Canada: SEC Issues Proposed Rules Implementing Dodd-Frank Act – Reporting Obligations Regarding Conflict Minerals, Mine Safety and Payments by Resource Extraction Issuers

On December 15, 2010, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) proposed rules to implement provisions of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Act) dealing with new reporting obligations regarding use of conflict minerals originating in the Democratic Republic of the Congo and adjoining countries, mine safety, and payments to government entities in connection with the commercial development of oil, natural gas or minerals.1 This Update discusses key aspects of the proposed rules and highlights important questions regarding the proposed rules raised by the SEC for comment. The deadline for persons wishing to submit comments to the SEC on the proposed rules is January 31, 2011. Readers are encouraged to review our previous Update, " New Reporting Obligations Imposed on Mining Companies Under the Dodd-Frank Act", for background on the statutory provisions of the Act.

Conflict Minerals

The proposed rules implementing Section 1502 of the Act require any issuer for which conflict minerals are "necessary to the functionality or production of a product manufactured, or contracted to be manufactured" by that issuer to disclose in its annual report whether its conflict minerals originated in the Democratic Republic of the Congo or an adjoining country (DRC countries). If so, the issuer will be required to furnish a separate report as an exhibit to its annual report that includes a description of measures taken by the issuer to exercise due diligence on the source and chain of custody of its conflict minerals.

  • Conflict minerals consist of:
    • columbite-tantalite (commonly used in electronic components);
    • wolframite (used to produce tungsten which is commonly used in metal wires);
    • cassiterite (tin); and
    • gold.
  • The disclosure requirements apply even if only small amounts of such minerals are utilized.

The proposed reporting requirements would apply to all issuers who file reports with the SEC, including foreign private issuers and smaller reporting companies. It is important for mining companies to note that issuers would be considered to be "manufacturing" conflict minerals when they extract those minerals from mining facilities.

  • An issuer would be considered to be "contracting to manufacture" a product if:
    • it has any influence over the product's manufacturing; or
    • it offers a generic product under its own brand name or a separate brand name, regardless of whether the issuer has any influence over the manufacturing specifications of the product, provided the issuer has contracted to have the product manufactured specifically for itself. As proposed, a variety of retailers, not just manufacturers of jewelry or consumer electronic devices, would be subject to the rules.

Issuer's Inquiry

If an issuer determines through a "reasonable country of origin inquiry" process that the conflict minerals it uses did not originate in the DRC countries, it will be required to disclose this determination in its annual report and, until the issuer files its subsequent annual report, on its Internet website. The proposed rules do not specify what constitutes a reasonable country of origin inquiry, but the proposing release states that obtaining reasonably reliable representations from the processing facility that the conflict minerals did not originate in DRC countries would satisfy the reasonable inquiry test. The proposing release further states that this inquiry requirement is not meant to suggest that issuers would have to determine with absolute certainty whether their conflict minerals originate in the DRC countries. Finally, the SEC notes that conducting the reasonable country of origin inquiry could be less exhaustive than the due diligence used in determining the source of custody of those conflict minerals that originate in the DRC countries (see discussion below). An issuer would be required to:

  • include brief conflict minerals disclosure in its annual report under a separate heading entitled, "Conflict Minerals Disclosure";
  • maintain reviewable records demonstrating that its conflict minerals did not originate in the DRC countries; and
  • disclose the due diligence used in making its determinations, such as whether it used any nationally or internationally recognized standards or guidance for supply chain due diligence such as those being developed by the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development or the United Nations Group of Experts for the Democratic Republic of the Congo.

If an issuer either determines that its conflict minerals originated in the DRC countries, or cannot conclude that they did not originate in the DRC countries it would be required to:

  • disclose this information in its annual report (under the heading referenced above);
  • furnish a report to the SEC (Conflict Minerals Report) as an exhibit to the annual report and post the Conflict Minerals Report on the issuer's website until the subsequent report is filed with the SEC; and
  • disclose the website address at which this exhibit is available.

Conflict Minerals Report

The Conflict Minerals Report would be required to include:

  • a description of the measures taken by the issuer to exercise due diligence on the source and chain of custody of its conflict minerals, including a certified independent private sector audit conducted in accordance with standards established by the Comptroller General of the United States;
  • a description of products that are not "DRC conflict free" (which the proposed rules define to mean a product which does not contain conflict minerals that directly or indirectly finance or benefit armed groups in the DRC countries), the country of origin of those conflict minerals, and the facilities used to process those minerals;
  • a description of efforts and procedures taken to determine the mine or location of origin of the minerals with the greatest possible specificity;
  • a certification by the issuer that it obtained an independent private sector audit of its Conflict Minerals Report; and
  • the audit report and the identity of the auditor.

The Conflict Minerals Report would not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filings under the U.S. Securities Act of 1933, as amended (Securities Act) or the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (Exchange Act), except to the extent that the issuer specifically incorporates it by reference.

Recycled and Scrap Minerals

The proposed rules allow for different treatment of conflict minerals from recycled and scrap sources than from mined sources due to the difficulty of looking through the recycling or scrap progress to determine the origin of the minerals.

  • Issuers whose conflict minerals originated from recycled or scrap sources would be required to disclose in their annual report, under the "Conflict Minerals Disclosure" heading, that their conflict minerals were obtained from recycled or scrap sources and that they furnished a Conflict Minerals Report;
  • Issuers would state in the Conflict Minerals Report that under SEC rules their recycled or scrap minerals are considered DRC conflict free; and
  • Issuers would also need to describe the measures taken to exercise due diligence in determining that their conflict minerals were recycled or scrap.


An issuer using conflict minerals that are necessary to the functionality or production of a product manufactured or contracted to be manufactured would be required to provide its first disclosures after its full fiscal year following the promulgation of the final rules. Assuming the SEC adopts final rules in April 2011 (the deadline provided in the Act), a December 31 fiscal year-end issuer would first have to provide conflict minerals disclosure or a Conflict Minerals Report, as applicable, after the end of its December 31, 2012 fiscal year.

Important Questions Raised For Comment By SEC

1. Does the extraction of conflict minerals from a mine constitute "manufacturing" or "contracting to manufacture" a "product" such that mining issuers should be subject to the proposed rules?

2. Alternatively, should a mining issuer not be viewed as manufacturing a product unless it engages in additional processes to refine and concentrate the extracted minerals into salable commodities or otherwise changes the basic composition of the extracted minerals?

3. Should the SEC require issuers to provide the conflict minerals disclosure and reporting requirements mandated by the Act in Exchange Act annual reports filed, as applicable, on Form 10-K, Form 20-F and Form 40-F or should the SEC require or permit issuers to disclose the information in a separate annual report?

4. Whether the disclosure requirements as proposed should apply to foreign private issuers and smaller reporting companies, or whether the rules should be adjusted in some fashion?

5. Should the term "manufacture" be defined in a way that broadens or limits the scope of issuers for which the disclosure requirements would apply?

6. Should a minimum level of influence, involvement or control over the manufacturing process be required before an issuer must comply with the proposed rules?

7. Should the SEC provide additional guidance on how an issuer may satisfy a "reasonable country of origin" inquiry?

8. Should the SEC provide additional guidance or a defined term for the phrase "necessary to the functionality or production" with respect to the use of conflict minerals?

9. Should the independent audit certification be signed; who should be required to sign the audit certification and what liability should be assigned to the individual/firm that signs the certification?

Mine Safety

The proposed rules implementing Section 1503 of the Act require issuers that are operators of a coal or other mine to disclose in their periodic reports with the SEC information regarding specified health and safety violations, orders and citations, related assessments, legal actions and mining-related fatalities. They also require disclosure on Form 8-K following the receipt of certain orders and notices from the U.S. Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA).

  • The definition of "coal or other mine" in the Act is as defined in the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977 (Mine Act) and the Mine Act applies only to mines inside the United States. Therefore, the new disclosure requirements would only apply to those mines inside the United States and an issuer operating mines both in the United States and Canada will only need to disclose information regarding its U.S. mines.
  • Foreign private issuers and smaller reporting companies will have to comply with the periodic disclosure requirements, but under the proposed rules, foreign private issuers will not be required to comply with the requirement that receipt of certain orders and notices be disclosed on Form 8-K.
  • Disclosure must be made for each distinct mine and grouping mines by project or geographic region will not be permitted. In accordance with the plain language of Act, the SEC has rejected the use of any materiality thresholds.

New Periodic Disclosure Requirements

Section 1503(a) of the Act lists new items to be disclosed in periodic reports, as we discussed in our previous Update, including, amongst others, violations that could significantly and substantially contribute to the cause and effect of a coal or other safety mine or health hazard under Section 104 of the Mine Act and the total number of mining-related fatalities. Besides those items listed in the Act, the proposed rules require a brief description of each category of violations, orders and citations included in other items required by Section 1503(a) so that investors can understand the basis for the violations, orders or citations referenced.

  • New periodic disclosure will be required for domestic issuers on Form 10-Q and Form 10-K, and for foreign private issuers on Form 20-F and Form 40-F.
  • Each periodic report would cover disclosure for the time period covered by such report, so that a Form 10-Q, for example, would need to include disclosure for the quarter covered, and a Form 10-K would need to include disclosure for both the quarter and fiscal year covered.
  • The proposed rules do not propose to allow issuers to exclude information about orders, violations or citations that were received during the time period covered by the report but subsequently were dismissed or reduced. However, additional contextual information would not be prohibited.
  • No particular presentation requirements for the new disclosure are being proposed by the SEC, but issuers are encouraged to use tabular presentations whenever possible if to do so would facilitate investor understanding.

Form 8-K Filing Requirements

Section 1503(b) of the Act requires the disclosure on Form 8-K of orders and notices received by the operator of a U.S. mine from the MSHA. While foreign private issuers would be required to comply with the new periodic disclosure requirements in connection with mine safety, foreign private issuers are not required to file current reports on Form 8-K. Thus, under the proposed rules they would not be required to comply with the new Form 8-K disclosure requirements.

  • The disclosure filed on Form 8-K would need to be filed again in the Form 10-Q for the quarter in which the Form 8-K was filed, and in the Form 10-K for the fiscal year in which the Form 8-K was filed.
  • Information required to be disclosed on Form 8-K would include:
    • the date of receipt of the order or notice;
    • the category of order or notice; and
    • the name and location of the mine involved.
  • The Form 8-K would need to be filed no later than four business days after the triggering event.


The disclosure requirements set forth in the Act are currently in effect. Thus, Form 8-K must be filed for triggering events under Section 1503(b) as discussed above and appropriate disclosure on Form 10-Q, Form 10-K, Form 20-F and Form 40-F, as applicable, must be included for all periodic filings made after July 21, 2010.

Important Questions Raised for Comment By SEC

  1. Is it appropriate that the new disclosure requirements are only applicable to mines in the United States? Will issuers that operate mines within the United States be at a competitive advantage or disadvantage compared to issuers that operate mines in other regions because of a lack of disclosure about non-U.S. mines?
  2. Should the periodic disclosure under Section 1503(a) apply to foreign private issuers as proposed?
  3. Should foreign private issuers be exempt from the Form 8-K disclosure requirements under Section 1503(b) as proposed?
  4. For issuers using domestic forms, should periodic disclosure be required in both Form 10-Q and Form 10-K, or only annually on Form 10-K?
  5. Is a separate disclosure requirement for each individual mine appropriate? Could this approach produce such a volume of information that investors will be overwhelmed?
  6. Should disclosure be required for each project or geographic region?
  7. Should the new disclosure requirements apply to registration statements under the Securities Act as well as periodic reports?
  8. Should all mining fatalities at mines operated by companies that file periodic reports with the SEC be required to be reported rather than just fatalities at U.S. mines?
  9. Should the rules be revised in order to minimize duplicative disclosure such as by not requiring repetition of information previously reported?

Payments by Resource Extraction Issuers

The proposed rules implementing Section 1504 of the Act require each "resource extraction issuer" to include in its annual report information relating to any payment made by the issuer, a subsidiary of the issuer, or an entity under the control of the issuer to a foreign government or the U.S. federal government for the purpose of the commercial development of oil, natural gas or minerals. Information would need to be provided regarding:

  • the type and total amount of such payments made for each project of the resource extraction issuer relating to the commercial development of oil, natural gas or minerals; and
  • the type and total amount of such payments made to each government.

The proposed rules would apply to domestic issuers, foreign issuers and smaller reporting companies that meet the definition of "resource extraction issuer", regardless of size or the extent of business operations constituting commercial development of oil, natural gas or minerals.

Key Definitions

"resource extraction issuer": the SEC adopted the statutory definition of "resource extraction issuer", meaning an issuer that:

  • is required to file an annual report with the SEC; and
  • engages in the commercial development of oil, natural gas or minerals.

"commercial development": the SEC also adopted the statutory definition of "commercial development of oil, natural gas, or minerals". The proposing release notes that the proposed definition is intended to capture only activities that are directly related to the commercial development, and not activities that are ancillary or preparatory to such development. Therefore, the SEC would not consider a manufacturer of a product used in the commercial development of oil, natural gas or minerals to be engaged in the commercial development of the resource such as a manufacturer of drill bits or heavy equipment.

New Disclosure Requirements

The proposed rules would require a resource extraction issuer to submit the prescribed payment information using electronic tags that identify, for any payments made by a resource extraction issuer to a foreign government or the U.S. federal government:

  • the total amount of the payments, by category;
  • the currency used to make the payments;
  • the financial period in which the payments were made;
  • the business segment of the resource extraction issuer that made the payments;
  • the government that received the payments, and the country in which the government is located; and
  • the project of the resource extraction issuer to which the payments relate.

The proposing release clarifies that disclosure will be required in connection with payments made to subnational foreign governments and that payments made to a "foreign government" include payments made to an entity that is majority-owned by a foreign government. It also clarifies that the reference to the "federal government" refers to the U.S. federal government.

A resource extraction issuer would be required to provide the information annually in its Exchange Act annual report on Form 10-K, Form 40-F or Form 20-F, as applicable. Under the proposed rules the information would be included in two exhibits:

  • one exhibit that would be filed in text format, which would enable investors to easily read the disclosure about payment information without additional computer programs or software; and
  • a second exhibit filed in eXtensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL) format that would be readable through a viewer.

Definition of "Payment"

The proposed rules adopt the definition of "payment" from Section 13(q) of the Exchange Act. "Payment" means a payment that:

  • is made to further the commercial development of oil, natural gas, or minerals;
  • is not de minimus; and
  • includes taxes, royalties, fees (including license fees), production entitlements, bonuses, and other material benefits that the SEC determines are part of the commonly recognized revenue stream for the commercial development of oil, natural gas or minerals.

The SEC emphasizes that these types of payments are consistent with the types of payments that the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI), which was referenced in the statutory definition of payment, suggests should be disclosed. Information regarding the EITI can be found at

"Not de minimus": the proposing release does not define this term.

Currency: under the proposed rules, disclosure would be required in the currency used to make the payments.

Payments by "a subsidiary...or an entity under the control of the resource extraction issuer": under the proposed rules, resource extraction issuers are required to disclose payments by a subsidiary or other entity controlled by the issuer. The proposing release notes that the determination of whether an entity is under the control of an issuer will be based on consideration of the particular facts and circumstances. At a minimum under the proposed rules, payments made by a subsidiary or entity under the control of a resource issuer would be subject to disclosure if the issuer must provide consolidated financial information for the subsidiary or other entity in the issuer's financial statements included in its Exchange Act reports.

Treatment of the Disclosure

In the proposing release, the SEC proposes that the required disclosure would be required to be "furnished" rather than "filed" and not be subject to liability under Section 18 of the Exchange Act.


The Act provides that the final rules "shall take effect on the date on which the resource extraction issuer is required to submit an annual report relating to the fiscal year...that ends not earlier than 1 year after the date on which the [SEC] issues final rules". As the SEC must enact such final rules at the latest by April 15, 2011, the statute requires disclosure in an issuer's annual report relating to the fiscal year ending on or after April 15, 2012.

Important Questions Raised for Comment by SEC

1. Should the SEC exempt certain categories of issuers, such as foreign private issuers or smaller reporting companies, from the proposed rules?

2. Should the SEC provide an exemption to allow foreign private issuers to follow their home country rules and disclose in their Form 20-F annual report the required home country disclosure?

3. Should the definition of "commercial development of oil, natural gas or minerals" include the activities of exploration, extraction, processing and export, as proposed? Should the SEC exclude any of these activities?

4. As proposed, the definition of "payment" does not include payments resource extraction issuers make for infrastructure improvements, even if they are a direct cost of engaging in the commercial development of oil, natural gas or minerals. Should the definition be expanded to cover such payments?

5. The proposed rules do not expressly include social or community payments made to improve a host country's schools, hospitals or other social welfare activities within the definition of payments. Are such payments part of the commonly recognized revenue stream for the commercial development of oil, gas or minerals?

6. Should the SEC adopt a definition of "not de minimis" that uses an absolute dollar amount as a threshold? Should a payment be considered "not de minimis" if it meets or exceeds a percentage of expenses incurred per project for the year that is the subject of the annual report?

7. Should the SEC adopt a definition for the term "project"? Should it adopt a definition of project that is substantially similar to the definition of "development project" under Rule 4-10(a)(B) of Regulation S-X?

8. Is the requirement to disclose payments by an entity under the control of the issuer even though the issuer does not consolidate the entity appropriate?

9. Should the SEC include an exemption to the requirement to disclose the payment information if the laws of the host country prohibit the resource extracting issuer from disclosing such information?

10. Should the SEC require, or permit, resource extraction issuers to provide the payment information in an annual report other than an annual report on Form 10-K, Form 20-F or Form 40-F?

Osler will continue to monitor developments involving the SEC's proposed rules related to Sections 1502, 1503 and 1504 of the Act and update our clients as events warrant. We would be pleased to discuss any aspects of the proposed rules and any comments you are considering making to the SEC in response to the proposed rules.


1 Conflict Minerals, Exchange Act Rel. No. 34-63547 (Dec.15 2010); Mine Safety Disclosure, Securities Act Rel. No. 33-9164 (Dec. 15, 2010); and Disclosure of Payments by Resource Extraction Issuers, Exchange Act Rel. No. 34-63549 (Dec. 15, 2010).

Kevin Cramer practices U.S. mergers & acquisitions and securities law. Matthew Sadofsky practices corporate finance, public company representation and U.S. securities law matters. Kate Coolican practices mergers & acquisitions, corporate finance and securities and general corporate matters. Michael McQuown practices mergers and acquisitions, securities and general corporate matters.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.