Australia: ASIC Reluctantly Bears The Costs Of A Failed Asset Preservation Order

Last Updated: 6 February 2009

Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Krecichwost & Ors [2008] NSWSC 855

In a recent decision of the Supreme Court of New South Wales, Young CJ in Equity ordered the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) to pay the costs of a defendant who was subjected to orders, obtained by ASIC ex parte, pursuant to section 1323 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), that she be restrained from dealing with her property.2 The Court concluded that the costs incurred by the party subjected to the ex parte orders, being costs incurred and associated with legal review, advice and Court attendance, received after being served with the orders, constituted costs incurred by virtue of an ASIC investigation and should be reimbursed on that basis.

Such costs, when reasonably incurred for the purposes of responding to orders made pursuant to an investigation, rather than contesting such orders, may be more analogous to investigation expenses than costs in the typical party/party sense of the word. This novel approach, taken by the Court in this case, could have a significant impact on investigations undertaken by ASIC and other regulatory bodies, and the parties subjected to those investigations.


As part of an investigation being conducted by ASIC into the affairs of Fincorp Group Holdings Pty Ltd, proceedings were commenced against a number of defendants pursuant to section 1323 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth). On 5 July 2007, seeking property preservation orders against Fincorp directors and their wives ASIC obtained ex parte orders against the 8th Defendant, Ms Gallie, restraining her from dealing with her property. On 16 July 2007, after receiving notification of the ex parte orders, Ms Gallie's solicitors appeared before the Court and consented to a continuation of the orders in a varied form. Virtually a year later, on 30 June 2008, ASIC sought and obtained orders dismissing the proceedings against Ms Gallie. Ms Gallie subsequently sought reimbursement for her costs. The costs application was heard by Young, CJ in Eq on 11 August 2008.

ASIC resisted the application for costs submitting that it was appropriate that each party pay their own costs. In support of its position ASIC relied upon decisions in ASIC v Carey (No 3) (2006) 57 ACSR 307 and ASIC v Burnard (2007) 64 ACSR 360. ASIC submitted that the public interest was served by permitting ASIC to preserve assets, pursuant to section 1323, pending investigations into suspected transactions. ASIC contended that the public interest inherent in its investigations and actions was evident in parliament's election, in section 1323(4), not to require ASIC to provide an undertaking as to damages as a condition to granting an interim order when ASIC was in the process of conducting an investigation. ASIC also relied upon its exemption from liability for damages under section 246(1)(a) of the Australian Securities and Investment Commission Act 2001 (Cth) in relation to any act done or omitted by ASIC in the performance of its vested powers when undertaken in good faith.

ASIC conceded that s 1323 did not absolve it from any liability for costs, however it was submitted that the question of costs ought to be determined by ASIC's success in respect of any orders obtained under s 1323. ASIC contended that the position should be that if it were successful in an application for orders under s 1323, then it would be entitled to its costs; conversely if it were unsuccessful then it would be liable.

In ASIC's submission, in the event that a defendant consents to orders, as occurred in the present case, there should be no order as to costs3. Alternatively, ASIC submitted that it ought to be liable for costs in respect of a discontinued s 1323 proceeding only in the event that its actions in seeking the s 1323 orders were found to be unreasonable4. It's success, ASIC submitted, in obtaining ex parte orders in the present case was prima facie evidence of its reasonableness. Furthermore, the continuation of those orders had been consented to by the 8th Defendant and therefore there was no indication that ASIC's conduct had been unreasonable, and every indication to the contrary.

It was submitted on behalf of the 8th Defendant that by virtue of ASIC's conduct, Ms Gallie had been unable to avoid incurring costs. These costs were incurred as ASIC had not sought, prior to obtaining ex parte orders from the Court, Ms Gallie's agreement to terms restraining her from dealing with the property. Had ASIC done so, as it could have, it may well have been unnecessary for Ms Gallie to retain solicitors in response to the ex parte orders and the various necessary dealings with ASIC thereafter. Additionally, ASIC had never given any indication that it would not seek substantive relief or its costs in any application involving Ms Gallie. She was therefore required to retain solicitors to protect her interests.

The conduct of the proceedings by ASIC required that Ms Gallie (who was ultimately demonstrated to be an innocent victim of the s 1323 orders obtained by ASIC, and released from such orders) bear the burden of her costs incurred in seeking legal advice and in seeking legal protection against adverse orders including orders as to costs. As she was ultimately successful, and the orders against her dismissed, Ms Gallie claimed entitlement for the reimbursement of her costs by ASIC and relied upon Pt 42, r20 of the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 that, prima facie, when proceedings are dismissed, the defendant is entitled to an order for costs.

Notably in this case, each of ASIC and Ms Gallie relied upon the usual orders made in respect of costs that costs are generally awarded in favour of the successful party. Part 42, r1 of the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 states:

"Subject to this Part, if the court makes any order as to costs, the court is to order that the costs follow the event unless it appears to the court that some other order should be made as to the whole or any part of the costs."

Ms Gallie claimed entitlement to her costs as the proceedings against her were dismissed. She was therefore the successful party. ASIC submitted however that as it had obtained s 1323 orders (including the continuation of those orders by consent) it was the successful party. Alternatively, as there was no ultimate contested hearing, and as the proceedings were simply withdrawn against Ms Gallie, there should be no order as to costs.

The Court ruled in favour of Ms Gallie.


In reaching its conclusions, Young CJ in Eq gave some comparative consideration to the circumstances arising in applications for interlocutory injunctions.

His Honour noted that an injunction application bears some similarity to an application under s 1323 in that an injunction application is purely preservative. In the case of an interlocutory injunction, the Court does not determine positions with finality but rather is tasked with making orders to maintain the status quo. When making orders the Court does so subject to a pending ultimate final hearing. In applications brought before the Court pursuant to s 1323 of the Corporations Act 2001 however, there is no 'final' hearing whereby the Court may award costs to the 'successful party'. Furthermore, the successful party in a s 1323 proceeding, may arguably, as in the present case, be a matter of perspective.

When orders are made in interlocutory injunction applications, if the applicant has been successful, any cost order is generally 'costs in the cause', meaning that the award of costs will go to the party ultimately successful at a final hearing of the matter. Should the application for an injunction fail however, the applicant typically pays costs. The origin of this rests upon the principle that upon a successful application for an injunction, the applicant has merely demonstrated a basis for preserving the status quo, and not necessarily a basis for success in the ultimate hearing on the entirety of issues. For this reason, Courts typically deem it necessary to wait until the conclusion of any final hearing in the matter prior to making any determination on an appropriate award of costs of the interlocutory application.

With the above in mind, Young CJ in Eq queried the basis of ASIC's claim to 'success' as a result of obtaining a s 1323 preservation order. By comparison to the principles applicable in respect of interlocutory injunctions, ASIC had merely demonstrated some prima facie basis for the preservation of an asset.

Although His Honour gave consideration to the fact that ASIC bears no liability for damages as a result of s 246 of Australian Securities and Investment Commission Act 2001 (Cth), this provision does not mean that ASIC is excused from the costs of its investigations. His Honour noted that ASIC, as a public authority empowered by Parliament for the purposes of conducting investigations, bears the expense of those investigations from its investigation budget. Obtaining a preservation order pursuant to s 1323 constitutes a cost of its investigation. If a person, as part of that investigation, is presented with an ex parte order necessitating consideration, or an attendance at Court to protect their position, and incurs legal expenses as a result of attending, consenting and watching the situation, then these should be considered part of the expense of the investigation for which ASIC would be liable. His Honour stated however that the position may be altered in the event the substantive matter giving rise to the initial orders is the subject of some contest between the parties. Although his Honour did not elaborate in great detail on this point, this suggests that where a party unsuccessfully challenges the substantive orders obtained as part of an investigation, costs of that challenge would not ordinarily be considered costs of the investigation.

His Honour concluded that Ms Gallie had suffered prejudice at the hands of ASIC as she was left with her property subject to a preservation order for nearly a year, without compensation. Additionally, the cause of the prejudice were the orders obtained by ASIC to aid it in its investigation. As her costs arose by virtue of the investigation, and she incurred expense for the benefit of that investigation, the Court directed that those costs ought to be compensated by ASIC. From the reasons for judgment given by His Honour Young CJ in Eq, this appears to have been an order directed more at attempted indemnification of a blameless party than a punitive order of costs against ASIC as the unsuccessful litigant. The judgment reflects an exercise of the Court's discretion, and its recognition that Ms Gallie incurred expenses, not unreasonably, and that the reimbursement of those expenses was appropriate, at least in the particular circumstances of this case.


Although His Honour Young CJ in Eq was careful to point out that each case is to be decided on its individual merits and that it is a matter of discretion to be exercised by the Court in each particular circumstance, it may reasonably be taken from this case that ASIC will bear the costs incurred by defendants, subjected to ex parte asset preservation orders or other investigatory measures, who later have the proceedings against them dismissed, even by consent. The decision reflects a novel approach to the issue of the costs of regulatory investigations and it remains to be seen whether this case will have any lasting impact on other investigations undertaken by ASIC or other regulatory bodies.


1 Tean Kerr, BA, LLB, is a Senior Associate with Swaab Attorneys, the solicitors for the 8th Defendant, Ms Gallie.

2 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Krecichwost & Ors [2008] NSWSC 855.

3 ASIC relied upon decisions of White J in ASIC v Banovec on 5 September 2007 and Barrett J in ASIC v Burnard on 3 December 2007.

4 Australian Securities Commission v Aust-Home Investments Ltd (1993) 11 ACSR 136.

Swaab was recently named winner 'Best Law Firm in Australia (Revenue < $20m)' and 'Attribute Award for Exceptional Service (Australia Wide)' and at the 2008 BRW- Client Choice Awards.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:
  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.
  • Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.
    If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here
    If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq you may opt out by clicking here

    Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

    Use of

    You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


    Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

    The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


    Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

    • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
    • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
    • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

    Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

    Information Collection and Use

    We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

    We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

    Mondaq News Alerts

    In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


    A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

    Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

    Log Files

    We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


    This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

    Surveys & Contests

    From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


    If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


    From time to time Mondaq may send you emails promoting Mondaq services including new services. You may opt out of receiving such emails by clicking below.

    *** If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of services offered by Mondaq you may opt out by clicking here .


    This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

    Correcting/Updating Personal Information

    If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

    Notification of Changes

    If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

    How to contact Mondaq

    You can contact us with comments or queries at

    If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.

    By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions