Canada: FMC Occupational Health and Safety Law Digest (Ontario): Brief Digests of Recent OHS Cases, Bills and Other Developments of Interest - April 2011

Last Updated: April 11 2011
Article by Christina Hall and Adrian Miedema


No provision yet for MOL to impose "administrative monetary penalties", but new certified member training requirements coming. Codes of Practice will provide broader defence

The Ontario government has introduced amendments to the Occupational Health and Safety Act resulting from the recent report of an expert panel. Bill 160 received first reading on March 3, 2011.

No "Administrative Monetary Penalties" – Yet. Perhaps because it is an election year, the government appears to have chosen not to implement the recommendation that might have concerned employers the most: giving the MOL power to impose monetary penalties without laying charges in the courts. The Ontario Ministry of the Environment already has such a power.

Training Standards and Codes of Practice. The two changes most likely to directly impact employers are: (1) the Minister of Labour will be given the authority to establish standards for health and safety training of health and safety representatives and certified members of joint health and safety committees, and (2) Codes of Practice approved by the Minister may now be used to prove compliance with the OHSA itself (for instance, employers' general duty to take reasonable precautions) rather than with the regulations only (for instance, guarding requirements in the Industrial Regulations).

Reprisals. Where the employee consents, the Bill will also allow an MOL inspector to refer a reprisal issue to the Ontario Labour Relations Board, instead of requiring the employee to file a reprisal complaint – alleging that he or she was punished for raising safety issues ‐ him or herself.

Expanded Mandate of Offices of Worker and Employer Adviser. Under the Bill, the Minister may assign the Office of the Worker Adviser and the Office of the Employer Adviser the authority to advise workers and employers with fewer than 100 employees, respectively, on health and safety matters, rather than simply on workers' compensation matters. This change could provide a real benefit to small employers.

Prevention. The MOL will assume responsibility for prevention of injuries and accidents. Previously, the OHSA did not explicitly make this a responsibility of the MOL.

Chief Prevention Officer. There will be a new Chief Prevention Officer for Ontario who will be tasked with providing leadership on the prevention of workplace injury and occupational diseases. The MOL has already appointed an Interim Health and Safety Prevention Council headed by Paavo Kivisto, former Deputy Minister of Labour.

Health and Safety Associations. The Minister of Labour will also be given oversight power over the Province's health and safety associations (Infrastructure Health and Safety Association, Workplace Safety North, Public Services Health & Safety Association, Workplace Safety & Prevention Services), under the leadership of the Chief Prevention Officer.

The report of the Expert Advisory Panel, which was released in December 2010, can be viewed at:

Bill 160, Occupational Health and Safety Statute Law Amendment Act, 2011: (


Small office with large number of dispersed independent contractors may be required to establish joint health and safety committee

The Ontario Court of Appeal has held that independent truck drivers were "regularly employed" by the load broker that contracted with them to transport sand, gravel and crushed stone.

Section 9 of the Ontario Occupational Health and Safety Act requires a joint health and safety committee "at a workplace at which twenty or more workers are regularly employed".

The company, United Independent Operators Limited, had a small office with fewer than 20 employees but contracted with 30 to 140 independent truck drivers depending on the time of year. It was charged with not having a joint health and safety committee at that office.

The court rejected the company's argument that, because the truck drivers were independent, they were not "regularly employed" by the company. The court noted that the OHSA's definition of "employer" includes the employer of an independent contractor and the definition of "worker" includes independent contractors.

Interestingly, the court did not decide the ultimate question of whether the company must establish a joint health and safety committee, because there had been no decision on whether the company's office was the truck drivers' "workplace" at which they were regularly employed. As the company had already established a joint health and safety committee, that issue did not need to be decided.

This decision may affect employers with small offices that support dispersed contractors such as salespersons or drivers. Those employers should consider counting the dispersed contractors as "regularly employed" workers at that workplace and establishing a joint health and safety committee at that workplace, in order to avoid the types of charges that United Independent Operators Limited faced for approximately six years.

Ontario (Ministry of Labour) v. United Independent Operators Limited (Ontario Court of Appeal):


Bridge collapsed because engineer's design of falsework was negligent under OHSA: Court

An Ontario engineer has been found guilty of negligently designing falsework (supports intended to provide stability while the concrete is forming) for a bridge that collapsed.

Six workers were injured when the falsework for the bridge collapsed in the final stages of a "concrete pour". The bridge crossed the Eighteen Mile River near Lucknow, Ontario.

Subsection 31(2) of the Ontario Occupational Health and Safety Act allows for charges against a licensed architect or engineer where a worker is endangered as a result of the architect's or engineer's negligent or incompetent certification required under the OHSA or advice that is given. These charges are separate from any disciplinary charges that could be laid against an engineer by Professional Engineers Ontario.

The court found that the engineer's falsework design made the falsework incapable of withstanding all loads and forces likely to be applied to it. In particular, because the bridge crossed the river at an angle, the engineer had designed the horizontal and diagonal braces to be clipped to the corners – not flush with the sides – of the vertical supports. The court found that the corner clips did not provide enough friction to have a sufficiently strong connection against sideways forces. The court relied on expert evidence of other engineers who testified as witnesses.

The court imposed a fine of $10,000 on the engineer.

This decision shows that not only employers and supervisors can be convicted and fined under the OHSA. Where accidents occur, engineers and architects who have given related advice should themselves obtain legal advice from a health and safety lawyer about their personal risk.

R. v. James McGerrigle (Ontario Court of Justice):


Your firm may be targeted for an unannounced workplace inspection

The Ontario Ministry of Labour has introduced two new criteria for selecting firms for "proactive" workplace inspections:

  • Workplaces that have been visited as part of a blitz may be revisited to determine if compliance has improved; and
  • Firms that have not reported an injury within the last three years in rate groups that have a high number of injuries may also be visited.

These two criteria were added to the following existing criteria:

  • The number and severity of workplace injuries;
  • Compliance history;
  • Hazards inherent to the work;
  • New businesses;
  • Size of businesses;
  • Specific events or incidents (e.g., critical or fatal injuries or due to workplace violence); and
  • The presence of young, new or otherwise vulnerable workers.

The MOL also looks at Workplace Safety and Insurance Board data to identify companies with high rates of lost‐time and non‐lost‐time injuries and⁄or injuries with high costs.

Employers that fit these criteria should be and remain prepared for an unannounced visit by an MOL inspector. Unprepared employers may receive costly compliance orders or, in some cases, charges.


The MOL rarely publicizes employer fines under $50,000. Here is when it has

The Ontario Ministry of Labour has an unpublicized policy of issuing news releases for all charges against employers that result in fines of $50,000 or more not including the Victim Fine Surcharge.

For many employers, the business or reputational risk associated with a safety charge is as serious as the financial risk. In some cases, employers who have a conviction under the Occupational Health and Safety Act might lose the opportunity to obtain a contract with a company that asks for disclosure of the bidders' safety records.

Our review of the MOL's recent press releases shows that, even where the fine is under $50,000, the MOL has publicized convictions involving:

  • Farm employers (conviction of a farmer in a tractor roll‐over; the OHSA has only recently (since 2006) applied to certain farms);
  • Injuries to young workers (a co‐op student was injured on a brake press);
  • Asbestos violations (failure to advise workers of asbestos);
  • Obstruction of MOL inspector (a company obstructed a Ministry of Labour inspector);
  • Dangerous clothing or jewelry (a worker wearing a ring had his hand entangled in a pinch point between two rolls); and
  • Apparent disregard for obvious or known safety hazard (ladder was missing three of its four non‐slip feet, and one of its cross‐members was broken).


Dollarama ordered to ensure receiving employees wear safety shoes

An Ontario Ministry of Labour inspector has ordered Dollarama to ensure that receiving employees at three of its stores wear safety shoes because "toe‐caps" are not safe enough.

Many of us have worn toe caps – plastic equipment that are reminiscent of Ronald McDonald's shoes – at work or on site visits.

The OLRB rejected Dollarama's argument that the inspector's orders should be suspended because pump‐cart operators and pallet movers would be adequately protected by toe‐caps and by Dollarama's safety procedures. The Ministry of Labour noted that toe‐caps did not comply with the Canadian Standards Association standard "Protective Footwear".

Toe caps are quite commonly used in manufacturing and other industries. Employers in those industries should pay attention to this decision.

This is an interim decision only. The OLRB has yet to finally rule on whether toe caps are sufficient in this case.

Dollarama L.P. v. Johnson (Ontario Labour Relations Board):


Employee cannot advance both Human Rights and OHSA complaint that deal with same dispute

The Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario has decided not to hear a disability‐discrimination complaint until a companion safety‐reprisal complaint has been resolved.

The employee's human rights complaint alleged disability‐discrimination and alleged that he was harassed and laid off following his filing of a report with the Ontario Ministry of Labour. The employee also filed a complaint under the Occupational Health and Safety Act claiming that he was fired for attempting to ensure that his employer complied with the OHSA.

The Human Rights Tribunal decided that the facts and allegations in the human rights and health and safety complaints were the same, the legal issues overlapped, and the employee claimed similar remedies – reinstatement, lost wages, training, and general damages – in both complaints.

The Human Rights Tribunal therefore ordered that the hearing of the human rights complaint be deferred pending the resolution of the OHSA process.

Many employers have experienced employees who file multiple complaints about the same issue. This decision demonstrates that where the facts, issues, and remedies claimed are essentially the same, employers can force the employee to deal with one complaint at a time.

MacDougall v. Caldwell Enterprises (Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario):


Employees increasingly using health and safety legislation to challenge unpopular policies

The Toronto Police Association (the union for Toronto police officers) has lost its safety‐based challenge to the requirement that police officers wear badges that display their first initial and last name.

In 2006, the Toronto Police Service introduced a mandatory requirement that while in uniform, officers wear a name badge. The Police Association asked a Ministry of Labour inspector to order the Police Service to drop the requirement. The inspector refused to grant the order, and the Police Association appealed to the Ontario Labour Relations Board.

The Police Association claimed that criminals and others could use the badge information to track down officers and harass or harm them and their families.

The OLRB found that there were a number of ways, apart from the name tags, that members of the public could obtain officers' names – including by calling the police detachment and giving the officer's badge number.

Although the OLRB concluded that organized crime and motorcycle gangs do maintain databanks containing personal information on police officers, there was no evidence that that information had been used to harm police officers. The Police Association had not proven that the use of the name tag increased the risk to police officers from organized crime or gangs.

In the result, the Police Association had not proven any material increase in risk from the use of the name tags. As such, the inspector's refusal to order the Police Association to change its name tag policy was upheld.

This dispute illustrates how employees can use health and safety legislation to attempt to strike down unpopular policy decisions of their employer.

Toronto Police Association v. Toronto Police Services Board (Ontario Labour Relations Board):


Court overturns technical interpretation of safety regulations. Lower court had found employer not guilty because truck not handling material at the time

An employer has been found guilty of a material handling charge even though the truck in question was not handling material at the time of the accident.

Sheehan's Truck Centre was found guilty under section 56 of Ontario's Industrial Regulations, which requires the use of a signaler when the operator of a vehicle or "similar material handling equipment" does not have a full view of the intended path of travel. Section 56 is under the heading "Material Handling" in the Regulation.

An employee of Sheehan's had reversed an industrial truck with a trailer and drove over another employee who suffered serious pelvic injuries. At the time, Sheehan's lot was being paved. The truck and trailer were empty.

The appeal judge decided that the truck did not have to be handling material at the time of the accident in order for the "material handling" section, including the requirement of a signaler, to apply. It was sufficient that the truck was intended to be used to handle materials. The trial judge had applied a "literal, technical interpretation" when he found Sheehan not guilty because the truck was not handling materials at the time.

The case is not over yet. The Ontario Court of Appeal has agreed to hear Sheehan's appeal on the issue of the proper interpretation of section 56, finding that the section raises workplace safety issues that are of public interest.

Ministry of Labour v. Sheehan's Truck Centre Inc. (Ontario Court of Justice):, and (Ontario Court of Appeal)


Grocer convicted and fined where young worker fell through drop ceiling and died

The Ontario Ministry of Labour has long been concerned with safety of young workers. The courts recently handed down a significant fine in the death of a young worker.

Metro Ontario Inc., a retail grocer, was fined $350,000 after a young worker in its Mississauga store fell to his death through a drop ceiling. The worker had been helping the assistant store manager clear materials from the top of a cooler beside which was a drop ceiling made up of acoustic tiles. The drop ceiling was accessible from the top of the cooler but it was not meant to be weight bearing.

The assistant store manager indicated that a box needed to be removed from on top of the drop ceiling. The young worker stepped onto the drop ceiling to remove the box and fell through. He died of head injuries.

The company pleaded guilty to failing to ensure that a guardrail was in place to prevent workers from accessing the drop ceiling.

From May 1, to August 31, 2010, the Ontario Ministry of Labour conducted a blitz focusing on the health and safety of new and young workers at construction, industrial and health care workplaces. A primary finding of the blitz was lack of training of young workers. Ministry of Labour inspectors issued 3,586 compliance orders during the blitz. The Ministry of Labour's report on the results of the blitz can be read at:

About Fraser Milner Casgrain LLP (FMC)

FMC is one of Canada's leading business and litigation law firms with more than 500 lawyers in six full-service offices located in the country's key business centres. We focus on providing outstanding service and value to our clients, and we strive to excel as a workplace of choice for our people. Regardless of where you choose to do business in Canada, our strong team of professionals possess knowledge and expertise on regional, national and cross-border matters. FMC's well-earned reputation for consistently delivering the highest quality legal services and counsel to our clients is complemented by an ongoing commitment to diversity and inclusion to broaden our insight and perspective on our clients' needs. Visit:

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Events from this Firm
25 Nov 2016, Seminar, Toronto, Canada

On Thursday, September 22, 2016, Dentons hosted a panel discussion about the management of liabilities and risks associated with environmental crises, including potential liabilities for directors and officers and provided insight into risk and liability techniques associated with environmental crisis management.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.