Canada: Buy Low, Donate High, Sue to Get Even: More Risks for Recommending Aggressive Tax Avoidance Schemes

Originally published in Taxation Law @ Gowlings - November 30, 2010.

  • Taxand - access Taxand's Take for the latest tax issues affecting multinationals worldwide as well as Taxand's latest range of publications.



Buy Low, Donate High, Sue to Get Even: More Risks for Recommending Aggressive Tax Avoidance Schemes
By Stevan Novoselac, Michelle McBride and John Sorensen

In a recent decision of the Ontario Superior Court, Lemberg v. Perris,1 Eric and Valerie Lemberg successfully sued their loyal accountant, Michael Perris ("Perris"), for breach of fiduciary duty.  Over the course of their almost twenty-year relationship, Perris provided tax and accounting advice to the Lembergs and performed their tax compliance work.

Perris advised the Lembergs to engage in a so-called "art-flip" tax reduction scheme.  The Lembergs accepted Perris' advice and enjoyed their large tax savings.  However, they were reassessed by the Canada Revenue Agency ("CRA") to disallow all of the benefits they received.  Subsequently, the Lembergs learned that Perris had received a "secret commission" from the scheme's promoters to help sell the art-flip deal. 

In finding in favour of the Lembergs, the Court held that Perris was in a fiduciary relationship with them and that he had breached his fiduciary duties.  The most fundamental breach was Perris' acceptance of the secret commissions, which meant that Perris was working not for the Lembergs, but rather for the promoters of the art-flip scheme.  The Court found that Perris had induced the Lembergs into investing in the scheme and that he had abused his relationship of trust and confidence which had been established over many years.  The Court held that Perris was acting in his own best interest, not in the best interest of the Lembergs, when he advised them on the art-flip scheme.  Consequently, the Court ordered Perris to compensate the Lembergs for the difference between the amount they had paid for the artwork and their tax savings realized, for a total of $39,797.  The Court also ordered that Perris disgorge the $7,500 secret commission he had received from the promoters of the scheme.

Art-flip schemes are straightforward.  Taxpayers buy limited edition prints in bulk from the scheme's promoters at a significant discount.  These prints are then donated to United States-based educational institutions or other charities.  The taxpayer receives a tax receipt based on an appraised market-value of the prints, which is invariably several times higher than the actual price paid for the artwork, resulting in large tax savings.  For example, in the Lemberg's case, their $31,000 paid for their 1998 participation in the scheme yielded a donation receipt of $136,500.

The CRA re-assessed the Lembergs on the basis that the tax benefit must be based on the actual purchase price of the artwork, not the higher appraised value.  The CRA's reassessments against the huge numbers of taxpayers involved in art-flip schemes spawned waves of litigation, and in 2004 the test case of Klotz v. Canada2 was heard by the Tax Court of Canada ("TCC").  The TCC held that any tax benefit must be limited to the actual purchase price of the art, rather than the purported appraised value when the art was donated.

The art-flip scheme used by the Lembergs was supported by tax opinions from certain Canadian law firms.  These legal opinions confirmed that it was possible for buyers to obtain tax credits based not on the purchase price paid, but on the higher appraised value of the art.  However, the opinions were based on the assumptions that a buyer would purchase several prints over an extended time, receive actual possession of the art, gift some of the art to friends and family, retain some of it for personal use, and periodically donate prints to a number of different charities.  The legal opinions also assumed that buyers would play a hands-on role in selecting the recipients of the donated artwork.  Purchasing and donating the art strictly to obtain a tax benefit would vitiate the required "donative intent", and undermine the validity of the tax planning.

However, as is invariably the case, in practice the facts differed materially from the facts assumed in the tax opinions.  The participants in an art-flip scheme, such as the Lembergs, typically had little or no knowledge of the recipients of the artwork and never took possession of the art, nor played any role whatsoever in selecting the recipient.  In fact, the Lembergs had never seen the art they purchased and had never heard of the universities that received their "charitable donations".  Rather, the majority of taxpayers purchased the artwork for the sole purpose of obtaining a charitable tax deduction.  The Court in Lemberg was critical not only of the accountants who recommended these schemes, but also of the lawyers who provided the legal opinions that "lent apparent legitimacy to the scheme".3 In particular, the Court noted that because Perris' loyalties were divided, he did not pay sufficient attention to the risks associated with the art-flip scheme, notwithstanding that the actual execution of the transactions by the Lembergs and others "bore little resemblance to the circumstances of the actual transactions that were recommended" in the tax opinions.

Like the Court in Lemberg, in Klotz the TCC was critical of the legal opinions that were used to promote the tax avoidance scheme to investors, stating "[s]uch opinions are stated to be subject to so many qualifications, provisos and assumptions that it is difficult to see how a client could derive much comfort from them".4 These opinions were used enthusiastically by promoters to support these schemes.  However, they were based on ideal facts and assumptions, which differed materially from the actual facts in how many of these transactions were later implemented.

The majority of taxpayers, including the Lembergs, did not read the opinions or seek independent legal advice to evaluate their utility.  If they had, they would have likely detected glaring discrepancies between the assumptions upon which the opinions were based and reality.  In Klotz, the TCC made the following critical comment: "[h]e had two legal opinions which, however qualified they might be, would be taken by the average layman as implicitly putting the imprimatur of two major law firms on the program."5

This case raises important issues for taxpayers who participate in these and other charitable tax avoidance schemes, and their advisors.  Clearly, Lemberg confirms that a financial and tax advisor with a long-standing client relationship has a fiduciary duty to that client.  Therefore, the adviser has an obligation to put the client's interests first.  Consequently, when it comes to aggressive, if not dubious, tax planning, an advisor should be watchful and prudent in safeguarding the client's interest.

Further questions raised by this case and other pending related cases include whether tax advisors should be:

  • more circumspect in providing opinions on potentially aggressive tax planning products;
  • wary of the prospect of litigation when advising on potentially aggressive tax planning products that are highly likely to lead to reassessments against participants;
  • alert to the use or misuse of tax opinions which are provided to a wide, unsophisticated group of potential "investors" as opposed to knowledgeable business persons;
  • concerned about ethics and professional responsibility when participating in the structuring of potentially aggressive tax planning products; and
  • concerned about reputational damage arising from providing advice on potentially aggressive tax planning products.

The Lemberg case certainly rings many warning bells for both taxpayers and their advisors.

Footnotes

1. 2010 ONSC 3690 ("Lemberg").

2. 2004 TCC 147 ("Klotz").

3. Lemberg, at para. 73

4. Klotz, at para. 23

5. Klotz, at para. 71

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Events from this Firm
19 Sep 2019, Seminar, Birmingham, UK

Providing GCs, Heads of Legal and senior in-house lawyers with timely, topical and practical legal advice on a variety of topics.

26 Sep 2019, Seminar, London, UK

Providing GCs, Heads of Legal and senior in-house lawyers with timely, topical and practical legal advice on a variety of topics.

8 Oct 2019, Seminar, Birmingham, UK

Supporting the development of paralegals, trainees and lawyers of up to five years' PQE by providing valuable knowledge and guidance together with practical tips.

 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions