Canada: Tax Court of Canada Rules U.S. Limited Liability Company is Treaty Resident

On April 8, 2010, the Tax Court of Canada held that a U.S. limited liability company (LLC) was "liable to tax" in, and therefore a resident of, the United States for purposes of the Canada-United States Income Tax Convention (the Treaty). The case overturns the long-established position of the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) that LLCs that are fiscally transparent for U.S. tax purposes cannot be U.S. residents for purposes of the Treaty, a position that had greater relevance prior to the Fifth Protocol to the Treaty (which did not apply to the taxation years at issue). The taxpayer was represented by Osler's Al Meghji , Patrick Marley and Pooja Samtani .

In TD Securities (USA) LLC v. The Queen , the Court concluded that TD Securities (USA) LLC (TD LLC) was a U.S. resident since the United States retained and exercised jurisdiction to tax the worldwide income of TD LLC on a comprehensive basis, notwithstanding that such taxation occurred only at the level of its U.S. resident member.

Background Facts

TD LLC was originally formed as a U.S. corporation, and converted into a Delaware limited liability company, a form of business organization that is recognized as a distinct legal entity separate from its members under Delaware law. For U.S. federal income tax purposes, TD LLC was generally disregarded as an entity (i.e., it did not make an election to be treated as a taxable entity). As a disregarded entity, all of TD LLC's income (which included income from Canadian branch operations) was included in computing the income of Holdings II, a U.S. corporation that was the sole member of TD LLC and whose income was in turn included in the consolidated return of TD USA, a U.S. corporation that was the sole shareholder of Holdings II.

From a Canadian tax perspective, TD LLC was considered a corporation and was subject to Canadian branch profits tax on its income from the portion of its business that was carried on in Canada. For the 2005 and 2006 taxation years, the CRA assessed TD LLC for branch tax at the statutory rate of 25%, denying TD LLC the Treaty-reduced rate of 5% based on the CRA's long held position that a fiscally transparent LLC is not a resident of the United States for purposes of the Treaty.

Arguments

Article IV(1) of the Treaty defines a U.S. resident as any person that, under the laws of the United States, is"liable to tax therein by reason of that person's domicile, residence, citizenship, place of management, place of incorporation or any other criterion of a similar nature." During the relevant taxation years, the Treaty did not expressly address or restrict the entitlement to relief with respect to income derived through a fiscally transparent entity.

The Crown argued that Article IV(1) of the Treaty is clear and unambiguous. Since TD LLC was treated as a disregarded entity for U.S. tax purposes, it was not "liable to tax" in the United States on its own account and therefore was not a U.S. resident for Treaty purposes. The Crown further argued that, even if TD LLC was considered to be liable to tax in the U.S. by virtue of its income being taxed in the hands of Holdings II, such liability to tax was not "by reason of...[TD LLC's] domicile, residence, place of management, citizenship, place of incorporation or any other criterion of a similar nature" as required by Article IV(1) of the Treaty. Finally, the Crown maintained that a judgment in TD LLC's favour could render redundant or meaningless the Fifth Protocol amendments relating to hybrid entities.

TD LLC argued that Article IV(1) must be interpreted by reference to Canadian law, and that the determination of whether a person is "liable to tax" in the United States for purposes of the Treaty differs from the determination of whether a person is itself subject to tax on its income in the United States. TD LLC's position, in particular, was that Treaty benefits should apply because TD LLC was "liable to tax" in the United States to the extent that the United States retained and exercised jurisdiction to tax the worldwide income of TD LLC. Moreover such income had in fact been subject to tax in the United States.

As an alternative, TD LLC argued that Treaty benefits applied because the worldwide income (including the Canadian branch income) derived through TD LLC was taxed in the United States in the hands of Holdings II, which clearly was a Treaty resident. It maintained that benefits under the Treaty should apply in respect of the income derived through TD LLC by a U.S. resident, consistent with the 'look-through' approach endorsed by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (the "OECD") and generally adopted by Canada and the United States with respect to income derived through other fiscally transparent entities.

Tax Court Decision

The Tax Court of Canada found that during the taxation years in issue the United States retained its jurisdiction to tax TD LLC on a comprehensive basis. The fact that the United States exercised such jurisdiction by taxing that income in the hands of Holdings II did not lead to the conclusion that TD LLC was not liable to tax or that benefits under the Treaty were therefore unavailable.

The Court observed that the Canadian and U.S. tax authorities had previously interpreted Article IV(1) of the Treaty liberally and pragmatically when considering whether treaty benefits should be available to entities that are not required to pay tax under the relevant domestic law. In this regard, it was noted that past Treaty amendments specifying that tax-exempts and governmental entities were "resident" for Treaty purposes were effected as "clarifications" rather than changes in law, and did not require Canadian and U.S. tax authorities to change their practice of granting Treaty benefits to such entities.

The Court also noted other situations in which the Canadian tax authorities had administratively interpreted the Treaty in a liberal manner to make benefits available where doing so was consistent with the spirit of the Treaty, such as with respect to S Corporations (which are generally fiscally transparent for U.S. federal income tax purposes) and partnerships. The "sole anomaly" in this respect was Canada's treatment of LLCs. In light of the "overwhelming consistency" of this approach, the Court held that it was not intended that an entity whose income was comprehensively taxed in the other contracting state would be denied the benefit of a treaty simply because its income was taxed by the other country at the level of its shareholders, members or partners.

In this vein, the Court noted that the Technical Explanation to the Fifth Protocol demonstrated a similar willingness on the part of the tax authorities to overcome certain technical deficiencies in the wording of the Treaty to deal with residence in "a workable manner to achieve a result consistent with its purpose and context".

By analogy, the Court applied the approach adopted by the OECD in the 1999 OECD report entitled The Application of the OECD Model Tax Convention to Partnerships (the "OECD Partnership Report") and in the commentaries to the OECD Model Treaty. The Court noted that neither Canada nor the United States had expressed a reservation or observation in respect of the OECD Partnership Report or related commentary to the OECD Model Treaty. The OECD Partnership Report had considered the case where a source state's tax laws treat a foreign partnership as a taxable entity but the partnership is fiscally transparent under the tax laws of the partners' residence country. The OECD's position was that treaty benefits should apply to the income of the partnership based on the fact that the partners are liable to tax in respect of such income. The Court said that a similar conclusion in principle should apply to a fiscally transparent LLC.

The Court applied the above considerations as part of the context and purpose of the residence provision in the Treaty to decide the case in favour of TD LLC. Given that the Canadian source income of TD LLC had been fully taxed in the United States, the Court concluded that the context, object and purpose of the Treaty would not be achieved (and indeed would be frustrated) if such income did not enjoy the benefits of the Treaty. Therefore, the Court specifically held that TD LLC was entitled to Treaty benefits as a U.S. resident in its own right. The Court reasoned that TD LLC was a U.S. resident as it was "liable to tax" in the United States on the basis that its income was fully and comprehensively taxed in the hands of its sole member, Holdings II. The Court moreover held that such a basis for liability to tax is, as is required by Article IV(1) of the Treaty, "by reason of...[a]criterion of a similar nature" to the enumerated grounds in that Article.

In reaching its conclusions, the Court reiterated (as it has in other cases involving treaty interpretation) that the proper approach to interpreting a treaty is to follow the interpretive approach taken by other OECD countries, the OECD Model Treaty and related commentaries. In the Court's view, this requires, in the case of determining the residence of a hybrid entity, that the source state (Canada in this case) read the text of Article IV(1) in the context of the relevant treaty as a whole, in the context of the object and purpose of the treaty, and in the context of how (if at all) the residence state chooses to fully and comprehensively impose tax under its domestic tax legislation, on the income of the hybrid entity. The Court noted that, in such circumstances, although Canada has the right to select the manner in which it taxes income in its domestic tax legislation, when applying the Treaty, Canada must consider, as part of the context, the manner in which the United States has imposed its domestic tax laws on that income (including at the level of the entity or its members). Thus, the Court agreed with TD LLC that the availability of Treaty benefits should not turn on whether TD LLC made a particular election under U.S. domestic tax law, particularly where such election would not have had any material effect on the extent to which the U.S. taxed its worldwide income.

The Court went on to address the Crown's concerns that a ruling in TD LLC's favour might allow LLCs in the future to choose between claiming Treaty benefits based on the reasoning in the case or the rules relating to hybrid entities introduced by the Fifth Protocol. Consistent with its textual, contextual and purposive approach to interpreting the Treaty for the 2005 and 2006 taxation years, the Court stated that the revised Treaty, including the Fifth Protocol amendments thereto, would be both part of the text and context to be considered when applying the Treaty in future cases. The Court moreover indicated that the factual context of interpreting the Treaty may have been different in a situation that involved an abuse, or where the income of the LLC had not been liable to tax in the United States in the hands of its parent.

This decision is important in that it overturns the long-standing position of the CRA that a fiscally transparent LLC cannot in any circumstance be a U.S. resident and access benefits under the Treaty. It also reaffirms the importance of interpreting the text of tax treaty provisions in light of their context and purpose. In particular, in interpreting the residence provisions of a tax treaty, the judgment is an example of what the Court refers to as "interpreting and applying the chosen language of the treaty to deal with residence in a workable manner to achieve a result consistent with its purpose and context". ­

The Crown has until May 10, 2010 to appeal the decision of the Tax Court to the Federal Court of Appeal.

Al Meghji practice is restricted to tax litigation. Patrick Marley advises on tax issues associated with international tax planning, domestic and cross-border mergers and acquisitions, corporate reorganizations, corporate finance and various other tax matters. Pooja Samtani specializes in advising on tax litigation and dispute resolution matters.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions