Canada: Dodd-Frank: Application of Corporate Governance, Securities Reform and Disclosure Requirements to Public Companies

Overview

The scope of the recently enacted Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act ("Dodd-Frank" or the "Act") extends beyond regulating the financial industry and includes a number of corporate governance, securities reform and disclosure requirements that will apply to public companies, including Canadian companies, with securities registered or traded in the United States. While certain provisions of the Act are effective immediately, a majority of the reforms will be implemented through regulatory action by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") or U.S. national securities exchanges. In most cases, the Act directs the regulatory agencies to adopt the implementing rules over the course of the next year. After adoption of these rules, the scope of the Dodd-Frank regulatory changes, as well as their application to Canadian companies, should become clearer.1

Most of the SEC and stock exchange rules mandated by Dodd-Frank will not apply to foreign private issuers ("FPIs"). For example, the Act includes substantial changes to U.S. proxy rules, especially with regard to disclosure of executive compensation matters and permitting proxy access for shareholders. Because FPIs are not subject to the U.S. proxy rules, these changes will not impose these obligations on FPIs. However, we anticipate that it will be advantageous for Canadian and other FPIs to keep abreast of the shifts in the regulatory environment that are generally applicable to the U.S. securities markets.

Other provisions of the Act will have a direct effect on FPIs and other non-U.S. issuers, including those relating to: (i) limitations on discretionary broker voting; (ii) changes to beneficial ownership reporting; (iii) whistleblower incentives and protections; (iv) credit rating agency reforms; and (v) new disclosure requirements directed at issuers in the mining industry. Whether Dodd-Frank's executive compensation "clawback" provisions will apply to FPIs will remain unclear until the SEC and the stock exchanges adopt their rules implementing the clawback provisions of the Act. A provision mandating independent compensation committees applies on its face to all public companies, including FPIs, but permits FPIs to satisfy the requirement through disclosure rather than compliance with its substantive requirements. Finally, this memorandum discusses some changes to rules regarding anti-fraud enforcement that we expect will be of interest to non-U.S. issuers. We have included at the end of this memorandum a chart listing the provisions of the Act discussed in this memorandum, the corresponding section references to the Act, a note indicating whether they apply to FPIs, the rulemaking deadlines regarding such sections imposed by the Act, and any corresponding dates from the SEC's recently announced (anticipated) rulemaking timeline.

Shareholder "Say" on Executive Compensation

"Say on Pay," "Say When on Pay" and "Say on Golden Parachutes"

The Act directs the SEC to adopt proxy rules that will provide shareholders with new advisory rights regarding various elements of executive compensation. Beginning with the first annual or other shareholder meeting occurring after January 21, 2011, and at least once every three years thereafter, companies subject to the U.S. proxy rules must submit a resolution on executive compensation to a non-binding shareholder vote (sometimes referred to as a "say on pay" vote). In addition, the frequency of the "say on pay" vote – whether every one, two or three years – will be subject to a separate shareholder vote (a "say when on pay" vote) that must occur at least once every six years. It is unclear from the Act whether the result of the "say when on pay" vote will also be non-binding.

Similarly, after January 21, 2011, any proxy materials relating to a business combination transaction must provide for a separate non-binding vote approving any "golden parachutes" that are part of the transaction (unless they were previously approved in a separate "say on pay" vote). The proxy statement must set out certain material terms of the golden parachutes, as specified by the disclosure rules to be adopted by the SEC. Like the "say on pay" and "say when on pay" votes, "golden parachute" votes will not overrule prior decisions of the company or the board of directors, nor will they create, change or imply any additional fiduciary duties. These voting requirements are also not intended to otherwise restrict shareholder proposals about executive compensation matters. Dodd-Frank expressly grants the SEC the authority to exempt an issuer or class of issuers from these voting requirements, and in making any such determination, the SEC is directed to take into consideration the possibility of a disproportionate burden on small issuers.

Institutional investment managers who are subject to reporting requirements under Section 13(f) of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act") must report, no less frequently than annually, how they voted on these executive compensation matters.

Independent Compensation Committees

Dodd-Frank requires the SEC to issue by July 16, 2011, rules requiring U.S. national stock exchanges to prohibit listing by any issuer that does not have an independent compensation committee. The SEC rules must define "independence," and directors will be required to satisfy that definition to serve on the compensation committee. The Act also provides that compensation committees must have authority to hire advisors and consultants, and are required to consider the independence of such advisors and consultants prior to engaging them.

This independence requirement will not apply to FPIs that provide annual disclosure to their shareholders of the reasons for not having an independent compensation committee. Certain other issuers, including controlled companies, limited partnerships and companies in bankruptcy proceedings, are also exempt from these independence requirements.

In addition, proxy statements for any meeting occurring after July 21, 2011, must disclose whether a compensation committee has obtained advice from a compensation advisor and, if so, whether the advisor was independent. If a conflict of interest exists, the proxy statement must disclose the conflict and discuss how it was addressed. As with the other amendments to the U.S. proxy rules, these changes will not apply to FPIs.

Pay versus Performance and Internal Pay Ratio Disclosures; Disclosure of Issuer's Hedging Policy

Dodd-Frank directs the SEC to amend the U.S. proxy rules to require additional executive compensation disclosures. In any proxy or consent solicitation materials for annual shareholder meetings, issuers must now include "information that shows the relationship between executive compensation actually paid and the financial performance of the issuer." The new rules will also require issuers to disclose: (i) the annual total compensation of the issuer's CEO (or CEO equivalent); (ii) the median annual total compensation of all other employees; and (iii) the ratio of the former to the latter. Beyond these few guidelines, the SEC has considerable discretion in structuring the internal pay ratio disclosure requirement, and some analysts have expressed concerns that gathering the data and performing the calculations to fulfill this requirement may place a considerable burden on issuers.

The new proxy rules will also require issuers to disclose in their annual proxy statements or consent solicitation materials whether any director or employee is permitted by the issuer to purchase financial instruments designed to hedge or offset decreases in the market value of directly or indirectly held issuer equity securities.

No specific timeframe is provided in the Act for implementation of the pay versus performance, internal pay ratio or hedging policy disclosure requirements. However, according to the SEC's recently announced timeline, these rules will not be in place for the 2011 proxy season. As noted above, these changes to the U.S. proxy rules will not apply to FPIs.

Compensation Clawback

Dodd-Frank directs the SEC and the stock exchanges to adopt rules requiring "clawback" of certain executive compensation by issuers that restate their financial statements. It is not clear from the Act whether such rules will apply to FPIs

Although the clawback provision of the Act does not exclude FPIs or any other issuer, the SEC and the stock exchanges may elect to create an express exemption for FPIs.

The Act directs the SEC to require that issuers of all listed securities include in their compensation policies a mandatory clawback of incentive-based compensation tied to reported financial information, and that these policies be disclosed. The clawback will be triggered automatically by a restatement of financial statements due to material noncompliance with financial reporting requirements under U.S. securities laws. Furthermore, the clawback policy must provide that, based on the corrections to the misstated financials, the issuer will recover any overpayment of incentive-based compensation to an executive officer during the three-year period prior to the date on which the issuer was required to prepare the restatement that triggered the clawback.

Dodd-Frank notably departs from the clawback rule in the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 ("Sarbanes-Oxley"), which applies when a company must restate its financial statements due to noncompliance with SEC reporting rules. While the Sarbanes-Oxley clawback applies only to the CEO and CFO associated with the noncompliant filing, Dodd-Frank expands the class of covered executives to include all present and former executive officers. In addition, while Sarbanes-Oxley requires disgorgement of incentive-based compensation and profits from sales of the issuer's securities within the 12-month period following the issuance or filing of the incorrect financial statements, Dodd-Frank applies retroactively to all incentive-based compensation paid over a three-year period. Moreover, unlike Sarbanes-Oxley, Dodd-Frank does not require any misconduct to trigger the clawback. A mere accounting error, if found to be materially non-compliant, will be sufficient to trigger the clawback remedy under Dodd-Frank. Commentators have suggested that, with as many as 650 companies filing restatements on an annual basis, the clawback provision may emerge as one the most consequential of the Act's securities reforms.

Shareholder Voting

Although Dodd-Frank includes a number of provisions regarding shareholder voting, the provision in the bill initially passed by the U.S. Senate requiring election of directors of U.S. public companies by majority vote was not included in the final version of the Act. Consequently, director election standards will continue to be governed by state corporate law. Other aspects of shareholder participation, however, will be governed by new Federal standards, as described below.

Proxy Access

Prior to the adoption of the Act, the SEC's authority to adopt rules that, for example, required proxy statements to include shareholder nominees, remained an open question. The Act confirms the authority of the SEC to make such rules but does not mandate SEC action in this area. In one of its first definitive responses to Dodd-Frank, the SEC exercised this discretionary authority by issuing shareholder proxy access rules on August 25, 2010.

However, these rules are not applicable to FPIs, which will continue to be governed by the proxy rules in their own countries.2

Discretionary Voting by Brokers ("Broker Non-Votes")

In a provision that does apply to FPIs, the Act directs the SEC to require national securities exchanges to adopt rules prohibiting brokers from voting shares without the beneficial owner's instructions in connection with: (i) director elections (except for uncontested elections at registered investment companies); (ii) votes on matters of executive compensation; or (iii) resolutions concerning "any other significant matter" as determined by the SEC. By way of example, under this provision, brokers will no longer be able to cast votes on "say on pay" resolutions, which were previously considered "routine" under stock exchange rules, without affirmative direction from the beneficial holders. In addition, the Act reserves for national securities exchanges the ability to prohibit broker discretionary voting on shareholder matters not covered by the Act. This provision, which is not conditioned on the adoption of SEC rules, became effective with the enactment of the Act.

Positions of Board Chairperson and CEO

The SEC is required to issue rules no later than January 17, 2011, requiring issuers to disclose in their annual proxy statements why they have chosen to combine or separate the positions of the board chairperson and the CEO. This change to the U.S. proxy rules will not apply to FPIs.

Additional Securities Laws Reforms

Beneficial Ownership Reporting

Dodd-Frank broadens the current beneficial ownership reporting requirements under Section 13 of the Exchange Act by providing that beneficial ownership may be obtained through the purchase or sale of a security-based swap, as the SEC may determine in accordance with rules that it is required to adopt. The SEC must also adopt rules providing for monthly disclosure of short positions by certain institutional investors.

The Act also authorizes, but does not require, the SEC to adopt rules accelerating the current 10-day filing deadline under Section 13(d) following acquisition of beneficial ownership of securities and for filing initial statements of beneficial ownership under Section 16 of the Exchange Act. The same provision of the Act eliminates the requirements in Sections 13(d) and 16 that beneficial ownership reports be provided to the issuer and the applicable stock exchange on which the securities are traded.

The changes to Section 13 of the Exchange Act will apply to shareholders of FPIs. Section 16 of the Exchange Act, however, does not apply to insiders of FPIs.

Whistleblower Incentives and Protections

As part of its efforts to strengthen enforcement measures, the Act creates a whistleblower "bounty fund" (the "Securities and Exchange Commission Investor Protection Fund"). Persons who voluntarily provide original, independently derived information to the SEC relating to U.S. securities law violations that result in penalties of greater than $1 million will be entitled to receive between 10 and 30 percent of the amount of those penalties, as determined by the SEC.

Whistleblowers are also granted enhanced protections against retaliation, including a private right of action and, under certain circumstances, extended limitations periods and provisions for jury trials. In addition, the Act reinforces the SEC's rules prohibiting the disclosure of any information regarding the whistleblower's identity until the start of enforcement proceedings.

The Act also amends Section 806 of Sarbanes-Oxley to include employees of consolidated subsidiaries and affiliates of public companies under the whistleblower protections already provided for employees of public companies.3 As the Act places no restrictions on the types of persons who will be protected, both U.S. and non-U.S. affiliates and their employees will presumably be included in these whistleblower protections.

These whistleblower incentive and protection rules are to be implemented by the SEC by April 18, 2011. Unless expressly exempted, FPIs will be subject to those rules.

Other Securities Reforms

Please see our September 7, 2010 Perspective, "Effects of Dodd-Frank on Advisors to Private Investment Funds," for a discussion of certain amendments to the U.S. Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended, and the rules under the U.S. Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act"), including those relating to the changes in the definition of "accredited investor" for purposes of the U.S. private placement rules.

Credit Rating Agencies

In connection with its reforms in credit rating agency regulation, the Act removes the exemption under Regulation FD under the Exchange Act, which prohibits the selective disclosure of information by public companies, for information conveyed to such agencies. As a result, information delivered to credit rating agencies may have to be disclosed contemporaneously to the public. We note that Regulation FD does not apply to FPIs.

More significantly, the Act nullifies Rule 436(g) under the Securities Act, which had exempted credit agencies that qualified as "nationally recognized statistical rating organizations" from the liability provisions of the Securities Act applicable to "experts." As a result, subject to certain limited exceptions, issuers may refer to a credit rating in a registration statement or prospectus filing only if the credit agency provides a written consent to the issuer's disclosure of that information and the consent is filed as an exhibit to the registration statement. By so consenting, a credit agency will be deemed an "expert" for purposes of the Securities Act, and thus will be subject to the same enhanced liability standards under the Securities Act for material misstatements or omissions as apply to other experts, such as public accounting firms and geological and other technical experts, whose reports are included or cited in prospectuses. In addition, the credit rating agency would be subject to the same enforcement and penalty provisions as those already applying under Federal securities laws to other experts.

In contrast with the U.S. rules, applicable Canadian securities laws expressly require credit rating disclosure in all prospectuses where the offered security has been rated and exempt credit rating agencies from providing their consent to that disclosure (which consent would make them "experts" for liability purposes). In the context of public cross-border securities offerings, particularly offerings conducted under the Canadian-U.S. Multijurisdictional Disclosure System (often referred to as "MJDS"), this disparity creates a legal tension in offering the securities in both jurisdictions. It remains to be seen how this potential tension will be resolved.

Mining Industry

High profile events in the mining industry influenced the inclusion of additional industryspecific reporting requirements in Dodd-Frank. These requirements generally apply to FPIs, although in some instances only to the issuer's mines that are located in the U.S., as explained further below.

Mine Safety

The Act requires disclosure by issuers and their subsidiaries regarding the operation of any mine that is subject to the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977 (the "FMSHA"). As FMSHA regulates only U.S. mines, this particular disclosure requirement applies only to mines located in the U.S. that are not otherwise exempt from the FMSHA. Most of the required disclosures involve violations cited, or sanctions imposed, by the Mine Safety and Health Administration pursuant to the FMSHA. Issuers subject to this provision must also report any legal actions pending before the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission (the "Mine Safety and Health Commission"). The Act's mining safety disclosure provisions became effective on August 20, 2011.

Most of the Act's mine safety-related disclosure requirements will apply to each periodic filing by the issuer, which, for most FPIs, will be their annual reports on Form 20-F or 40-F. Certain events, however, such as the receipt of an imminent danger order issued under the FMSHA or a written notice from the Mine Safety and Health Commission detailing a pattern of safety violations, require the issuer to make disclosures within four business days on a Form 8-K. Because FPIs are not required to file current reports on Form 8-K, the SEC is likely to require FPIs to provide this disclosure in their annual reports on Form 20-F or Form 40-F.

Extraction Payments

By April 17, 2011, the SEC must adopt rules requiring issuers to disclose in their annual reports filed with the SEC all taxes, royalties, fees and other material benefits, beyond de minimis amounts, paid or given by the issuer to any government, including the U.S. government, for the purpose of commercial development of oil, natural gas or minerals. The Act directs that issuers must make such disclosure with respect to payments to each country and in respect of each project. In further defining the types of payments to bedisclosed, the SEC is directed to consider the standards set by the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative.

The required information is to be submitted in an "interactive data format," according to standards established by the SEC. The Act directs the SEC to make the reported information publicly available online "to the extent practicable."

Conflict Minerals

As part of a larger strategy to "promote peace and security in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (the "DRC")," the Act requires the SEC to issue rules mandating additional disclosure requirements for all reporting companies that manufacture a product whose functionality or production depends on "conflict minerals" (which are defined as coltan, cassiterite, gold, wolframite or any other minerals or mineral derivatives whose trade is deemed by the U.S. Secretary of State to be funding the conflict in the DRC). The SEC must require companies to include in their annual reports filed with the SEC an independently audited report that describes the due diligence measures taken to ascertain the source and chain of custody of the covered minerals. This report must also be posted on the company's website. The "conflict minerals" rules must be issued by the SEC no later than April 17, 2011

Other Provisions of Interest

Exemptions from Auditor Attestation Reports:

Non-accelerated filers and smaller company issuers (generally, those with worldwide market capitalization of less than $75 million), including FPIs, are permanently exempted by the Act from the requirement to provide an auditor attestation report on internal controls pursuant to Section 404(b) of Sarbanes-Oxley. On September 15, 2010, the SEC amended its rules to effect this exemption. In addition, the SEC is to complete a study by April 11, 2011, identifying ways to reduce the Section 404(b) compliance burden on mid-sized companies, i.e., those with market capitalizations of between $75 million and $250 million.

Broader Enforcement of Anti-Fraud Provisions: The Act expands the jurisdiction of the SEC and the U.S. Department of Justice in actions alleging violations of the U.S. Federal securities laws where the impugned conduct (i) takes place within the U.S. and constitutes "significant steps in furtherance of the violation," even if the securities transaction itself occurs outside the U.S. and involves only foreign investors, or (ii) occurs outside the U.S. but has "a foreseeable substantial effect" within the U.S.4

The Act also expands the SEC's enforcement authority by amending the standard of liability for aiding and abetting securities violations. Prior to the enactment of Dodd-Frank, establishing a claim of aiding and abetting securities fraud required proving that the actor knowingly provided assistance to another person's violation. That standard has been revised to include persons who knowingly or recklessly provide such assistance. The Act also confirms the SEC's ability to bring an enforcement action on the basis of "control person" liability.

Conclusion

As discussed above, Dodd-Frank includes a significant number of changes to the U.S. Federal securities laws and corporate governance rules in the United States. In light of the substantial role that the SEC and the stock exchanges will play in implementing and enforcing the rules required by Dodd-Frank, much of the ultimate impact of the Act will remain unclear until the rule-making deadlines approach. Even beyond those deadlines, as securities regulators and stock exchanges in other countries begin to consider similar reforms, the Act's consequences may affect non-U.S. issuers in unanticipated ways

Dodd-Frank Timeline and Section References

SUBJECT MATTER

DODD-

FRANK §

 

APPLICABLE TO FPIS?

 

STATUTORY DEADLINE

 

SEC'S PROJECTED TIMELINE5

 

Say on Pay / Say When on

Pay / Say on Golden

Parachutes

 

951

No

Effective starting Jan. 21, 2011.

 

Oct.-Dec. 2010: propose rules.

Jan.-Mar. 2011: adopt rules.

 

Independent

Compensation

Committees

 

952

No6

SEC to issue

rules by July

16, 2011.

 

Oct.-Dec. 2010: propose rules.

Apr.-July 2011: adopt rules.

 

Pay versus Performance

953 (a)

No

Not specified

Apr.-July 2011: propose rules.

Internal Pay Ratio

953 (b)

No

Not specified

Apr.-July 2011: propose rules.

 

Hedging

955

No

Not specified

Apr.-July 2011: propose rules.

 

Compensation Clawback

954

Unclear

Not specified

Apr.-July 2011: propose rules.

 

Proxy Access

971

No

Not specified

Aug. 25, 2010: rules adopted.

 

Discretionary Broker

Voting

 

957

Yes

Effective as of

July 21, 2010.

 

Apr.-July 2011: propose rules

defining "other significant matters."

 

Board Chairperson / CEO

Positions

 

972

No

SEC to issue

rules by Jan.

17, 2011.

 

[Timeline for rule implementation not

yet announced by the SEC.]

 

Beneficial Ownership

Reporting

- Swaps

- Short Positions

- Accelerated Filings

 

766

929X

929R

 

Yes

Not specified

Oct.-Dec. 2010: adopt interim

reporting rules regarding swaps.

Apr.-July 2011: adopt final rules

regarding swaps.

 

Whistleblowers

- Generally

- Subsidiary Employees

 

922

929A

 

Yes

SEC to issue

rules by Apr.

18, 2011.

 

Oct.-Dec. 2010: propose rules.

Jan.-Mar. 2011: adopt rules.

 

Credit Rating Agencies

Title IX,

Subtitle C

 

Yes

Effective as of

July 21, 2010.

 

Oct.-Dec. 2010: remove Reg. FD

exemption.

[The SEC has stated that it may

provide further clarification regarding

the repeal of Rule 436(g) of the

Securities Act; however, no timeline

has been provided.]

 

Mining Disclosures

- Mine Safety

- Extraction Payments /

Conflict Minerals

 

1503

1502 /

1504

 

Yes

Mine safety

effective as of

Aug. 20, 2010.

SEC to issue all

rules by Apr.

17, 2011.

 

Oct.-Dec. 2010: propose rules.

Jan.-Mar. 2011: adopt rules.

[Although the mine safety provision

is technically already in effect, the

SEC plans to issue rules for all the

mining provisions at the same time.]

Footnotes

1. In general, the Act's provisions that are directed primarily at financial institutions are beyond the scope of this memorandum, although some of the Act's provisions may extend to financial institutions that are foreign private issuers. For a discussion of other aspects of Dodd-Frank applicable to private investment funds, please see our September 7, 2010 Perspective, "Effects of Dodd-Frank on Advisors to Private Investment Funds."

2. The key aspects of these new rules are discussed in our "FLASH: SEC Adopts Final Rules for Shareholder Proxy Access" (Aug. 26, 2010

3. Previously, some courts had declined to extend these protections to the subsidiary level.

4. Because the provision applies only to actions brought by governmental agencies, it does not affect the U.S. Supreme Court's recent decision in Morrison v. National Australia Bank, Ltd., slip op. No. 18-1191 (U.S. June 24, 2010), which concerned the scope of private rights of action over non-U.S. securities transactions. The Court ruled that private party fraud claims could be brought under U.S. securities laws only where the transaction either occurred in the U.S. or involved the purchase or sale of a security listed on a U.S. stock exchange. Although Dodd-Frank does not overturn this decision, it does provide for an SEC study of whether it should be overturned to extend the extraterritorial jurisdiction of U.S. courts over securities fraud cases to private rights of action as well. Several commenters have noted that, even with regard to actions brought by governmental agencies, the Act's expansion of "jurisdiction" may not address the Morrison majority's conclusion that the substance of the Exchange Act's anti-fraud provisions, rather than a lack of jurisdiction, precluded a private right of action with respect to a non-U.S. transaction involving non-U.S.-listed securities

5. Timeline through July 2011, as posted by the SEC on its website on September 23, 2010.

6. The provision does not apply to FPIs if an alternative disclosure is made, as described above.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions