defendant's conduct, the court found that aggravated or punitive damages were not warranted.

Points of interest

Justice Sharpe noted that most American jurisdictions have recognized four categories of torts relating to invasion of privacy:

  • intrusion upon seclusion;
  • public disclosure of embarrassing private facts about the plaintiff;
  • publicity which places the plaintiff in a false light in the public eye; and
  • appropriation of the plaintiff's name or likeness.

In this case, the court was clear that it was recognizing only intrusion upon seclusion as a new cause of action, though it considered that appropriation of personality was already accepted in Ontario. However, it signalled that other torts relating to breach of privacy may be recognized in the future.

This decision has important implications for the media, which may investigate and report upon the private affairs of individuals. While it did not consider the issue in detail, the Court of Appeal recognized that in the future, it may be necessary to reconcile the new common law right to privacy with other competing rights, including the Charter rights of freedom of expression and freedom of the press. The court suggested that the balance may tip in favour of the press where it is reporting on matters that are in the public interest. Nevertheless, it can be expected that going forward, plaintiffs in defamation actions, particularly against media outlets, are likely to rely on this new cause of action, and may attempt to extend the law to recognize other privacy-related torts.

This decision may also have implications for organizations currently subject to PIPEDA and substantially similar privacy legislation. In the present instance, Justice Sharpe dispensed with the issue of the bank's liability by stating that the defendant acted as a rogue employee contrary to the bank's policy. However, if the defendant did not act as a rogue employee (i.e., if the defendant was acting on an organization's behalf, such as in the capacity of a private investigator), could the organization be liable for intrusion upon seclusion? It remains to be seen whether courts will be willing to award damages against an organization under the new tort when a damage remedy already exists under PIPEDA. If so, organizations may be subject to both a common law and a statutory duty to protect personal information that they collect, use or disclose in the course of commercial activities. In the case of a federal work, undertaking or business subject to PIPEDA, both duties may also extend to the protection of personal information about an employee of that organization.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Events from this Firm
26 Oct 2018, Other, Vancouver, Canada

Cybersecurity, including data privacy and security obligations, has become a critical chapter in every company’s risk management playbook.

30 Oct 2018, Other, Toronto, Canada

Please join us for discussions on recent updates and legal developments in pension and employee benefits as well as employment law issues.

12 Nov 2018, Other, Toronto, Canada

Stories aren’t falsehoods. Stories are the root of all effective human communications: they motivate, animate and clarify. If you aren’t telling stories, you probably aren’t getting your point across.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Fogler, Rubinoff LLP
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Fogler, Rubinoff LLP
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions