Australia: Directors Under Fire: Defending Insolvent Trading Claims

Last Updated: 5 February 2009
and Doran Cook

The purpose of this paper is to provide a very brief overview of the law relating to directors' liability for insolvent trading and, more importantly, a practical guide to defending proceedings brought against a director for such a claim. Hopefully, the paper will inform directors of some of the important issues that arise in the defence of an insolvent trading claim.

The Overview

Directors of a company are under a statutory duty not to incur debts whilst a company is insolvent or incurring a debt that makes the company insolvent. The duty is imposed by section 588G of the Corporations Act (Cth). That section provides that a director breaches the section if, whilst he or she is a director, the company incurs a debt and the company is insolvent at that time or becomes insolvent by incurring the debt provided that there are reasonable grounds for suspecting that the company is insolvent or will become insolvent.

If a director does not prevent the company from incurring such a debt, he or she breaches section 588G which can have both criminal and civil consequences.

It is important to remember that the term "director" includes an actual director or a 'shadow director' (i.e. someone who although not formally appointed as a director in facts conducts himself or herself as a director).

The meaning of insolvency

A company that is not solvent is insolvent: section 95A. A company is solvent if it is able to pay its debts as and when they become due and payable.

The test therefore is a cash flow test, rather than a balance sheet test. However, the Courts do recognise that consideration should be given to "near cash" assets (i.e. assets which can be readily and quickly realised) in determining solvency as well as the commercial realities (for example, the company's ability to obtain borrowings or voluntary extensions of time from creditors): Lewis v Doran.

If there are insufficient accounting records because the company failed to keep proper accounting records (in contravention of section 286), then the company will be presumed to be insolvent.

Suspecting insolvency

"To 'suspect' is to have more than a mere idle wondering"; it is "a positive feeling of actual apprehension or mistrust, amounting to a 'slight opinion, but without sufficient evidence'": Queensland Bacon Pty Limited v Rees.

Some of the things that the court would look at to see whether there were reasonable grounds for suspecting insolvency include: negotiations toward payment arrangements, payments to creditors of rounded amounts (rather than specific invoiced amounts), receipt of letters of demand, overdue taxes, banking facilities at or over limits, creditors being paid out of normal trading terms and issuing of post-dated cheques.

It is important to remember that the director needs not have the subjective opinion that the company is insolvent or will become insolvent: all that he needs be aware of, to become liable, is of the grounds upon which a reasonable suspicion could be objectively based.

The meaning of a debt

The director becomes liable if he fails to prevent the company incurring a debt. What is required is that the company commit some positive act and in so doing that the company becomes bound to pay money. Therefore, a company only incurs a debt when it enters a lease, not each time another month's rent becomes due. But on the other hand, the ongoing liability to pay workers' compensation insurance is a debt that arises each month even though the obligation arises out of the conclusion of a single contract of employment. The position in relation to interest is even less clear.

The statutory defences

Section 588H provides the director with a number of defences.

Firstly, a director has a defence if the director proves that when the debt was incurred he or she had reasonable grounds for expecting (and did so expect) that the company was solvent at the time the debt was incurred and would remain solvent even if the debt was incurred.

Secondly, a director also has a defence if the director can show that he or she expected the company to be and remain solvent on the basis of information provided to him or her by a competent and reliable person responsible for providing information about solvency to the director.

A third defence that can be raised is that the director, at the time the company incurred the debt, did not take part in the management of the company because of illness or "some other good reason" (abdicating the responsibilities of being a director is not a good reason).

Finally, it is a defence if proved that the director took all reasonable steps (which can include the appointment of an administrator) to prevent the company incurring the debt.

In addition to s588H, ss 1318 and 1317S provide that the court can excuse a contravention, if a director has acted honestly, after having regard to all the circumstances, where the court finds that the director ought to be excused from all or part of any liability.

These defences may seem very helpful and not too arduous to raise but in reality, the courts look to the legislative intent of the insolvent trading provisions when considering the availability of a defence and the clear intent of the legislation is to impose a heavy burden on directors not to allow the company to incur further debts when it becomes insolvent.

The Practical Guide

Defending a claim brought against a director for insolvent trading successfully requires a complex balancing of competing considerations.

On the one hand, the defence should involve a rigorous testing of the liquidator's claim and a strong presentation of any defence. However, on the other hand, most individual directors simply do not possess the funds required to fight on all the possible fronts. To achieve success, the defence must utilise its resources in the most effective way. To further complicate matters, the director may have to balance the benefits of presenting a united front with his or her co-directors against the liquidator with the cost of advancing their own interests.

Attacking the liquidator's claim

The liquidator bears the onus of proving the elements of a claim for insolvent trading. This means that he has to prove that the company incurred a debt, at a time when the company was insolvent or became insolvent by incurring the debt, and that the director was aware of the grounds upon which a reasonable suspicion of insolvency would have arisen.

Usually, the facts relating to the incurring of the debt don't raise too much controversy. However, the question of whether the company was insolvent at the time that the debt was incurred is often a far more contentious issue. Bear in mind that the liquidator will attempt to push back this date as far as possible so as to increase the size of his claim.

To prove insolvency, the liquidator will often rely upon a "solvency report" prepared by an independent expert (usual an accountant or another liquidator) or himself.

That report will express an opinion as to when the company became insolvent and will often provide a series of closer dates as fallback position. The reports will often contain a reconstituted cash flow statement, working capital calculation and an analysis of the debts outstanding at the relevant dates and the available funds to meet those debts.

These reports can be challenged on any number of bases including bias of the author, the inadmissibility of the evidence used in support of the report, the failure to prove the underlying assumptions in the report as well as the form of the report. There have been some spectacular failures to admit into evidence substantial solvency reports, costing hundreds of thousands of dollars, because of what might be construed as technical grounds.

Disputing solvency

In addition to mounting a challenge to the solvency report relied upon by the liquidator, consideration has to be given to the filing of an opposing report by an expert briefed by the director's solicitors.

There are occasions when accounting experts have different views as to whether a complex company is insolvent or not. For instance, how does one determine whether an insurance company, which might have large sums of money in its bank account but substantial and unquantifiable pending claims was insolvent or not at a particular date?

However, in a large number of cases, the circumstances of a company are fairly straight forward (and often dire) and it may be difficult to adduce competent evidence to the contrary. Bear in mind also that all solicitors and barristers owe a duty to the court not to advance defences which are not reasonably arguable.

In such cases, it would often be better to admit the company was insolvent (at an early stage of the proceedings) so as to avoid the liquidator's costs associated with preparing the report (which are usually quite substantial) for which the director will be liable if the defence fails and which will have to be taken into account when trying to settle the matter.

Advancing the statutory defences

This can be the trickiest part of the litigation particularly if there are multiple defendants.

On the one hand, one would assume that the directors all have a common interest in defeating the liquidator's claim. However, on the other hand, each director also has to be concerned that if the other directors succeed in their defences, he or she will be left with the full amount of the claim when judgment is handed down.

If one director raises the "reasonable reliance" defence, other directors might try to undermine that defence, particularly if they are alleged to be the source of the information relied upon. Furthermore, directors often advance cases that the other directors kept them in the dark and that they had no idea of what was going on. All of this in-fighting of course is greatly appreciated by the liquidator as it advances his case on the knowledge each director had.

There is also the risk (often exploited by liquidators) that one of the directors will break ranks and do a deal with the liquidator in exchange for testimony against other directors.

Often the best tactic in large multi-party proceedings is for a director to keep a low profile (and in so doing, save costs) and concentrate on the evidence specifically implicating him whilst the other directors attack the liquidator on all other fronts. Careful and discrete cross-examination may quietly establish all the facts upon which a statutory defence can be made out.

Settlement and the point of no return

Sometimes, a realistic assessment of the prospects of success in defending an insolvent trading claim indicates that the defence will be a waste of costs. What to do then? Some directors choose to bankrupt themselves. Others engage in desperate attempts to conceal their assets by transferring them to their husband, wife or a related entity.

A more constructive approach may be to consider approaching the liquidator with a settlement proposal. A liquidator will only act if he is funded. In some cases he receives that funding from the proceeds of the company's assets or even prior preference actions he may have instituted. Increasingly, he may have received litigation funding.

An early success in a recovery action can be very important to a liquidator who is concerned that protracted litigation will deplete the available funds for creditors. A director can use this to his or her advantage by approaching a liquidator early on in the litigation with an offer. The liquidator may offer a substantial discount for an early settlement.

On the other hand, the liquidator may be overly bullish about his claim and not be prepared to offer a reasonable compromise. In such a case it may be necessary to temper his enthusiasm by some successful interlocutory proceedings. Timing can be everything.

Unfortunately, often settlement is only considered when all other avenues have been exhausted and it appears that a judgment is inevitable. This is hardly the time to settle, particularly if the liquidator has spent large sums of money on the litigation (or worse, a funder has advanced large sums of money for the litigation). In those cases, the legal costs alone will demand a substantial payment and the amount required to settle the matter is simply beyond what a director can pay.

Staying power

Litigation, whether as a plaintiff or as a defendant, is stressful. Commercial litigation of this nature is even more stressful. The proceedings can stretch over several months, even years. The costs of participating are high, particularly for an individual. In addition to the stress of a possible judgment hanging over the director's head, there is the ongoing distraction of having to give solicitors instructions, depose to affidavits and follow the proceedings generally. And then there is the prospect of being cross-examined by the opposing barristers in open court.

All of this takes its toll on a director and lawyers can often forget this. It is important that the director have a clear understanding of the road ahead, the time it will take and what will be expected of him or her. Financial planning of the defence is important. It does the defence no good if there is the additional stress of fighting between the director and his solicitors over the payment of fees. Directors should have a clear understanding of how much will be required and when it will be required. Allowance should also be made for a contingency fund for when unexpected developments arise.


All of this may present a very daunting scenario but it is one that, unfortunately, can easily arise and has become an unavoidable occupational hazard for those who accept appointments as directors.

Swaab was recently named winner 'Best Law Firm in Australia (Revenue < $20m)' and 'Attribute Award for Exceptional Service (Australia Wide)' and at the 2008 BRW- Client Choice Awards.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Mondaq Advice Centre (MACs)
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.