Canada: "Smith v. Inco": Environmental Class Action First

Last Updated: July 22 2010
Article by Gabrielle K. Kramer and Barry Glaspell

Most Read Contributor in Canada, November 2017

The July 6, 2010 decision of the Ontario Superior Court in Smith v. Inco is Canada's first environmental class action trial decision from a common law province. The Court awarded $36 million to approximately 7000 property owners for loss in property values attributable to nuisance and strict liability, arising from nickel contamination.

The Plaintiffs alleged that nickel emissions from Inco's Port Colborne refinery caused soil contamination on neighbouring properties. Public disclosures regarding the nickel contamination in September 2000 were alleged to have negatively affected values of class members' properties.

The Court was faced with the difficult task of adjudicating a claim twenty six years after the Inco refinery operations were concluded — more recent public announcements were alleged to have triggered a decline in property values in Port Colborne.

The Court's decision may be vulnerable on appeal in that Inco had not caused new contamination for 16 years at the time of the public disclosures; the fact of the contamination was arguably known prior to 2000 creating limitations issues; and the market evidence does not appear to establish on a balance of probabilities a causal connection between the loss in property values and the public disclosure.

Claims Not Statute-Barred

Inco operated its property as a refinery between 1918 and 1984, when it ceased all refining. It was common ground that the nickel contamination found on neighbouring properties largely originated from the Inco refinery. There were no new deposits by Inco after 1984. The Ministry of Environment (MOE) commenced testing of air, vegetation and soil in the 1970s. The MOE tested the surrounding soils in 1972, 1975, 1983, 1991 and 1998.

In November 1976, the MOE published the results of soil tests taken at 21 properties in the vicinity of Inco. The readings ranged between 3,000 and 6,000 parts-per-million (ppm), with one reading at 16,500 ppm. Elsewhere most readings were in the range of 1,000 to 6,000 ppm with one reading of 24,000 ppm. These were substantial exceedences measured against the MOE guideline of 200 ppm. It is not clear whether individual owners received copies of the report, although it is expected that they would have been entitled to the results.

An owner reviewing the report would have been alerted to the fact that there were nickel deposits exceeding the MOE standard by as much as 120 times. It is strongly arguable that knowledge of the exceedence is knowledge of the property damage sufficient to found a claim.

After Inco shut down its refining operations in 1984, the MOE conducted further studies. In 1991, the MOE performed a large scale study to determine the nickel soil footprint around Inco. A July 1994 report concluded that the "soil to at least 10 centimetres in depth was severely contaminated with nickel". Severe contamination is property damage. Nickel in the soil exceeded the MOE guideline in 36 of 37 test sites. The highest reading was 9,750 ppm southwest of the refinery, relative to the guideline level of 200 ppm. Property owners who had made a specific complaint would have received a copy of the report. However, there were no studies linking the property damage to health risks at that time. A copy of the report was available in the Port Colborne library.

A 1998 MOE study of 80 properties released in January 2000 showed nickel levels exceeding 14,000 ppm in certain properties, while the guideline level for nickel contamination remained at 200 ppm. The MOE then initiated a human health risk assessment (HHRA). The 2000 MOE report showed two nickel hot spots, the highest levels of concentration being in the range of 15,000 ppm. The judge took that report as the beginning of time for discovering the claim.

In March 2002, as a result of the HHRA a soil "intervention level" for nickel was set at 8,000 ppm to "protect toddler aged children". Inco was ordered by MOE to remediate properties with a nickel level higher than 8,000 ppm. Twenty-five properties were designated for remediation. All except the representative Plaintiff's property have been remediated.

The Court concluded that publication of results by the MOE and the Public Health Department triggered the Plaintiff's claim to damages. The Plaintiff lead evidence that the publication resulted in a drop in property values. The Court appears to have conflated the damage completed no later than 1984 by Inco, with the publication of test results by governmental bodies 16 years later. The Court accepted that the average person in the class could not reasonably have known about the impact on property value until 2000. However, the better question would have been, could a Plaintiff class member reasonably have known that their property was damaged prior to 2000? Based on the MOE publications, it would have been possible for the Court to conclude that such knowledge was available.

Rylands v. Fletcher Liability Found

The Plaintiff's claim had two common law bases. Firstly, the court found that Inco was strictly liable for bringing nickel onto its land to refine it and creating airborne nickel particles which were deposited on neighbouring properties. These deposits constituted a non-natural use of the property and created an increased danger to others, satisfying the first element of Rylands v. Fletcher strict liability. The nickel deposits had the potential to do damage, satisfying the second element of Rylands.

The trial judge specifically rejected Inco's argument that Rylands v. Fletcher is restricted to an isolated escape. The judge concluded that if an unnatural substance is brought onto a property which creates a potential danger for a neighbour, and the substance escapes and causes damage, then there is no reason to restrict Rylands v. Fletcher to a single isolated escape. Further, he explained that strict liability supplants negligence and nuisance for "abnormally dangerous activities."


The Plaintiff also sought damages for injury to property caused by Inco's nuisance. The judge accepted that physical damage was caused by the deposit of nickel onto the soil. The judge concluded that physical damage to the neighbouring properties was "material" if the amount that accumulated was such as to negatively affect the value of the property. Inco unsuccessfully argued that a class member is not entitled to make a claim for diminution of property value unless they had sold or attempted to sell the property. On an alternative analysis, the Court could have found that property was damaged when it was "severely contaminated"; however, this analysis would have likely resulted in the claims being out of time.


The judge assumed "two common sense causal connections" existed as between negative publicity regarding soil contamination and property values:

  1. The value of residential property is reduced if located close to a large industrial operation. Depression of values existed long before any negative publicity about nickel in the soil in Port Colborne.
  2. Environmental contamination in a community negatively affects residential property values.


While the trial held that negative publicity and public disclosures of the nickel contamination starting in the year 2000 logically caused a negative effect on residential property values in Port Colborne, the expert evidence also suggested other trends that may not have been fully canvassed by the Court. The Plaintiff's expert used Municipal Property Assessment Corporation (MPAC) data from 1996 to 2008 to do a statistical analysis comparing changes in property values in Port Colborne with those in Welland, a neighbouring community. The MPAC data showed that property values in Port Colborne actually increased between 1996 and 2003, relative to Welland. After 2003, the increase in values in Port Colborne slowed down relative to Welland. The continued increase in values may not be consistent with the publications in 2000 triggering a loss in property value. It suggests the influence of other market factors that are not reflected in the Court's decision.

The defence tendered evidence that Port Colborne property values actually outperformed Welland sale prices after 2004. This suggests that there was no permanent loss in value to the Port Colborne properties. The trial concluded that the Plaintiff had proved, on a balance of probabilities, that the negative publicity and public disclosures after September 2000 significantly affected property values in an area closest to the refinery, somewhat less so further away from the refinery, and had only a slight effect on the property values in another segment further still from the refinery.

The current decision does not address who will be entitled to the receipt of the damages. Many of the properties may have changed hands between 2000 and the date of trial. Further transfers between the date of the decision, and a likely appeal, can also be anticipated, exacerbating the difficulty of making this determination.

About BLG

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:
  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.
  • Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.
    If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here
    If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq you may opt out by clicking here

    Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

    Use of

    You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


    Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

    The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


    Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

    • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
    • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
    • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

    Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

    Information Collection and Use

    We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

    We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

    Mondaq News Alerts

    In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


    A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

    Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

    Log Files

    We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


    This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

    Surveys & Contests

    From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


    If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


    From time to time Mondaq may send you emails promoting Mondaq services including new services. You may opt out of receiving such emails by clicking below.

    *** If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of services offered by Mondaq you may opt out by clicking here .


    This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

    Correcting/Updating Personal Information

    If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

    Notification of Changes

    If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

    How to contact Mondaq

    You can contact us with comments or queries at

    If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.

    By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions