Canada: Round III To The Provinces: Supreme Court Rejects Canadian Securities Act As Unconstitutional

Last Updated: January 12 2012
Article by Alan P. Gardner, Ranjan K. Agarwal and Preet K. Bell

On December 22, 2011, the Supreme Court of Canada released its much anticipated decision on the constitutionality of the proposed Canadian Securities Act (CSA). To the surprise of many, the Supreme Court unanimously found the CSA to be unconstitutional and outside the authority of Parliament, much like the Alberta Court of Appeal and Quebec Court of Appeal did earlier last year. But the Supreme Court did not rule that the concept of a national securities regulator is necessarily unconstitutional. As such, the federal government is forced back to the drawing board.


In May 2010, the federal government released the CSA, which provides for the harmonization of the existing provincial and territorial legislation into a single federal statute and creates a national securities regulator. At the same time as releasing the CSA, the federal government referred the question of its constitutionality to the Supreme Court. Shortly after, both the Alberta and Quebec governments submitted similar reference questions to five-judge panels of their respective appeal courts. Both provincial appeal courts found the CSA to be unconstitutional (with only one Quebec judge dissenting).

The Canadian constitution divides certain powers between the provincial and federal governments. The legal issue before the courts was whether the CSA falls under a provincial or federal head of power.

Canada's Argument

The federal government, supported by the province of Ontario, argued that the CSA falls within the federal government's general trade and commerce power. It conceded that certain aspects of securities regulation fall under provincial power, and acknowledged the oft-affirmed power of the provinces to regulate securities. But the federal government took the position that the securities market has evolved from a provincial matter to a national matter, affecting the country as a whole. This significant transformation, argued the federal government, has given rise to systemic risks and other concerns that can only be dealt with on a national level.

The Provinces' Argument

The provinces of Alberta, Quebec, Manitoba and New Brunswick opposed the constitutionality of the CSA. The provinces argued that the CSA falls under the provincial property and civil rights head of power. They also argued that the CSA trenches on the provincial power over matters of a merely local or private nature, namely the regulation of contracts, property and professions. The provinces heavily relied on the fact that provincial governments have regulated the securities market since Confederation.

The Supreme Court's Decision

To determine the constitutionality of the CSA, the Supreme Court engaged in a two-step analysis. First, what is the "pith and substance" of the legislation? In other words, what is the main thrust of the law based on a review of its purpose and effects? The CSA's stated purpose is to implement a comprehensive Canadian regime for the regulation of securities. The effects of the CSA are to duplicate and displace existing provincial regimes and replace them with a new federal regulatory scheme. Based on the stated purpose of the CSA, its provisions and other evidence, the Court concluded that the pith and substance of the legislation "is to regulate, on an exclusive basis, all aspects of securities trading in Canada, including the trades and occupations related to securities in each of the provinces."

Second, does the legislation as characterized fall within the federal trade and commerce power or the provincial property and civil rights power? On its face, the general trade and commerce power is broad, having the ability to subsume other federal heads of power, and duplicate (and perhaps displace) provincial powers. In order to constrain this seemingly limitless power, it has been confined to matters that are genuinely national in scope. There are five indicia of federal competence under the general trade and commerce power:

  1. Is the law part of a general regulatory scheme?
  2. Is the scheme under the oversight of a regulatory agency?
  3. Is the law concerned with trade as a whole rather than a particular industry?
  4. Is the scheme of such a nature that provinces, acting alone or together, would be constitutionally incapable of enacting it?
  5. Would failure to include one or more provinces jeopardize its successful operation in other parts of the country?

These indicia are not exhaustive, and do not need to be present in every case. The first two indicia identify the required structure of the legislation. The latter three consider whether the matter is one of genuine national importance distinct from provincial concerns.

The Court accepted that goals of the CSA, in particular, the preservation of capital markets to fuel Canada's economy and maintain financial stability, go beyond a particular industry and engage "trade as a whole" (making the CSA part of a general regulatory scheme and under oversight of a regulatory agency). But the Court also found that the CSA descends into the day-to-day regulation of all aspects of securities trading within the provinces, which has long since been regulated provincially. The federal government argued that the securities market has transformed into a national concern but the Court rejected this view. The fact that the structure and terms of the CSA "largely replicate the existing provincial schemes belies the suggestion that the securities market has been wholly transformed over the years."

The Court also found that the provinces lack the constitutional capacity to sustain a viable national scheme aimed at genuine national goals, such as managing systemic risk. But the CSA goes beyond matters of national interest and reaches down into the detailed regulation of all aspects of securities, meaning that the provinces are not "constitutionally incapable" of responding to those matters.

The national goals of the CSA, such as managing systemic risk, would be rendered ineffective if a province absented itself from the CSA. But, because the main thrust of the CSA is the day-to-day regulation of securities, the Court stated that the CSA would not give way if a province declined to participate. Significantly, the CSA contains an opt-in feature, whereby provinces would opt-in to the federal scheme. This feature of the CSA contemplates that not all provinces will participate, which weighed against the federal government's argument that the success of the CSA requires the participation of all provinces.

In conclusion, while the Supreme Court noted that certain aspects of the CSA may be of genuine national concern (and realities such as systemic risk could justify federal regulation), the CSA as a whole cannot be sustained under the general trade and commerce power. The main thrust of the legislation–the day-to-day regulation of securities–cannot be described as a matter that is truly national in importance and scope. Systemic risk, however concerning, cannot justify a complete federal takeover.

Final Comments from the Court

The Supreme Court was careful to confine its decision to the constitutionality of the proposed CSA. Its decision was focused on legislative competence, not policy.

The Supreme Court made clear that "courts do not have the power to declare legislation constitutional simply because they conclude that it may be the best option from the point of view of policy". This statement leaves the door open for alternative strategies for regulating Canada's securities markets.

The Court highlighted the potential for a cooperative approach with both levels of government working in collaboration on securities regulation. The Court appears to suggest that since the matter possesses both central and local aspects, the federal government should pursue an approach that permits a scheme recognizing the essentially provincial nature of securities regulation, while still allowing Parliament to deal with genuinely national concerns.

The Supreme Court also noted, on several occasions, that the federal government grounded its position that the CSA was constitutional entirely on the general trade and commerce power, and that the Court had not been asked to opine on Parliament's authority over securities regulation under other federal heads of power. If the CSA is redrafted, the federal government may contemplate a different constitutional position.

Next Steps?

The Supreme Court's decision arguably provides a map to a new securities regime. It characterizes many aspects of provincial and federal jurisdiction with respect to securities, and suggests where the federal government may be able to regulate (such as with respect to systemic risk). The Court also essentially proposes a cooperative approach between the federal and provincial governments, envisioning roles for both national and provincial regulators.

The federal government has not announced what, if any, steps it will take next. The Supreme Court's decision makes it clear that, absent a constitutional amendment, a single national regulator, without provincial involvement, will not succeed. It remains to be seen whether both levels of government can cooperate on a national securities regime that deals with some of the national concerns raised by the federal government. For now, the only thing that remains certain is that a national securities regulator will not be in place any time soon.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Alan P. Gardner
Ranjan K. Agarwal
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Affleck Greene McMurtry LLP
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Affleck Greene McMurtry LLP
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions