Australia: Driver of unidentified taxi found negligent based on circumstantial evidence

Last Updated: 27 November 2009
Article by Nathan Morehead
Circumstantial evidence of negligent driving

Judgment date: 12 November 2009

Penrose v nominal defendant & Anor (2009) NSW SC 1187

Supreme Court of NSW1

In Brief

  • Circumstantial evidence can be sufficient to establish the involvement of an unidentified vehicle in a motor accident. To make that finding when the identity of the alleged vehicle is in dispute, the Court must be reasonably satisfied the circumstantial evidence raises a more probable inference that the alleged vehicle was involved in the accident.


On 25 January 2004 at approximately 4:40am, the plaintiff approached a taxi which was stationary in a taxi-rank in Wheat Road in Cockle Bay. The plaintiff unsuccessfully attempted to open the front passenger-side door of the taxi. Whilst the plaintiff made further attempts to open the door, the taxi began to pull away. The plaintiff then held on to the taxi as it continued to pull away. The taxi re-entered Wheat Road and steadily accelerated. The taxi travelled approximately 345 metres, or for 35 to 40 seconds, with the plaintiff attached to it when it drove over a third speed hump at 45km/h. This caused the plaintiff to become dislodged from the taxi and travel approximately 20 metres along the roadway before coming to rest. The taxi continued along Wheat Road, which ends a short distance later and becomes Shelley Street.

The plaintiff undertook due enquiry and search to establish the identity of the taxi but was unsuccessful. Proceedings were brought against the nominal defendant, who subsequently produced evidence that Taxi T7154 was the vehicle involved. The plaintiff then filed an Amended Statement of Claim, adding the second defendant to the proceedings.

The issues which were to be decided by Justice Hoeben were whether, on the balance of probabilities, Taxi T7154 was the taxi involved in the accident and whether contributory negligence should be found against the plaintiff. This involved a critical analysis of circumstantial evidence and competing inferences the parties submitted should be drawn.

Circumstantial Evidence – Identity of Taxi

The circumstantial evidence consisted of footage captured by seven CCTV cameras, the GPS in Taxi T7154, a Logged Taxi Activity (LTA) database, records of the second defendant and three lists produced by the RTA.

This evidence was problematic for a number of reasons. Most notably, it was impossible to identify the number plate of the taxi involved. The LTA database, by reference to the GPS, only recorded snapshots, not a continuous record, of a taxi's movement. Lastly, there were 287 vehicles in the final list of taxis produced by the RTA which matched the description of the taxi which was captured by the CCTV footage. Not all of them, with the exception of Taxi T7154, could be excluded.

CCTV Footage

Based on this evidence it was agreed, or found, that the taxi in question was a white Ford Falcon station wagon, either an EL or EF model, carried the Taxi Combined Services (TCS) livery and markings and had a NSW "T" or "TC" prefixed taxi number plate.

Records of the Second Defendant

This evidence revealed that Taxi T7154 was driven by Mr Rana on 25 January 2004. Mr Rana gave evidence that he could not recall whether he drove, or the movements of, that vehicle on the date in question. Mr Rana accepted the accuracy of the records insofar as they revealed that he was the driver of Taxi T7154 on 25 January 2004 but expressly denied being involved in an incident similar to that which had seriously injured the plaintiff.

GPS & LTA on 25 January 2004

At 4.08am, Taxi T7154 signed on at Kogarah, where Mr Rana resided. Over the next thirty minutes Mr Rana had two short, paying fares and made four entries in the LTA. The last entry prior to the commencement of the incident was at 4.37am. At that time, Mr Rana generated an action described as "logged in rank (Darling Harbour – Convention Centre rank)" when in fact he was in Chippendale. The first entry following the conclusion of the incident was at 4.45am. At that time, Mr Rana generated two entries, the first being "log out manual (Darling Harbour – Convention Centre Rank)", followed by "log in vacant (Pyrmont)". Both entries showed the taxi was in Shelley Street, only 50 metres from the end of Wheat Road (where it becomes Shelley Street) and approximately 150 to 200 metres from where the plaintiff became detached from the taxi. Importantly, three subsequent entries were made. At 4.48am, the entry was "job offer reject (Pyrmont)" from King Street. At 4.54am, the entry was "cover offer rejected", showing the taxi was near the intersection of George and Park Streets. At 5.00am, another cover offer was rejected, showing the taxi to be in Harris Street in Ultimo.

RTA Lists & the "Process of Exclusion"

The first defendant attempted to exclude other white EL or EF Ford Falcon taxi wagons in TCS livery from being in Wheat Road at the time of the incident. Whilst it accepted it could not entirely exclude all other vehicles of that kind, it submitted that it was able to eliminate all but a relatively small number of that kind of vehicle, and this would arguably produce two conclusions. Firstly, it significantly reduced the likelihood that one of the vehicles not excluded was the one involved in the incident. Secondly, it demonstrated that Taxi T7154 was precisely where one would expect it to be if it were the taxi involved. In undertaking this task, the first defendant relied on lists of taxis and information provided by the RTA and TCS. Attendances at the TCS premises were made by the first defendant to identify which of the 287 white taxi wagons in the final RTA list were part of the TCS fleet at the time of the accident and, where that was confirmed, to identify where that taxi wagon was at the time of the incident.

Circumstantial Evidence – Standard of Proof

Justice Hoeben accepted that, for the Court to reject the evidence of Mr Rana, it would have to be satisfied, on the balance of probabilities, to the standard specified in Briginshaw v Briginshaw2. The test is whether the circumstantial evidence before the Court raises conflicting inferences with differing or equal degrees of probability so that the choice between them is not merely a matter of conjecture or surmise. The consequence of rejecting Mr Rana's evidence would obviously lead to a finding of serious misconduct on his part.


Justice Hoeben acknowledged the inadequacies of the "process of exclusion" but was prepared to be guided by the final list of 287 taxis as the number of vehicles likely to have been missed, and not included, was likely to be small. His Honour removed all but 16 taxis by reference to their make and model, whether the taxi was a country taxi unlikely to be operating in the Darling Harbour area when the incident occurred, situations in which the LTA showed a driver signed off and then on at the same location, situations in which the LTA showed a taxi became engaged at one location and then vacant at another during the time the incident occurred and the two locations were away from the Darling Harbour area, and the requirement for some taxis to display two number plates, noting the CCTV footage showed the unidentified taxi had one.

Justice Hoeben was satisfied that Taxi T7154 was involved in the incident for these reasons:

  • Mr Rana's evidence – he was eager to explain why he would not have driven into Wheat Road on the morning of the accident. He was aware this is where a serious accident involving a taxi wagon similar to the one he was driving had occurred. His evidence was intended to exculpate him for any responsibility for the accident.
  • The likely route Mr Rana took to arrive at Shelley Street – he was aware, and the CCTV footage showed, persons wanting to take a taxi were located at the taxi rank and other locations along Wheat Road. He was also aware there were often persons seeking taxis in Shelley Street. There was nothing to stop Mr Rana driving down Wheat Road (approximately 400m) into Shelley Street. This would produce the advantage of Mr Rana collecting fares in Wheat Road, and if he was unsuccessful there, in Shelley Street. Why Mr Rana, having been on the road for over 30 minutes, and having had fares for no more than 6 or 7 minutes, would have preferred to drive down Harbour Street (parallel to Wheat Road) instead of Wheat Road was difficult to understand.
  • The presence of Taxi T7154 in Shelley Street at 4.45am – this placed it precisely where the taxi involved in the incident would have been at that time. The attempts by Mr Rana to place himself in Harbour Street, noting a number of persons were seeking a taxi in Wheat Road, and his lack of fares until that time, were not persuasive.
  • The conduct of Mr Rana between 4.45am and 5.00am – Mr Rana refused three offers of fares. His taxi had been on the road for over 50 minutes and had only had two short fares. In view of the number of persons wanting taxis in Wheat Road, it was surprising that Mr Rana would abandon a fertile area for obtaining fares and travel to Pyrmont. An inference was drawn that something unusual or untoward had occurred which caused Mr Rana to avoid entering Wheat Road and which also upset him sufficiently that he was not prepared to accept a fare until after 5.00am.
  • The exclusion process – it established there were comparatively few vehicles of the necessary type whose location at the time of the accident was unaccounted for. The prospect that one of that small number was on Wheat Road at about 4.45am is low.
  • The established facts – the possibility a phantom taxi or a taxi operating contrary to the regulations being involved was weighed against the presence of Taxi T7154 a short distance from the incident site exactly where, and when, one would expect it to be had it been involved in the incident, as well as the significant identifying features possessed by Taxi T7154 and the taxi depicted in the CCTV footage. The submission that if Taxi T7154 was the relevant taxi, Mr Rana was unlikely to have notified his presence in Shelley Street, did not significantly weigh in that conclusion.

Contributory Negligence

Justice Hoeben found there was no basis for a finding that the plaintiff did anything to cause the taxi driver to act in the way in which he did. His Honour held the plaintiff was moderately affected by alcohol which, by itself, did not constitute contributory negligence. That being the case, the only basis for a finding of contributory negligence was that he attached himself to the taxi and remained attached to it until he was dislodged. In relation to the latter aspect, the evidence made it clear that, after 3 to 4 seconds, the speed of the taxi was such that, had the plaintiff let go of it, there was a strong likelihood of him suffering serious injuries. Accordingly, the question of whether contributory negligence should be found against the plaintiff related to his initial attachment to the taxi and then remaining attached to it for the first 3 to 4 seconds.

His Honour found the plaintiff grabbing hold of the taxi involved a readily foreseeable risk of injury and, therefore, a failure to take reasonable care for his own safety. The plaintiff's level of contributory negligence was assessed at 10%, noting he was attached to the taxi for between 35 and 40 seconds and, during that time, the taxi covered approximately 320 metres and was continuously accelerating. As each second passed, it must have been increasingly obvious to the taxi driver that the plaintiff would be seriously injured, yet he did nothing to slow down. Most of that time, the plaintiff had no choice but to hang on to the taxi as best as he could.


A plaintiff and/or nominal defendant, when relying on circumstantial evidence to submit an unidentified vehicle was involved in an accident, can employ a methodology which is imperfect or inherently inaccurate and still be successful. Even if there are conflicting inferences which can be drawn from the evidence, as long as the allegation of fact can be established on the balance of probabilities, the unidentified vehicle will be found to have been involved.

1. Hoeben J 2. (1938) 60 CLR 336

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Mondaq Advice Centre (MACs)
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.