ARTICLE
1 December 2018

Contractors vs employees: who do I need to pay superannuation to?

CG
Coleman Greig Lawyers

Contributor

Coleman Greig is a leading law firm in Sydney, focusing on empowering clients through legal services and value-adding initiatives. With over 95 years of experience, we cater to a wide range of clients from individuals to multinational enterprises. Our flexible work environment and commitment to innovation ensure the best service for our clients. We integrate with the community and strive for excellence in all aspects of our work.
When engaging a contractor, employers should carefully consider any potential liabilities surrounding superannuation.
Australia Employment and HR

As an employer, one of the most important factors to keep in mind with regard to the engagement of contractors is ensuring that you get the on-costs right. The rules for superannuation, payroll tax and workers compensation are complicated, not only due to the general uncertainty surrounding the tests used to classify workers as either employees or contractors, or the grab bag of considerations to be taken into account, but also thanks to the fact that legislation in each area prescribes different exceptions or extensions to those rules.

With regard to superannuation, it is common to see situations where an individual has been engaged as a contractor, and the principal has made the assumption that as it is not an employment relationship, superannuation is not payable. This is not always correct.

Superannuation legislation extends the definition of an 'employee' to cover a person who works under a contract either "wholly or principally for the labour of the person". A worker will fit within this test and be classed as an employee (for whom superannuation is payable), even if both parties treat the connection as a contracting relationship, where the individual is renumerated for their personal labour and skills, must perform the contractual work personally (i.e. the worker has no right of delegation), and is not paid to achieve a 'result'.

Within the context of a 'results' contract, the worker is likely to be paid a fixed amount for a task (as opposed to receiving compensation through an hourly, or time-based rate of pay), is required to produce a specific result, and in turn bears the risk of rectification or rework. It therefore follows that a contractor who is both engaged on a regular open-ended basis and paid by the hour is unlikely to be on a 'results' contract - meaning that superannuation will be payable.

The situation is different if the contracting party is an external company responsible for supplying the services of an individual (e.g. a recruitment agency), as under this circumstance it would be the contracting/employing company that has the obligation to pay the worker's superannuation.

So, when engaging an individual as a contractor, it is important for employers to put careful consideration towards any potential liabilities surrounding superannuation, and if necessary, to factor any relevant superannuation remittances into the payments being made to the contractor.
By doing so, employers can ensure that they forego any nasty surprises by way of liability for superannuation, interest and/or possible penalties when the relationship sours or comes to an end.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More