Australia: GST In These Troubled Times

Last Updated: 12 December 2008

A recent survey by Sydney's Daily Telegraph found "at the end of the day" to be the most irritating phrase in the English language. However, the current economic woes have set the scene for the crowning of a new champion, with the emergence of phrases like "global economic crisis", "financial meltdown" and the inevitable return of that old chestnut "in these troubled times"... a new winner to be sure!

Apart from a few minor linguistic irritations, a global economic downturn will damage Australia's economy and drive up the number of business failures. This will be the first real test of Australian businesses since the GST regime commenced on 1 July 2000. If corporate insolvencies increase dramatically then, sooner or later, the Tax Office will turn to insolvency practitioners to maximize dwindling tax revenues.

This paper looks at some developments in the law regarding the liability of insolvency practitioners for GST on supplies.

Personal liability – are we there yet?

The question of a liquidator's liability to account for GST arose in the Supreme Court of Queensland decision in Sunnyville Pty Ltd v ADIG (Australia Development and Investment Group) Pty Ltd & Anor [2006] QSC 249. In that case, ADIG had entered into a contract to sell land to Sunnyville. ADIG subsequently purported to sell the land to another buyer, JNJ Investments Australia Pty Ltd (JNJ), which handed over money in exchange for transfers and mortgage releases. Most of the money provided by JNJ was received by the mortgagees. Sunnyville lodged caveats and obtained an order for specific performance before JNJ could become registered as owner. At about the same time a liquidator was appointed to ADIG. Sunnyville subsequently obtained a declaration that its equitable interest ranked in priority to JNJ's equitable interest. Further proceedings followed and the liquidator of ADIG claimed an entitlement to a first ranking equitable lien for his reasonable costs, charges and expenses of completing the original sale to Sunnyville.

The liquidator contended that his costs might include a liability to pay GST of $300,000 and he pointed to the Explanatory Memorandum (E.M.) for the GST legislation to show that the intention of Parliament was to make liquidators personally liable for GST on supplies made during the period of their appointment. Sunnyville and JNJ both separately argued against this contention. Sunnyville submitted that there is nothing in the GST Act which clearly provides that the liquidator is the person who makes the supply in relation to pre-appointment contracts, which he merely carries into effect as agent of the company. Also, according to Sunnyville, it was unclear whether the liquidator would be personally liable to pay GST in relation to the company's supply. JNJ submitted that a claim for GST by the Commissioner of Taxation would be a matter of submitting a proof in the wind up because the contract was a pre-liquidation contract. JNJ argued that the Commissioner of Taxation had a 'future claim' that arose when the contract was made and the circumstances giving rise to that claim occurred before the 'relevant date' under s. 553 of the Corporations Act.

Lyons J found that "the state of the law is unclear and the view of the Deputy Commissioner in relation to the liquidator's liability is uncertain". However, her Honour commented that the view that a liquidator does not have a personal liability because he or she is an agent of the company "may prevail".

The Sunnyville case raises an important question of timing as to whether the 'supply' of the land to Sunnyville was made during the liquidator's period of appointment. The Australian GST law does not contain 'time of supply' rules (other than special transitional rules). However, the Tax Office view as to the 'day of supply' in the context of the sale of a going concern is discussed in GST Ruling GSTR 2002/5:

"The day of the supply occurs when the supplier has done everything to satisfy the obligations under the contract or arrangement governing the supply and the recipient has assumed effective control and possession of all of the things that are necessary for the continued operation of the enterprise." (at para 161)

In FC of T v Reliance Carpet Co Pty Ltd 2008 ATC 20-028, the Full High Court of Australia considered whether GST was payable on a forfeited security deposit under a land contract. The issues in the Reliance Carpet case surrounded the special attribution rules for security deposits (the 'wait and see' provisions), which provide that a security deposit is not treated as consideration for a taxable supply unless the deposit is forfeited because of a failure to perform an obligation or is applied as all or part of the consideration for a supply.

In a unanimous joint judgment the court found that upon forfeiture of the deposit by reason of the purchaser's failure to complete the contract, the 'supply' represented by making the contract became a 'taxable supply'.

The court considered whether this means that in a typical completion scenario there would be a second supply, in addition to making the contract, which is represented by the conveyance to the purchaser. Their honours concluded that no question of two 'taxable supplies' arises because of the 'wait and see' provisions. However, the decision anticipates two 'supplies', of which only one would ever be a 'taxable supply' because consideration is only attributed to the first supply if the deposit is forfeited.

It would seem to follow that the only 'taxable supply' that results where a land contract progresses to completion is the second supply, namely the conveyance to the purchaser. In the ordinary course, this second supply will happen on completion, which is consistent with the Commissioner's views in GSTR 2002/5.

The next important case is the decision of the Full Federal Court of Australia in Brady King Pty Ltd v FC of T 2008 ATC 20-034. There, the taxpayer entered into the purchase contract in May 2000 (pre-GST) and completion happened in October 2000 (post-GST). At some time after 1 July 2000 the land was redeveloped into stratum units. The taxpayer proceeded to sell the units under the margin scheme on the basis that it had 'acquired' the necessary interest in the units before 1 July 2000. Their honours allowed the taxpayer's appeal, reasoning that "once the 'precise juridical identity' approach is rejected and a more practical construction adopted, it is not possible to ring fence the interest the appellant acquired under the contract from the stratum unit which it later supplied to its customer". The court discussed the decision in Reliance Carpet and said that the High Court's "emphasis on the breadth of the statutory definition of 'real property' supports the conclusion that when the appellant entered into the contract on 22 May 2000 it acquired or held something that was an inextricable part of the interest which it sold after 1 July 2000".

The taxpayer in Brady King 'acquired' an interest in land when it entered into the purchase contract and the Full Federal Court considered, at least for the purposes of the margin scheme, that there should be no distinction between the interest acquired as purchaser under the contract and the stratum unit eventually sold to the taxpayer's customers. It may seem strange to say, on the one hand, that the relevant interest in land is acquired when the purchase contract is made while, on the other hand, the taxable supply (and corresponding creditable acquisition) in relation to the transaction does not happen until the contract is completed. This perceived inconsistency is attributed to the 'wait and see' rule for security deposits.

So what does this mean for the liquidator in the Sunnyville case? Applying the principles from Reliance Carpet, there were two distinct supplies to Sunnyville: the first happened when the contract between ADIG and Sunnyville was made, being before the liquidator's appointment; the second supply was the future conveyance of the land, which presumably happened while the liquidator was appointed. By virtue of the 'wait and see' rule, only the second of these was a taxable supply upon which GST was payable.

However, in Brady King the Full Federal Court explained the acquisition of the relevant interest in that case as follows:

"But that fee simple was not conferred on the appellant by the Lands Title Office without regard to anything the appellant had previously done to acquire it. The appellant was only able to complete the purchase and obtain registration because, by entering into the contract it had obtained or acquired enforceable rights against (and of course obligations to) the previous owner of the property. The Contract was the genesis or source of the appellant's interest in the stratum unit it supplied. In the language of the Commissioner's submission, the contract was the parent." (at para 27)

Once it is accepted that the genesis or source of a taxable supply of land is the contract, which in the Sunnyville case was made before the liquidator's appointment, the argument put by JNJ that the circumstances giving rise to a claim for GST occurred before the relevant date under s. 553 of the Corporations Act becomes much more appealing.

And what of the prophesy of Lyons J in Sunnyville? Namely, that the prevailing view might be that the liquidator does not have a personal liability for GST payable on taxable supplies made during his or her appointment because the liquidator is merely an agent of the company. The view stands in stark contrast to the E.M. to the GST Act, which explained the drafter's intention that:

"The representative is personally liable for the GST payable and for the other requirements of the Bill. The representative is liable from the date on which he or she becomes entitled to act for you (the principal) until he or she ceases to be so entitled. The representative is liable for GST, entitled to input tax credits and has any adjustments attributable to that period.

"During that period the effect of [Division 147] is that the representative rather than the principal is carrying on the enterprise. The representative is not personally liable for GST attributable before he or she becomes entitled to act for the principal." (at paras 6.272 to 6.273)

But this seemingly unambiguous statement requires further clarification. First, the E.M. suggests that the representative is liable for GST "attributable" to the period of the representative's appointment. This suggests that the representative may be liable for GST on pre-appointment supplies if the GST becomes payable while the representative is appointed. This may not accurately reflect the true intentions of the legislators and the Tax Office has taken a different course. Interpretative Decision ATO ID 2004/290 indicates that the GST on a taxable supply made by an incapacitated entity (say, an insolvent company) remains the liability of the company even though the GST is attributed to a tax period after the representative is appointed.

Secondly, there is nothing in Division 147, or elsewhere, that deems the representative to be carrying on the principal's enterprise. Unlike the special rules for mortgagee sale (which deems the sale to be a taxable supply if the sale would have been taxable had it been made by the debtor), Division 147 does not deem supplies by the representative of an incapacitated entity to be a taxable supply by the representative. If the GST law sought to impose a personal liability on representatives then that liability should be clearly stated in the Act; it should not be implied.

If a company is being wound up in insolvency by the court, or a provisional liquidator has been appointed, the liquidator (or provisional liquidator) must take control of all of the property of the company (s. 474 of the Corporations Act). However, it is well established that the property does not vest in the liquidator as trustee (see, Re Timberland Ltd (in liquidation) (1979) 4 ACLR 259; Commissioner of Taxation v Linter Textiles Australia Ltd (in liquidation) [2003] FCAFC 63; and Hamilton v Piggott Wood & Baker [2003] FCA 1055). Rather, the liquidator is the agent of the company.

The E.M. to the GST Act discusses the role of agents under the GST law and explains that:

"If you make supplies through agents the general law of agency applies. That is, a thing done by your agent as agent for you is a thing done by you. You are liable for the GST on taxable supplies and importations made through your agent. You are entitled to the input tax credits on creditable acquisitions and importations you make through your agent. Your agent is not liable for the GST and is not entitled to the input tax credits." (at para 6.277)

If a liquidator of a company is an agent of the company then any supplies made by the liquidator should be treated as having been made by the company. On that basis, the company should be liable for the GST on taxable supplies made through the liquidators as agent, unless the GST law expressly imposes a personal liability on the liquidator. In the writer's opinion there is nothing in the GST law that effectively shifts the GST liability from the company to the liquidator, other than in a reporting or administrative sense.

Subsection 444-70(1) of Schedule 1 to the Taxation Administration Act 1953 might be drawn on to support a view that the representatives of an incapacitated entity are personally liable. The subsection provides that where two or more representatives are appointed to the same incapacitated entity, "the representatives are jointly and severally liable to pay any amount that is payable under an indirect tax law by any of the representatives in relation to that same incapacitated entity".

Subsection 444-70(1) does not directly impose a personal liability on representatives; it only applies where there is an existing liability under an indirect tax law. It could be argued that to give effect to the subsection, there must be a liability imposed on representatives under the GST law. However, there may be a number of circumstances where the representative of an incapacitated entity has the primary liability under the ordinary GST rules, without implying a liability under Division 147. For example, the court may order that the property of a company vests in the liquidator pursuant to subsection 474(2) of the Corporations Act and in those circumstances the liquidator may hold and dispose of the property other than as agent.

Curiously, subsection 444-70(1) could have surprising implications where two or more representatives are appointed in different roles, such as where a receiver is appointed in relation to a company that is in liquidation, but that is the subject of a separate discussion.

At the end of the day

The decision of the Full Federal Court in Brady King indicates that the genesis or source of a taxable supply of land is the contract. If the contract is made before the liquidator is appointed then there seems to be substantial weight in the argument that a claim for GST by the Commissioner of Taxation should be a matter of proof in the winding up.

The contention that the liquidator is not personally liability for GST payable on taxable supplies made during his or her appointment because the liquidator is an agent of the company in liquidation is yet to be determined. In the absence of judicial guidance the Tax Office will almost certainly maintain that the liquidator is personally liable for post appointment supplies, but that claim is justifiably losing support.



Martin Hirst

T +61 2 9931 4871



Cameron Steele

T + 61 2 9931 4738



The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Mondaq Advice Centre (MACs)
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.