Canada: BCSC Releases Reasons in Lions Gate Decision

Last Updated: August 17 2010
Most Read Contributor in Canada, September 2016

Article by Michael T. Waters , Paul A.D. Mingay , Nigel P. Cave and David R. Surat and

On July 27, 2010, the British Columbia Securities Commission released reasons of the majority of the panel supporting its April 27, 2010, decision to ceasetrade the Lions Gate shareholder rights plan. In its reasons the BCSC held that:

  • A shareholder rights plan will only be tolerated where the plan provides a target board of directors with additional time to seek an improved or alternative transaction. Otherwise, there is no basis for allowing a shareholder rights plan to continue.
  • It is in the public interest that each shareholder of a target company ultimately be given the opportunity to decide whether or not to accept or reject a bid, notwithstanding the conclusions of a target company's board of directors, or the views of a majority of the target company's shareholders. In other words, the BCSC is of the view that a plan may not be used as a "just say no" defence to a take-over bid.

The reasons of the final Commissioner who concurred in the result will be released at a future date. In our May 2010 Mergers & Acquisitions Alert (available here) we noted the BCSC's reservations regarding the Alberta Securities Commission's 2007 decision in Pulse Data Inc. and the Ontario Securities Commission's 2009 decision in Neo Material Technologies Inc. With the benefit of the BCSC's majority reasons, it is now clear that a divide has emerged in the interpretative approaches adopted by the BCSC, on the one hand, and the ASC and OSC, on the other, in their treatment of shareholder rights plans and their interpretation of National Policy 62-202 Take-Over Bids – Defensive Tactics. This split could have significant consequences for British Columbia issuers faced with a hostile bid.

The split with Alberta and Ontario

In Pulse and Neo, the ASC and OSC held that, in appropriate circumstances, Canadian securities regulators ought to defer to a target board's decision to leave a shareholder rights plan in place in the face of a hostile bid. Both decisions were driven by unique circumstances.

In both cases, the rights plans were "tactical" rights plans, adopted by the target board after the announcement of the hostile bid. Tactical rights plans have historically faced intense scrutiny from Canadian regulators, however, in both cases the target boards had sought, and secured, shareholder approval of the rights plans before the rights plan hearing. This was the critical factor for both panels. In the end, both panels stated that they were reluctant to interfere with the decision of a target board where the decision reflected the board's reasonable business judgement in its attempt to fulfil its fiduciary duty, and where the decision to maintain the shareholder rights plan had very recently been approved by informed shareholders.

Following the example of the Pulse and Neo target boards, the Lions Gate board adopted a tactical shareholder rights plan ten days after the Icahn take-over bid, and called a shareholders' meeting for May 4, 2010, to seek shareholder approval. Icahn subsequently varied its bid, increasing the offering price, converting the bid to an all share bid, and extending the expiry date of the bid to April 30, 2010, just four days before the Lions Gate shareholders' meeting.

At the hearing, Lions Gate argued that the Pulse and Neo decisions supported their position that recent, informed shareholder approval was a relevant consideration, and that the BCSC ought not consider cease trading the Lions Gate shareholder rights plan until shareholders had the opportunity to express their views at the meeting. The BCSC was unmoved and immediately cease traded the Lions Gate rights plan

Protecting the bona fide interests of shareholders

National Policy 62-202 states that the primary objective of the take-over bid provisions of Canadian securities legislation is the protection of the bona fide interests of the shareholders of the target company.

The BCSC adopted the view, articulated in some of the earliest shareholder rights plan decisions, that the public interest lies in upholding the rights of individual shareholders of a target company to exercise one of the fundamental rights of share ownership – the ability to dispose of shares as one wishes. The BCSC found that the continued operation of the Lions Gate shareholder rights plan would deny Lions Gateshareholders the opportunity to respond to the Icahn bid. In the absence of any attempt by the target board to seek improved or alternative transactions, there was no basis to interfere with each shareholder's right to decide whether to tender to the bid. Accordingly, the plan was cease traded.

Both the ASC and OSC concluded that their public interest jurisdiction required them to consider the interests of target shareholders as a whole, as well as the rights of individual shareholders. In Pulse, the ASC found that recent and informed target shareholder approval, given the absence of imminent alternatives to the offer in question, demonstrated that the continuation of the target rights plan was in the bona fide interests of the target shareholders. Noting that the Canadian take-over bid regime and National Policy 62-202 are both premised on the concept that an individual's rights of share ownership are subject to reasonable restrictions, the OSC adopted similar reasoning in Neo.

The BCSC acknowledged that shareholder approval of a rights plan could be relevant to the Commission's determination of whether it was time for a rights plan to go. For example, a rights plan without shareholder approval will generally be suspect. Further, a negative vote by shareholders may lead a commission to cease to trade the plan even in circumstances where it would otherwise be prepared to give the board additional time. However, in circumstances where the board is not actively seeking alternatives, there is no legitimate purpose for a rights plan and shareholder approval is not relevant.

Reconciling National Policy 62-202 with a target board's fiduciary duty

National Policy 62-202 has been in force since 1997, and continues the policy stated in its predecessor, National Policy 38, adopted in 1986. The policy codifies the view that unrestricted auctions produce the most desirable results in take-over bids, and that defensive tactics may be taken by a target board in a genuine attempt to obtain a better bid.

This policy has been criticized by commentators who suggest that the regulators should allow target boards more leeway to defend against a bid where they consider that it is not in the best interests of the corporation.

In contrast to the more traditional approach adopted by the BCSC, both the ASC and OSC were prepared to defer to the target board where the decision to implement a shareholder rights plan in the face of a hostile bid reflected the reasonable business judgement of a target board in its attempt to fulfil its fiduciary duty.

In reaching its conclusion in Neo the OSC relied on the Supreme Court of Canada's clarification of a board's fiduciary duty in the BCE decision. While acknowledging that, in many instances, a primary purpose for adopting a shareholder rights plan is to allow the target board to pursue alternative valueenhancing transactions, the OSC held that this is not the only legitimate purpose for a shareholder rights plan. Instead, citing the Supreme Court's statements in BCE, and the established body of corporate case law on the subject, the OSC held that a shareholder rights plan may be adopted for the broader purpose of protecting the long-term interests of shareholders, where, in the directors' reasonable business judgement, the implementation of a rights plan would be in the best interests of the corporation and shareholders as a whole.

The BCSC held that, whatever doubt there may be in the interpretation of National Policy 62-202, the body of decisions by Canadian securities commissions makes clear that the only reason a Canadian securities regulator will tolerate a shareholder rights plan is to give the target company board time to discharge its fiduciary duty; and the focus of that duty is to improve the existing bid, or to find a better one. Whether a target board complies with its broader duty to act in the best interests of the corporation is at best a "neutral factor". "Proper behaviour is expected; behaving properly is therefore not a factor of allowing a [shareholder rights plan] to continue." In effect, the BCSC is saying that directors are expected to fulfill their fiduciary duty, but a shareholders rights plan is not a tool that is available to them, as a matter of securities law, unless they are actively seeking improved or alternative bids.

Consequences for future decisions

In each of the Pulse, Neo and Lions Gate decisions, the target board of directors expressed concern that the bid in question could be used to facilitate a "creeping take-over" of the target company. Faced with the very real possibility of creeping take-over bids, both the ASC and OSC held it was appropriate to defer to a target board's decision to leave a shareholder rights plan in place in the face of a hostile bid where this decision was supported by recent, informed shareholder ratification. In appropriate circumstances, this approach allows target boards in these jurisdictions to mount a successful defence against a creeping take-over bid.

The BCSC's decision in Lions Gate suggests that this mechanism is not available to British Columbia issuers or their shareholders.

These two approaches appear to be at odds. In view of the uncertainty, it appears likely that target boards will continue to put tactical shareholder rights plans to a shareholder vote if the opportunity arises. It will be interesting to see whether Commission staff and adjudicative panels in the future are persuaded to continue to develop the more deferential approach suggested by the Pulse and Neo decisions or accept the more traditional view articulated by the BCSC in Lions Gate. We have yet to see the minority reasons in Lions Gate, but it seems likely that they will provide an additional dimension to this debate.

The Canadian securities regulators have expressed reservations about setting policy through adjudicative decisions. If the law in this area continues to diverge, it may lead to public consultations or a revisiting of National Policy 62-202.

The BCSC's majority reasons are available on its website.

About BLG

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.