Canada: IMAX And Securities Class Actions Involving The Secondary Market - The Big Picture Is Still Not Clear

Last Updated: March 4 2011
Article by Jeffrey S. Leon and Preet K. Bell

Silver v. IMAX is the first decision to consider the new statutory cause of action provisions under Part XXIII.1 of the Securities Act (Ontario) for misrepresentations made in secondary market disclosures.1 To bring such a claim, prospective plaintiffs must first obtain leave of the Court. This leave requirement serves a gatekeeper function, in order to weed out unmeritorious litigation. In Silver v. IMAX,2 Justice Van Rensburg set a relatively low threshold for plaintiffs to obtain leave. The decision prompted much debate. An application for leave to appeal to the Divisional Court was argued in July 2010. On February 14, 2011, Justice Corbett denied the application for leave. At present, the low threshold test established by Justice Van Rensburg remains the law in Ontario.

In his reasons for denying leave,3 Justice Corbett left what he acknowledged were the controversial and difficult substantive issues to the Court of Appeal, following an actual trial of the issues (assuming a trial is held and an appeal is taken). His Honour's reasons do not reflect a view that Justice Van Rensburg's decision is necessarily correct. Rather, in his view, the issues and concerns before the Court should be left for a later date. In the interim, and subject to a judge taking a different view, the standard set for leave to bring an action under Part XXIII.1 as pronounced by Justice Van Rensburg, stands.

In Silver v. IMAX, the plaintiffs bought IMAX shares on the secondary market (the TSX and NASDAQ). The value of the shares dropped 40 percent following a press release from the company announcing it was responding to an SEC inquiry regarding the timing of its revenue recognition. The plaintiffs alleged that IMAX (and some of its directors and officers) improperly recognized certain revenue resulting in a misrepresentation of the true state of the company's revenue in its 2005 annual financial results and certain press releases. In 2007, IMAX restated its financial results and subsequently acknowledged that there had been an error in revenue recognition.

The test for leave to bring a claim under Part XXIII.1 is a two-part statutory test: (1) the action must be brought in good faith; and (2) the plaintiffs must have a reasonable possibility of success at trial.

For the first requirement of good faith, Justice Van Rensburg stated that the plaintiffs have to establish "that they are bringing their action in the honest belief that they have an arguable claim, and for reasons that are consistent with the purpose of the statutory cause of action and not for an oblique or collateral purpose." For the second part of the test (reasonable possibility of success), Justice Van Rensburg determined that while the court must undertake a preliminary analysis of the merits of the case, it must keep in mind the limitations of available evidence at this early stage. The evidentiary threshold applied by Justice Van Rensburg was therefore low and the plaintiffs were able to satisfy the test to obtain leave with minimal evidence. By way of contrast, the requirement for the defendants to successfully assert a statutory defence to defeat the plaintiffs' leave motion was significantly higher; the evidence of such a defence must "foreclose the plaintiffs' reasonable possibility of success at trial."

In companion reasons, Justice Van Rensburg certified the class action for a global class of investors for the statutory cause of action under Part XXIII.1 as well as for the common law claims of negligent and fraudulent misrepresentation, and conspiracy. The common law claims of negligent and fraudulent misrepresentation are often difficult to certify as a class action due to the requisite element of reliance. In fact, part of the impetus for Part XXIII.1 was to overcome the hurdle of reliance in such common law claims by removing that requirement.

Before Justice Corbett, the defendants argued that Justice Van Rensburg erred on several significant issues. For leave to appeal to be granted it is necessary to establish that there are conflicting decisions on a point and it is desirable for leave to be granted, or that there is good reason to doubt the correctness of the order in question and the proposed appeal involves matters of such importance that the granting of leave is justified. Justice Corbett found that neither two part test had been met. In reaching this conclusion His Honour took the view that in determining whether to grant leave the focus must be on the order or decision and not on "debatable aspects of the reasons" of the motions judge: "interesting legal questions raised by reasons, but not by decisions, can await other cases."

Justice Corbett found that since this was the first decision granting leave under s.138.8(1), there could be no conflicting decisions. He accepted that the nature of the leave test was a matter of general importance that would justify leave being granted if there was good reason to doubt the correctness of the decision below. However, in His Honour's view, there was no such reason: "this was not a close call that turned on the precise test to grant leave."4

One of the arguments made by the defendants was that the good faith requirement justified vigorous scrutiny of each aspect of the claim. Justice Corbett found this to be too restrictive an approach: plaintiffs can rely on their counsel to frame the claims. A further argument made was that the standard of proof for leave was too low for plaintiffs, and there was a reverse of the statutory onus for defendants to meet in respect of an affirmative defence. Justice Corbett did not state that the standard of proof and onus found by Justice Van Rensburg was correct. Rather, there was no reason to doubt the correctness of Her Honour's decision "whatever the precise formulation of the onus, standard of proof, and test to be applied in respect to affirmative defences."

Overall, Justice Corbett agreed that many of the substantive issues relating to Part XXIII.1 and common law claims for misrepresentation are important, complex and controversial. He concluded that "appellate courts will be in a better position to address them on a full factual record, after trial." Specifically, with respect to the common law claims, Justice Corbett concluded that Justice Van Rensburg's decision "does no more than permit the plaintiffs to proceed to trial. The Court of Appeal will be able to give full consideration to these issues if and when the case is appealed after a trial judgment."5

The proposition that these issues should be considered following a trial has much to recommend it. However, given the increasing number of secondary market class actions, the courts, counsel and clients would benefit now from further consideration of these new statutory provisions at an appellate level. The real question is whether Justice Van Rensburg took the "right approach" for her analysis of the leave requirement. Appellate review will have to await a lower court taking a different approach than Justice Van Rensburg, such that there will be conflicting decisions and the test for leave will be satisfied.

It is also a reality that few class actions, secondary market or otherwise, ever get to trial, let alone appeal. The impact of the IMAX approach may well put some pressure on defendants to settle in order to avoid the uncertainties and the market reality created by such uncertainties. In fact, it was in part the desire to avoid such pressures, where not justified by the facts, that lead to the inclusion of the leave test in the legislation Other judicial reasoning has, in fact, suggested a different perspective. For example, Justice Lax in CV Technologies had a different and significantly more robust view of the court's gatekeeper function in relation to early disclosure by proposed defendants in secondary market class actions. This could indicate that a conflicting decision may well be on the horizon.


1. See prior Bennett Jones publication on this decision: " Silver v. IMAX: Round One to the Plaintiffs in a Secondary Market Misrepresentation Claim" dated January 19, 2010.

2. [2009] O.J. No. 5573 & [2009] O.J. No. 5585 (Sup. Ct. J.).

3. Silver v. IMAX, 2011 ONSC 1035.

4. The Court did not accept Justice Lax's reasoning in Ainslie v. CV Technologies, [2009] O.J. No. 730 (Sup. Ct. J.) as a "conflicting decision" [CV Technologies].

5. Justice Corbett agreed with Justice Sachs in the leave application in McKenna v. Gammon Gold (2010), 266 O.A.C. 314 (Sup. Ct. J.) that the facts determined by Justice Sachs in that case were distinguishable from the facts in IMAX.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Jeffrey S. Leon
In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.