Australia: Proportionate Liability And Non-Judicial Bodies

Last Updated: 12 May 2009
Article by Simon Willoughby

In Wealthcare Financial Planning Pty Ltd v Financial Industry Complaints Service Limited & Ors [2009] VSC 7 the Supreme Court of Victoria considered whether the proportionate liability provisions in the Wrongs Act 1958 (Vic) had to be applied in the determination by the Financial Industry Complaint Service of a retail investor's complaint against a financial adviser for breach of certain provisions of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth).

Facts

This case involved the determination by the Financial Industry Complaint Service Limited (FICS) of a complaint against Wealthcare Financial Planning Pty Ltd (Wealthcare). The complaint arose from advice given by Wealthcare to a retired couple (the investors) that led to their making a loan to a mezzanine finance company in the Westpoint Group. Not surprisingly, the investor's investment was substantially lost.

The investors lodged a complaint against Wealthcare with FICS, the dispute resolution service of which Wealthcare was a member under section 912A of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (the Corporations Act). The panel appointed by FICS found that Wealthcare had breached section 851(2) of the Corporations Act and its successor provision, section 945A. Sections 851(2) and 945A make it an offence for a financial adviser to give advice to a retail client unless the adviser has considered the client's personal circumstances, has made reasonable investigations into the proposed investment which is the subject of the advice, and considered whether what is being recommended is appropriate for the client in question. FICS ordered Wealthcare to pay a sum of money to the investors for the breach of sections 851(2) and 945A.

Supreme Court

Aggrieved by the decision of FICS, Wealthcare filed an originating motion in the Supreme Court of Victoria. Wealthcare sought a declaration that the FICS determination had been made in breach of the constitution and rules of FICS and was of no force or effect. In addition, Wealthcare sought corresponding relief by way of judicial review under Order 56 of the Supreme Court Rules. As the case progressed, Wealthcare accepted that its challenge to the FICS decision turned on the proposition that the decision was made in breach of FICS' rules and therefore amounted to a claim for breach of contract. Of the four grounds originally stated in the originating motion, only one was ultimately pressed: that FICS had erred by failing to apply the principles of proportionate liability in determining the investors' complaint.

Justice Cavanough considered the nature and function of FICS. His Honour observed that FICS is not equivalent to a court and does not exist to hear and determine legal proceedings. Rather, it hears complaints (as opposed to causes of action) with the aim of resolving consumer disputes over the provision of financial services. It does so under certain published rules which, pursuant to the contract between it and its members, are binding on members. After reviewing the various FICS rules, Justice Cavanough considered that one rule was particularly relevant to this case, namely Rule 5, which provided:

'What principles must the Service have regard to?

5 In dealing with complaints, the Service must deal with the complaint on its merits and do what, in its opinion, is fair in all the circumstances, having regard to each of the following:

  • any applicable legal rule or judicial authority... ...'

Wealthcare, both in its original submissions to FICS and then initially before the Supreme Court, argued that the Victorian proportionate liability provisions contained in Part IVAA of the Wrongs Act 1958 (Vic) (Wrongs Act) were of direct application to the investors' claim and had to be applied by FICS in its determination of the investors' complaint. At the hearing before Justice Cavanough, Wealthcare conceded that Part IVAA of the Wrongs Act did not apply directly of its own force to the investors' complaint. Rather, Wealthcare accepted that its entire case rested on the proposition that Part IVAA was an 'applicable legal rule' which FICS, under Rule 5, was required to apply to the claim and not merely 'have regard' to.

Did the proportionate liability provisions apply?

Justice Cavanough found that FICS was not obliged to apply the Victorian proportionate liability provisions in determining the investors' claim.

His Honour stated that the essential task of FICS was to deal with a complaint 'on its merits' and do what it considered was 'fair in all the circumstances'. Additionally, he considered that one of FICS' most important functions was to resolve complaints in an 'accessible, efficient and timely way'. His Honour was of the view that FICS had a broad discretion in determining complaints, albeit that it was required by Rule 5 to 'have regard' to any statutory and common law rules or principles that were capable of being applied to a particular matter.

In considering the interplay between Rule 5 of the FICS Rules and Part IVAA of the Wrongs Act, Justice Cavanough noted that Wealthcare had put its case on an 'all or nothing' basis. In other words, it was Wealthcare's case that FICS was obliged to apply Part IVAA rather than merely 'have regard' to it.

His Honour carefully considered the words of Part IVAA and made a number of interesting observations as to its operation

  • The provisions of Part IVAA are not of 'universal application'. They apply only in a 'proceeding involving an apportionable claim' (section 24AI of the Wrongs Act), with an apportionable claim being a claim for economic loss or damage to property in an action for damages arising from a failure to take reasonable care or from a breach of section 9 of the Fair Trading Act 1999 (Vic).
  • Insofar as Part IVAA relates to a claim arising from a failure to take reasonable care the claim must be made in an 'action' (section 24AF(1)(a)). 'Action' means a legal proceeding conducted in a court or tribunal.
  • Part IVAA requires, in the ordinary case, that all potential 'concurrent wrongdoers' are parties to the proceeding before the court. That is only possible in a forum that has jurisdiction over all potential defendants. FICS is empowered only to deal with its members and has no jurisdiction over any other person. (His Honour noted that even if FICS had purported to apply Part IVAA to the investors' claim, it would necessarily have reached the same conclusion because there would have only been one 'defendant'.)

Justice Cavanough went on to consider the difference between Part IVAA and the provisions of the Corporations Act which FICS had considered in making its determination. Relying on the reasoning of Justice Middleton in Dartberg Pty Ltd v Wealthcare Financial Planning Pty Limited [2007] FCA 1216, Justice Cavanough stated that if the investors had brought a claim against Wealthcare in the Federal Court under section 953B of the Corporations Act for breaches of sections 851(2) and 945A, then such a claim could not have been met with a defence which relied on the provisions in Part IVAA of the Wrongs Act. His Honour held that although the principles of proportionate liability did feature in the Corporations Act they were only applicable to a breach of section 1041H, which prohibits misleading or deceptive conduct in connection with a financial product or financial service. His Honour approved Justice Middleton's finding in Dartberg that the 'express purpose' of section 851(2) (and, it can be inferred, section 945A) was to make a person found liable for a breach of the section legally responsible for the whole of any resulting loss.

His Honour further referred to Justice Middleton's decision in the context of whether the Victorian proportionate liability provisions could apply to a claim brought in the Federal Court involving the exercise of federal jurisdiction. While it was obvious that those provisions could not apply of their own force, it was possible that they could apply by virtue of section 79 of the Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth). Section 79, in essence, provides that the laws of a state or territory are binding on all courts exercising federal jurisdiction in the particular state or territory, except as otherwise provided by the laws of the Commonwealth. His Honour noted that in Dartberg Justice Middleton found that Part IVAA was not given force by section 79 of the Judiciary Act because the relevant Commonwealth legislation 'otherwise provided'. Part IVAA, if it were applicable, would detract from the purpose of the relevant Commonwealth legislation (which was to make a transgressor liable for the entirety of a claimant's loss). That being the case, Part IVAA was irreconcilable with sections 851(2), 945A and 953B of the Corporations Act and therefore inapplicable to claims involving those provisions.

Implications

While this case turned to a large extent on the interpretation of the FICS rules, and in particular Rule 5, the decision is of potential application to any panel or body which exercises a function similar to that exercised by FICS. However, the decision also demonstrates that much will depend on the particular powers of the body in question and the rules under which it operates.

In light of the finding made by Justice Cavanough that Part IVAA applies only to courts or tribunals, it is unlikely that other bodies or panels not exercising a judicial function will be in error if they fail or refuse to take into account the proportionate liability provisions of Part IVAA (unless the rules applicable to a body or panel provide otherwise). The wording of, for example, the New South Wales proportionate liability provisions in the Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW) is sufficiently similar to the Victorian counterpart for Justice Cavanough's findings to be of application in New South Wales.

From the perspective of financial service providers and their insurers, the decision in Wealthcare is of some concern as it potentially exposes them to greater liability than would be the case if a consumer's dispute were to be agitated in legal proceedings. The introduction of proportionate liability represents the most significant evolution of the law of tort in modern times, yet the peculiarities of a scheme such as FICS deprives its members of the benefits brought about by proportionate liability. While it is recognised that the raison d'ętre of complaint resolution schemes such as FICS is to assist consumers, the interests of members should not be overlooked entirely. It is submitted that in circumstances where determinations are binding on members but not consumers (as is the case with FICS), a fairer approach would be for the schemes' rules to permit the application of the principles of proportionate liability. A consumer aggrieved by the application of the proportionate liability provisions would then be at liberty to seek redress by issuing court proceedings.

The decision also serves as a useful reminder of the limits on the application of state legislation to cases in the Federal Court involving the exercise of federal jurisdiction.

Phillips Fox has changed its name to DLA Phillips Fox because the firm entered into an exclusive alliance with DLA Piper, one of the largest legal services organisations in the world. We will retain our offices in every major commercial centre in Australia and New Zealand, with no operational change to your relationship with the firm. DLA Phillips Fox can now take your business one step further − by connecting you to a global network of legal experience, talent and knowledge.

This publication is intended as a first point of reference and should not be relied on as a substitute for professional advice. Specialist legal advice should always be sought in relation to any particular circumstances and no liability will be accepted for any losses incurred by those relying solely on this publication.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Mondaq Advice Centre (MACs)
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.

Disclaimer

Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.

Registration

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.

Cookies

A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.

Links

This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.

Mail-A-Friend

If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.

Security

This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.