Canada: Facebook At Your Service

Last Updated: January 3 2012

Article by S. Leonard Polsky and Stacey A. Wade1

With all of our training, precedents and rules, lawyers tend to be the last to adapt to new technologies.

Despite this, the pervasive nature of social networks on the Internet is giving lawyers a powerful new tool in serving legal process on those who play hide and seek with the legal system.

Much like emails in the last decade, courts around the globe have begun to recognize the value of social networks in expediting and managing litigation.

Traditional modes of service

The requirement that defendants be given notice of claims is a linchpin of due process and the proper administration of justice. This does not mean that any particular mode of service must be used, only that the method used be reasonably calculated to provide notice and an opportunity to respond.

Because personal service is not always feasible, Canadian law permits 'substitutional' service by alternate means where appropriate, including service by mail, publication in newspapers, attaching documents to doors and mailboxes, and delivery to the defendant's friends or relations.

As technologies have evolved, so too have permitted modes of service. As one American court famously observed in a 1980 decision involving service by telex,

Courts, however, cannot be blind to changes and advances in technology. No longer do we live in a world where communications are conducted solely by mail carried by fast sailing clipper or steam ships. Electronic communication via satellite can and does provide instantaneous transmission of notice and information. No longer must process be mailed to a defendant's door when he can receive complete notice at an electronic terminal inside his very office, even when the door is steel and bolted shut.2

Telexes were soon eclipsed by faxes as the dominant means of transmitting documents. Faxes in turn are now yielding their dominant position to emails and 'pdf' attachments.

Personal service remains the default but the rules of procedure across the country grant an exception where personal service is impractical. In Alberta, for example, Rule 11.28(1) permits substitutional service if supported by sworn evidence 'stating why the alternative method of service is likely to bring the document to the attention of the person to be served.'

Case law goes further and requires that the supporting affidavit explain what efforts have been made to locate the defendant and effect personal service, and why prompt personal service has failed.

What is reasonable is fact specific, and will depend on the circumstances of the case, the type and amount of relief claimed, the efforts made to date, and why, in the opinion of the deponent, the alternate mode of service is likely to bring the document to the defendant's attention.

Service by Facebook and similar social networking sites has now been added to the list of options available.


Facebook is an Internet-based network that allows users to create online profiles revealing information about themselves which they then share with others online.

Information is revealed in a variety of ways. Users can place 'status' updates about themselves on their profiles; list a wide variety of their likes, preferences and dislikes; exchange text messages with other users; and post messages to other users' profiles.

A typical Facebook profile may include multiple photographs of the user, his name, address, birth date, telephone and email contact information, work and school history, political and religious views, favourite books, movies and other activities, and the names and details of various Facebook 'friends'. A fully completed page may include as many as forty categories of information identifying its owner.

Service by Facebook, like any other form of substitutional service, will only be appropriate where circumstances warrant.

In addition to the usual considerations, one unique concern regarding Facebook is the need to verify that the person maintaining a presence on the site truly is that person. The chances of mistaken identity are reduced however by the range of personal information coupled with photographs posted to a user's profile.

Ensuring timely notice is also a concern. Sporadic postings to the user's profile and changes in his Facebook 'status' may suggest only infrequent use, in which case there may not be due process or timely notice of whatever is served. This can be addressed when applying to the court by including printouts of the defendant's page to demonstrate the number and frequency of updates to the defendant's page.

As with all forms of substitutional service, the test is not whether using Facebook will be 100% effective but whether the means used is reasonably likely to bring the document to the attention of the person served.

Australia and Canada Lead the Way

Australia led the way in embracing service by Facebook with the December 2008 decision in MKM Capital Property Ltd. v. Corbo and Poyser,3 a decision described as "the shot heard 'round cyberspace."4

In MKM, a mortgage lender obtained default judgment against two defendants. Service of the judgment was attempted at their residence and last known place of employment. A private investigator was hired. An ad was placed in the local newspaper. After all of these steps proved unsuccessful, an order was sought for substitutional service by Facebook.

The defendants had Facebook pages with no privacy settings and had posted their birth dates, lists of friends and email addresses. This information matched the defendants' loan applications and the two were even 'friends' on Facebook. This was enough to satisfy the court that the online profiles belonged to the defendants and that service on Facebook would be sufficient notice to them. The Order was granted and the stage was set for courts around the globe to follow suit.

Just months later, Canada did just that in the February 2009 decision of the Alberta Court of Queen's Bench decision in Knott v. Sutherland.5

In Knott, the court allowed substitutional service of a Statement of Claim by sending notice of the action to the defendant's Facebook profile. This was not done in isolation however, and was to be accompanied by publication in a newspaper and forwarding a copy of the statement of claim to the human resources department where the defendant formerly worked.

The following month, it was New Zealand's turn with the March 2009 decision in Axe Market Garden Ltd. v. Axe.6

In this unreported piece of commercial litigation, a company was claiming against its minority shareholder for taking money from the company's account. Information concerning the defendant's identity was put forward, including the fact that he was living in the United Kingdom (although not an exact location) and that he had a Facebook page. The defendant and his father had been in regular contact via Facebook since the son moved to the United Kingdom. This was enough to address the court's concerns regarding certainty of identity, and substitutional service was allowed.

That same month, England joined the trend of allowing service by social media.

In Blaney v. Persons Unknown,7 an injunction against an anonymous blogger was served via Twitter. A blogger, Donal Blaney, was being impersonated on the Internet through a Twitter account using his photo and links to Blaney's real blog. A writing style similar to Blaney's was also used. An injunction was requested on the basis that the impersonator was in breach of intellectual property rights. Once granted, the issue became service of the injunction as the defendant was anonymous and difficult to identify. The offending Twitter page was used for service because it apparently belonged to and was regularly visited by the defendant and it was possible to monitor via Twitter whether the defendant had received the injunction. The message was sent to the defendant's Twitter account with a link to the full text of the injunction.

Returning to Australia in April 2010, Byrne & Howard8 is an example of the continuing international trend to allow service by Facebook.

Byrne was a family law case involving proof of paternity. The plaintiff applied for substitutional service following attempts to bring the proceedings to the defendant's attention by writing to him at his last known address, his parents' address, sending a letter care of his girlfriend, and using a process server to serve him at his parent's address. After she sent him a message through his Facebook page, the plaintiff returned to court for a final ruling on paternity. When the defendant failed to appear, the court was asked to determine whether proper service had been effected in accordance with the earlier order.

Evidence was put forward of the details of the defendant's Facebook page, which included his photograph, profile information and details of his friends. There was also an electronic confirmation of delivery given by Microsoft Exchange, which was the relevant server, although no confirmation of delivery came from the defendant himself. The court put emphasis on the evidence that shortly after the service message was sent to the defendant's Facebook page, he took his site down.

Based on this information, the court found that the proceedings were brought to the defendant's attention and that he was properly served.

These are but a sampling of instances in which Facebook has been used to effect service or is under consideration for that purpose.9

While it has not yet been allowed in the United States, the trend has certainly garnered interest from the American legal community, both from the bar and those responsible for the administration of justice.

The website maintained by the Utah State Courts10, for example, currently offers up Facebook and other social networks as a means of contacting defendants when making alternative service. In what is no doubt a harbinger of things to come, the site advises litigants:

Serving someone by publishing the summons in a newspaper has been for many years the most common means of alternative service. However, the courts are more frequently using electronic communications and social media to publish the complaint and summons or to notify the person being served that the documents have been published.

Even though you cannot find the person to be served, you may know where they accept communications: email; mail to a friend or relative; a social network, such as Facebook; a text number or phone number; or a Twitter name. With the court's permission, you might be able to send the complaint and summons directly to the person by mail, email or social media.

With comments such as these and the ubiquitous nature of Facebook, it is just a matter of time before state and federal rules of civil procedure are amended to formally endorse this option as well.

What Next?

The enormous popularity of Facebook and other social networks, and their broad acceptance among large portions of the population, offer a creative and inexpensive means of streamlining and expediting at least one part of the process, the service of documents.

Service by Facebook is not a panacea, nor should it be held out as the primary means of service, but we can expect increasing use of this option in cases involving defamation, family law disputes, theft of intellectual property and a host of other litigation in which elusive defendants try to shield their location and availability in the hope of escaping judicial process.


1. S. Leonard Polsky is Litigation Counsel with the Calgary office of MacPherson Leslie & Tyerman LLP, practicing in the areas of commercial litigation and employment law. Stacey Wade is a student at law at the same office and assisted in the preparation of this article.

2. New England Merchants National Bank v. Iran Power Generation and Transmission Co., 495 F. Supp. 73, 81-82 (S.D.N.Y. 1980)

3. MKM Capital Property Ltd. v. Corbo and Poyser, ACT Sup. Ct., 12 December 2008 (No. SC 608 of 2008) See: Bonnie Malkin "Australian couple served with legal documents via Facebook" The Telegraph (16 December 2008) online: The Telegraph < >; John G. Browning, "Served Without Ever Leaving the Computer: Service of Process via Social Media" (2010) 73 Tex. B.J. 180, at 181; Nicole Shiels, "Welcome, user! (and you're sued)" The Journal Online (14 December 2009) online: The Journal Online < >.

4. Browning, "Served Without Ever Leaving the Computer: Service of Process via Social Media" (2010) 73 Tex. B.J. 180.

5. Knott v. Sutherland (5 February 2009), Edmonton 0803 02267 (Alta. Q.B.M.).

6. Axe Market Garden Ltd. v. Axe (High Court of NZ in Wellington, CIV-2008-485-002676), cited in Allison Ferguson & Felicity Monteiro, "High Court Allows Service of Proceedings on Facebook" (19 May 2009) online: International Law Office: < >.

7. This decision is unreported but is cited in Robert Hunt & Mark Simmons, "Service Permissible via Twitter" Herbert Smith Litigation e-bulletin (30 November 2009), online: Herbert Smith e-bulletin < >. See also Browning, supra, at 182.

8. Byrne & Howard [2010] FMCAfam 509 (21 April 2010).

9. Examples abound: Canada: Justice Cheryl Robertson & Alison McEwan, "Substituted E-Service" (Paper presented to the Kingston and the 1000 Islands Legal Conference, 1 October 2010) [unpublished], available at ); Singapore: Consultation paper issued August 2010 entitled "Use and Impact of Social Media in Litigation" ( ); Hong Kong: Mayer Brown Legal Update "Service of Process via Online Social Media," ( ); China: "China service of process and social media", ( ).


The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.