Brazil: Does The Brazilian Antitrust Authority Investigate Conducts Carried Abroad?

Last Updated: 16 May 2019
Article by Leonardo Duarte, Thaiane Abreu, Gabriela Monteiro and Fernanda Lins Nemer
Most Read Contributor in Brazil, July 2019

1. Introduction

The Administrative Council for Economic Defense – CADE is the Brazilian Antitrust Authority in charge of investigating and punishing anticompetitive conducts, including conducts carried out abroad if they may produce effects in Brazil. Article 2 of the Brazilian Antitrust Law (Law N. 12,529/2011) establishes that its enforcement is not limited to conducts performed within the national territory, but it also includes conducts performed abroad that may produce effects in Brazil, even if such effects are not achieved.1

CADE has developed an effects theory when analyzing international conducts that may have effects in Brazil, particularly international cartels. This chapter provides an overview of the relevant decisions in which CADE established this cause-effect connection between conducts abroad and their possible effects in the Brazilian markets.

2. Cade's jurisdiction to investigate conducts abroad and the effects Theory

Article 2 of the Brazilian Antitrust Law states that its application is not restricted to anticompetitive conducts performed within the national territory, and expressly extends its applicability to conducts carried out abroad that may produce effects in Brazil. Therefore, the Brazilian Antitrust Law adopted an effect-based approach, specifically providing for its extraterritorial applicability to conducts performed abroad that may have at least the potential of producing effects in the national territory. In order to ascertain its jurisdiction to investigate foreign conducts and to successfully prosecute and convict foreign violators, CADE must demonstrate that the conduct under investigation could have at least the potential of producing effects in Brazil.

CADE has developed this effect-based approach mostly in international cartel cases, but the same rationale may also be extended to unilateral conducts performed abroad that may have effects in Brazil. According to CADE's case law, international cartels may be classified as follows from the perspective of their possible effects in Brazil: (i) international cartels with direct effects in Brazil, where the cartel members had direct sales (i.e. export sales) in Brazil that were affected by the collusion; (ii) international cartels with indirect effects in Brazil, where the cartel members did not have direct sales in Brazil, but final products manufactured based on inputs supplied by the cartel members elsewhere and affected by the collusion ended up exported to Brazil; (iii) international cartels for the allocation of markets that include Brazil, where there is evidence that Brazil was also covered by the market allocation agreement, and (iv) international cartels with no effects in Brazil, where there is no evidence that the cartel produced or could produce effect in Brazil.

3. Cade's caselaw on international cartels investigations in Brazil

Until 2018, CADE analyzed over 25 cases involving allegations of international cartels.2 The decision on the Vitamins Cartel Case,3 in 2007, is considered the leading case on this matter in Brazil and paved the way for the investigation of other international cartels by CADE under the more efficient framework established by Law N. 12,529/11. The Brazilian investigation into this cartel started after the Brazilian authorities became aware of leniency and settlement agreements executed with foreign antitrust authorities, and of decisions rendered abroad. In its decision in this case, CADE analyzed many factors to verify the possible effects caused in Brazil and ultimately concluded that there was sufficient evidence that the cartel had effects in this country, because: i) the imported goods represented almost all of the Brazilian vitamins market and the defendants were responsible for supplying a significant amount of vitamins to Brazil; ii) the defendants' market shares in Brazil were almost identical to the "international budget" that they had divided among themselves in their anticompetitive agreement; and iii) it would not be logical for an international cartel for the allocation of markets, including the Latin American market, to exclude Brazil in the market division.

The Vitamins Cartel Case's decision established the standard approach for the assessment of effects in Brazil that would be followed by CADE in the next international cartel investigations, since most of the international cartel cases decided by CADE involved situations in which the defendants had direct sales to Brazil through exports. This was the case in the Air Cargo Cartel Case4, in which CADE concluded that the cartel agreed to fix prices and dates for the implementation of a fuel surcharge for international air cargo transportation worldwide. CADE considered that the fact that the companies involved in the cartel controlled close to 60% of the Brazilian air cargo market in the period under investigation was a strong evidence that their agreement abroad affected the national territory.

On the other hand, the analysis of international cartels that could have indirect effects in the national territory has been proving to be much more burdensome to CADE than those where defendants had direct export sales to Brazil. These situations required CADE to adopt a broader interpretation of the effects doctrine to assess possible effects in cases involving indirect sales in Brazil. In the DRAM Memory Cartel Case, CADE concluded that DRAM memory manufacturers had formed a bidrigging cartel to fix prices and sales strategies in bids promoted by original equipment manufacturers – OEMs abroad. In assessing whether the conduct could have affected the Brazilian market, the CADE argued that the defendants were responsible for providing practically all the DRAM memory in the Brazilian market – most of which had entered the country equipped in other products –, considering that there was no domestic production for this product in Brazil. Sales of DRAM products used to be negotiated abroad, even in cases where these products were sent directly to Brazil by the defendants.

In the Marine Hose Cartel Case,5 in addition to the fact that the cartel members had direct export sales to Brazil, CADE also considered that the cartel agreement involved the geographic allocation of markets that also included Brazil. According to CADE, Petrobras acquired marine hoses through certain procedures, in relation to which the competitors that participated in the conduct would have previously discussed and allocated results among themselves. The members of the cartel that were not awarded certain Petrobras' contracts proposed offers to cover the winning member's prices and were then compensated in other countries. This, in CADE's understanding, was a strong evidence that the cartel had effects in the Brazilian market.

As for international cartels with no effects in Brazil, in 2016, CADE concluded the judgement of the Elastomers Cartel Case,6 deciding for the closing of the investigation due to the lack of evidence that the conduct could have affected the Brazilian market. The conduct consisted of meetings between competitors to fix prices for the Chinese and Hong Kong markets. According to the leniency applicant, these prices had possibly been used as reference prices worldwide, including for the national territory. Nevertheless, according to CADE, the confession from the leniency applicants that they also used the reference prices agreed upon with competitors as calculation basis for the prices practiced in the Brazilian market, and the assumption that other competitors behaved in the same manner, were not considered enough to conclude that the alleged conduct would have potentially affected the national territory.

The Compressors Cartel Case7 deserves special notice, as CADE, in a non-unanimous decision, adopted an atypical approach. CADE's General Superintendent – GS had previously concluded that this case involved "two cartels": i) a national cartel involving the two local manufacturers; and ii) a foreign cartel that would not have affected the Brazilian market. According to the GS, it would not make sense for the foreign manufacturers to discuss the Brazilian market, as the compressors market was clearly a national market due to the high applicable import taxes and transportation costs, as well as the fact that the local manufacturers were able to supply the total local demand at a lower price. CADE's Tribunal, however, concluded that the evidence in the case files demonstrated that discussions abroad had mentioned the Brazilian market, and that the foreign manufacturers were present in the meetings in which Brazil was discussed by the national manufacturers. According to the majority of the members of the Tribunal, this aspect was considered enough to establish at least potential effects of the conducts in Brazil.

In the recent Color Picture Tubes Cartel Case,8 CADE established a relevant precedent regarding the defendants that may be investigated for international cartel practices in Brazil. According to this decision, since cartels are considered a multi-perpetrator offense, all companies that participate in a cartel are responsible for the possible effects that may be caused by this conduct. Thus, even if only one of the cartelized companies sells its products in Brazil, all of them may be prosecuted and convicted by the Brazilian antitrust authority for the possible anticompetitive effects of the practice in Brazil.

Finally, CADE has recently issued its decisions in the Optical Disk Drives (ODD's) Case9 and LCD Panel Case10 and, in both cases, CADE concluded that the fact that ODDs and LCD panels consumed in Brazil depended exclusively on the external market, would be sufficient to demonstrate that any collusion in these worldwide markets would necessarily affect the Brazilian markets. Therefore, the evidence that the defendants have colluded to fix prices and sales conditions abroad was considered sufficient to base the conviction of the defendants in Brazil.

4. Conclusion

The Brazilian Antitrust Law provides for an effect-based approach that expressly extends its application to conducts performed abroad and that may have at least the potential to produce effects in Brazil. An analysis of CADE's case law in international cartel cases reviews that this authority has adopted a very broad interpretation to establish this cause-effect connection between conducts abroad and their possible effects in the Brazilian markets, making use of indirect evidence and practically shifting to the defendants the burden of proof to demonstrate that certain international cartels would not have the potential of producing effects in Brazil. It is important that foreign companies be aware that possible anticompetitive conducts carried out abroad and that may produce effects in Brazil, may be subject to investigation and severe penalties in Brazil under the Brazilian Antitrust Law, even in case of companies that do not have any direct sales to Brazil.


1 See also Article 36 of the Brazilian Antitrust Law.

2 SEI/CADE N. 0518637.

3 Administrative Process N. 08012.004599/1999-18. Reporting Commissioner Ricardo Villas Bôas Cueva. Decided by the Tribunal on April 11, 2007.

4 Administrative Process N. 08012.011027/2006-02. Reporting Commissioner Ricardo Machado Ruiz. Decided by the Tribunal on August 28, 2013.

5 Administrative Process N. 08012.010932/2007-18. Reporting Commissioner Márcio de Oliveira Júnior. Decided by the Tribunal on February 25, 2015.

6 Administrative Process N. 08012.000773/2011-20. Reporting Commissioner João Paulo de Resende. Decided by the Tribunal on August 31, 2016.

7 Administrative Process N. 08012.000820/2009-11. Decided by the Tribunal on March 16, 2016.

8 Administrative Process N. 08012.002414/2009-92. Decided by the Tribunal on August 28, 2018.

9 Administrative Process N. 08012.001395/2011-00. Decided by the Tribunal on January 30, 2019.

 10 Administrative Process N. 08012.011980/2008-12. Decided by the Tribunal on February 27, 2019.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions