Australia: Battles From Afar: A Liquidator’s Fight To Recover Payments To UK Companies

Last Updated: 15 September 2009
Article by Scott McDonald

In a win for Australian liquidators, New Cap Reinsurance Corp Limited v A Grant & Ors, Lloyd's Syndicate No. 991 [2009] NSWSC 662 allowed the Australian liquidator of a re-insurer recovery of payments to two UK companies under sections 588FF and 588FE of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth).

Key Points:

  • Arbitration clauses in a reinsurance treaty may not bind a liquidator seeking to recover voidable payments as this is not a right of the contracting party but a statutory entitlement of the liquidator.
  • Although reciprocity of civil judgments is commonly assumed between Australia and the UK, this does not apply to court orders not relating to compensation or damages.
  • Non-appearance by a defendant still carries a significant risk due to other mechanisms available to parties to give effect to orders overseas, such as a letter of request to the UK court.


In the early 1990s, Sydney developed grand plans for itself as a worldwide reinsurance centre. After the recession in the 1990s there was a shortage of capacity in the traditional reinsurance markets of London and New York. A number of reinsurance companies set up business in Sydney to cultivate and grow this opportunity.

By the end of the 1990s, the grand plan was in tatters. Most of these companies failed, combining reinsurance risk that had been rejected by the London or New York markets with reinsurance against a series of natural disasters that occurred across Europe and North America.

One of the more spectacular failures was New Cap Reinsurance Corporation Limited (NCR) which was publicly listed on the Australian Stock Exchange on 12 December 1996. Its flame burned brightly for two years before having a provisional liquidator appointed on 18 May 1999. However, in the decade since that time the NCR group and its liquidators have left a rich legacy of case law concerning innovative aspects of the liquidation of Australian reinsurance companies. Over two dozen published judgments of superior courts have emerged on a range of aspects of the liquidation of reinsurance companies in Australia, including: legal professional privilege; unfair preferences; access by a creditor to documents produced to the liquidator prior to a creditor's examination; insolvency of a reinsurer within section 95A of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (the Act), insolvent trading; the application of section 562A of the Act to contracts of reinsurance; and (of course) costs.


On 14 July 2009 Justice Barrett in the Supreme Court of New South Wales delivered judgment in the latest chapter, New Cap Reinsurance Corporation Limited v A.E. Grant & Ors, Lloyds Syndicate No. 991 [2009] NSWSC 662. The facts of the case are relatively simple. The liquidator of NCR commenced proceedings under section 588FF(1) of the Act to recover two payments made by NCR to the defendants – US$2 million on 8 January 1999 and US$3,980,600 on 14 January 1999 – asserting that they constituted 'voidable transactions' within the meaning of section 588FE of the Act.

An earlier judgment by Justice White in the Supreme Court of New South Wales (New Cap Reinsurance Corporation Limited (in liquidation) v A.E. Grant & Ors [2008] NSWSC 1015) had determined the date on which NCR became insolvent within the meaning of section 95A of the Act, namely at all relevant times after 31 December 1998.

Interestingly, the defendants in both cases were members of a Lloyds Syndicate No. 991. They were resident outside Australia in London. They filed no appearance and did not seek to take part in either of these proceedings. In correspondence their solicitors made it clear that they did not submit to the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court of New South Wales. For reasons outlined below, this can make the carriage of such proceedings both simpler (in the Justice White judgment) and more difficult (in the Justice Barrett judgment for a liquidator).

Justice Barett's Judgment

On the liquidator's evidence, and as a question of fact, Justice Barrett had no difficulty satisfying certain statutory elements of the liquidator's claim. These included findings that the subject electronic transfers of funds on 8 January 1999 and 14 January 1999 were payments by NCR to the defendants and that they were sourced from NCR funds held in New South Wales. This was relevant both to the fact of payment and to jurisdiction.

In relation to section 588FE of the Act, Justice Barrett had little difficulty finding that the payments were 'transactions', that they occurred within the period of six months ending on the relation-back day, that NCR was insolvent when each transaction was entered into and that the payments to the defendants were as a creditor of NCR for an unsecured debt. Also, Justice Barrett found that the payments were 'unfair preferences' to the defendants within section 588FA(1)(b) of the Act in that the payments were more than the defendants would have received if the payments were set aside and the defendants had proved as unsecured creditors in the actual winding up of NCR.

Justice Barrett relied on the earlier judgment of Justice White on the insolvency issues. Justice Barrett also found that the liquidator's application was not time-barred as it was made during the three year period ending on the relation-back day under section 588FF(1) of the Act. At this point, some of the issues relating to the defendants' failure to submit to the jurisdiction and their non-appearance arose.

Defendants' Failure To Submit And Non-Appearance

In correspondence, the defendants' solicitors outside the jurisdiction had raised a substantive law issue with their opponents. They asserted that any claims which the NCR liquidator had in connection with the reinsurance contracts must be submitted to arbitration in London in accordance with Article 16 of the Reinsurance Treaties and that the current proceedings were in breach of these agreements.

Also, because of the non-appearance of the defendants, an issue arose around the enforcement of any order obtained by the NCR liquidator outside New South Wales and in England, whether reciprocal enforcement legislation applied and if not the appropriate mechanism for enforcement.

Failure To Submit To Jurisdiction

Justice Barrett considered the arbitration clause in the Reinsurance Treaties, which stated:

All matters in difference between the parties arising under, out of or in connection with this Reinsurance, including its formation and validity, and whether arising during or after the period of this Reinsurance shall be referred to an arbitration tribunal in the manner here and after set out.

Detailed procedures for arbitration were then set out. Justice Barrett found that an order under section 588FF(1) of the Act had, as he delicately put it, 'nothing to do with the reinsurance contract'. Justice Barrett found that the liquidator was not attempting to enforce some right of a contracting party, but rather a statutory right given only to the liquidator. Therefore the arbitration provision did not extend to such an action.


On the enforcement issue arising as a result of the defendants' non-appearance, Justice Barrett found that an order under section 588FF(1) of the Act requiring the defendants to repay moneys to NCR was not a 'judgment' under section 11(1) of the Foreign Judgments (Reciprocal Enforcement) Act 1933 (UK) (Foreign Judgments Act) or its application to Australia through the Reciprocal Enforcement of Foreign Judgments (Australia) Order 1994 (UK).

Section 11(1) of the Foreign Judgments Act states:

Judgment means a judgment already given or made by a court in any civil proceedings, or a judgment already given or made by a court in any criminal proceedings for the payment of a sum of money in respect of compensation or damages to an injured party.

Justice Barrett found that the payment of money required in obedience to a section 588FF(1) order is not payment 'in respect of compensation or damages to an injured party'. The payment will in fact be to NCR as a result of the Court's findings about several statutory elements. NCR is not an 'injured party' and the money does not have the character of 'compensation or damages'.

As a result of this last finding the liquidator of NCR was required to find alternative means to enforce any section 588FF(1) order. Assistance was found in section 581(4) of the Act which states:

The Court may request a court of an external Territory, or of a country other than Australia, that has jurisdiction in external administration matters to act in aid of, and be auxiliary to, it in an external administration matter.

Justice Barrett also referred to section 426(4) of the Insolvency Act 1986 (UK) which states:

The courts having jurisdiction in relation to insolvency law in any part of the United Kingdom shall assist the courts having the corresponding jurisdiction in any other part of the United Kingdom or any other relevant country or territory.

Australia is a 'relevant country' for the purposes of the UK Insolvency Act.

Having determined that the Supreme Court had power to make the relevant request of the English court, Justice Barrett satisfied himself first that there was good substantive reason for the request and second, that there was utility in the request in that the English court was likely to exercise its power to act on the request if it was made.

In determining the issue of utility, Justice Barrett relied on the written opinion of Senior Counsel of the English Bar which was put into evidence. Unsurprisingly, the opinion of the English Senior Counsel referred favourably to Lord Hoffmann's magnanimous judgment in the House of Lords' decision in McGrath & Anor v Riddell v Ors [2008] UKHL 21 (see Insurance Focus, May 2008).


Justice Barrett granted the orders sought by the liquidator of NCR under the Act and the letters of request. DLA Phillips Fox will follow in due course the progress of this matter including the response that the letters of request illicit in the English court and any rearguard action that may be assembled by the defendants.

© DLA Phillips Fox

DLA Phillips Fox is one of the largest legal firms in Australasia and a member of DLA Piper Group, an alliance of independent legal practices. It is a separate and distinct legal entity. For more information visit

This publication is intended as a first point of reference and should not be relied on as a substitute for professional advice. Specialist legal advice should always be sought in relation to any particular circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Mondaq Advice Centre (MACs)
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.