Canada: Stripped Interest Coupon Planning not Subject to GAAR

On May 17, 2010, the Federal Court of Appeal allowed the taxpayer's appeal in Lehigh Cement Limited v. The Queen, holding that the general anti-avoidance rule ("GAAR") did not apply to a series of transactions through which Lehigh's interest payments on debt held by a related non-resident corporation were paid free of withholding tax to an arm's length non-resident bank. The debt restructuring was carried out to access the "5/25" withholding tax exemption for interest paid at arm's length on corporate debt formerly provided under subparagraph 212(1)(b)(vii) of the Income Tax Act (Canada). The 5/25 exemption was replaced in 2008 with a much broader withholding tax exemption for non-participating interest paid to an arm's length person.

The case is important for both broad and narrow reasons. Broadly, the case provides clear confirmation that any doubt as to whether a transaction is abusive must be resolved in the taxpayer's favour and it provides an example of how one goes about determining the purpose of a statutory provision. Narrowly, the case's reasoning implies that stripping interest coupons on non-participating debt owed to related persons may be an effective withholding tax reduction strategy under current rules. It remains to be seen whether the case will be appealed to the Supreme Court of Canada.

Lehigh, a member of an international corporate group led by a German parent, borrowed $140 million from a consortium of Canadian banks in 1986 (the "Lehigh Debt"). Sometime after 1986, the Lehigh Debt was acquired by the Lehigh group. Prior to the 1997 restructuring, Lehigh withheld Canadian nonresident withholding tax on interest payments made to a related Belgian corporation which held the Lehigh Debt. In 1997, the terms of the Lehigh Debt were amended to change the interest rate from the Canadian prime rate at that time (4.75%) to a fixed rate of 7% for the first five years (the then market rate), and to provide that Lehigh was not obliged to repay more than 25% of the principal amount within five years from the time the debt was amended (to fit within the 5/25 exemption). The Belgian corporation was also granted the right to, and did, sell all of its right to interest payable on the Lehigh Debt to an arm's length Belgian bank. Following the restructuring, Lehigh paid directly to the Belgian bank all interest payable on the Lehigh Debt and did not withhold any amount in respect of the interest payments on the basis that the 5/25 exemption applied.

The Minister reassessed Lehigh for failure to withhold and remit withholding tax on the interest payments on the basis that the GAAR applied. The Crown argued that the 5/25 exemption was not intended to benefit a non-resident person who is legally entitled to be paid interest on a debt as a result of a transaction by which the right to be paid the interest is split from the right to be paid the principal amount. Since the restructured loan did not result in Lehigh accessing funds in the international capital markets, it was inconsistent with the underlying rationale of the 5/25 exemption.

As the taxpayer had conceded that the restructuring of the Lehigh Debt was an avoidance transaction intended to achieve the tax benefit of avoiding non-resident withholding tax on interest payments, the Court focused on whether there was abusive tax avoidance. Following the principles established by the Supreme Court of Canada in Canada Trustco Mortgage Co. v. The Queen, the Court conducted a textual, contextual and purposive analysis of the 5/25 exemption to determine whether the tax benefit would be inconsistent with the object, spirit or purpose of the exemption.

The Court noted that the wording of the exemption was broad enough to include any interest payable by a Canadian resident corporation to a non-resident, "no matter how the non-resident may have become entitled to receive that interest". The exemption also required the arm's length test to be met only in respect of the relationship between the person required to pay the interest and the person entitled to be paid the interest, and not in respect of the relationship between the person required to pay the principal amount of the debt and the person entitled to be paid the principal amount of the debt. The Court also commented that the splitting of interest and principal on a debt is a long-standing practice in commercial financing transactions and that there was no evidence that the restructuring of the Lehigh Debt was unusual. Furthermore, Parliament was aware that these transactions existed in 1975 when the 5/25 exemption was first enacted, as the Act provided for the predecessor rule to section 240 of the Act (which deals with the stripping of interest coupons).

Reviewing the evidence presented by the Crown, the Court found that the Crown's argument that the purpose of the 5/25 exemption was to enable Canadian corporations to access funds in international capital markets was based on the following sentence from a brief description of the first version of the 5/25 exemption contained in the 1975 Federal Budget papers:

"The proposed relief from withholding tax is intended to increase the flexibility of Canadian business to plan long-term debt financing and facilitate access to funds in international capital markets".

In the Court's view, the Crown's reliance on the 1975 budget papers was a "shaky foundation" and an insufficient basis on which to apply the GAAR to the restructuring of the Lehigh Debt. The Crown's argument found no other support in either the Act, the jurisprudence or any other authority. The Court noted that while a transaction may misuse a statutory exemption containing bright line tests (e.g., the arm's length and five-year tests for the 5/25 exemption) since Parliament cannot possibly describe every transaction inside or outside of the intended scope of the exemption, claiming an exemption in an unforeseen or novel manner does not necessarily mean that the exemption has been misused. Accordingly, the Crown cannot meet its burden of proving a misuse by simply asserting that the transaction was unforeseen or exploited a legislative loophole.

The Court also noted an "irreconcilable inconsistency" in the Crown's argument, as the Crown had conceded that, in contrast to the Lehigh Debt restructuring, the GAAR would not apply to a hypothetical sale by the Belgian corporation to the Belgian Bank of the right to be paid both the principal amount of, and the interest on, the Lehigh Debt. As the hypothetical sale would not have enabled Lehigh to access funds in the international capital markets, the Court concluded that there was no relevant distinction, in terms of the underlying rationale of the 5/25 exemption, between the hypothetical sale and the Lehigh Debt restructuring. The lack of such a distinction was similarly fatal to the Crown's argument that the restructuring of the Lehigh Debt was abusive on the basis that the corporate group was able to extract part of Lehigh's Canadian source profits free of Canadian withholding tax.

Finally, the Court concluded that there was no merit to the Crown's argument that the 5/25 exemption was misused based on the assertion that while the exemption was intended to reduce the cost of borrowing, the interest rate on the Lehigh Debt was increased from 4.75% to 7%. In the Court's view, the fact that the 5/25 exemption applied only if the interest payer and the interest recipient dealt at arm's length with each other indicated Parliament's intention that "the exemption be available only where the relationship between payer and payee provided some assurance that the rate of interest would reflect a fair market rate". In any event, the Court concluded that it was not reasonable to conclude that the 7% interest rate was abusive since it was a fair market rate.

The Lehigh decision provides a detailed and reasoned analysis of the misuse or abuse test under the GAAR (following the analytical framework mandated by Canada Trustco) and emphasizes that it is the Crown's responsibility to provide sufficient evidence and reasoned argument to meet its burden of establishing the purpose and misuse/abuse of the statutory provision(s) at issue.

To read the full text of the Federal Court of Appeal's decision in Lehigh, please click here .

About BLG

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions