Brazil: Ten Years Of The Opening Of The Brazilian Reinsurance Market - Lessons And Perspectives

Last Updated: 1 November 2017
Article by João Marcelo dos Santos

Ten years ago Supplementary Law no. 126/2007, the landmark of the Brazilian insurance market opening, was published. And despite all problems that obviously result from such a major change to a paradigm, this is a fact that should be celebrated by all those that need a developed insurance and reinsurance market or that operate in it.

Personally, I had the honour of leading, within the ambit of the Private Insurance Superintendence - SUSEP, the discussions held with the Brazilian Congress about the Law, and some interesting aspects of such process and everything that happened deserve to be remembered.

In the first place, SUSEP1 is to be congratulated on the quality of the regulation that was initially prepared in view of all limitations of the lack of experience in reinsurance, the shortage of human resources and the urgent need to make the determinations of the Law effective.

Before the publication of the Law, we were indeed concerned to prepare the insurers, to the extent possible, for the insurance market opening. One example was the rules on risk based supervision risks (internal controls, accounting and actuarial audit, underwriting risk-based capital and others). However, in practice it was impossible to progress in the preparation before the opening.

In this context, also considering that the closed market was during a long time one of the bases for the development and good functioning of the Brazilian insurance market, to promote an ordered opening was a major challenge. And the result reveals the ability of those involved in the bill both to propose a model and to discuss and improve that model jointly with the private sector.

An example of a good measure was the establishment of relatively few rules (considering the Brazilian excessive interventionist standard practice) and an important barrier for the entry of foreign reinsurers by requiring a high rating and 5 years of experience. We know that there is no good market with bad companies and the opposite is true almost always. And the adopted strategy, outlined by the Law and detailed by SUSEP, was extremely successful to ensure a less troubled transition.

We also took advantage of the size of our economy and our potential insurance market to set up the foundation for the existence of an actual local reinsurance market.

The permanent concern, at this point, should be keeping always in mind that the protection of the local reinsurance market makes sense only to the extent that such protection will not result in difficulties for the development and good functioning of the insurance market. And the insurance market serves the society when it offers adequate protection safely and at the lowest possible cost.

Concerning the debate on market reserve x preferential offer, it is worth remembering a bit of our history.

It was not the legislator's intent to give the insurance regulator the choice between the market reserve and the preferential offer. We even included in the Law detailed rules on preferential offer, which were approved by the Brazilian Congress and sent to the President for sanction.

But it was the discussion held with the Brazilian Congress, combined with our need to progress with the bill, which forced us to detail more and more the rules that were initially proposed. We even inserted in article 11 of the Law six paragraphs, some with several items, explaining how the preferential offer should be made. For such reason, upon recommendation made by SUSEP itself to the President, such rules were vetoed. The task of detailing them fell on the regulatory agency.

The veto message is clear: "As this is a new market, it is not proper nor convenient to have in a supplementary law a level of excessive detailing, as it may be an obstacle to accomplish the expected purposes of this Bill. Ideally all such rules should be detailed at the discretion of the regulatory agency for the adaptation of the regulatory framework to follow the dynamics and the development of the market itself. It should be emphasized that the spirit of the article, which establishes the preferential offer and defines its magnitude and effectiveness, will remain unchanged, and it will be incumbent upon the regulatory agency, according to the authority defined in the head provision, to define the rules on this preferential offer." (Emphasis added) http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_Ato2007-2010/2007/Msg/VEP-16-07.htm)

The text of art. 11, according to which "Subject to the rules of the insurance regulatory agency, the cedent will engage or offer preferably to local reinsurers..." (emphasis added) was not intended to mean that the regulatory agency may choose between the preferential offer and the market reserve. Differently, the preferential offer was intended to be satisfied (i) by the offer of risk to all local reinsurers or (ii) by the local contracting of 40% of the risks.

However, the "personal" intent or the legislator's intent objectively explained is not even the most important element for the law interpretation. And, according to the words used to write the rule above, it was later interpreted that the regulatory agency had the option to choose the preferential offer or the reserve regime.

Thus, given the failures in satisfying the preferential offer system, and this could have been corrected by localized inspection actions designed to inhibit practices in contravention of the spirit of the Law and the legislation, in 2010, after almost three years of experience with the open reinsurance market, the National Council of Private Insurance (CNSP) published Resolution no. 225/2010, which imposed the market reserve in replacement for the preferential offer. This market reserve, combined with the prohibition of intra-group transactions (provided for in CNSP Resolution no. 224/2010, which was later amended by CNSP Resolution no. 232/2011 to become more flexible) represented a structural reduction in the opening level of the Brazilian reinsurance market.

More than their contents, the way said rules were prepared and published, without an open and transparent discussion, was extremely harmful to the trust that was being established, including abroad, in the Brazilian regulatory environment.

On the other side, it should be noted that, due to a political issue of the Workers' Party2, the reinsurance market was opened without the privatization of IRB (state-owned company that monopolized the Brazilian reinsurance market) differently from what occurred in almost all privatization/market opening processes previously promoted by the Administration Fernando Henrique Cardozo in the 90's.

Perhaps, even the maintenance of IRB as a state-owned company was an important element for the smooth transition to an open reinsurance market.

Anyway, the "open by privatizing" strategy made the successful privatization of several monopolist companies viable to the extent that the company that controlled the market on the day before the market opening was being sold. At the same time, the monopolist company was prevented from suffering, in the condition of a state-owned company, the inevitable losses arising from the competition to which it had never been exposed. In other words, the market opening associated with the privatization of the monopolist company prevented the inevitable losses of the ex-monopolist company from being a problem for the government, the ex-shareholder, which became a regulatory State. But that was not the case of the Brazilian reinsurance market and the IRB.

For this reason, it was not possible to prevent negative impacts of the effects of the market opening on IRB's transactions o the regulation imposed on the insurance and reinsurance market. And, among such impacts is the replacement of the preferential offer for the combination of market reserve and restriction on intra-group transactions.

More recently, upon the publication of CNSP Resolution no. 325/2015, there was an attempt to correct in part that move by the increase along the next years of the authorized portion of intra-group transactions and the reduction in the market reserve percentage, all associated with the preferential offer. However, the result was not good.

The evident difficulties arising from the coexistence of the reserve and the preference, as well as the maintenance of the reduction in the intra-group restrictions signal the need for new future adjustments to make the legislation comprehensive and enforceable, without excessive operating costs and without many controversial points. All this in spite of the attempt to clarify the meaning of the rule via the legislation.

Anyway, irrespective of the identification of the mistakes and successes and the comings and goings, it is undeniable that today we actually have a functional reinsurance market.

Moreover, the Brazilian reinsurance market became the driving force for the development not only of the insurance market but also of the Brazilian supervision and regulation practices.

In the past 10 years, the new business environment challenged SUSEP to develop its practices and did it wonderfully. And everything signals that this process, subject to the economic and political turbulences in Brazil, is only beginning.

Today, we entertain the possibility of Brazil being consolidated as a hub for the Latin America for the insurance and reinsurance transactions of global and local groups.

We are also discussing with the Government, on the initiative of the National Federation of Reinsurance Companies – Fenaber – the enactment of new rules to reinforce our capacity to establish in Brazil a regional insurance pole to accept reinsurance risks from abroad.

In brief, we advanced a lot and will advance further with the reinsurance market opening introduced by Supplementary Law no. 126/2007. The perspectives are the best possible. But we must be permanently alert to proactively construct a regulatory and business environment increasingly better.

The private sector, in turn, must prevent demands for SUSEP to intervene and, in addition, must discuss with such Agency, whenever necessary, the best alternatives for specific or structural changes to the legislation and the supervision practices.

Footnotes

1 I worked at SUSEP until soon after the publication of the Law, and the regulation was prepared under the coordination of Director Murilo Chaim, during the management of Superintendent Armando Vergilio.

2 That was the political party of President Lula, and it was during his first term that the Law was discussed with the Brazilian Congress.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions