Canada: Ontario Court Of Appeal Gives Priority To Pension Plan Wind‐Up Deficits In CCAA Proceedings

Last Updated: April 19 2011
Article by Mary M. Picard and Jane Dietrich

On April 7, 2011, in Indalex Limited (Re), 2011 ONCA 265 (Re Indalex), the Ontario Court of Appeal (the Court) held that in certain circumstances a pension plan wind‐up deficit should be paid in priority to claims of secured creditors, including amounts outstanding under a court‐approved debtor‐in‐possession facility (the DIP Facility).

In Re Indalex the debtor company sponsored two defined benefit registered pension plans. One was in the process of being wound‐up at the time of the CCAA filing and the subsequent motion for a sale of assets and distribution. The other was not. That difference between the status of the two plans affected the Court's analysis, but the Court's conclusion was the same with respect to both plans: the deficit in both plans had priority over the super‐priority status that was granted to the DIP Facility in the CCAA proceedings.

The Re Indalex decision is notable for a number of reasons.

The Pension Benefits Act deemed trust extends to the full amount of the wind-up deficit

With respect to the plan that was in the process of being wound‐up at the time of the CCAA filing, the Court held that the deemed trust created by the Pension Benefits Act (Ontario) (the PBA) extends to the full amount of the wind‐up deficit. The Court found that plan liabilities, including the wind‐up deficit even though not yet due under the PBA, accrue as of the wind‐up date and aredeemed to be held, in trust, pursuant to section 57(4) of the PBA.

The PBA deemed trust may extend to plans that are not wound‐up at the time of the CCAA filing

Lawyers for the members of the pension plan that was not in the process of being wound‐up at the date of the CCAA filing argued that the deemed trust provisions of the PBA applied because it was inevitable that the plan would be wound‐up. The Court noted that the opening words of the applicable PBA provision speak to "where a pension plan is wound up", and on its face suggest the deemed trust would not apply.

However, the Court stated that it was troubled that Indalex could rely on its own inaction to avoid the consequences of a wind‐up. In its reasons, the Court held that it did not need to determine that specific question in this case. Rather, as explained below, the Court found that the deficit in the non‐wound‐up plan had priority over the claims of secured creditors as a result of Indalex's "breach of fiduciary duty" as plan administrator.

A wind‐up deficit may have priority on the basis of "breach of fiduciary duty"

The Court provided a second reason for granting priority to the pension wind‐up deficits, quite apart from the application of the PBA deemed trust, which is novel. The Court stated that the assets of a debtor company could be subject to a "constructive trust" at common law, as a remedy for the company's breach of its fiduciary duty as plan administrator.

It is well accepted in pension law that companies which administer pension plans have a fiduciary duty to act in the best interests of the pension plan's beneficiaries. Companies also have the right to act in the interests of their shareholders when they are required to make decisions about the pension plans. These two roles (which sometimes conflict) have been confirmed in pension cases outside the insolvency arena. This is sometimes referred to as the "two hats" dilemma.

Re Indalex appears to be the first occasion where a court has applied the fiduciary duty to act in the best interest of the pension plan beneficiaries in order to grant a super‐priority to pension deficit claims.

The Court found that Indalex had breached its fiduciary duty by failing to try to fund the deficits in each of the pension plans. It was not sufficient for Indalex to simply make contributions to the plans when they were due under pension legislation. Indalex breached its fiduciary obligations, the Court said, by (a) taking steps which undermined the possibility of additional funding to the plans; (b) applying for CCAA protection without notice to the members of the plans; (c) obtaining a CCAA order that gave priority to the DIP lenders over "statutory trusts", without notice to the members of the plans; (d) seeking court orders approving the distribution of sale proceeds to the DIP lenders knowing that there would be insufficient monies to fund the plans' deficit; and (e) seeking a bankruptcy order to defeat the PBA deemed trust. The Court stated: "In short, Indalex did nothing to protect the best interests of the Plans' beneficiaries and, accordingly, was in breach of its fiduciary obligations as administrator."

The Court also stated that Indalex should have taken steps to address the conflict: the obligation to act in the interests of the shareholders versus the obligation to act in the best interests of the members of the pension plans. The Court did not suggest how Indalex could have addressed that conflict.

The Court determined that the appropriate remedy for Indalex's breach of its fiduciary duty was to apply the common‐law equitable doctrine of "constructive trust" in order to grant priority to the pension deficit for both plans.

Questionable super‐priority of DIP Facility

The Court also held that the super‐priority given to the DIP Facility under previous court orders (even though the orders had not been appealed) was not effective in these circumstances. The order approving the DIP Facility contained the typical priority related language relied on by DIP lenders in most CCAA proceedings.

The Court stated that the CCAA court does have the authority to grant a super‐priority charge to DIP lenders in CCAA proceeding and, under the doctrine of paramountcy, has the authority to override provincial legislation such as the PBA. However, in Indalex, the Court found nothing to suggest that the doctrine of paramountcy was considered at the time of the granting of the order which approved the DIP Facility. Rather, the Court noted that the PBA deemed trust was not specifically identified at the time the super‐priority charge was granted to the DIP lender and there was nothing in evidence to suggest such a priority was necessary.

The Court held that to override the provincial deemed trust for pension deficits, Indalex should have specifically raised the issue of paramountcy, alerted the affected parties to the risks and put the affected parties in a position where they could have taken steps to protect their rights. In this regard, the Court took into consideration the lack of notice that was given to the pension plan beneficiaries of the proceedings.

Summary

The Court of Appeal appears to have focused on the 'equities' of this case and emphasized that the decision with respect to the DIP priority (or rather lack thereof) is unique to the facts of this case. In this respect, the Court made comments which appear to limit the effect of its decision by casting the contest not as one between a third party DIP lender and pension plan beneficiaries, but rather as an 'equitable' dispute between the pension plan beneficiaries and the principal secured creditor of Indalex's parent company (as Indalex's parent company was subrogated to the position of DIP lender as a result of payments made under its guarantee of the DIP Facility).

Regardless of the Court's attempts to emphasize the uniqueness of the circumstances of this case, this decision raises significant uncertainty with respect to a number of matters including (i) the priority of DIP financing; (ii) the priority of pension plan wind‐up deficits with respect to secured creditors generally; (iii) duties of debtors (and directors) to deal with pension issues during a CCAA proceeding; (iv), the effect of a subsequent bankruptcy on either the deemed trust under the PBA or a 'constructive trust'; and (v) the application of the decision in the context of a receivership proceeding.

At this early stage it is not clear whether or not leave to appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada will be sought.

About Fraser Milner Casgrain LLP (FMC)

FMC is one of Canada's leading business and litigation law firms with more than 500 lawyers in six full-service offices located in the country's key business centres. We focus on providing outstanding service and value to our clients, and we strive to excel as a workplace of choice for our people. Regardless of where you choose to do business in Canada, our strong team of professionals possess knowledge and expertise on regional, national and cross-border matters. FMC's well-earned reputation for consistently delivering the highest quality legal services and counsel to our clients is complemented by an ongoing commitment to diversity and inclusion to broaden our insight and perspective on our clients' needs. Visit: www.fmc-law.com

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Events from this Firm
16 Oct 2018, Other, Calgary, Canada

Dentons and SheEO are coming together for a morning of #radicalgenerosity on October 16, 2018. Meet Vicki Saunders, Founder of SheEO, and learn about how SheEO is changing the landscape for female entrepreneurs.

17 Oct 2018, Webinar, Toronto, Canada

Dentons and SheEO are coming together for an evening of #radicalgenerosity on October 17, 2018. Meet Vicki Saunders, Founder of SheEO, and learn about how SheEO is changing the landscape for female entrepreneurs.

17 Oct 2018, Webinar, Toronto, Canada

With the continued focus on Bill 148’s significant changes to the Employment Standards Act, Dentons’ Toronto Employment and Labour group is pleased to launch a new webinar series focusing on Bill 148.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Wickwire Holm
Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP
Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Wickwire Holm
Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP
Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions