Canada: Supreme Court Of Canada Dismisses Lax Kw’alaams’ Claim For A Commercial Fishing Right

Last Updated: November 14 2011
Article by Katey Grist and Bridget Gilbride

On November 10, 2011, the Supreme Court of Canada upheld the decisions of the BC Supreme Court and the BC Court of Appeal to dismiss the claim of the Lax Kw'alaams First Nation (and other First Nations) for the right to a commercial fishery on the north coast of British Columbia, just north of Prince Rupert. The fact that trade in the fish product eulachon grease was integral to the Lax Kw'alaams' pre-contact distinctive society was not sufficient to establish an Aboriginal right to a general commercial fishery.


At trial (2008 BCSC 447), the Lax Kw'alaams were successful in proving that they are an Aboriginal group descendent from the Coast Tsimshiam who had lived and fished in the Prince Rupert area at the time of contact with Europeans. They also demonstrated that the harvest and consumption of fish resources remained an integral part of their distinctive culture. However, although a "fishing people", the Lax Kw'alaams failed to demonstrate they were a "trading people" in any fish resource or fish product except for the limited species-specific luxury good of eulachon grease.

In the result, the trial judge dismissed the First Nations' claim for a declaration that they held an Aboriginal right to harvest and sell all species of fish on a commercial scale in their claimed territories. The BC Court of Appeal concurred (2009 BCCA 593).

The Supreme Court of Canada Decision

In a unanimous decision, Mr. Justice Binnie dismissed the Lax Kw'alaams' arguments, and upheld the conclusion of the Court of Appeal on all issues.

A. Characterization of the Claim

The Lax Kw'alaams argued that the court should first make inquires and findings about pre-contact practices and way of life of the claimant, and then characterize the claimed Aboriginal rights. Mr. Justice Binnie coined this the 'commission of inquiry' approach, and dismissed it as illogical and contrary to the rules of civil procedure as well as prior authority on establishing Aboriginal rights (Van der Peet).

A claimant may take advantage of the ability to amend its pleadings, but at the end of the day, the defendant must know what precisely is being claimed. Mr. Justice Binnie went on to set out a four-step process for a court to follow when dealing with a section 35 claim:

  1. Identify the precise nature of the First Nation's claim to an Aboriginal right based on the pleadings. If necessary, in light of the evidence, refine the characterization of the right.
  2. Based on the evidence, determine if the First Nation has proved: (a) the existence of the pre-contact practice advanced in the pleadings, and that (b) this practice was integral to the distinctive pre-contact Aboriginal society.
  3. Determine if the claimed modern right has a "reasonable degree of continuity with" or is "demonstrably connected to" or is "reasonably regarded as a continuation of" the integral pre-contact practice. This step should be approached in a "generous though realistic" manner, and the modern right must engage the essential elements of the pre-contact practice.
  4. If an Aboriginal right to trade commercially is found, that right should be delineated with consideration to the objectives of the pursuit of economic and regional fairness, and the historical reliance and participation in the fishery by non-Aboriginal groups (citing Gladstone and Marshall).

B. Continuity between the Pre-Contact Trade in Eulachon Grease and a Modern Commercial Fishery

The trial judge had found it would be "stretching the concept of an evolved Aboriginal right too far" to say the Coast Tsimshian's practice of trading in eulachon grease was equivalent to a modern right to fish commercially in all species in their claimed territories.

The Supreme Court of Canada agreed. Although Aboriginal rights are not "frozen at contact" and subject to evolution, such evolution is limited both quantitatively and qualitatively. The Court re-asserted the "distinctive culture" test set out in Van der Peet remains the proper test.

In this case, a finding of a general commercial right to fish would directly counter the trial judge's factual conclusion that the Lax Kw'alaams did not trade in any significant way in fish or fish products other than eulachon grease. A general commercial fishery is qualitatively different from the pre-contact activity, and out of proportion to its importance to the pre-contact Tsimshian economy. The Court also drew its own inference that given the short fishing season of eulachon pre-contact, a commercial fishery would lack quantitative proportionality to the pre-contact activity as well.

With respect to "species specific" rights, the Court emphasized this finding will turn on the facts of a particular case. The evolution of fisheries and change in migratory patterns of fish should not be ignored, but in this case, the only subject matter of significant trade was eulachon grease.

C. Lesser and Included Rights

Lax Kw'alaams, drawing upon principles of criminal procedure, argued the trial judge failed to consider all "lesser" rights subsumed in the right to trade commercially, including the right to harvest and sell fish for sustenance, still on a commercial scale.

The Court firstly, relied on the trial judge's conclusion that trading fish other than eulachon was not integral to the Lax Kw'alaams' pre-contact society, noting this factual finding was as fatal to the establishment of the lesser right as it was to the greater commercial claim. The Court also acknowledged the problem faced by the trial judge that the Lax Kw'alaams did not articulate any relief for a lesser claim in its pleadings nor in argument, and ultimately concluded the claim was unclear, "bristled with difficulty", and failed at the establishment stage.

D. The Honour of the Crown

As an alternative argument, the Lax Kw'alaams asserted that, in the late nineteenth century, the Crown made promises, express or implied, to preserve their commercial fishery. However, the trial judge found no promise was made, and there is no treaty in place with the Lax Kw'alaams (as was the case in R. v. Marshall). Given this lack of evidence, the Court found no basis on which to conclude the Crown breached its fiduciary duties to the Lax Kw'alaams.


The Court provided guidance on the process of Aboriginal rights litigation, emphasizing the importance of the pleadings and articulating precisely the nature of the asserted rights. The Court reinforced its view that trials seeking declaratory relief are better suited to the determination of Aboriginal rights than the confines of regulatory hearings, allowing for pre-trial discovery and other procedural advantages. Nevertheless, the Court concluded that this advantage is lost if the rules of civil procedure are not followed, and emphasized a "commission of inquiry" approach is not appropriate. In drawing this conclusion, the Court noted that claimants are now generally well-resourced and represented by experienced counsel, and that Aboriginal rights litigation carries great importance to non-Aboriginal communities as well as Aboriginal communities.

With respect to the much-debated issue of species-specific rights, the Court found Aboriginal rights will be delineated by the facts and circumstances of each case. In this case, the trial judge's conclusion that the Lax Kw'alaams traded in a product generated by one specific species was supported by the evidence.

Finally, the Court emphasized that care must be taken not to evolve an Aboriginal right into a modern right that is different than the Aboriginal right. This comment by the Court, although dicta, seems to suggest a rigorous analysis of assertions of evolving rights:

[51] However, when it comes to "evolving" the subject matter of the Aboriginal right, the situation is more complex. A "gathering right" to berries based on pre-contact times would not, for example, "evolve" into a right to "gather" natural gas within the traditional territory. The surface gathering of copper from the Coppermine River in the Northwest Territories in pre-contact times would not, I think, support an "Aboriginal right" to exploit deep shaft diamond mining in the same territory. While courts have recognized that Aboriginal rights must be allowed to evolve within limits, such limits are both quantitative and qualitative. "[A] pre-sovereignty Aboriginal practice cannot be transformed into a different modern right": Marshall (2005), at para. 50.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.