Brazil: Brazilian Supreme Federal Tribunal - In Favour Of Application Of Warsaw/Montreal Convention Regime

The Brazilian Supreme Federal Tribunal (SFT) decided yesterday, by a majority of 9 votes for and 2 against, in favour of application of Warsaw Convention 1929-Montreal Convention 1999 regime for international carriage by air. The decision was presented orally in the Supreme Federal Tribunal (SFT) in Brasilia yesterday. The published written version will hopefully be available within the next fortnight.

As airlines and insurers are painfully aware, although a party to both these Conventions, Brazil having most recently ratified the Montreal Convention in 2006, the Brazilian courts have regularly handed down decisions which  "override" provisions of the International Conventions when and where such provisions are considered to conflict with local laws (in particular the 1990 Consumer Defence Code).  Yesterday´s STF decision brings more clarity to the conflicted issue of whether the Consumer Defence Code or the international aviation Conventions should apply:  The STF decided that in cases involving international air carriage, the Conventions will prevail where there is conflict with the local law.  This means, for example, that claims in Brazil arising from international carriage by air must now be brought within 2 years of an event (rather than the 5 years allowed by the Consumer Code). 

Yesterday´s  SFT decision relates specifically to 2 suits (brought against Air France and Air Canada respectively) described in more detail below, but should have more widespread implications.    The decision is positive news for airlines which fly international routes to/from Brazil, and of course for their insurers.     With the advent of the "new" Brazilian procedural code, which came into force in March 2016, lower Brazilian courts should follow this new precedent set by the Supreme Federal Tribunal.   That said, the STF decision unfortunately will not resolve the bugbear of high "moral damages" awards, which are regularly made in addition to the limits established by the international Conventions.

The Air France and Air Canada appeals (described in more detail below) were designated "Leading Cases" which would have a widespread repercussion.   Accordingly, all the cases before the Supreme Courts in Brasília involving time-bar and the limitation of air carriers' liability pursuant to Warsaw/Hague or the Montreal Convention were suspended pending decisions by the STF made today.   There are currently 417 such cases suspended:  As a result of yesterday´s decision, these cases should now move forward, although we anticipate many cases might be resolved by way of settlement now the subject matter at hand has been clarified by Brazil´s highest legal authority.

Sylvia Regina de Moraes Rosolem versus Société Air France

The passenger travelled from Brazil to Spain in October 2005, but her checked bag was lost in transit.  Since the Montreal Convention 1999 came into force in Brazil only in 2006, carriage was in theory governed by Warsaw Convention 1929 as amended by the Hague Protocol of 1955.  Pursuant to the alternative legislation of Consumer Defence Code of 1990, the passenger claimed:   Reimbursement for expenditure on replacement items purchased during her trip; the alleged value of the missing bag's contents as well as moral damages to be quantified at the Court's discretion.   Air France argued in its defence that its liability for the baggage loss was limited pursuant to Article 22 of the Warsaw Convention as amended by the Hague Protocol of 1955.

The 1st Instance Court in Rio de Janeiro ruled in March 2007 that, whilst the passenger was entitled to moral damages of R$ 6,000 pursuant to the Consumer Defence Code 1990 by virtue of her "consumer relationship" with Air France, economic damages should be restricted to the Warsaw/Hague limit.  Both Air France and the Plaintiff appealed.   In December 2007, the 2nd Instance Court affirmed the 1st instance court´s decision, finding that the Consumer Defence Code 1990 should apply.  The 2nd Instance Court:   Increased moral damages from R$ 6,000 to R$ 10,000; and increased material damages from the Warsaw Convention limit to R$ 7,171 (i.e. the alleged full value of the missing bag's contents).  Whereas the 1st Instance Court had sought to strike a middle ground between the Warsaw/Hague limit and the unlimited regime of the Consumer Defence Code 1990, the 3-judge panel of the 2nd Instance Court effectively ruled firmly in favour of the supremacy of the 1990 Brazilian Consumer Defence Code.

Air France appealed to the Supreme Courts in Brasília in January 2008 and it is this appeal which was, at long last, decided yesterday.   Air France argued that in applying the Consumer Defence Code rather than the Warsaw Convention/Hague Protocol, the 2nd Instance Court had violated Article 178 of the Brazilian Constitution which provides that International Treaties regarding international transportation signed by the Brazilian Government must be observed, subject to reciprocity.  Ergo, Air France's liability to the passenger should be limited pursuant to Article 22 of the Warsaw Convention as amended by the Hague Protocol of 1955.

The case has attracted the attention of the International Air Transport Association (IATA), the International Union of Aerospace Insurers (IUAI) and American Airlines who each filed amicus briefs in support of Air France's arguments in an attempt to persuade the Brazilian courts that the International Conventions should be applied.  In its amicus brief, American Airlines requested the STF to define, in respect of cargo claims, that the unbreakable limit of 19 SDRs/kg contained at Article 22(3) of the Montreal Convention 1999 should be applied. 

Cintia Cristina Giardulli vs Air Canada 

This claim related to delay in passenger transportation.    A flight departing from Brazil was delayed, apparently due to a technical problem with the aircraft´s radar.  The passengers were forced to spend the night in the airport and were not accommodated in hotels nor provided with meals until the following morning.   The Plaintiff passenger was also deprived of access to her checked baggage during this delay.

The passenger filed suit in a small claims court in Sao Paulo in May 2009.  Air Canada argued that the passenger's claim was time-barred pursuant to the International Conventions as she had filed her suit more than 2 years after the delay had occurred.  

The 1st Instance Court in São Paulo dismissed Air Canada's time-bar defence in September 2011, ruling that the claim was filed in time pursuant to Article 27 of the Consumer Defence Code 1990 (which provides for a 5 year limitation period).  The claimant was awarded moral damages of R$ 6,000 (then approx. USD 3,700) plus interest and monetary correction.   Favourably for Air Canada, the passenger's claim for economic damage was rejected as she had failed to prove her losses with substantiating evidence.

The 1st Instance decision was upheld on appeal in April 2012 and Air Canada appealed to the Supreme Courts.   With a similar line of argument to the American Airlines amicus brief, Air Canada argued that the application of the Consumer Defence Code 1990 by the lower courts in preference to Warsaw/Hague or the Montreal Convention constituted a violation of Article 178 of the Brazilian Constitution.   Ergo, the relevant prescription period should be that contained in Warsaw/Hague or the Montreal Convention (2 years) and not the Consumer Defence Code 1990 (5 years).

Chronology of Supreme Tribunal Federal´s ruling

In September 2012, the Brazilian Public Prosecutor appointed in the case recommended to the Supreme Federal Tribunal that Air France's appeal should be rejected.   The pro-consumer Prosecutor considered that the provisions of the Consumer Defence Code 1990 should take precedence over the Warsaw/Hague regime, and that International Conventions signed by Brazil do not have greater weight than the Brazilian Constitution which expressly provides for the defence of the consumer (Article 5, XXXII).

The STF began its ruling on both the above suits on 8 May 2014.  Notwithstanding the unfavourable opinion issued by the Public Prosecutor in the Air France case, the first 3 Judges (who are known as "Ministers") Gilmar Mendes, Roberto Barroso and  the late Teori  Zavascki[1] voted in favour of the supremacy of the Warsaw/Hague/Montreal regime over the Consumer Defence Code of 1990 in both of the law suits.   The three STF Ministers noted Warsaw/Haguer/Montreal regime establishes specific laws for international aviation matters and, therefore, more relevant to the disputes in question than the Consumer Defence Code.   Minister Barroso suggested that the STF affirm, by virtue of Article 178 of the Federal Constitution, that the provisions of the Warsaw/Montreal Conventions should prevail over the Consumer Defence Code in the event of conflict.  Concerned by the potential ramifications of such a decision, the 4th Minister (Rosa Weber) asked for a postponement in order to review the entire Court files.  As a result, decisions in both cases were suspended.

The case had been scheduled for consideration by the STF since February 2016 but, until yesterday, other cases before the court had taken precedence.  At the oral hearing yesterday (25 May 2017) in Brasilia the remaining 8 Ministers cast their votes.

Minister Rosa Weber, voted in favour, stating that the Warsaw Convention, as amended by Montreal, is a rational regulation:  Failure to apply the Convention prejudices the market, creates judicial uncertainty and increases prices to the detriment of consumers.   By contrast, one of the 2 Ministers voting against, Celso Mello, stated that the Consumer Defence Code is a fundamental right enshrined in article 5 of the Brazilian Constitution and should prevail.  Minister Fux commented that  article 178 of the Brazilian Constitution  establishes that where International Conventions and Treaties conflict with local laws, the Conventions and Treaties should take precedence, except over matters involving human rights.

Details of the considered arguments by the eleven Ministers judging the suit will become available when the decision is published.

Preliminary analysis of effects of the STF decision

The decision is a positive step for airlines in that it should effectively reduce the time bar period for claims claims brought in Brazil relating to international air carriage from 5 years (CDC) to 2 years (MC99).   It should also limit material (or economic) damages claimed to the limits specified in the Montreal Convention 1999.   This should, for example, assist airlines to limit damage awards when passengers claim the loss of high value items from their baggage (unless the passenger can establish the limit breaking provisions of Article 22(5) – intent or recklessness with knowledge – should be applied).   Under the Brazilian Consumer Defence Code which has hitherto been applied by local courts, there is no limit and the defendant airline has the (unfair) burden of proof to show the missing goods were not being carried.   Under the provisions of the Montreal Convention 1999 for international air carriage, liability in respect of passenger baggage is limited by article 22(2) to 1,131 SDR (USD 1,565) per passenger (unless a special declaration of value is made).

Cargo:   The STF found in favour of the application of the limits imposed by the Montreal Convention and some of the Ministers specifically mentioned cargo in their considerations.   Yesterday´s decision should therefore assist airlines to defend the application of the 19SDR per kilo, "weight limit" specified in article 22(3) of the Montreal Convention 1999.    As mentioned, American Airlines had specifically asked the court to address this issue in the amicus brief it filed.    We note that many cargo claims are framed under the Brazilian Civil Code, as opposed to the Consumer Code considered by the STF in these two suits.  We would also caveat that, in separate cargo litigation afoot in Brazil, Plaintiffs have argued that the contention that the MC99 cargo weight limit of 19SDR per kilo cannot be surpassed (unlike the baggage limit) renders the Convention´s weight limitation provision unconstitutional.   The effect of yesterday´s STF decision in relation to cargo weight limitation issues may therefore not be clear cut; our views will be honed following publication of the Court´s decision.

What the STF decision unfortunately (for airlines) does not change is the Brazilian judiciary´s ability to award moral (non-economic) damages in addition to the International Convention limits.   The continued right to award such moral damages, in addition to the Convention limits was indeed expressly cited by some of the STF Ministers  when casting their votes.  Regrettably, this means Brazilian courts can, and likely will, continue to award moral damages (for pain, suffering, discomfort, inconvenience, stress, etc.) in addition to the Montreal Convention 1999 limits even for delayed or damaged baggage.   Leaving this door open for the Brazilian courts means yesterday´s STF decision will not change the lamentable scenario of relatively high damages awards by Brazilian courts in the vast majority of passengers' suits  against airlines.

We anticipate that the lower courts may take some time to adjust to the new guideline which is established by this STF decision.   It will fall to the lawyers defending airlines in Brazil to ensure this positive precedent is adduced in the Defence arguments for all relevant cases.   

In summary: Yesterday´s STF decision will help airlines and insurers to limit, to 2 years, the time in which claimants in disputes arising from international air carriage must file suit.  It should also help limit most economic damages claims to the amounts established by the Montreal Convention 1999.   Regrettably, the decision will not alter the widespread practice by Brazilian courts of relatively high awards of moral damages:  The limits stipulated in Montreal Convention 1999 will, for the time being, still not apply or contain awards of moral damages.

Brazilian Supreme Federal Tribunal - In Favour Of Application Of Warsaw/Montreal Convention Regime

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Alexandre Lima
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.