More stringent cleanup standards for contaminated sites will
come into effect July 1, 2011, under 2009 amendments to Regulation 153/04. Some property owners
with ongoing cleanups may prefer to use the old numbers, i.e. the
"March 9, 2004 Soil, Ground Water and Sediment Standards"
("2004 standards") to obtain a record of site condition
after July 1, 2011. If they do, they must file a notice, which is
Section 21.1 of the Regulation allows such owners to extend the
use of the 2004 standards and certain associated provisions if the
meets the requirements of section 21.1;
chooses to use the 2004 standards;
submits a Record of Site Condition for filing after July 1,
2011 but before January 1, 2013.
For an owner to be eligible to use the 2004 standards,
aNoticemust be completed and submitted via email to the
Ministry of Environment between July 1, 2010 and December 31, 2010
along with the necessary supporting documents.
The Notice under Section 21.1 has been posted on the
ministry's website along with additional instructions at the
following link: http://www.ene.gov.on.ca/en/land/brownfields/amendments.php.
However, many owners of contaminated sites are finding that it
makes limited financial sense to extend the use of the 2004
numbers, given the requirement to prepare new Phase I and Phase II
environmental site assessments for any Record of Site Condition
filed after July 1, 2011.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.
To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.
Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.
On January 13, 2016, the BC Supreme Court released a decision with guidance respecting a common feature of environmental assessment, namely provincial/federal harmonization of reviews and corresponding decisions.
Last week the BC Supreme Court released its decision in Coastal First Nations v. British Columbia (Environment), holding the Province could not rely on a federal / provincial environmental assessment "equivalency agreement"...
In its recent decision in Coastal First Nations v. British Columbia (Environment), the B.C. Supreme Court held that the provincial government retains authority to impose conditions on the proposed Northern Gateway Project.
The Government of Canada has announced five "interim" principles to guide the review of a number of major resource projects while it undertakes a broader review of the federal environmental assessment process.