Canada: Ontario Court Finds Constructive Dismissal Not Suitable For Class Action Proceeding

In Kafka v. Allstate Insurance Company of Canada, the Ontario Superior Court found that a proposed class action by former employees of Allstate who alleged that they were constructively dismissed is not suitable for certification. The plaintiff, who resigned along with a large number of other employees following a policy change to the manner in which they were compensated, claimed that the unilateral change by Allstate to their compensation amounted to constructive dismissal on a class–wide scale. However, the court disagreed, and stated that the individual situation for each of the plaintiffs would have to be examined, and therefore this proceeding was no appropriate as a class action.


The former employees were all sales agents for Allstate. On July 24, 2007, Allstate issued a general announcement letter to all agents, advising that a revised product distribution model and compensation system would be implemented as of September 1, 2009. The new model would be phased in from September 1, 2007 through September 1, 2009. Following the implementation of the new system, the plaintiffs alleged that the new model was a unilateral change to the fundamental terms of the employment contracts and constituted constructive dismissal. They resigned enmasse from Allstate, and commenced the class action proceeding on behalf of the nearly 100 agents who rejected the new model. The plaintiffs were seeking termination and severance pay under the Ontario Employment Standards Act, 2000 plus punitive damages.

Elements of a claim for constructive dismissal

The court undertook a comprehensive review of the elements of constructive dismissal. The Court affirmed the seminal case of Farber v. Royal Trust Co, 1997 CanLII 387 (S.C.C.), [1997] 1 S.C.R. 846, where that court stated:

A constructive dismissal occurs when an employer makes a unilateral and fundamental change to a term or condition of an employment contract without providing reasonable notice of that change to the employee. Such action amounts to a repudiation of the contract of employment by the employer whether or not he intended to continue the employment relationship. Therefore, the employee can treat the contract as wrongfully terminated and resign which, in turn, gives rise to an obligation on the employer's part to provide damages in lieu of reasonable notice. [Emphasis added.]

The court further affirmed that the onus of proving constructive dismissal rests on the employee; that the inquiry must focus on the impact on the employee's position and the employment relationship; and that the most important consideration is the degree of change which the altered job duties place on the employee. Once such a unilateral and fundamental change occurs, two important obligations are imposed on the employee: an obligation to accept or reject the change, and an obligation to mitigate if the change is rejected.

It was clear in the case at hand that the employees rejected the change proposed by Allstate in the new model. The question was whether the employees failed to mitigate by refusing an offer of reasonable employment with Allstate by rejecting the new model. Importantly for this class proceeding, the court found that the duty to mitigate required an analysis on a case by case basis.

Elements required for certification of a class proceeding

Following an extensive review of the evidence, the court addressed the fundamental requirements for the certification of a class action. Under the Ontario Class Proceedings Act, there are five criterion that must be satisfied:

(a) the pleadings or the notice of application disclose a cause of action;
(b) there is an identifiable class of two or more persons that would be represented by the representative plaintiff or defendant;
(c) the claims or defences of the class members raise common issues;
(d) a class proceeding would be the preferable procedure for the resolution of the common issues; and
(e) there is a representative plaintiff or defendant who, (i) would fairly and adequately represent the interests of the class, (ii) has produced a plan for the proceeding that sets out a workable method of advancing the proceeding on behalf of the class and of notifying class members of the proceeding, and (iii) does not have, on the common issues for the class, an interest in conflict with the interests of other class members.

The court stated that the requirements above are linked, and that the core of a class proceeding is the "element of commonality". While the decision on certification is not fully merits-based, the courts have established a "some basis in fact" test, which allows the certification judge to examine some evidence to support the requirements set out above.

Pleadings disclose a cause of action

The court will only strike a claim where the pleadings do not contain a cause of action known to law, or it is plain, obvious and beyond doubt that the plaintiff cannot succeed. As it was conceded that the statement of claim contained a valid cause of action, this criterion was met.

Identifiable Class

Following an amendment to the definition of the class by counsel for the plaintiff which excluded certain agents who were dismissed for cause and therefore not entitled to any benefits under the ESA, the court found that the class was properly identified and limited to a group of persons who had a potential claim against Allstate. The second criterion was met.

Common Issues

As is the case in many class action certification motions, this criterion was the most problematic for the agents' claim. In order for an issue to be common, it must be a substantial ingredient of each member's claim and its resolution must be necessary to the resolution of each class member's claim. An issue will not be common if its resolution is dependent upon individual findings of fact that have to be made with respect to each individual claimant. Following an in-depth analysis of the ten proposed common issues, the court found that they contained a fatal flaw: they lacked commonality. The resolution of the proposed common issues would require individual fact finding and legal analysis, and could not be determined on a class wide basis. This was especially true of the examination of the alleged constructive dismissal of each agent; the court found that to establish this claim, each individual agent's situation must be examined to determine whether or not the agent had been constructively dismissed.

Likewise, the determination of the proposed common issues of (i) whether two years notice was sufficient; (ii) whether the agents' employment contracts permitted substantial material change; (iii) whether the agent's had an obligation to mitigate by accepting the New Model as a reasonable alternative employment offer; (iv) failure by Allstate to pay termination and/or severance pay; and (v) whether the conduct of Allstate justified an award of punitive damages all required an examination of the each agent's individual employment situation and an analysis of the legal facts and principles on an individual level. As such, the court rejected the common issues proposed by the plaintiffs, and the third criterion was not met.

Preferable procedure

Having found that the common issues required an individual analysis of each agents' employment relationship with Allstate, it followed that a class proceeding was not the preferable procedure for these claims. As there was no single common issue that would advance the litigation for the entire class, a class action would not be a fair, efficient or manageable procedure to use and it would not promote judicial economy or improve access to justice. This was a case where there was "no practical utility in allowing the class action to proceed", and the fourth criterion was not met.

Representative plaintiff with a workable litigation plan

The court found that two of the three representative plaintiffs were competent representatives of the class. However, the litigation plan proposed by the representative plaintiffs failed to explain how the individual nature of a constructive dismissal could be managed in a class action. The plan assumed that oral and documentary discovery would be sufficient to move the action to a trial or summary judgement, however, the court found that the plan "ignores the reality of a constructive dismissal action" as discussed in the rejection of the common issues.

In conclusion, the court denied the plaintiffs motion to certify the action, finding that an action based on constructive dismissal was not amenable to a class proceeding.

Our Views:

This case is interesting in that it contains an extensive examination of the elements of an action for constructive dismissal and found that these elements were not conducive to a class proceeding. This judgment affirms the principle that the determination of constructive dismissal requires an assessment of the individual's employment situation, and therefore cannot be conducted on a class-wide basis.

Taken liberally, this judgment indicates that any action involving the termination of employees, including constructive dismissal, may be unsuitable for a class proceeding if the commonality requirements set out in the Class Proceedings Act cannot be met by the plaintiffs.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.