Canada: Corporate Governance Paper Board Minute - Confidentiality ‐ An Important Commercial Interest

Last Updated: November 25 2010
Article by Chris J. Matthews

The 2009 decision of Justice Wilton‐Siegel of the Ontario Superior Court in iSRM Global Master Fund Limited Partnership v. Hudbay Minerals Inc.1 is notable for its recognition of the inherent confidentiality of board minutes. At the same time, however, it is clear that, despite this recognition, it will be very difficult to protect that confidentiality once the minutes become an issue in litigation.

Regardless of whether you believe the workings of a board of directors should be open and transparent, or shrouded from view, some level of confidentiality in a board's deliberations will always be important.

In Hudbay, Justice Wilton‐Siegel said the following about why this is important:

Although I agree with the applicants that no privilege attaches at law to such minutes, I think this is an important commercial interest. The board of directors of a corporation is charged with the responsibility to manage the corporation. The directors must be able to conduct open and frank discussions if they are to discharge their responsibilities to the corporation and the shareholders. In the ordinary course, it is certainly arguable that, for this reason, disclosure of minutes of board meetings and related notes of participants, would give rise to a serious risk to an important commercial interest.

This is a statement that will no doubt be used in the future to fend off requests for copies of board minutes. Although board deliberations are generally considered by the directors to be confidential, this is often not recognized by shareholders or members. There are good reasons, however, why confidentiality should be maintained, even in an age of increasing corporate disclosure.

Confidentiality not only facilitates open discussion at board meetings, it promotes the perception, if not the fact, of board unity. Once a decision is made, the board should speak with one voice. The effect and force of a decision are weakened if board members are free to discuss the level of dissent or lack of enthusiasm that some directors have for the decision. Confidentiality also facilitates the taking of proper minutes, which should reflect not only the decisions made but also the questions asked, and positions taken by various directors.

Specific requirements of confidentiality are seen most often in the by‐laws of not for profit corporations. Many such organizations include provisions for disciplining board members for breaches of confidentiality, even to the extent that the board itself may remove the director.2 The fact that such provisions exist highlights the importance some boards place on confidentiality. It may seem counter‐intuitive that it is the not‐for‐profit sector in which confidentiality appears to be more of a concern. It is the not‐for‐profit sector, after all, in which transparency is most vocally demanded and most often granted. This apparent contradiction can be seen in cases where a not‐for‐profit has both a strict confidentiality clause for its directors but also puts the minutes of board meetings on its website.

The reason specific confidentiality covenants are required may be because volunteer directors are more likely to be inexperienced in board procedure. They may also have come to the board with an agenda that is focused on one issue or constituency and not on serving the interests of the corporation as a whole. It is no secret that not‐for‐profit boards can sometimes be embroiled in disputes and politics that take on an emotional, if not vicious, tone. As Henry Kissinger said, this is because "the stakes are so small". In any case, a confidentiality covenant will at least help to control wayward board members.

Corporate statutes in both business and not for profit sectors recognize that board minutes are inherently confidential. They are not provided to shareholders as of right. Both the CBCA and the OBCA grant shareholders the right to inspect or receive copies of certain corporate books and records, including financial statements. Board minutes are not included in the documents to which access is granted. Access to the minutes is given only to the directors themselves.3

Similar provisions are included in the current Canada Corporations Act and the new Ontario Notfor‐ Profit Corporations Act.4 The new Canada Not‐for‐Profit Corporations Act, (which was passed by the House of Commons on May 5, 2009 but not yet in force)5, does not change the treatment of board minutes. Presumably, all of these statutes restrict access to board minutes because the need for confidentiality (or at least the option for it) is seen as something that should be maintained.

Despite the uniform treatment of board minutes in the statutes, boards are often met with requests from shareholders or members for copies of minutes or for their regular disclosure. As transparency and increased access to information is generally considered a good thing, the desire for openness and the need for confidentiality will naturally cause tension. This has often led to the unhappy compromise of producing two sets of minutes, one which will include the discussion and decisions taken on all matters (including areas considered to be sensitive or confidential) and another, which will be suitable for public disclosure, with the confidential sections removed. Alternatively, the minutes will be drafted in such a way that they say very little. They do not disclose confidential information because they do not record much of anything. Minutes that include statements such as: "The board discussed several confidential matters" or "discussed matters in camera" do little to meet the requirements that the company keep a record of business transacted. Neither of these alternatives does anything to promote transparency or openness. At most, it merely pays lip service to the concept.

The better view is that, while transparency is always to be encouraged to promote participation and alleviate dissent, information should be communicated through material to which shareholders or members are entitled. This includes annual reports, financial statements, and securities filings. If the board minutes are not disclosed, the need for meaningful minutes can then be met.

Although the corporate statutes do not require the disclosure of minutes, such protection may be somewhat illusory when it comes to litigation or where minutes are subject to access to information requests. There is always a tension between openness and confidentiality in both litigation and information proceedings. Openness and disclosure, however, more often carry the day than do commercial sensitivity and privacy.

Of course, there may be instances where the company wishes to rely on the contents of board minutes in addressing allegations made in litigation. This will particularly be the case in oppression proceedings or where directors' deliberations are directly in issue in the lawsuit. Most recently, board minutes were used by Lions Gate Entertainment Corp. in fending off an oppression application brought by entities controlled by Carl Icahn.6

Where the minutes may not be as directly relevant or where they contain sensitive information that needs to be protected, other efforts must be made. Confidentiality may be protected by sealing orders or by the deemed or implied undertaking rules, such protections will be narrowly construed if there is seen to be an impact on the administration of justice or the public interest. As stated by Justice Dickson (as he then was) in Attorney General of Nova Scotia v. McIntyre7

Many times it has been urged that the "privacy" of litigants requires that the public be excluded from Court proceedings. It is now well established, however, that covertness is the exception and openness the rule. Public confidence in the integrity of the Court system and understanding of the administration of justice are thereby fostered. As a general rule, the sensibilities of the individuals involved are not the basis for exclusion of the public from judicial proceedings.

So how does one stop board minutes from getting into the public domain? Merely having the company's lawyer present won't transform the minutes into a privileged document. Only that portion of the minutes that may be considered solicitor‐client or litigation privileged will be exempt. In order to protect non‐privileged minutes behind a sealing order, minutes must meet the tests set out by the Supreme Court of Canada in Sierra Club v. Canada (Minister of Finance)8. The company must show that the minutes are commercially sensitive, the disclosure of which could harm the company. The information in the minutes must also have been accumulated with a reasonable expectation of being kept confidential. While this is probably enough to protect disclosure under the federal Access to Information Act, the rest of the factors in Sierra Club must also be considered, if a sealing order in litigation is sought. The court will balance the negative or deleterious effects of granting a sealing order, including the negative impact on the open court procedure and on the right to freedom of expression.

In Hudbay, the minutes had been disclosed in the context of cross‐examinations on affidavits in an oppression application. The applicants wanted to use information from the minutes for a purpose outside the litigation, in particular, for inclusion in a dissident proxy circular. Hudbay had already obtained a sealing order at the beginning of the litigation and the applicants wanted the minutes released from the order.

Justice Wilton‐Siegel found that the board minutes did not meet the Sierra Club tests. Although he agreed that board minutes are confidential and commercially sensitive in principle, he found that the information in the Hudbay minutes had already been disclosed in considerable detail in the affidavits filed in court. He also found that a sealing order would have a deleterious effect on the administration of justice because some of the information sought to be sealed clarified or corrected information that was already in the public record. Justice Wilton‐Siegel also found the public interest would not be served by limiting the information available to dissident shareholders. He noted that applicable securities and corporate legislation did not prevent dissident shareholders from obtaining and disclosing information they may consider relevant "provided such information was not obtained by improper means".

Finally, Justice Wilton‐Siegel addressed the question of whether the minutes were subject to the implied undertaking rule, which prevents a party to whom documents are disclosed in litigation from using them for other purposes. He found that they were not subject to the rule because, among other reasons, the material had already been filed in court. He stated: "I do not think that a sealing order is available to implement the implied undertaking rule." He drew a distinction between a sealing order, which "addresses a concern for confidentiality", and the implied undertaking rule, which "addresses a concern for use".

Although the rules and sealing order may well address distinct concerns, one must ask why a sealing order could not be used to prevent a party from breaching the implied undertaking rule. If the material is not otherwise in the public domain, the logical way to prevent the use of the material is to keep it confidential or sealed. Use of the material in breach of the undertaking or of the order could then be considered "improper means". It must also be remembered that the deemed and implied undertaking rules also balance public and private interests. The court can always order that a party be relieved from the deemed or implied undertaking if satisfied that the interests of justice outweigh any prejudice to the disclosing party.

A different view of the implied undertaking rule is seen in Catalyst Fund v. Imax Corp.9. In the context of deciding whether various corporate records, including board minutes, should be produced, Justice Pepall ordered that all of the records should be sealed because they "clearly contain commercially sensitive material and, if obtained by examination for discovery, would be subject to the deemed undertaking rule". This language appears to support the use of a sealing order to enforce the deemed or implied undertaking.

In summary, boards that want to protect the confidentiality of their minutes will first want to ensure that their own members respect the obligation. If sensitive minutes are handed over to third parties, they should be marked as confidential and the fact that they contain sensitive commercial information should be described in any transmittal letter. In litigation proceedings, it will be prudent to obtain a sealing order, prior to disclosure. Nonetheless, a sealing order will be difficult to renew if it becomes disputed and if there are public interest factors that may trump commercial sensitivity.


1 [2009] O.J. No. 797 (February 26, 2009)

2 The enforceability of such a by‐law is questionable. For instance, the removal of a director by the board (as opposed to the members) does not appear to be permitted by the Ontario Corporations Act. This impediment may be overcome, however, by the directors personally agreeing to such a provision upon joining the board.

3 See OBCA ss. 140(1), (2), 144(1), 145(1); CBCA, ss. 20(1), (2), (4); 21 (1)

4 See Not‐for‐Profit Corporations Act, 2010, ss. 92, 95; Canada Corporations Act, ss. 109, 112

5 Canada Not‐for‐Profit Corporations Act, ss. 21(1), 22(1)

6 Icahn Partners LP v. Lions Gate Entertainment Corp., 2010 BCSC 1547 (CanLII)

7 (1982), 122 D.L.R. (3d) 385 (S.C.C.) at page 401‐402

8 [2002] 2 S.C.R. 522

9 Catalyst Fund Limited Partnership II v. Imax Corporation, 2008 CanLII 46325 (September 15, 2008)

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.