Brazil: E-commerce Leads To Tax Conflicts Among Brazilian States

It is undeniable that the Internet has altered several social and commercial relationships and created realities that are not satisfactorily regulated by the law.

There is a clear gap between the technological advances and the rules governing the judicial framework for the new forms of interacting and doing business on the web. In tax law, that gap is even larger, because the tax levy rules are strongly linked to rigid concepts which are often inconsistent with the dynamics of the virtual environment.

A case illustrative of that conflicting relationship between taxation and the Internet is the recent debate on the sharing of the Brazilian State VAT tax (ICMS) levied on interstate e-commerce. Many states of the Federation have established tax barriers to goods that consumers residing in those states acquire from virtual stores with distribution centers located in other states. In this context, the ICMS in question is assessed at the time the goods enter the end consumer's state of residence. In most states that have implemented that kind of measure, the tax rate is 10% of the transaction amount. This rate corresponds to the difference between the interstate ICMS rate, which varies from 7% to 12%, and the internal rate in the state of destination, which in most cases is 17%

The main activity conducted by virtual stores is nothing but a form of commercial purchase and sale, wherein the purchaser acquires a certain good offered on the Internet at a site maintained by the seller, that is liable for the delivery. Although the sale has been made on the Internet, the virtual store uses the physical premises of an establishment, as a rule, a distribution center, from which the good is shipped to the purchaser. As a rule, purchasers of goods from virtual stores are individuals, therefore, persons that do not pay ICMS. As a result of the nature of the addressee, most of the interstate transactions with goods negotiated on the Internet are subject to ICMS taxation only in the state where the shipper's establishment is located, that is, the virtual store's distribution center. This is so because under article 155, paragraph 2, item VII, letter 'b' of the Federal Constitution, interstate transactions in which the addressee is an end consumer that does not pay ICMS are subject to the internal tax rate of the state where the distribution center is located, regardless of the location of the headquarters of the virtual store.

Although it is not difficult to classify the transactions made by virtual stores and identify the elements required for determining the ICMS levy, it is undeniable that  e-commerce has exponentially increased the amount of interstate transactions involving non-ICMS taxpayers, which are subject to exclusive ICMS taxation in the state of origin per the Federal Constitution.

The negative consequences for the states that are predominantly destination for goods purchased on the Internet (net "importer" states) are quite clear. To the extent that consumers prefer the Internet to the traditional commerce of their place of residence, the ICMS revenue from their purchases is transferred from the state where they reside to the state where the distribution center of the virtual store is located (net "exporter" states).

This is a new reality generated by the technological advances, which certainly was not contemplated by the drafters of the 1988 Constitution when they subjected intestate sales of goods to non-ICMS taxpayers to the internal ICMS rate, following the state of origin principle.

The claim of the net "importer" states to receive a part of the ICMS generated from interstate e-commerce transactions is justifiable from an economical standpoint. After all, ICMS is conceived as a tax on consumption, and, in the case of interstate e-commerce sales, the states where the consumers are located do not obtain any revenue from that tax.

On the other hand, the current tax rules do not support the net "importer" states's claims. Their practice of charging the difference between the interstate and the internal ICMS rate for e-commerce transactions involving non ICMS taxpayers within their borders is entirely contrary to the constitutional guideline that provides for ICMS taxation at the internal rate of the state of origin; so much so that several preliminary injunctions have already been granted to release the virtual stores from paying ICMS to the net "importer" states in addition to that which they pay to their own state and many of these injunctions have already been upheld by the Brazilian Supreme Court.

In this context, the adoption of unilateral measures by the net "importer" states, which consider themselves harmed by the taxation exclusively by the net "exporter" states has given rise to a tax conflict with net exporter states, that currently hold the full right to tax those transactions at their internal ICMS rates.

Should this situation persist, e-commerce as whole will be affected, inasmuch as interstate transactions will be taxed both in the state of origin, at internal rates from 17% to 19% depending on the state, and in the state of destination, at rates up to 10%. This means that the tax burden on transactions made through virtual stores may reach as much as 29%, which would make those businesses economically unfeasible since the tax burden on traditional commerce is substantially lower. If the states do not take any steps to solve this bottleneck, the virtual stores may either disappear or be compelled to be permanent litigants, which also involves significant costs in bringing and conducting lawsuits in several parts of Brazil.

Although it may seem paradoxical, the current taxation rules may even eventually affect the current net "exporter" states. It is easy to anticipate a race among the states which offer  a variety of ICMS benefits to lure distribution centers conducting interstate transactions which would then generate tax revenue exclusively for themselves. As the constitution does not provide for sharing ICMS on such transactions between states of origin and destination, even an extremely low burden would still give states which previously lacked distribution centers a net revenue gain.

Should that happen, the distortion will be inverted, that is, the taxation exclusively at the state of origin along with the granting of tax benefits would make the tax burden on e-commerce much lower than that on traditional commerce, thereby subjecting the latter to unfair competition. That would also be a fertile field for the sort of tax litigation that is typical of the so-called "tax war", with states questioning the constitutionality of the benefits unilaterally granted by their peers to attract the virtual stores' distribution centers.

Based on those considerations, it is clear that the current constitutional framework for ICMS taxation on interstate transactions is not appropriate to regulate e-commerce in a satisfactory manner.

On the other hand, it is equally correct to affirm that the unilateral measures already adopted or about to be adopted by states allegedly harmed by the current rules on ICMS sharing do not represent a valid solution to this bottleneck, especially because an inequity cannot be remedied by violating the constitution.

The same logic applies to the agreement made between several of the net "importer" states to standardize their measures to collect ICMS tax on interstate transactions. This agreement, Protocol 21/11, provides for sharing that revenue between states of origin and destination, so that the state of origin charges a lower rate ( the interstate rate of 7% or 12% instead of the internal rate ranging from 17% to 19%) and the state of destination charges the difference between the two. The illegality here is that the signing states have been enforcing the rules of the agreement against non-signing, net exporter states. Moreover even compliance amongst signing states is questionable to the extent that it transfers taxing powers from origin to destination states, which goes against the Constitution.

The solution to the tax conflict inherent in e-commerce transactions requires legal changes valid for the whole country, and this may only be achieved by means of the enactment of a Constitutional Amendment changing the ICMS sharing scheme in interstate transactions. In fact, the Brazilian congress is drafting a bill to amend the constitution in order to enable destination states to collect a fraction of the ICMS levied on interstate sales to non ICMS taxpayers.

However, this solution is not simple to implement as it has political and operational obstacles that must be satisfactorily addressed by the national congress.

In this regard, it should be noted that the reason why 1988 Constitution adopted the principle of ICMS taxation exclusively at the state of origin for interstate operations involving non ICMS taxpayers is quite elementary: as a rule, none of the parties involved in this kind of transaction is subject to the tax administration of the state of destination.

Therefore, the adoption of the proposed ICMS sharing system in those transactions would result in imposing the obligation to withhold and pay the tax on behalf of the state of destination on an establishment located outside that state or on an individual residing therein. Considering that the possibility of any state compelling individuals purchasing goods on the Internet to pay the ICMS is practically unfeasible, the remaining alternative is the virtual store becoming liable for calculating, withholding and paying the ICMS in each state where it delivers the purchased goods.

Although that kind of obligation already exists in transactions subject to the Tax Replacement regime, the fact is that the virtual stores would then be subject to 27 different tax jurisdictions, which would certainly demand a great amount of financial effort for the stores to meet countless primary, i.e, payment, and ancillary, e.g. filing returns, tax obligations. In this scenario, smaller virtual stores would either fatally succumb to the costs inherent in such a huge effort or end up restricting their geographic area of operations.

In a nutshell, the creation of new rules with the purpose of addressing state disputes over ICMS in e-commerce would involve a great amount of effort by the involved parties and cooperation among the states so as to give the taxation rules some rationality.

Claudia Liguori Affonso Maluf is attorney-at-law in São Paulo, and a partner of Demarest e Almeida Advogados.

Luiz Carlos Junqueira Franco Filho is attorney-at-law in São Paulo, and a partner of Demarest e Almeida Advogados.

Ricardo Valim de Camargo is attorney-at-law in São Paulo, and a partner of Demarest e Almeida Advogados.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.

Disclaimer

Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.

Registration

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.

Cookies

A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.

Links

This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.

Mail-A-Friend

If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.

Security

This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.