Canada: Appeal Court Orders Retrial On Heron Bay

Last Updated: August 12 2010
Article by Elinore J. Richardson

Most Read Contributor in Canada, September 2016

In a judgment in Heron Bay Investments Ltd. v. The Queen (2010 FCA 203), delivered on July 26, 2010, the Canadian Federal Court of Appeal found that there was a "want of procedural fairness" in the proceedings of the Tax Court which resulted in its decision of September 8, 2009 (2009 TCC 337) and, as requested by the appellant, Heron Bay, in its pleadings, returned the matter to the Tax Court "for retrial by a different judge".

The case concerned a deduction for doubtful/bad debts claimed for tax purposes by Heron Bay in the amount of $3,770 million in its return for its taxation year ended August 31, 1995. Heron Bay was a member of the Conservancy Group of related companies controlled by four brothers. In November of 1994, it made a loan in the amount of the claim to Viewmark Homes Ltd., another member of the Conservancy Group, to assist it in financing the acquisition of a significant interest (95%) in real property acquired for $24.5 million in a series of transactions. The purchase price was later, based on independent valuations, determined to be inflated in that the value of the real property ($17,235 million) was significantly less than the price agreed.

Heron Bay, in order to support the claimed deduction, was required under the relevant provisions of the Canadian tax legislation to establish that its ordinary business included the lending of money in the year in which the deduction was claimed, that the loan contracted with Viewmark was made in the ordinary course of that lending business, and that at the end of its taxation year in respect of which the claim was made, there was a reasonable doubt as to whether the loan would be collectible.

The Tax Court found that Heron Bay was in the ordinary business of lending money but found that Heron Bay did not meet the second and third conditions necessary as the basis for the claim.

While the substantive questions in the case are also relevant, the principal argument made by Heron Bay, as appellant before the Federal Court of Appeal, was that the judge in the Tax Court deprived Heron Bay of procedural fairness by considering authorities not cited by either party without giving the parties an opportunity to make submissions on those authorities, by considering issues not pleaded by either party without giving the parties the opportunity to make submissions on those issues and by intervening excessively in the examination of witnesses giving rise to an apprehension of bias.

The judgment of the Federal Court of Appeal is interesting in that it carefully considers each of the complaints of the appellant and in so doing, provides some useful guidelines as to the role that a judge may play in court proceedings and as to what extent a judge may consider external references and issues not pleaded by a party to a dispute before the court.

The Federal Court of Appeal found in regard to the first complaint of Heron Bay that the Tax Court judge did not exceed the bounds of procedural fairness.

A breach of procedural fairness might have been demonstrated if the judge, by his reference to any of the 16 authorities referred to above, had introduced a principle of law that was not raised by either party expressly or by necessary implication, or had taken the case on a substantially new and different analytical path. para [24]

In regard to the second complaint pleaded by Heron Bay, that the judge had introduced a provision of the tax legislation (section 69) into the decision which was not pleaded by either party, the Federal Court of Appeal agreed with Heron Bay that the introduction of section 69 without inviting submissions from the parties was a breach of the rules of procedural fairness but agreed also with the Crown, and this was determinative, that "this breach did not result in a detriment to Heron Bay" and therefore did not justify a retrial.

The Federal Court of Appeal did, however, find for Heron Bay in regard to the third complaint in its pleadings. Heron Bay specifically argued that the judge's interventions in the examinations of Sheldon Libfeld, its only lay witness, raised issues of apprehension of bias. No allegation of actual bias was made. In this regard, the Court held that the Tax Court judge seemed to fall into the habit of "taking over the questioning", and more importantly, that "it is sufficiently clear from the judge's reasons that the evidence of Mr. Libfeld elicited by the judge provided the evidentiary base upon which the judge relied for a critical conclusion in favour of the Crown". The Court also noted that, in reproducing the information in the decision, the Tax Court judge omitted both the part of the record that indicated the information had been elicited by him and a further response of the witness that had a bearing on the conclusion reached.

The Court, also found that failure by a counsel to object to the conduct of the judge during the Tax Court proceedings, which was argued by the Crown as barring the appellant's right to raise the matter on appeal, was "significantly outweighed by the judge's use of the transcripts" in arriving at his conclusions.

The Federal Court of Appeal found that as a result of this procedural flaw the Trial Court judgment could not stand.

The record is such as to give a reasonable and well-informed observer the impression that the judge, during the examination of Mr. Libfeld and as a result of his own questioning, adopted a position in opposition to Heron Bay on a critical issue in the case, giving rise to a reasonable apprehension that the judge was not a fair and impartial arbiter. para [57]

The judgment may well have been a victory for Heron Bay but it remains, now, for it to again present its arguments in another trial before the Tax Court on the substantive issues. This is the second time that the Federal Court of Appeal has sent a matter back to the Tax Court in recent weeks. In the first case, GlaxoSmithKline v. The Queen (2010 FCA 201), the Court referred the matter back to the lower court on the basis that the trial judge had heard significant evidence presented at trial on the substantive issues and was, therefore, better able, with the benefit of the Court's Reasons, to make the determinations necessary on those substantive issues. In Heron Bay, the appellant pleaded, as a second basis of the appeal, that the judge in the Tax Court had erred in law in his decision. The Federal Court of Appeal made no finding on error in law. Similar issues remain to be decided on a further appeal to the same Court in General Electric Capital Canada Inc. v. The Queen (2008 DTC 3576) which has yet to be heard by the Court. It is of note, however, that the Appellant's Memorandum of Fact and Law in the General Electric case argues error of law as the first basis for its appeal and, as an alternative only, requests referral of the matter back for a new trial before a different judge of the Tax Court on the basis of interference with due process. It remains to be seen what the response of the Federal Court of Appeal will be in that case.

About BLG

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.