Canada: True Lease v. Security Lease – Is The Distinction Still Relevant? (Part 2)


In "True Lease v. Security Lease – Is the Distinction Still Relevant?" which appeared in the June 2008 issue of Collateral Matters, Jill Fraser discussed a 2007 amendment to the Personal Property Security Act (Ontario) (the "PPSA") and whether or not the distinction between a true lease and a security lease was still relevant in light of that amendment.

That issue is one that continues to preoccupy the courts.

Enforcement of Security

In her article, Jill reviewed a 2007 decision of the British Columbia Court of Appeal, DaimlerChrysler Services Canada Inc. v. Cameron, 2007 BCCA 144 (CanLII) ("Cameron") which involved a situation in which the distinction continued to be relevant, namely, application of the provisions governing enforcement of security agreements in the Personal Property Security Act (British Columbia). That decision is applicable in Ontario because Part V of the PPSA (Default – Rights and Remedies) applies to a security interest "only if it secures payment or performance of an obligation" (section 57.1).

As a consequence, although the PPSA otherwise applies to a lease of goods for a term of more than one year, whether or not it secures payment or performance of an obligation, Part V applies to such a lease only if it does so. It is necessary for the lessor, upon default by the lessee, to consider whether the lease is a true lease and therefore exempt from the provisions of Part V, or whether it is a security lease and subject to Part V.

In Cameron, the motion judge held that the lease in question was a security lease. The Court of Appeal reversed that decision. Professor Jacob Ziegel wrote a case comment critical of the decision of the Court of Appeal ("Security Interests and Continuing Challenges in Characterization of Equipment Leases: DaimlerChrysler Services Canada Inc. v. Cameron" (2009), 47 C.B.L.J. 283).

Reorganization or Restructuring

In her article, Jill also noted a second situation in which the distinction between true leases and security leases continues to be relevant: reorganizations or restructurings under Part III of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (the "BIA") and under the Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act (the "CCAA").

The distinction remains relevant in those situations because of provisions in the BIA (section 65(4)(a)) and the CCAA (section 34(4)(a)) that permit persons, after the commencement of proceedings under the applicable statute, to require immediate payment for "the use of leased ... property" that is provided to the insolvent debtor. Courts have held that only a lessor under a true lease may have the benefit of these provisions, and that a lessor under a security lease may not.

Application of the CCAA provision arose in an unreported 2010 decision of the Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta. The court held that the lease in question was a security lease. The unsuccessful lessor sought leave to appeal, under section 13 of the CCAA, which permits a person dissatisfied with an order to seek leave to appeal either from the court that made the order or from the applicable appellate court. The lessor tried the same court first (Royal Bank of Canada v. Cow Harbour Construction Ltd., 2010 ABQB 637 (Can LII)), and, when that application was rejected, it tried the Court of Appeal (De Lage Landen Financial Services Canada Inc. v. Royal Bank of Canada, 2010 ABCA 394 (CanLII)). Reasons for decision were issued by both courts, but, because they deal primarily with what an applicant for leave to appeal must establish, they add little to the discussion of the true lease / security lease distinction.

Contractual Subordination

A recently reported 2011 decision of the Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta, Re 843504 Alberta Ltd., 2011 ABQB 448 (CanLII) ("Skyreach Equipment"), introduced a third situation in which the true lease / security lease distinction remains relevant. Although Skyreach Equipment involved both the CCAA and the BIA, the issue arose in a priority dispute between a lessor of equipment and a secured creditor, with the lessor asserting contractual subordination by the secured creditor.

In 1999, the debtor had executed a general security agreement ("GSA") in favour of the secured creditor. It was validly registered in the Alberta personal property registry. In 2000, the debtor and the lessor entered into a master lease agreement, under which the lessor subsequently leased various vehicles and pieces of equipment to the debtor. The lessor registered a financing statement under the Personal Property Security Act (Alberta), but omitted to describe the collateral 'by item or kind' and did not set out serial numbers. These omissions rendered the security interest under the master lease agreement an unperfected one, and prevented the lessor from relying on the 'super-priority' given to a purchase-money security interest under the Alberta equivalent of section 33 of the PPSA.

Unable to assert a statutory priority, the lessor was left to make an argument based on the Alberta equivalent of section 38 of the PPSA and the provisions of the GSA. Section 38 of the PPSA states: "A secured party may, in the security agreement or otherwise, subordinate the secured party's security interest to any other security interest and such subordination is effective according to its terms."

The provision in the GSA relied on by the lessor was the following: "Borrower will not ... mortgage, pledge, grant or permit to exist a security interest in or lien upon any of the Collateral, now owned or hereafter acquired except for the Permitted Liens." The definition of Permitted Lien in the GSA included "lessor's Liens arising from operating leases entered into in the ordinary course of business." The lessor asserted that the master lease agreement was such an operating lease, and that the GSA provision had the effect of subordinating the security interest under the GSA in favour of the master lease agreement with regard to the leased equipment.

The court held otherwise. It noted first that the term 'operating lease' is used interchangeably with the term 'true lease,' and that the terms 'security lease,' 'financing lease' and 'capitalized lease' are also used interchangeably.

The court made reference to the 15 factors set out in a 1983 article by Ronald Cuming and listed in Jill Fraser's article mentioned above. Those factors will not be listed here.

The court went on to make reference to an article by Toronto lawyer Michael Burke, "Ontario Personal Property Security Act Reform: Significant Policy Changes" (2009), 48 C.B.L.J. 289. In that article, the author wrote that it was possible to make four generalizations from the case law:

  1. that four factors (what he called 'primary factors') are clearly more important than other factors ('secondary factors');
  2. that the presence of a primary factor in a lease often determines the issue;
  3. that secondary factors generally have a corroborative value and are not in and of themselves determinative of the characterization; and
  4. that, where a primary factor is ambiguous or absent, the court will weigh secondary factors in making the characterization.

The author identified the following primary factors:

  1. purchase option price – whether the purchase option price is nominal (indicating a security lease) or reflective of fair market value (true lease);
  2. mandatory purchase – whether the lessee is obligated to purchase the leased equipment (or title automatically transfers to the lessee) at the end of the lease term (security lease);
  3. open-end leases / guaranteed residual clauses – whether the lessee is liable for any deficiency in the sale of the leased equipment at the end of the lease term (security lease); and
  4. sale-leaseback transactions – whether the transaction is structured as a sale of the equipment (by the prospective lessee to the prospective lessor) and a leaseback by the buyer to the seller (security lease).

Mr. Burke also identified the following secondary factors:

  1. the ability to replace/exchange leased equipment (indicative of a true lease);
  2. the lessor's ability to accelerate payment of all future rental instalments and the residual value (security lease);
  3. full payment lease (indicative of either form of lease, depending on the language of the provision);
  4. security deposit (security lease);
  5. down payment (security lease);
  6. covenants relating to maintenance, insurance and risk of loss (indicative of either form of lease); and
  7. lessor's use of 'true lease' and 'security lease' forms for different transactions.

In Skyreach Equipment, the court found that the master lease agreement contained provisions that brought it within primary factor (3) above. At the end of the lease term, the lessee could return the vehicle and the lessor would sell it. The lessee would remain responsible for payment of rent until the end of the month in which the returned vehicle was sold. If the sale proceeds of a vehicle exceeded the termination book value, the lessee kept the surplus. If there was a shortfall, the lessee had to pay that amount to the lessor.

Although the court found some secondary factors in the master lease agreement that were indicative of a true lease, it found that their presence was "insufficient to outweigh the clear effect of the primary factors." The court concluded that the master lease agreement was properly characterized as a security lease and was not a 'Permitted Lien' under the GSA.

It is interesting to note that the provisions relied on by the courts in Skyreach Equipment and Cameron had the same effect, namely, to make the lessor 'whole.' The only difference was the timing when the provisions came into effect – on lease termination in Skyreach Equipment, on the occurrence of default by the lessee in Cameron. In his article, Michael Burke made note of the Cameron exception to the general rule that a guaranteed residual clause is indicative of a security lease.


The true lease / security lease distinction remains very much a relevant issue in Canadian personal property security law. Any thoughts that the 2007 amendments to the PPSA had ended its relevance in Ontario were, as Mark Twain said of reports of his death, exaggerated.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.