Canada: B.C. Court Dismisses Application For Leave To Commence Secondary Market Liability Class Action

Copyright 2011, Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

Originally published in Blakes Bulletin on Litigation & Dispute Resolution, November 2011

On October 21, 2011, the Supreme Court of British Columbia (the Court) released a decision in Round v. MacDonald, Dettwiler and Associates Ltd., dismissing the application of an intended plaintiff seeking leave of the Court to commence an action based on a secondary market liability claim. This was the first case in British Columbia to examine the test for leave pursuant to the statutory cause of action found in Part 16.1 of the British Columbia Securities Act, R.S.B.C. 1996, c. 418 (the Act).

The intended plaintiff, Ms. Round, received her common shares of MacDonald, Dettwiler and Associates Ltd. (MDA) from the company's treasury under an Employee Share Purchase Plan. She argued that the intended defendant, MDA, misrepresented material facts and failed to make timely disclosure of material changes that affected the price of her shares in the stock market.

The Court dismissed the application holding that there was no prospect that the intended action, as framed, could succeed at trial. The Court expressed two main reasons for reaching its decision. First, the material facts capable of giving rise to the cause of action were concluded before the legislation came into effect on July 4, 2008. Nothing in the legislation suggested that the Legislature intended the causes of action it created to apply retroactively or retrospectively. Secondly, the Court determined that as Ms. Round's interest in the shares of MDA came directly from the company's treasury, the secondary market liability provisions of the legislation did not apply to her circumstances.

Despite having reached a decision based on these two conclusions alone, the Court discussed the test for leave to commence an action and considered some of the arguments presented in the extensive submissions of the parties.

The Cause of Action

On July 4, 2008, new statutory causes of action came into force in British Columbia dealing with misrepresentations of material facts and failures to disclose material changes by public companies, and others, which affect the price at which their shares trade on an exchange. The causes of action were created for persons who acquire or dispose of shares during the period of time between the breach and its correction. Reliance on the misrepresentation or failure to disclose does not need to be proven to maintain an action. The causes of action formed part of the liability provisions of the Act pertaining to the secondary market, which is the market in a company's shares once they are trading publicly.

While the reforms appeared aimed at deterring companies from misrepresenting material facts, they created a risk that plaintiffs might begin abusive or unmeritorious lawsuits whenever there were material changes in the price of a company's shares. Accordingly, a plaintiff seeking to bring a secondary market liability claim must seek leave of the court before an action can be started, demonstrating that the claim is brought in good faith and that there is a reasonable possibility that the claim will be resolved at trial in favour of the plaintiff.

Background and Position of the Parties

Ms. Round had worked for MDA from 2002 to 2008, during which time she received an entitlement to common shares of MDA under an Employee Share Purchase Plan. On leaving her employment with MDA in 2008, she filed an election to withdraw shares from her account. In bringing her claim under Part 16.1, Ms. Round contended that MDA, and its named officers and directors, misrepresented material facts about a proposed sale of one of its primary assets, the ISB Division, and that MDA failed to make timely disclosure of material changes that related to the prospects of the sale receiving approval from the Minister under a review process conducted according to the rules of the Investment Canada Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. 28. Ms. Round alleged that MDA misrepresented the facts of certain documents, including the 2007 Annual Report, and deliberately delayed disclosing its knowledge of the Minister's conditional refusal. She argued that MDA was engaged in a continuous single misrepresentation and failure to disclose over an extended period of time starting in October 2007 and concluding in May 2008. Importantly, the evidence was that no shares were allotted to Ms. Round's employee account during three periods—in January, April and May 2008.

The intended defendants argued that Ms. Round had no prospect of succeeding at trial, as the time periods in which no shares were allotted to her account were the only ones in which there was a potential claim that facts were not disclosed or were misrepresented. Ms. Round neither acquired nor disposed of shares during those periods, and therefore her claim could not succeed. Furthermore, MDA argued that a distribution of shares from a company's treasury to an employee is exempt from the secondary market liability provisions if the distribution is voluntary.

Court Decision

The Court first considered whether the secondary liability market provisions of the Act could apply to Ms. Round's claim at all. The evidence on the record demonstrated that the events material to the cause of action had occurred, and their legal consequences were complete before the cause of action existed. By May 23, 2008, any alleged misrepresentation or failure to disclose had been corrected, and any effect on the market price of shares evaporated. The Court agreed with the position of MDA that, in light of this evidence, to apply the civil liability provisions of Part 16.1 of the Act to the facts at hand would be to give the statute a retroactive or retrospective application.'

The Court stated that "[i]t is uncontroversial that there is a common law presumption that a statute is interpreted to apply only to events in the future. Statutes are presumed to apply prospectively and not retroactively or retrospectively." The statutory scheme did not contain any transitional provisions, and there was no statement of legislative intent determining the temporal application of Part 16.1 of the Act. The Court therefore concluded that the statutory causes of action could not apply to the facts alleged to give rise to Ms. Round's claim.

Although this finding was sufficient to deny Ms. Round's application, the Court went on to consider whether Ms. Round could have fallen into the class of plaintiffs entitled to bring an action under the secondary market liability provisions. The Court considered the question of whether the provisions could confer a cause of action on a person who acquired shares from a treasury and did not acquire or dispose of them on the secondary market. It was not in dispute that Ms. Round's shares were acquired from MDA's treasury, through her participation in the Employee Share Purchase Plan. The Court found that the distribution of shares from a company's treasury to an employee is exempt from the secondary market liability provisions if the distribution is voluntary. The provision of shares to Ms. Round was indeed voluntary, and the secondary market liability provisions did not apply to confer a cause of action in respect of the shares she acquired through the plan.

As Ms. Round could not properly be a plaintiff under the secondary market liability provisions, she could not possibly satisfy the test for leave, which requires that "there is a reasonable possibility that the action will be resolved at trial in favour of the plaintiff."

The Court went on to address some of the issues raised by the parties on the matter of the test for leave. Ms. Round argued that the test for granting leave pursuant to the secondary market liability provisions should be given a liberal interpretation favouring a party seeking leave, as the provisions were intended to be remedial legislation. The Court held that this argument neglected the plain wording of the statute, requiring that the Court be satisfied that there is a reasonable possibility that the action will be resolved in favour of the plaintiff. Furthermore, the statutory scheme required that the plaintiff and each defendant serve and file with the court one or more affidavits setting forth the material facts upon which each intends to rely. The Court stated that based on these sections, the propositions emerged that the leave application involved a review of evidence and that the analysis must involve the weighing and balancing of such evidence. The Court could not simply rely on the material filed by the plaintiff. Furthermore, the test for leave involves assessing the evidence to determine whether there is a reasonable possibility that the action will be resolved at trial in favour of the plaintiff. The Court emphasized that this test is based on merit, differentiating it from the tests involved in the certification of class actions or the test for summary judgment.

The Court emphasized that establishing a reasonable possibility of success at trial involves more than merely raising a triable issue. However, it does not require that a plaintiff demonstrate that it is more likely than not that he or she will succeed.

Finally, the Court assessed the merits of the action on the evidence presented and, apart from the reasons already given, concluded that Ms. Round would not have had any prospect of succeeding at trial. The Court went through the matters raised by Ms. Round and concluded that the evidence did not disclose any issues on which there was any prospect that an action based on them would be resolved in her favour. Among other matters, the Court found that Ms. Round's argument that MDA failed to disclose the negotiations for the sale of the ISB Division was not responsive to the jurisprudence of the Securities Commissions about when negotiations amount to a material change. A material change occurs only where there is sufficient commitment by both parties and a substantial likelihood that the transaction will complete. In this case, the evidence was that there was considerable uncertainty surrounding the proposed transaction.


The Round decision clarifies that the test to be applied in granting leave to start an action is one that is based on merit. Specifically, the test for leave pursuant to the secondary market liability provisions of the Act involves the weighing and testing of evidence to assess whether there is a reasonable possibility that the plaintiff will be successful at trial. In its decision, the Court also confirms the common law presumption that a statute cannot be applied retroactively or retrospectively and that a person who acquires shares voluntarily through a company's treasury cannot properly be a plaintiff under Part 16.1 of the Act. The decision makes clear that the test for leave to bring an action pursuant to secondary market liability provisions will not be given a liberal interpretation that favours the party seeking leave.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Events from this Firm
1 Nov 2016, Seminar, Toronto, Canada

What is the emotional culture of your organization?

Every organization and workplace has an emotional culture that can have an impact on everything from employee performance to customer or client satisfaction.

3 Nov 2016, Seminar, Toronto, Canada

Join leading lawyers from the Blakes Pensions, Benefits & Executive Compensation group as they discuss recent updates and legal developments in pension and employee benefits law as well as strategies to identify and minimize common risks.

3 Nov 2016, Other, Vancouver, Canada

“Risk” is the new black. It’s on the lips of every CEO, CFO, GC and board member — as it should be. Can you spot it? How do you analyze it? Are you equipped to manage it?

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.