Canada: Summary Judgment And The Right To Set-Off Under The Construction Lien Act

Last Updated: November 22 2011
Article by David Debenham, JD, LLM, DIFA, CMA, CPA, CFE

It is not uncommon for a general contractor to carry the same trades from project to project. What happens when a trade is owed money on one project, and the general alleges a sizeable claim with respect to a prior project by way of set-off? That subject arose once again in Total Electrical v. Collège Boréal1.

In this case the Plaintiff ("TES") was an electrical contractor who did work on two projects for the general contractor Tribury Construction (1995) Inc. ("Tribury"). The plaintiff's claim arises out of work done on the second project, a residence at the "Collège Boréal d'Arts" project ("Collège Boréal"). In defence of that claim, Tribury claims a set-off under s. 17 (3) of the Construction Lien Act, which arises from a prior project the parties worked on together, being the "Living with Lakes" project. On a motion for summary judgment brought by TES, Tribury took the position that there are genuine issues which require trial with respect to the amount of set-offs and hence the summary judgment motion should fail.

TES claimed that there is $283,702.03, inclusive of GST, owing on the Collège Boréal contract. Tribury claims that from this amount approximately $10,000 must be deducted to rectify defects and for warranty issues. Tribury did not deny that the balance of the contract on Collège Boréal is $269,215.93 plus GST. Six days after TES completed the Collège Boréal project, and after their work had been certified by the consultant, Tribury advised them that they would not be paying the balance under the Collège Boréal contract, because they were setting-off the balance of the Living with Lakes contract against the Collège Boréal invoice in the amount of $200,402.75. TES did not deny that the question of liability on this set-off raises a triable issue. However, they argue that it would be unfair if their liquidated claim for summary judgment were denied or stayed while the un-liquidated claim for set-off were sent to trial. Put shortly, there was a "battle of the forms" on the Living with Lakes contract, and eventually the parties could never sign a contract. Once TES left the project, Tribury retained a new subcontractor to complete the remaining work for the project, and purports to back-charge TES with the extra cost of the substitute trade. For the next eight months, Tribury did not take any steps to pursue their claim against TES, nor did they communicate with them to articulate the value of the claim they would be making. During those eight months, TES worked on the Collège Boréal project.

Tribury did not contest that the plaintiff is entitled to partial summary judgment for the amount owing on the Collège Boréal contract; and that this entitlement exceeds the amount claimed on the Living with Lakes project. TES took the position that the amount owing under the Collège Boréal project is not in dispute and should be awarded on this motion for summary judgment. TES further submits that equity should prevent Tribury from exercising its right of set-off in relation to the Living with Lakes project. This argument is based on the fact that Tribury sent a letter on November 2, 2009, telling TES that they would be starting a legal action against them. TES argues that, by allowing the bidding process and the work to be done on the Collège Boréal project following that letter, but without taking any legal steps to enforce their rights on the Living with Lakes project, Tribury 'sat in the bushes' while TES detrimentally relied on their representation to commence a legal action. Finally, TES argued that the facts do not support an equitable set-off in that the two projects were completely unrelated and occurred during different time periods. Tribury responded that they have a statutory right of set-off under the s. 17(3) of the Construction Lien Act in the lien action, which permits a payer on a contract to set off the amounts owing on a project against any amounts arising on a separate project. As far as Tribury was concerned, it would be inequitable for it to be obliged to make payment to TES for amounts claimed with respect to the Collège Boréal subcontract without addressing its claims for set-off on the Living with Lakes subcontract. They claim that the two projects are linked in time and in the context of the ongoing relationship between the parties.

Tribury argued that the case of C & A Steel (1983) Ltd. v. Tesc Contracting Co., 2 ("C & A Steel") sets out the law regarding the scope of s. 17(3) of the Construction Lien Act. In C & A Steel, the court noted that s. 17(3) of the Construction Lien Act, and noted that the statutory right of set-off in the Act is broader than an equitable set-off. That provision specifically provides that, apart from the determination of holdback, "in determining the amount of a lien there may be taken into account the amount that is, as between a payer and the person the payer is liable to pay, equal to the balance in the payer's favour of all outstanding debts, claims or damages, whether or not related to the improvement." 3Nevertheless that court in C & A Steel went on to examine the criteria for an equitable set-off4 and found that in "the circumstances of the dealing between these parties" the equitable criteria was satisfied and the defendant was entitled to assert its claims by way of equitable set-off. In particular, given the relationship and dealing between the parties, it appeared that both parties have in effect treated their respective obligations and claims as a running account and withheld payments acknowledged to be owing because of unresolved competing claims.

In the TES case, there was no evidence that relationship between the parties that might suggest that they had a practice or understanding that there was a 'running account' between them with respect to different projects. It made no commercial sense for TES to work for Tilbury for a further eight months if TES thought Tribury would hold back payment as leverage in the Living with Lakes dispute. There was no evidence of any past practice between the parties. Tribury could not explain why it maintained silence on this issue for eight months. At no time prior to this motion did Tribury provide any evidence in support of its claim for damages. It is reasonable to infer from the evidence that the parties did not treat their respective obligations and claims as a "running account" as was the case in C & A Steel.

The facts in this case do not resemble the situation or circumstances that existed in C & A Steel. Consequently, the equities are also different. Rule 20 exists to provide a summary procedure whereby litigants may have judgment for claims for which there is no need for a trial to resolve an issue. This lawsuit involves two entirely different claims. According to the plaintiff, the commercial relationship between the parties was to treat each project separately. With respect to the Collège Boréal claim, the plaintiff demonstrated and the defendant conceded that the work was done and the amount of the claim is not contested. With respect to the Living with Lakes claim, the defendant has not provided any evidence to allow either the plaintiff or this court to assess the claim. It is undisputed that there is a question of liability and likely damages; but to date, those damages remain a complete mystery. It would be inequitable to hold up the payment on the Collège Boréal project while Tribury continues to delay advancing its claim on the Living with Lakes project. Here, it would be unjust to deny the plaintiff relief under a summary procedure designed for this very purpose where Tribury has lead no evidence that the parties had a past commercial relationship that treated their respective obligations as a running account, particularly where the defendant has declined to put its best foot forward and where the plaintiff's case is conceded.

Does this case stand for the proposition that the defendant was not able to rely on the claim for set-off because it did not raise a genuine issue for trial? Did the court draw an analogy with Rule 20.08 and simply refuse a stay? Or does the decision restrictively interpret ss.17(3) of the Construction Lien Act to cases involving "running accounts" between parties working on several projects or once? Time will tell. To date, the cases where s.17(3) have been applied have involved "an inextricable intertwining of the factual matrix between the claims upon which summary judgment is sought and those relating to the set-off." Such that "the set-off claimed flows from the same relationship as the claim itself." and evidence that has demonstrated that "the defence of set-off is not so weak as to refuse to justify postponing payments to [the plaintiff].5. When we have a case with a strong claim for set-off in relation to wholly separate projects such as the one in Total Electrical v. Collège Boréal we will truly find out if s.17(3) is broader in its application than the equitable defence of set-off.


1 2011 ONSC 4586

2 [1998] CanLII 14682 (ON SC)

3 The combined effect of ss.21 and 17(3) of the Construction Lien Act is to ensure subcontractor liens are a charge against the whole of the amount owed by the owner to the contractor under the contract, with the owner entitled to set off claims against the contractor in calculating the overall obligation, provided, however, that set-off claims cannot be applied to reduce the owner's obligation below the amount of the basic holdback created in s. 22. And so it goes for the contractor's holdback on down the construction pyramid.

4 (1) The party relying on a set-off must show some equitable ground for being protected against his adversary's demands...(2) The equitable ground must go to the very root of the plaintiff's claim before a set-off will be allowed...(3) A cross-claim must be so clearly connected with the demand of the plaintiff that it would be manifestly unjust to allow the plaintiff to enforce payment without taking into consideration the cross-claim...(4) The plaintiff's claim and the cross-claim need not arise out of the same contract...(5) Unliquidated claims are on the same footing as liquidated claims.

This article was originally published in the Ontario Bar Association in November 2011.

The foregoing provides only an overview. Readers are cautioned against making any decisions based on this material alone. Rather, a qualified lawyer should be consulted.

© Copyright 2011 McMillan LLP

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

David Debenham, JD, LLM, DIFA, CMA, CPA, CFE
In association with
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.