Canada: NAFTA Creates New Scope For Expropriation Claims

Last Updated: August 17 2001
Article by Gabrielle K. Kramer

A. Introduction

For years, Canadian businesses have attempted, without success, to use the law of expropriation to obtain compensation for losses arising from legislative changes which have a negative impact on their ownership or use of property. A recent example involved a challenge in Ontario to changes in landlord and tenant legislation. However, unless the express provisions of the legislative regime have been engaged, Land Compensation Tribunals and Canadian Courts have been loath to find that a compensable interest has been affected. In cases where the claim of expropriation stems from the passing of new legislation that adversely affects a given business venture, Canadian investors are often left without a remedy.

Chapter 11 of The North American Free Trade Agreement (the "NAFTA") creates the opportunity to obtain compensation where the Canadian law of expropriation does not. Compensation is provided by NAFTA governments for the full market value of the property that is taken away or subject to unreasonable interference. One of the objectives of Chapter 11 is to protect companies from the expropriation of their investments in NAFTA participating countries by ensuring that they enjoy, at a minimum, the same treatment as other investors, whether national or foreign, in the host country. Qualifying international investors – or Canadian companies with some international investment, may be eligible to apply for arbitration under Chapter 11 of the NAFTA to settle disputes arising from losses caused by expropriation or regulatory failures. This process significantly expands the type of claim for which compensation is available.

B. The Seven Claims

Despite the NAFTA’s eight year history, only 7 claims have been launched against Canada since the inception of the NAFTA in 1994. A brief review of the claims brought to date is instructive in appreciating the scope of this underused remedy (A discussion of the principal provisions of Chapter 11 follows).

Ethyl Corporation v. Canada

In 1997, the Canadian government banned a fuel additive called MMT. Ethyl, an American corporation with a subsidiary in Ontario, produced MMT for Canadian gasoline refiners. Ethyl claimed compensation in the amount of US $250 million, stating that the government’s action was an indirect expropriation of its assets. The claim was settled in April 1998 for US $13 million, and the law prohibiting the interprovincial transport of MMT was repealed.

Pope & Talbot v. Canada

Pope & Talbot owns sawmills in British Columbia, and exports timber to the United States. Pope & Talbot claimed that irregularities in the implementation of the Softwood Lumber Agreement between Canada and the United States have decreased the value of their investment. On April 10, 2001, they were awarded judgement on the basis that the Canadian Government had failed to meet basic standards of fairness and due process at international law in the calculation and allocation of the Softwood Lumber Agreement. Their claim was for a total of US $500 million.

While the panel agreed with Pope & Talbot that the drafters of Chapter 11 clearly intended the national treatment provisions to cover individual investors and singular investments, they nevertheless found that Canadian Softwood Lumber Producers were being treated in the same manner as Pope & Talbot, and therefore that there was no breach of the national treatment provisions. The panel was careful to note that the dispute was about national treatment in the implementation of the Agreement, not about treatment under the Agreement itself.

United Parcel Service v. Canada

On January 19, 2000, United Parcel Service (America) filed a claim stating that UPS Canada is not being treated in the same manner as Canada Post. In an ongoing dispute, UPS argues that Canada Post is using its existing mail delivery infrastructure to compete in the courier delivery market, and, since the Canada Post delivery infrastructure is subsidized by government, that this is unfair to UPS.

Sun Belt Water Incorporated v. Canada

Sun Belt Water is a California-based company that exports water from British Columbia under the provisions of that province’s Water Act. It claims that the British Columbia Government made a secret agreement with Western Canada Water Enterprises Ltd. that adversely affected Sun Belt’s ability to profit, contrary to the national treatment, most favoured nation treatment, minimum standard of treatment and performance requirements of Chapter 11 of the NAFTA.

S.D. Myers v. Canada

S.D. Myers International ("SDMI") is an Ohio-based waste treatment company that was importing PCB contaminated waste from Canada. In 1995, the Canadian government imposed a temporary ban on exports of PCB waste, permitting Canadian companies to continue to deal in PCB contaminated waste, while SDMI, an American company, could not. In 1998, SDMI claimed that the Canadian ban amounted to a violation of the national treatment, minimum standard of treatment, performance requirements and expropriation provisions of the NAFTA. SDMI has claimed US $20,000,000 in damages.

On November 13, 2000, the panel decided that Canada’s actions were in breach of the national treatment and minimum standard of treatment provisions, but that because the ban on PCB exports was temporary, it did not constitute expropriation. Although the panel has not yet calculated the amount of the award that SDMI is entitled to, the Canadian government has already applied to the Federal Court of Canada to have the award set aside.

Ketcham Investments and Tysa Investments v. Canada

Ketcham and Tysa hold shares in a mill in British Columbia which exports timber to the United States under the Softwood Lumber Agreement. In their notice of intent, Ketcham and Tysa claim that Canada has breached the national treatment, most favoured nation treatment, minimum standard of treatment, performance requirements and expropriation provisions of the NAFTA, through the allocation of the Softwood Lumber Quota. It has claimed that mills owned by Canadian companies received higher quotas than the quota allocated to its mill. Notice of withdrawal of the claim has just been received.

Signa C.A. de C.V. v. Canada

This was the first claim filed under Chapter 11. Signa is a Mexico based corporation, and the suit involved the Canadian government preventing Signa from manufacturing an antibiotic for the Canadian market. The suit was settled in 1996 for an undisclosed sum, and no other details about this case have been published.

C. When Is Chapter 11 Triggered?

Chapter 11 of the NAFTA is entitled "Investment" and covers investor-state relations between investors (described below) and Parties to the NAFTA – the governments of Canada, the United States, and Mexico. Chapter 11 sets out the primary obligations which NAFTA Parties must follow.

Article 1110 Expropriation and Compensation

1. No Party may directly or indirectly nationalize or expropriate an investment of an investor or another party in its territory or take a measure tantamount to nationalization or expropriation of such an investment ("expropriation"), except:

  1. for a public purpose;
  2. on a non-discriminatory basis;
  3. in accordance with due process of law and Article (1105 (1); and
  4. on payment of compensation in accordance with paragraphs 2 through 6.

Unlike the other provisions of Chapter 11, liability under Article 1110 is not triggered by conduct that is unlawful or contrary to the NAFTA. Expropriations that are conducted for a public purpose, are non-discriminatory and carried out in accordance with due process of law are lawful provided that compensation is paid to the investor by the host state. Article 1110 provides investors with security in that there must be procedures in place before investors make investments, and ad-hoc measures, implemented after the investors have made their investment, will not be tolerated. Significantly, Article 1110 is not limited to interests in real property and includes measures that are not an actual expropriation, but "tantamount" to. While every regulation will necessarily have some economic impact, only those that have the effect of functionally expropriating property are intended to trigger rights under Chapter 11.

The award of the panel in the SDMI case provides some guidance in understanding the scope of Article 1110. The panel stated that the expropriation claim made by SDMI could not succeed for the following reasons:

  1. the measures taken by the Canadian government were not permanent.
  2. The government was not enriched through the measures taken (there was no clear transfer of wealth);
  3. Government regulation is not necessarily expropriation (although it can rise to that level on occasion); and
  4. Other protections were available to SDMI and the panel was reluctant to "mis-label" the award as an award under Article 1110.

The panel also stated that the term "tantamount" was to be interpreted as "equivalent", with the implication that the term did not expand the definition of expropriation. Note, however, that in the Ethyl case there was no transfer of wealth to the Government of Canada.

Article 1102 – National Treatment

1. Each Party shall accord to investors of another Party treatment no less favourable than that it accords, in like circumstances, to its own investors with respect to the establishment, acquisition, expansion management, conduct, operation, and sale or other disposition of investments.

This section guarantees that a foreign investor is to be treated in the same way by the local government as a local investor would be. It allows for more favourable treatment, but not less favourable treatment. Article 1102 also states that the local government cannot impose restrictions on a foreign investor with respect to disposition of an investment or management of the investment solely because that investor is foreign.

Article 1105 – Minimum Standard of Treatment

1. Each party shall accord to investments of investors of another Party treatment in accordance with international law, including fair and equitable treatment and full protection and security.

This provision provides a "floor" below which the treatment of international investors cannot fall. Significantly, this may mean that international investors are actually treated better than their domestic counterparts. Article 1105 provides investors with a remedy when they have been treated unfairly or in an arbitrary manner when compared to domestic investors or from the perspective of international law.

Article 1106 – Performance Requirements

1. No Party may impose or enforce any of the following requirements, or enforce any commitment or undertaking, in connection with the establishment, acquisition, expansion, management, conduct, or operation of an investment of an investor of a Party or of a non-Party in its territory:

  1. to export a given level or percentage of goods or services;
  2. to achieve a given level or percentage of domestic content; . . .

Article 1106 prevents a party from regulating the behaviour of investors through domestic content or export requirements. The provision is intended to ensure that investors are protected from government action which requires them to change the way they do business where there is no overwhelming public policy reason for the change.

D. Eligibility To Make A Chapter 11 Claim

Investors And Parties

Defined investors, enterprises and parties are eligible to make a claim within three years of when an alleged breach of the NAFTA is known or ought to have been known. For the purposes of the NAFTA, an investor must be a citizen or permanent resident of a NAFTA country, or Party. An investor can also be the government of a NAFTA country or a state enterprise of a NAFTA country. In the case of an enterprise, the investor need not be a NAFTA citizen – it is enough that the enterprise is organized according to the laws of a NAFTA country. In this sense, the definition of an investor is much broader than in other bilateral trade agreements. Foreign parent companies of domestic subsidiaries can be considered investors for the purposes of a claim under Chapter 11. However, in the case of a corporation that is controlled by non-Party investors, benefits may be denied if the enterprise does not have substantial business interests in the NAFTA country under whose laws it is organized. The NAFTA also specifies that an individual or corporation with an investment in a NAFTA country may make a claim under Chapter 11.

The definition of investment is expansive and includes almost any type of ownership interest. For example, an investment is: a share of a business, a debt security, a loan to a business incorporated in the NAFTA country, or any business interest that would entitle the investor to income or profits. The broad scope of entitlement to make a claim leaves open the possibility that an individual could raise a Chapter 11 claim on the basis of an interest in a contract that has not yet been performed.

Internationally Controlled Canadian Corporations

In Canada, many of the recent claims under Chapter 11 have been initiated by the foreign (typically American) parent corporations of domestic companies. The NAFTA dispute resolution process is well suited to claims from companies with this structure, as it can address directly, government action that has an international effect. The NAFTA process is not limited in the quantum of damages that can be sought, or number of claims filed. Recent claims have ranged from approximately US $10 million to upwards of US $200 million.

E. Conclusion

The Articles that make up Chapter 11 of the NAFTA have the potential to provide significant protection for foreign investors in North America. These protections would apply not only to American companies or individuals investing in Canada, but to an individual or corporation that has an investment in a country that is a party to the NAFTA. The arbitral process is relatively simple and powerful. Chapter 11 provides a unique opportunity for qualifying investors to protect their investment or business interests. With only a handful of cases having been decided by the arbitral tribunal, the true potential of this mechanism has yet to be fully explored.

By comparison to NAFTA qualifying investors, domestic investors are limited by the Canadian law of expropriation. All attempts to date at broadening the scope of compensation have been shut down. Compensation is only available in relation to the taking of an interest in land pursuant to the exercise of statutory authority. As a consequence, wholly owned Canadian companies may find themselves at a competitive disadvantage to foreign investors who are able to avail themselves of the NAFTA arbitration process. As the opportunities afforded by the NAFTA become better known and understood, we may find business’ making investments in fields subject to significant legislative change structuring their affairs to qualify under this process.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Gabrielle K. Kramer
 
In association with
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
Accounting and Audit
Anti-trust/Competition Law
Consumer Protection
Corporate/Commercial Law
Criminal Law
Employment and HR
Energy and Natural Resources
Environment
Family and Matrimonial
Finance and Banking
Food, Drugs, Healthcare, Life Sciences
Government, Public Sector
Immigration
Insolvency/Bankruptcy, Re-structuring
Insurance
Intellectual Property
International Law
Law Practice Management
Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Media, Telecoms, IT, Entertainment
Privacy
Real Estate and Construction
Strategy
Tax
Transport
Wealth Management
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.

Disclaimer

Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.

Registration

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.

Cookies

A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.

Links

This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.

Mail-A-Friend

If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.

Security

This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.