Canada: Canada’s Federal Appeal Court Clarifies When Patents Can Be Invalidated

Canada's Federal Court of Appeal last week released a decision in Corlac Inc. v. Weatherford Canada Ltd. that makes clear that the failure to respond in good faith to a requisition made during prosecution of the underlying patent application cannot be used to invalidate an issued patent. This decision should be welcomed by patentees, who were concerned about a developing line of law that seemed to import a U.S.-style "inequitable conduct" ground for invalidating patents, which the Court's decision seems to foreclose.

Unless the Supreme Court of Canada grants leave to appeal, the decision should preclude any more patents being invalidated on the basis of the applicant's communications with the patent office during prosecution, short of material misstatements caught by section 53 of the Patent Act. The Court of Appeal's reasoning also strongly suggests that other forms of non-compliance with the requirements of section 73(1) of the Patent Act during prosecution, including non-payment of fees or payment of incorrect fees, will not constitute grounds for invalidating a patent once it has issued.

Section 73(1) of the Act sets out a variety of circumstances in which a patent application is deemed "abandoned" during prosecution, including a failure to (i) "reply in good faith to any requisition made by an examiner;" (ii) respond to certain notices that the Commissioner of Patents can issue in the course of prosecution; or (iii) pay certain types of fees. At the time the Act was amended to include section 73(1), the patent bar understood that it was intended to be a tool that the Commissioner of Patents could use in dealing with applicants that had not complied with a procedural or timing requirement under the Act during prosecution of a patent application. The section gave the Commissioner the express statutory power to deem such an application abandoned; section 73(3), however, gave the applicant the right to reinstate the application within one year of the deemed abandonment.

Notwithstanding the bar's original understanding of the purpose of section 73(1), it was significantly broadened by two trial-level decisions. In G.D. Searle & Co. v. Novopharm Ltd. and Lundbeck Canada Inc. v. Ratiopharm Inc., the Federal Court found that the requirement to "reply in good faith" was not merely an obligation that could be applied during prosecution of an application. Rather, the Court found that an applicant's failure to "reply in good faith" during prosecution allowed the Court to reach back and retrospectively deem the application to have been abandoned, meaning that the patent that had issued from this application would be invalid. This led to a Canadian version of the U.S. inequitable conduct defence, by which infringers or intended infringers could delve into a patent's prosecution history to find an inaccurate or incomplete statement and ask the Court to declare the patent invalid on that basis.

The Federal Court of Appeal, in Weatherford, has put an end to the use of section 73(1)(a) as a ground of patent invalidity. The Court held that section 73(1)(a) is operative during the prosecution of a patent application, but does not apply once the patent has issued. Several reasons were given for this interpretation of this section.

First, the Court provided what appeared to be an exhaustive list of grounds for patent invalidity: "The grounds for attacking the validity of a patent are delineated in the Act. Specifically, they relate to: utility, section 2; novelty (anticipation), section 28.2; obviousness (inventiveness), section 28.3; and sufficiency of disclosure, subsection 27(3). In addition to validity grounds, a patent can be found to be void if the conditions of subsection 53(1) are met." Section 73(1) is not part of this list, and therefore not a ground for invalidating a patent under the Patent Act.

Second, the Court indicated that section 53 of the Patent Act is intended to deal with misrepresentations in a patent that has issued, whereas section 73 is intended to deal with misrepresentations during prosecution, which is not for the Court to determine. It explained the rationale for this: "It is for the Commissioner to determine whether an applicant's response to a requisition from an Examiner is made in good faith, not for the courts. The courts do not issue patents."

Third, the Court made a point of distinguishing between abandonment of a patent application and the invalidity of a patent, stating that the "point of demarcation" between them is the issuance of the patent. Something that might cause a "deemed abandonment" before the patent issues is not relevant to its validity after it has issued.

Finally, to ensure that there is no lingering uncertainty on the status of the good faith requirement as a possible ground of invalidity, the Court took the unusual step of expressly commenting that "[t]o the extent that the Federal Court decisions in G.D. Searle and Lundbeck can be interpreted as standing for the proposition that paragraph 73(1)(a) can be relied upon for the purpose of attacking the validity of a patent, they should not be followed" (emphasis added).

Are There Remaining Questions?

Barring an appeal, this decision is bound to guide future judicial consideration of the other circumstances for which an application may be deemed abandoned under section 73(1). The Court of Appeal's 2003 decision in Dutch Industries v. Commissioner of Patents caused a stir in the patent world by finding that the Commissioner had no jurisdiction to accept late top-up payments from applicants who had paid the wrong maintenance fees, and that their applications would, therefore, be deemed abandoned. This decision gave rise to a debate among patent prosecutors about whether payment of the wrong fees during prosecution could lead to invalidation of an issued patent on the basis of retroactive "deemed abandonment" of the underlying application. In light of the logic employed by the Court of Appeal in Weatherford, it appears much more likely that all of the grounds of deemed abandonment under section 73(1) – and not just the good faith provision in section 73(1)(a) – apply only during the application process and will not invalidate a patent once issued.


2011 FCA 228 [Weatherford].

Torys has offices in Toronto, New York and Calgary

The content of this article does not constitute legal advice and should not be relied on in that way. Specific advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.