Australia: Interpretation Of Policy Wordings

Last Updated: 22 October 2008
Article by Julie Kinnear

QBE and CGU were successful in recent decisions which examined the interpretation of policy wordings. Both cases reinforced the importance of ensuring that the words of the policy meet the policyholder's expectations. Representations, explanations and suppositions are not enough.

Davis & Anor v CGU Insurance Limited & Anor [2008] SADC 69

This case concerned claims by the plaintiffs (a husband and wife) in respect of property covered against theft and damage by a CGU Insurance Limited insurance policy.

The plaintiffs purchased a rural waterfront property via a mortgagee sale in December 2001. The area in front of the property was Crown Land. This land included a jetty and a Grundfos pump which were both in place at the time of the purchase.

The plaintiffs insured the property with the first defendant following purchase, with the intention that the jetty and pump would be covered under the policy.

After the sale of the property but before settlement in June 2002, the former owner of the property purported to sell the jetty and pump to a third party. Following settlement, the third party removed the pump and partially dismantled and removed the jetty.

The insurance policy was renewed in December 2002. Before the renewal, both CGU and the second defendant, Bank SA Insurance Agencies (BSAI) confirmed that the jetty and the pump were covered by the policy.

The plaintiffs subsequently claimed indemnity from CGU for loss of the pump and the jetty. The relevant terms of the policy were that the policy would insure the property set out in the Schedule 'if it is destroyed, lost or damaged. It is insured only if you own or are liable for the property'.

In addition the policy stated:

'We will cover your domestic buildings and domestic contents shown on your Schedule for the events listed below. There must be damage or loss from one of these events to the domestic buildings or domestic contents for you to make a claim ...'

The listed events included theft, malicious damage including vandalism and deliberate or intentional acts.

CGU denied indemnity for the claim, its reasoning being that even if the jetty and/or the pump was damaged or stolen, no obligation to indemnify arose because the plaintiffs were never at any material time the owners of or liable for (within the meaning of the policy) those items. The plaintiffs claimed damages against CGU for breach of the insurance contract.

The judgment

In dismissing the plaintiffs' claim, Justice Burley determined that the expression 'owned ...the property' must be given its ordinary meaning. As to ownership, the plaintiffs had not reasonably established that they were at any material time the owners of the jetty or the pump. There were no dealings between the plaintiffs and the former owner, at the time of the sale, transferring ownership of the jetty to the plaintiffs. Similarly, there were no dealings between the Crown and the plaintiffs transferring ownership. In addition, although the Crown granted the plaintiffs a licence to use land adjoining the property, this could not be said to confer ownership of the pump and jetty onto the plaintiffs. Finally, neither the former licence holder or the original builder of the jetty had conferred ownership on the plaintiffs.

In addition, Justice Burley found that while the plaintiffs may have formed the belief that they were legally responsible for the pump and jetty, the plaintiffs had never been liable for the pump or jetty because they would not have been financially responsible to anyone else for any loss that might have occurred from damage or removal of the property.

Reliance on CGU's confirmation

The plaintiffs relied on their frequent requests to BSAI (as the agent of CGU) to confirm that the pump and jetty were 'covered' by the policy to assert that CGU had accepted liability for these items. However, Justice Burley considered that CGU's confirmation was merely an acknowledgement that the property would be included within the policy as 'domestic property' on the assumption that it was owned by the plaintiffs. By agreeing to include the items in the policy, CGU could not have been said to have accepted that the plaintiffs owned the items or waived the requirement that the plaintiffs must establish ownership of or liability for the goods. Thus, CGU were under no obligation to indemnify the plaintiffs even where the goods had actually been damaged or stolen.

Other causes of action

The plaintiffs also asserted other causes of action against the defendants. Firstly, that the conduct of CGU and BSAI was misleading and therefore constituted a breach of section 52 of the Trade Practices Act 1971 (Cth) and secondly that CGU was estopped from denying indemnity for the claim in these circumstances. Both causes of action were asserted on the basis that the conduct of CGU induced the plaintiffs to believe that the insurance contract covered the loss.

Justice Burley found that neither defendant had caused the plaintiffs to make the assumption that CGU would indemnify them for any loss. The plaintiffs' belief that they would be indemnified did not reasonably arise from the conduct or statements of either of the defendants, particularly as there was no intention on the part of either defendant that the plaintiffs would act on such an assumption.

The Court also found against the plaintiffs' allegation that BSAI breached an implied term of the contract between BSAI and the plaintiffs, that if BSAI was unable to effect the necessary cover, it would inform the plaintiffs. Justice Burley found that in these circumstances by agreeing to include the jetty and the pump as items within the terms of the policy, BSAI could not be said to have accepted that the plaintiffs owned or were liable for the items. As a consequence, BSAI effected the insurance that it was instructed to procure and any requirement to notify the plaintiffs that it was unable to effect the required cover never came into play.


This case reinforces the importance of the interpretation of the insuring clause in establishing indemnity. It also emphasises the distinction between the interpretation of the insuring clause and representations which may be made by or on behalf of the insurer on what may be 'covered' under the terms of a policy. While an insurer may agree that certain goods and items will be included under the Schedule of items to the policy, this will be at all times subject to those goods and items otherwise coming within the terms of the insuring clause of the contract.

Zang v Minox Securities Pty Ltd: Liu v Minox Securities Pty Ltd [2008] NSWSC 689

The proceedings in this case concerned the activities of Mr Chen, an authorised representative of the defendant Minox Securities Pty Ltd (formerly Quantum Securities Pty Ltd) (Quantum). It was alleged that Mr Chen solicited the plaintiffs and those represented by the plaintiffs to invest in promissory notes of various companies associated with the Westpoint Group known as 'the Mezzanine Companies'. The Mezzanine Companies became subject to a creditor's voluntary winding up.

The two plaintiffs in this case became aware of the existence of certain insurances written by QBE Insurance (Australia) Limited (QBE) and held by Quantum for certain risks relevant to the claim. As a result, the plaintiffs applied to join QBE to the proceedings pursuant to section 6(4) of the Law Reform Miscellaneous Provisions Act 1946 (Cth), claiming that under the insurance contract QBE is liable to indemnify Quantum for any liability to the plaintiffs in this particular case and as a consequence a charge attaches to the insurance moneys that are or may become payable in respect of that liability.

QBE resisted the plaintiffs' application solely on the grounds that there was no arguable case that the relevant policy responded to any liability for damages of Quantum to the plaintiffs and the class for whom they sue.

QBE had issued two policies of insurance during the relevant period, a Professional Indemnity policy and a Financial Institutions policy. Justice Barrett ultimately found that neither of these policies responded to the plaintiffs' claims against Quantum in these proceedings and therefore declined to make the order joining QBE as a defendant.

Professional Indemnity Policy

The relevant insuring clause of the Professional Indemnity policy provided that QBE would indemnify the insured against civil liability for compensation arising from any claim 'as a result of a breach of professional duty in the conduct of the insured's profession (financial planning and insurance broking)'.

The policy contained a Financial Planner's Authorised Representative Endorsement which extended the definition of 'insured' to include 'any person who is during the period of cover an Authorised Representative of the named insurer but only in respect of work performed whilst an Authorised Representative of the named insurer'.

The policy also contained an exclusion (the product list exclusion) which provided that QBE shall not be liable to provide indemnity for any claim against the insured 'arising directly or indirectly based upon, attributable to, or in consequence of an actual or alleged act, error or omission in respect of any financial or investment product that at the time the actual or alleged act, error or omission occurred is not listed on the approved Product List of the entity ...'.

Justice Barrett accepted QBE's contention that the Mezzanine Company promissory notes invested in by the plaintiffs were not included on Quantum's approved product list, and therefore such claims were within the product list exclusion.

The plaintiffs argued that the product list exclusion might not operate to exclude the plaintiffs' claim against Quantum because Mr Chen was arguably not an 'insured' as he was performing work beyond the scope of his authority at the time, and as such was not acting as an 'authorised representative' of Quantum. However, Justice Barrett found that this argument was negated by section 91B of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) which confirms that Quantum is responsible for Mr Chen's conduct 'whether or not the representative's conduct is within authority'.

Financial Institutions Policy

Under the terms of the Financial Institutions policy, QBE agreed to indemnify the insured against liability arising out of any claim 'as a result of a breach of professional duty in the conduct of the financial service (Funds Management, Finance Broking, Securities Dealing)'.

The Financial Institutions Policy Schedule contained an endorsement creating an exception for financial planning (the financial planning exclusion).

This endorsement provided:

'QBE shall not be liable under this policy and provide indemnity in respect of any claim against the insured directly or indirectly based upon, attributable to or in consequence of the provision by or on behalf of the insured of any advice usually provided by a Financial Planner'.

The plaintiffs argued that at least some of their claims were beyond the scope of the financial planning exclusion, as they related not to the fact that Mr Chen had actively given advice but rather to the fact that he had contravened statutory requirements under the Corporations Act for the procedures to be observed in giving that advice. For example, he had failed to give a client a Product Disclosure Statement in one instance. In addition, it was argued that the claims also related to the alleged failure of Quantum to perform its statutory obligation to supervise and monitor Mr Chen's activities.

Justice Barrett found that the claims against Quantum were at least 'indirectly based' on or 'attributable to' or 'in consequence of' the activities of Mr Chen, including the advice he gave, and that each of the allegations against Mr Chen therefore go ultimately to 'advice' given by him and are within the financial planning exclusion.

As a consequence, his Honour was of the opinion that there could not be any real doubt that the advice of Mr Chen to invest in the Mezzanine Company promissory notes, was advice of the kind that would usually be provided by a financial planner. As such, Justice Barrett, concluded QBE could not be held liable to indemnify Quantum under the terms of the Financial Institutions policy.


The courts will look to the source of the underlying cause of the claim giving rise to the claim for indemnity, rather than merely interpreting the words contained in the exclusion clauses in these types of insurance contracts.

Phillips Fox has changed its name to DLA Phillips Fox because the firm entered into an exclusive alliance with DLA Piper, one of the largest legal services organisations in the world. We will retain our offices in every major commercial centre in Australia and New Zealand, with no operational change to your relationship with the firm. DLA Phillips Fox can now take your business one step further − by connecting you to a global network of legal experience, talent and knowledge.

This publication is intended as a first point of reference and should not be relied on as a substitute for professional advice. Specialist legal advice should always be sought in relation to any particular circumstances and no liability will be accepted for any losses incurred by those relying solely on this publication.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Mondaq Advice Centre (MACs)
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.