Valuer and retail leases update – Supplementary reports by valuers

M
Madgwicks

Contributor

Madgwicks Lawyers has been serving clients since 1975 with reliable legal advice, clear explanations of outcomes, and practical options. Their deep expertise helps clients navigate complex matters by providing informed decision-making. The firm prioritizes developing long-term relationships with clients locally and globally, adding value beyond legal services. With over 100 staff and expertise in key practice areas, Madgwicks is an award-winning commercial firm. As part of Meritas, they are connected to a global alliance, offering business law services in 92 countries.
Valuers need to exercise extreme caution in providing a follow-up or supplementary valuation for the landlord or tenant.
Australia Real Estate and Construction

In brief: In the June update, I made reference to valuers answering questions from a landlord or a tenant about a rental valuation. I cautioned valuers about doing this, as it can result in your rental valuation being set aside with it not always being classified as a supplementary valuation.

What you need to know:

Valuers need to exercise extreme caution in providing a follow-up or supplementary valuation at the request of the landlord or the tenant. At a minimum, I do not believe any further communication should be made to either party, say after 30 days since the valuation has been given.

If any further communication or supplementary report is to be given, it must be provided to both parties and their respective solicitors and valuers (if any).

It may be worthwhile adding a condition to the terms of engagement stating that any clarification of the report (if any) will be provided to both parties, any request for clarification must be made within 30 days of the date of valuation, and the party requesting clarification must bear the costs involved.

Background

In the VCAT decision of Di Dio Nominees v JVR Enterprises (Vic) Pty Ltd (Building and Property) [2018] VCAT 772, the landlord's lawyer wrote to the valuer seeking further details of the rent determination and the matters that were taken into account by the valuer. The valuer responded to the letter 14 months after the rental valuation was given. The tenant was of the view that the letter should be taken into account therefore forming a supplementary report. This was rejected by the landlord as presumably the letter did not suit its purposes. VCAT noted the following concerning the response:

  • it was only provided to one party;
  • there was a significant delay between the rent valuation and the response (14 months);
  • it did not state it was supplementary to the rental valuation; and
  • it was in response to leading questions by the landlord.

Accordingly, VCAT did not consider that the letter formed part of the rental valuation and it was not deemed to be supplementary to the rental valuation.

Conclusion:

If a landlord or a tenant seeks clarification of the rental valuation, exercise extreme caution. Preferably, obtain legal advice before offering any further explanation. As noted, please amend the engagement to allow for additional response at the cost of the requesting party.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances. Madgwicks is a member of Meritas, one of the world's largest law firm alliances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More