Canada: The Supreme Court Of Canada Speaks On GAAR

Last Updated: January 31 2012
Article by Timothy S. Wach

On December 16th last the Supreme Court of Canada ("SCC") released its long anticipated decision in the case of Copthorne Holdings Ltd. v. The Queen ("Copthorne").  The reason that this decision was long anticipated is that it represents only the third time that the SCC has addressed the application of the so-called "general anti-avoidance rule" or "GAAR", found in section 245 of the Canadian Income Tax Act ("ITA"), since the GAAR was introduced into the ITA in 1988.

The Copthorne case revolved around the characterization of a distribution by the taxpayer to its non-resident parent corporation.  Briefly, the taxpayer contended that the distribution consisted of a non-taxable return of "paid-up capital" ("PUC", being, in general terms, the amount received by a corporation on the issuance of its shares).  The Canada Revenue Agency ("CRA") took the position that the PUC in question had been created or preserved in a manner that constituted a misuse or abuse of the provisions of the ITA and that, therefore, the GAAR should apply to re-characterize the distribution as a taxable dividend, not as a non-taxable return of PUC.  In short, the SCC agreed with the CRA.

The Facts

The facts of the case are extraordinarily complex, even for a tax planning case.  In very general terms, the case involved two sets of transactions.  One aspect of the decision of the SCC, an aspect of some considerable importance, is the determination of whether the two sets of transactions were part of one series of transactions.  This was a threshold issue because, in the circumstances, the GAAR could only apply if this were the case.

The first set of transactions involved a loss consolidation.  Canadian tax law does not provide for consolidated reporting within a corporate group, nor does it explicitly provide for loss transfers within such a group.  However, certain loss consolidation transactions are tolerated by the CRA and, therefore, are not unusual when one corporation within a group has income or a gain and another has unused tax losses.  In this case, the loss consolidation transactions involved a transfer of the shares of one group member, "VHHC Holdings", held by its parent corporation, "VHHC Investments", to another group member which was a predecessor to the taxpayer.  The loss consolidation transaction was not impugned by the CRA. 

At the end of the loss consolidation transaction, the predecessor of the taxpayer was left holding shares of "VHHC Holdings" the PUC of which was high but the fair market value of which was nominal.  This is important because the PUC of those shares had, as its source, the same funds that had been invested into VHHC Investments, which shares (with their high PUC and nominal value) were still held within the group (in other words, the funds had made their way down the chain of corporations, creating PUC at each level).

A decision was taken to merge several group corporations, including the predecessor of the taxpayer and its then wholly owned subsidiary, VHHC Holdings.  A vertical amalgamation of VHHC Holdings with its then parent, the predecessor of the taxpayer, would have caused the high PUC of the shares of the capital of VHHC Holdings to disappear.  Accordingly, the shares of the capital of VHHC Holdings were first sold to the parent of the predecessor to the taxpayer, "Big City", and the predecessor to the taxpayer and VHHC Holdings were merged by way of a horizontal amalgamation, thereby preserving the PUC of the shares of the capital of VHHC Holdings.  The decision to effect this merger by way of the horizontal amalgamation, rather than a vertical amalgamation, was a key factor in the SCC decision.

The second set of transactions, effected approximately two years later, involved the transfer of the shares of the capital of both the processor of the taxpayer and of VHHC Investments to another group member resident in Barbados, following which the two Canadian corporations, and two other Canadian corporations in the group, were amalgamated to form the taxpayer.  This was then followed by a redemption of shares of the capital of the taxpayer held by its Barbadian parent corporation. 

The taxpayer took the position that the redemption did not trigger a deemed dividend for its non-resident parent because the PUC of the shares redeemed exceeded the amount paid to the parent on the redemption.  The CRA, in essence, contended that the PUC of the shares should not include the PUC derived from the shares of the capital of VHHC Holdings with the result that the share redemption by the taxpayer gave rise to a deemed dividend paid to its parent on which the taxpayer should have withheld Canadian tax.


The first question addressed by the SCC was whether the first set of transactions and the second set were part of one series of transactions.  The Court held that they were, based upon the extended definition of a "series" found in subsection 248(10) of the ITA which includes in a series any "related transaction" completed "in contemplation of" the series.  This aspect of the decision is interesting in itself, but is not the focus of this commentary.


The SCC also agreed with the CRA that the GAAR should apply to redetermine the PUC of the shares redeemed by the taxpayer.  In particular, the SCC agreed that the PUC of the redeemed shares should not include the PUC derived from the shares of the capital of VHHC Holdings.  At the risk of oversimplifying the well considered and reasoned decision of the Court, the following are some observations on the reasons of the Court:

  • "taxpayers are entitled to select courses of action or enter into transactions that will minimize their tax liability (see Duke of Westminster)";
  • "The GAAR is a legal mechanism whereby Parliament has conferred on the court the unusual duty of going behind the words of the legislation to determine the object, spirit or purpose of the provision or provisions relied upon by the taxpayer.  While the taxpayer's transactions will be in strict compliance with the text of the relevant provisions relied upon, they may not necessarily be in accord with their object, spirit or purpose.  In such cases, the GAAR may be invoked by the Minister.  The GAAR does create some uncertainty for taxpayers.  Courts, however, must remember that s. 245 was enacted 'as a provision of last resort' ";
  • Because of the potential to affect so many transactions, the court must approach a GAAR decision cautiously.  It is necessary to remember that "Parliament must...'be taken to seek consistency, predictability and fairness in tax law'...For this reason, 'the GAAR can only be applied to deny a tax benefit when the abusive nature of the transaction is clear' " (emphasis added).

In using the emphasized words in the last bullet above, the SCC was quoting itself from the Canada Trustco decision.  However, the words are reminiscent of the Federal Court of Appeal ("FCA") decision in OSFC Holdings, in which that court stated:

to deny a tax benefit where there has been strict compliance with the Act, on the grounds that the avoidance transaction constitutes a misuse or abuse, requires that the relevant policy be clear and unambiguous. The Court will proceed cautiously in carrying out the unusual duty imposed upon it under subsection 245(4). The Court must be confident that although the words used by Parliament allow the avoidance transaction, the policy of relevant provisions or the Act as a whole is sufficiently clear that the Court may safely conclude that the use made of the provision or provisions by the taxpayer constituted a misuse or abuse.

In answer to the argument that such an approach will make the GAAR difficult to apply, I would say that where the policy is clear, it will not be difficult to apply. Where the policy is ambiguous, it should be difficult to apply (emphasis added).

It is interesting to note that both the SCC decision in Copthorne and the FCA decision in OSFC Holdings were written by Justice Marshall Rothstein.  These two decisions are, arguably, the best written and best reasoned GAAR decisions to date.  They also provide clear guidance on when the GAAR should be applied, which is not very often, and only when "the abusive nature of the transaction is clear" or when the relevant policy is "clear and unambiguous".

OFSC Holdings involved a series of transactions intended to circumvent the loss streaming rules applicable upon a corporate acquisition of control.  In that case the FCA did not have too much difficulty finding a general scheme of the ITA against corporate loss trading, a conclusion that is hard to question.

It is perhaps more difficult to find a general scheme of the ITA in respect of PUC and corporate distributions than it is in respect of corporate loss trading (although some would argue that such a scheme is present, and that one only needs to look harder to find it, although perhaps this means that it is not "clear and unambiguous").  In its decision, the SCC relied heavily on the fact that had the merger of the predecessor of the taxpayer and its wholly owned subsidiary, VHHC Holdings, been effected as a vertical amalgamation the PUC in issue would not have survived the merger because subsection 87(3) of the ITA would have eliminated it.  The Court held that by effecting the merger as a horizontal amalgamation, rather than a vertical amalgamation (which would have been a simpler way of achieving the same non-tax, commercial result), constituted an abuse of subsection 87(3) of the ITA.  This conclusion was heavily influenced by the fact that the PUC had, as its source, the same original funds, as described above.


It is probably safe to say that the CRA won in Copthorne because it had really good facts.  These facts presented to the Court a fairly clear case of duplication of PUC through the investment of funds down a corporate chain, and also allowed the Court to draw a fairly clear comparison between the elimination of that PUC on a simple transaction (the vertical amalgamation which could have been effected) versus the preservation of it on a more complicated transaction (the horizontal amalgamation that was effected) and the avoidance of subsection 87(3) as a result.

However, the importance of Copthorne is not in what it tells us about PUC planning transactions, but what it tells us about the GAAR.  As noted above, it is interesting to note the similarities between the reasons in Copthorne and OSFC Holdings.  Hopefully those decisions, particularly the portions referred to above, will guide the courts (and the CRA?) in their future considerations of the application of the GAAR.  In particular, in addressing the misuse or abuse question necessary for determining if the GAAR is applicable to a particular transaction,  hopefully the Copthorne criterion ("the GAAR can only be applied to deny a tax benefit when the abusive nature of the transaction is clear"), and the similar OSFC Holdings criterion (the GAAR should be applied, which is not very often, and only when "the abusive nature of the transaction is clear" or when the relevant policy is "clear and unambiguous") will be our guides.

No doubt many tax professionals in Canada will continue to decry the "uncertainty" and "arbitrary nature" of the GAAR, as they have for over 20 years.  On the other hand, it is interesting to note that officials of the CRA and the Department of Finance can often be heard expressing concern that the courts have applied the GAAR in too restrictive a manner.  If the courts are hearing complaints from both ends of the spectrum, perhaps they have hit the "Goldilocks zone".

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Events from this Firm
8 Nov 2016, Seminar, Ottawa, Canada

The prospect of an internal investigation raises many thorny issues. This presentation will canvass some of the potential triggering events, and discuss how to structure an investigation, retain forensic assistance and manage the inevitable ethical issues that will arise.

22 Nov 2016, Seminar, Ottawa, Canada

From the boardroom to the shop floor, effective organizations recognize the value of having a diverse workplace. This presentation will explore effective strategies to promote diversity, defeat bias and encourage a broader community outlook.

7 Dec 2016, Seminar, Ottawa, Canada

Staying local but going global presents its challenges. Gowling WLG lawyers offer an international roundtable on doing business in the U.K., France, Germany, China and Russia. This three-hour session will videoconference in lawyers from around the world to discuss business and intellectual property hurdles.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.