Brazil: Amendments To The Brazilian Arbitration Law

Last Updated: 1 June 2015
Article by Gustavo Fernandes de Andrade and Roberto Figueiredo

Keywords: Brazil, arbitration,

The Brazilian Vice-President signed on 26 May 2014 the law amending the 1996 Brazilian Arbitration Law (Law No. 9.307/96). The amendments will enter into force 60 days after publication in the official gazette, occurred on 27 May 2015.

The 1996 Arbitration Law, resolutely progressive and arbitration friendly, was a crucial step for Brazil, placing it among the biggest arbitration players worldwide.

Rather than a wholesale change, the amendments allow some long standing practices to be consolidated. Formal changes were made merely to align the 1996 Arbitration Law with legislative changes occurred after 1996, such as the enforcement procedure of court decisions, also applicable to arbitral awards, which was modified in 2005; and the authority of the Superior Court of Justice to rule on the recognition of foreign arbitral awards, which belonged to the Federal Supreme Court before constitutional amendments of 2004. A number of changes were also made to correct inaccuracies contained in the original wording of the 1996 Arbitration Law, such as replacing "compromisso" with "convenção de arbitragem" in Article 32, and "decretação" with "declaração" in Article 33.

The amendments also attempt to settle controversial issues, such as the possibility to include arbitration clauses in by-laws of companies and to make the arbitration clause binding upon all shareholders. However, the amendments to the 1996 Brazilian Arbitration Law allowing the submission to arbitration of consumer and employment disputes were vetoed by the Brazilian Vice-President.

Despite its objective to modernize the 1996 Arbitration Law, the amendments lack clarity in some instances and introduce possibilities that will surely be challenging for arbitration practitioners.

Below, the thematically sorted key changes contained in the law:

Key change Signification
Public Entities One of the most controversial issues in the 1996 Arbitration Law was whether public entities were allowed to be party to arbitral proceedings. The amendments expressly allow public entities to use arbitration, should the dispute relate to disposable economic rights ("direitos patrimoniais disponíveis": economic rights that can be waived). Pursuant to the amendments, arbitration involving public entities shall always remain public.
Constitution of the arbitral tribunal With the amendments, parties may agree to avoid restrictions imposed by arbitration rules on the choice of arbitrators among those listed by the arbitration institution. The restriction on the choice of arbitrators is a recurrent practice in Brazil. For instance, the arbitration rules of the Center for Arbitration and Mediation of the Chamber of Commerce Brazil-Canada (CAMCCBC), one of the main arbitration institutions in Brazil, prevent the parties from appointing arbitrators outside the list unless authorized by the president of CAM-CCBC. The rules also require the chairman of the arbitral tribunal to be a listed arbitrator.
Statute of Limitation The amendments introduce a rule concerning the statute of limitation, according to which the statute of limitation is interrupted by the institution of the arbitration, even if the arbitral tribunal eventually finds that it lacks jurisdiction. In accordance with the Arbitration Law, the arbitration is considered instituted once all arbitrators have accepted their appointment. Nevertheless, once the arbitration is instituted, the date of the request for arbitration determines the time in which the statute of limitation is interrupted.
Precautionary measures A new chapter dedicated to precautionary measures was introduced by the amendments, essentially consolidating the existing practice on the power of arbitrators to order precautionary measures and to review precautionary measures granted by courts before the constitution of the arbitral tribunal. The amendments allow the parties to seek precautionary measures from courts while the constitution of the arbitral tribunal is pending. After the arbitral tribunal is constituted, the parties may only request precautionary measures directly from the arbitrators. Precautionary measures granted by courts will remain in force provided that the institution of the arbitration is requested within 30 days of the date of enforcement of the court order. Once constituted, the arbitral tribunal will be empowered to uphold, modify or revoke precautionary measures granted by courts
Arbitral Letter ("Carta arbitral") The arbitral tribunal may communicate with courts through an arbitral letter ("carta arbitral"), which allows arbitrators to request adoption of enforcement measures directly from the courts, such as the deposition of uncooperative witnesses. The amendments align the 1996 Arbitration Law with the new Brazilian Code of Civil Procedure, which foresees that communications through "cartas arbitrais" will remain confidential as long as the parties have provided that the arbitration itself should be confidential.
Partial awards The amendments put an end to the controversy concerning the validity of partial awards. The amendments expressly state that arbitral tribunals may render final as well as partial awards. In addition, the amendments provide that the 90-day limit for applying for an award to be set aside is triggered by the notification of the award, regardless of being a partial or final award. As such, the amendments settle the controversy concerning the possibility of applying for a partial award to be set aside before the final award is rendered.
Arbitrator's power to decide on issues related to non-disposable rights The amendments revoke Article 25 of the 1996 Arbitration Law, which required arbitral tribunals to stay the proceedings and to refer to courts issues related to non-disposable rights ("direitos indisponíveis") upon which the decision of the arbitral tribunal is contingent. At first sight, the amendments aim at allowing arbitral tribunals to decide on the existence of non-disposable rights as an incidental or preliminary issue. However, to what extent is a decision on the existence of non-disposable rights consistent with the rule according to which parties may only submit to arbitration disputes concerning disposable rights? This is a matter which will certainly lead to controversial cases in which the jurisdiction of arbitral tribunals may be challenged because the dispute involves non-disposable rights.
Requests for clarification The amendments create a new rule pertaining to the time limit for filing requests for clarification of the arbitral award. Under the 1996 Arbitration Law, the parties had five days to request clarifications from the arbitral tribunal, differently from several arbitration rules, which provide for longer periods for requesting clarifications. Given that the 90-day deadline for applying to have an award vacated by a court was triggered by the decision on the request for clarification, requests for an award to be set aside could be considered time-barred by courts if the five-day deadline for clarification requests originally set forth in the 1996 Arbitration Law was not complied with. The amendments solve this problem by allowing the parties to freely determine the deadline for requests for clarification.

A problem remains, however, if under the arbitration rules the scope of the request for clarification is narrower than under the Arbitration Law. For instance, while the Arbitration Law allows the parties to request clarification in cases of material errors, obscurities, doubts and contradictions contained in the award, or if the arbitral tribunal fails to decide certain issues in the award, under the ICC Arbitration Rules the scope of such requests is limited to the correction of material errors and the interpretation of the award. The ICC Arbitration Rules do not set forth a deadline for the parties to request the arbitral tribunal to decide an issue that it failed to decide in the award. In this case, the parties would still have to follow the five day deadline in order to request the arbitral tribunal to clarify issues that were not decided in the award, in order to interrupt the 90-day time limit applicable to requests to set aside an award before the courts.

On the other hand, the amendments make clear that, in case the parties request the clarification of the award, the 90-day time limit for applying to court to vacate an award starts upon the decision on the request for clarification, irrespective of the decision of the arbitral tribunal. Under the 1996 Arbitration Law, it was not clear whether the request for clarification would only interrupt the 90 day deadline if the arbitral tribunal modified the award.
Annulment of Arbitral Awards and Supplementary Arbitral Awards The amendments introduce a new rule concerning the consequences of vacating an award. Under the 1996 Arbitration Law, the court would remit the case back to the original arbitral tribunal for a new award if the original award was vacated because it did not contain all statutory requirements (name of the parties, summary of the case, reasoning, ruling, time limit for compliance with the decision, date, place and signature); it was rendered outside the limits of the arbitration agreement; or it did not decide the whole dispute submitted to arbitration. In all other cases, the whole arbitration would be vacated. With the amendments, the decision on whether to vacate an award must decide whether he case should be remitted back to the original arbitral tribunal or not.

In addition, the amendments confer on the parties the possibility of going to courts to request the rendering of a supplementary arbitral award if the arbitral tribunal fails to decide every claim submitted to arbitration. Before the amendments, the 1996 Arbitration Law provided that the award could be vacated if the arbitral tribunal failed to decide the whole dispute and the case would be remitted back to the arbitral tribunal for a new award. With the amendments, awards are no longer subject to being set aside if the arbitral tribunal does not decide the whole dispute submitted to arbitration, leaving to the parties the option of requesting a supplementary arbitral award. It is not clear, however, whether the supplementary arbitral award would be rendered by the court or by an arbitral tribunal. The poor wording employed in the amendments could lead to both interpretations.
Corporate Disputes and Arbitration The amendments also modify the Brazilian Corporate Law in order to expressly allow arbitration clauses in by-laws of companies and to make the arbitration clause binding upon all shareholders, including those who voted against the insertion of the arbitration clause, granting them the right to exit the company.

The amendments aim at settling a long lasting battle among Brazilian arbitration practitioners. While some practitioners argued that arbitration clauses inserted in by-laws must be binding upon all shareholders, others advocated that the arbitration clause could not bind shareholders who did not expressly consent to arbitrate. The amendments, however, will certainly be subject to constitutional challenges because the right to access courts can only be restrained if the parties expressly consented to the arbitration clause.

Originally published May 2015

Learn more about our Litigation & Arbitration practice.

Visit us at Tauil & Chequer

Founded in 2001, Tauil & Chequer Advogados is a full service law firm with approximately 90 lawyers and offices in Rio de Janeiro, São Paulo and Vitória. T&C represents local and international businesses on their domestic and cross-border activities and offers clients the full range of legal services including: corporate and M&A; debt and equity capital markets; banking and finance; employment and benefits; environmental; intellectual property; litigation and dispute resolution; restructuring, bankruptcy and insolvency; tax; and real estate. The firm has a particularly strong and longstanding presence in the energy, oil and gas and infrastructure industries as well as with pension and investment funds. In December 2009, T&C entered into an agreement to operate in association with Mayer Brown LLP and become "Tauil & Chequer Advogados in association with Mayer Brown LLP."

© Copyright 2015. Tauil & Chequer Advogados, a Brazilian law partnership with which Mayer Brown is associated. All rights reserved.

This article provides information and comments on legal issues and developments of interest. The foregoing is not a comprehensive treatment of the subject matter covered and is not intended to provide legal advice. Readers should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to the matters discussed herein.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions