Brazil: Efficiencies Of Brazil's Newly Approved Competition Law

On October 5, 2011, Brazil's Congress approved a new competition law that significantly restructures the landscape of competition enforcement in Brazil. Brazil's Congress will now forward the bill to the desk of President Dilma Rousseff, who has 15 working days to approve or reject the bill.1 If the new competition act is approved, which many believe it will be, it shall enter into force six months from the date of its publication in the Federal Official Gazette (meaning that the current law will continue to be valid until at least April 2012).

As Brazil's economic stature grows, its role in upholding and maintaining a globally reputable antitrust policy becomes increasingly important, both within Latin America and throughout the world. With a significant reorganization of Brazil's merger review process on the verge of becoming law, companies doing business in Brazil should closely evaluate the newly passed legislation.

This Commentary will briefly survey the current merger review process in Brazil. It will also evaluate the newly passed competition law and the impact the changes in the new competition law will have on companies and corporations looking to do business in Brazil.

Brazil's Current Economic Situation

While most countries around the globe are struggling to recover from the global financial crisis of 2008, Brazil's economy has shown remarkable resilience. In 2009, as the economies throughout Latin America contracted by 1.9 percent, Brazil's economy remained stable.2 According to early estimates, in 2010 the Brazilian economy expanded by more than 7.5 percent.3 One result of the increase in economic activity is a corresponding increase in high-value mergers and acquisitions in Brazil. In 2005, 386 mergers were reviewed by Brazil's Administrative Council for Economic Defence ("CADE"), the principal authority in charge of rendering final decisions after the Brazilian merger review is complete.4 In 2006 and 2007, the number of mergers reviewed by CADE grew to 411 and 591 respectively.5 In 2010, CADE reviewed 640 mergers,6 and signs indicate that this upward trend will continue in 2011.7 As the economy grows and economic activity flourishes, the antitrust system, particularly the merger control system, is of increasing importance. Fernando Furlan, the president of CADE, agrees: "We have a great responsibility, as the country is going through big changes, and I believe competition advocacy institutes have a great role to play."8

Overview of Current Law

Brazil's current competition law went into effect in 1994 by way of Law No. 8,884/94.9 The law states that, "Any acts that may limit or otherwise restrain open competition or that result in the control of relevant markets for certain products or services, shall be submitted to CADE for review."10 The law creates a triangular institutional system of three separate governmental entities that work together to monitor competition in Brazil. The three agencies created by Law No. 8,884/94 are the Secretariat of Economic Law of the Ministry of Justice ("SDE"), the Secretariat for Economic Monitoring of the Ministry of Finance ("SEAE"), and the aforementioned CADE.11 The law designates different merger review responsibilities to each. The SDE is in charge of investigating anticompetitive practices and issuing nonbinding opinions of its analysis of the merger.12 SEAE also submits a nonbinding opinion regarding the economic aspects and impacts of the merger.13 CADE, the one agency with authority to make binding decisions and rulings, reviews these nonbinding reports from SDE and SEAE, conducts its own review of the merger, and is ultimately responsible for the final ruling on merger approvals.14

Brazil's current law creates a post-merger notification system, meaning merging parties are generally not precluded from consummating their transaction before or during the review process. The law states that notification of a "merger or other agreement" is mandatory within 15 days after its "occurrence," 15if the merger meets certain threshold notification requirements.16 The existing law establishes the factors that determine whether the merger must be sent to CADE for review: (i) the transaction will have some effect in Brazil; and (ii)(a) if, as a result of the transaction, the market share held by any of the participants is higher than 20 percent or (ii)(b) any participant has a reported revenue in the fiscal year prior to the transaction equal to or higher than R$400 million.17 Over the past 16 years, CADE has made efforts to better define these broad rules to create a more reliable and standardized merger review process; however, the current structure of the Brazilian merger review process still contains significant inefficiencies.

Overview of New Competition LawOn October 5, 2011, the Brazilian National Congress, following in the footsteps of the Federal Senate18 and supported by both Brazilian competition agencies and companies,19 approved the new competition law.20 The bill has been sent to President Rousseff for approval. The three most important substantive changes that the new competition law includes are: (i) the introduction of a pre-merger notification system; (ii) the consolidation of merger review responsibilities into a single competition agency, CADE; and (iii) the simplification of the required notification threshold.

The most significant change in the new competition law is that it establishes a mandatory pre-merger notification system.21 The pre-merger notification system requires merging parties to notify CADE of a transaction meeting the thresholds set forth in the new law and receive approval from CADE prior to the closing of the transaction unless the statutory time period for CADE review expires, in which case the parties are then free to consummate the transaction.22

Along with creating a pre-merger notification requirement, the new competition act consolidates the merger review responsibilities from its current triangular approach to a singular one—placing all investigatory, review, and decision-making authority with CADE. Under the newly passed law, CADE will comprise three principal bodies, all of which will work together within one agency: (i) the Administrative Tribunal; (ii) the Superintendence General; and (iii) the Department of Economic Studies. The Administrative Tribunal is the decision-making body in charge of rendering final and binding administrative decisions on merger notifications that are not cleared by the Superintendence General.23 The Superintendence General, led by an appointed Superintendent General, will conduct investigations of anticompetitive practices and is empowered to render final administrative decisions to clear merger notifications.24 The Superintendent General will also be able to render nonbinding opinions on merger notifications that it believes should not be unconditionally cleared. The Department of Economic Studies, headed by CADE's chief economist, will be responsible for rendering nonbinding economic opinions and studies.

Finally, the new competition act amends and clarifies the mandatory notification thresholds. Under the recently passed bill, a transaction is subject to mandatory notification if one of the parties in the transaction reported revenues in Brazil of at least R$400 million in the previous year and the other party reported revenues in Brazil of at least R$30 million in the previous year. The new competition law does not contain the mandatory notification requirement in the existing competition law when a party has 20 percent market share in the relevant market.25

Efficiencies of the New Law

The newly passed competition law, although not perfect, contains several aspects that will generally benefit the Brazilian competition system as well as companies and corporations intending to do business in Brazil; even Brazil's iconic former President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva endorsed the legislation.26 The three primary improvements that the new competition act presents are: (i) the creation of a pre-merger notification requirement ensures that businesses and regulatory agencies will not face the possibility of having to undo a fully completed or partially completed merger; (ii) the new consolidated merger review structure will be quicker and less cumbersome for all parties involved; and (iii) the notification requirement threshold is clarified.

The most significant change to the merger review process is the change to a pre-merger notification system. The existing competition law's post-merger notification system allows for consolidations to have been completed, or at least initiated, before CADE is able to rule whether or not they should be approved or should be denied due to anticompetitive effects. The pre-merger notification system in the newly passed bill will allow the competition agencies the ability to review the merger before it has been executed, evaluate any potential anticompetitive effects, and approve or deny the merger without the mess of undoing a consolidation or unraveling certain consolidated aspects of a merger. Furthermore, pre-merger notification will benefit CADE because it optimizes the agency's ability to utilize structural remedies as a more effective way to make an anticompetitive merger more competition friendly. Finally, while companies will no longer have the flexibility of deciding whether it is in their interest to close a transaction prior to CADE's approval, they will no longer be faced with the possibility of a forced unwinding of a partially or fully consummated consolidation. As one attorney put it, "the new law gives an important tool to the authorities and should also increase legal certainty to private parties."27

The second major change in the new merger review law is the consolidation of merger review powers within a singular entity. The new guidelines consolidate the powers and responsibilities currently held by three separate agencies into CADE. No longer will CADE have to rely on SEAE and SDE for their investigative reports, nor will the agencies duplicate one another's efforts.28 Rather, within CADE, the Superintendence General, the Administrative Tribunal, and the Department of Economic Studies will be able to work together to fully review and approve all mergers. Moreover, with the entire review being conducted by one agency, the new review deadline is able to be much more straightforward with a maximum term for the issuance of a final administrative decision of 240 days from the date of notification. This timeline may be extended up to 90 days if CADE determines the transaction requires deeper analysis. Not only will the process be more efficient on the regulatory side, but businesses will now have a clearer picture as to the review timeline of their proposed mergers and will be able to work with a single agency. The confusion created by a system where merging companies had to communicate with three separate, seemingly autonomous agencies will be eliminated. In fact, the new centralization of merger review powers into CADE received praise from antitrust attorneys in Brazil: "Merging the agencies was crucial as the existence of three separate bodies has been something of a nightmare."29

The third major change in the new merger guidelines is the clarification of the merger notification requirements. The new competition law outlines a simple set of factors that must be met in order to require the reporting of a proposed transaction to CADE. Under the new law, if one of the parties has revenues within Brazil from the previous year of at least R$400 million and the other party has revenues in Brazil from the previous year of at least R$30 million, then the merger must be reported. No other factors would need to be met in order to require notification, and the ambiguous 20 percent market share test in the existing rules is eliminated. The elimination of the market share test and the clarification of the threshold requirements, stating that the revenues had to have occurred in Brazil, make the notification thresholds very clear to both the parties involved in the transaction as well as the reviewing antitrust authorities.

Of course, just as the Brazilian merger control system is "improved," it becomes a more significant regulatory hurdle for merging companies. Adding a pre-merger review requirement and consolidating government agency authority will likely lead to a more active and effective system for challenging, and sometimes blocking, mergers whose notification is triggered by the established thresholds under the new Brazilian competition law. The new pre-merger notification system will bring further clarity to parties involved in merger transactions by establishing a definitive review period and certainty concerning the ability to close a merger transaction prior to the parties actually completing the contemplated transaction. In addition, the clarified thresholds for merger control and definition of transactions requiring notice should reduce the number of transactions that require notification to the Brazilian competition authority. However, it is likely that the transactions that require notification to CADE under the pending competition law will receive stricter scrutiny from the Brazilian competition authority.


By signing the bill into law, President Rousseff can effectuate a productive and efficient overhaul and restructuring of Brazil's merger review process. Brazil has been a leader among Latin American countries, and all emerging economies, with respect to its competition law. In fact, Brazil's main antitrust agency, CADE, was recently recognized by the Global Competition Review as the best agency in the Americas for 2010.30 The new competition law will allow CADE, and the Brazilian merger review process in general, to eliminate many of the inefficiencies inherent in a post-merger notification system, particularly a post-merger system with responsibilities divided among three different regulatory agencies.

Moving forward, it is important for corporations doing business in Brazil or companies considering consolidation activities that could affect Brazilian markets to closely evaluate the final version of the new competition law if and when it is ratified by President Rousseff. The law will likely make Brazil a friendlier environment for consolidation activity, as potential merging parties would have a clearer understanding of the regulatory framework of the merger review, and several inefficiencies both for the merging parties and the regulatory agencies would be eliminated.


1. President Rousseff is expected to approve the bill. If the bill is not enacted by the president within 15 working days from the day it is received by her from congress, the bill will automatically be enacted.

2. In 2009, Brazil's GDP contracted by 0.2 percent. "Brazil's GDP grows 7.5 percent in 2010," Yahoo! Finance (March 3, 2011), available at

3. Id.

4. OECD, Competition Law and Policy in Brazil: A Peer Review 2010, at 32 (2010), available at

5. Id.

6. Of those 640 mergers reviewed, 573 were cleared without any conditions, 25 were cleared under certain conditions, and one was not cleared. Petro Dutra and Patrícia de Campos Dutra, "Competition—Brazil: Recent Antirust Developments and Expected Future Changes," International Law Office (Jan. 20, 2011), available at

7. Kenneth Rapoza, "Slower Brazil Economy Doesn't Stop US Deal Flow," Forbes (Aug. 25, 2011), available at

8. Clare Bolton, "Antitrust Agencies Have 'A Great Responsibility' for Brazil's Future," GCR (Nov. 26, 2010), available at

9. Lei No. 8.884, de 11 de Junho de 1994.

10. Id.

11. B2482EB4A0C2456D06789DPTBRIE.htm.

12. The International Comparative Legal Guide to Merger Control 2011: Chapter 8, "Brazil," Global Legal Group, at

13. Id.

14. Id.

15. While the term "occurrence" is not explicitly defined within the law, a 2007 CADE Resolution defined the "occurrence" as the execution of the first binding agreement between the parties even though it may not be the final agreement nor be in full force. The International Comparative Legal Guide, supra n.12.

16. Lei No. 8.884, supra n.9.

17. Id.

18. The Federal Senate approved Bill of Law No. 06/2009 on December 1, 2010. Neil Montgomery, "Brazil: Antitrust Merger-Review Rule Changes," Mondaq, (Jan. 17, 2011), available at

19. Business Community Support, "the improvements in the quality of the enforcement by the Brazilian NCAs have convinced the Brazilian business community to accept an ex-ante system of review," Marco Botta, "The Brazilian Senate Approves the Text of the New Competition Act," Kluwer Competition Law Blog (Feb. 7, 2011), available at; Antitrust Agency Support, "The bill had effective sponsorship in both houses of Congress and the sponsors were optimistic about its eventual passage," Competition Law and Policy in Brazil, supra n.4, at 56.

20. Faaez Samadi, "Brazil Passes New Antitrust Bill," GCR (Oct. 6, 2011), available at

21. Id.

22.The new competition act sets stricter statutory time periods for the review of transactions, establishing a maximum term for the issuance of a final administrative decision of 240 days from the date of notification, which may be extended for up to 90 days if CADE determines the transaction requires a further review and analysis.

23. The Administrative Tribunal will continue to be composed of a president and six commissioners, but they will now be limited to serving four-year terms, without the possibility of reappointment.

24. The Superintendent General will be appointed to a two-year term, with the possibility of one reappointment.

25. "Brazil Passes New Antitrust Bill," supra n.20.

26. Competition Law and Policy in Brazil, supra n.4 "The country's [former] President had strongly endorsed it; the business community, which had had reservations about some aspects of it in the past, especially about pre-merger notification, professed support for it."

27. "Brazil Passes New Antitrust Bill," supra n.20.

28. SEAE will remain; however, its focus will be on competition advocacy, and its merger review responsibilities will transfer to CADE.

29. "Brazil Passes New Antitrust Bill," supra n.20.

30. The agency was nominated alongside three other agencies, beating both Canada's Bureau of Competition and the Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice of the United States of America. See

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions