Australia: The Blame Game - How moral culpability plays a role in the application of proportionate liability legislation

Last Updated: 22 October 2008
Article by Tamara Young

A recent case shows moral culpability is a factor in apportioning responsibility under proportionate liability legislation.

The decision of Justice Young of the Supreme Court of New South Wales in Vella v Permanent Mortgages Pty Ltd [2008] NSWSC 505 (Vella) clarifies how a Court will allocate loss in the context of a mortgage transaction perpetuated by fraudsters under the proportionate liability provisions of the Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW) (CLA).

The decision also provides insight into the standard of care expected of professionals under section 5O of the Act, and stands as a warning to those operating in the low document short term loans sector of the mortgage lending industry.

The facts

The plaintiff, Mr Vella (Vella) sought a declaration for two mortgages over several parcels of land owned by him. The proceeds were deposited into a bank account he jointly held with his business partner, Mr Caradonna (Caradonna).

In 2005, Vella and Caradonna uplifted certificates of title over a number of Vella's properties. Vella understood this was for the purpose of consolidating loans on his properties, associated with their joint business venture. In fact, the certificates were used by Caradonna and a finance broker, Mr Rutty, to obtain a number of loans from Permanent Mortgages Pty Ltd (Permanent) and Mitchell Morgan Nominees Pty Limited (trading as La Trobe) (Mitchell Morgan). Hunt & Hunt Solicitors (Hunt & Hunt) acted for Mitchell Morgan on the loan transaction.

Vella instigated proceedings in the Supreme Court seeking to have the mortgages set aside on the basis that they had been forged and he never received money pursuant to the mortgages. The form of mortgage used by Hunt & Hunt was an 'all moneys' mortgage.

Mr Flammia (Flammia) was a solicitor appointed by Caradonna, to allegedly act on behalf of Vella in relation to the loan applications. Flammia signed the mortgage documents certifying that he had witnessed Vella's signatures. He had not done so.

Despite a number of signs warning of fraud, the loans were approved. This resulted in loans together totalling over $2.4 million being deposited into the joint account of Vella and Caradonna, of which only $300,000 had 'knowingly' been approved by Vella. Caradonna then advanced the entire $2.4 million to himself, using cheques signed by himself and Vella's forged signature.

The decision

Ultimately, Justice Young held that the mortgages were unenforceable, and orders were made restoring Vella to the title in his properties unencumbered by the mortgages of Permanent or Mitchell Morgan. In doing so, the Court applied the earlier decision of Perpetual Trustees Victoria Limited v Tsai [2004] NSWSC 745.

The Court then considered:

  • Whether Hunt & Hunt had been negligent in using an 'all moneys' mortgage without warning Mitchell Morgan that that type of mortgage would not give it indefeasibility of title against an innocent owner, in the event of fraud.
  • If so, how the loss should be apportioned between Flammia, Caradonna and Hunt & Hunt.

The standard of care of professionals

In determining Hunt & Hunt's liability, the Court examined the operation of section 5O of the CLA, which makes it a defence for a professional to show it acted in a manner which was 'widely accepted in Australia by peer professional opinion as competent professional practice'. Justice Young held that:

  • Section 5O will only operate to determine the standard of care expected of a professional in the event that evidence is called on peer professional practice and, in that instance, 'it is the profession that sets the standard' (unless that standard is 'irrational').
  • If no evidence is called, then the Court will determine the matter using 'traditional principles' and 'the standard of care to be observed by a person with some special skill or competence is that of the ordinary skilled person exercising and professing to have that special skill': as per the High Court in Rogers v Whitaker (1992) 175 CLR 479. To this end, Justice Young made some useful comments on the standard of care expected of professional solicitors, including that:
  • A professional adviser is not an insurer ... the mere fact that the result is disastrous to the client does not mean necessarily that the solicitor was negligent [at 492].
  • 'The solicitor is not expected to be a person with superhuman abilities, but rather a person who will bring to bear on the tasks at hand their competence and skill that is usual among qualified and ordinary competent and careful solicitors in the exercise of their profession' [at 499].

In this case, expert evidence was adduced by Hunt & Hunt that 'all moneys' mortgages were the most common form of mortgage used in Australia. This was not sufficient to convince Justice Young that Hunt & Hunt complied with peer professional practice in this case. In his Honour's judgment, Hunt & Hunt should have advised of the risks of employing that standard form of 'all moneys' mortgage in every case.

Principles of apportionment

The Court then considered principles of proportionate liability. The Court determined that the claim against Hunt & Hunt was determined to be an 'apportionable claim' and that both Flammia and Caradonna were concurrent wrongdoers. Hunt & Hunt submitted that its liability should be restricted to 5% of the loss in circumstances where Caradonna and Flammia were guilty of actual fraud.

In apportioning Hunt & Hunt's liability, Justice Young determined that nothing turned on the difference between the use of the word 'just' in section 35 of the CLA, and the words 'just and equitable' in section 5 and section 9 of the Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1946 (NSW), which relate to contribution between tortfeasors and contributory negligence respectively. As a result, the Court could consider similar judgments on apportionment made in decisions applying contribution and contributory negligence principles.

His Honour referred to the apportionment exercise applied in various contributory negligence cases, including as set out by the High Court in Podrebersek v Australian Iron & Steel Pty Ltd (1985) 59 ALJR 492 at 495:

'The making of an apportionment as between a plaintiff and a defendant of their respective shares in the responsibility for the damage involves a comparison of both culpability, ie of the degree of departure from the standard of care of a reasonable man ... and of the relative importance of the acts of the parties in causing the damage ... it is the whole conduct of each negligent party in relation to the circumstances of the accident which must be subjected to comparative examination. The significance of the various elements involved in such an examination will vary from case to case; for example, the circumstances of some cases may be that a comparison of the relative importance of the acts of the parties in causing the damage will be of little, if any, importance.'

Justice Young also referred with approval to Justice Palmer's guidelines in Yates v Mobile Marine Repairs Pty Ltd [2007] NSWSC 1463, which specifically related to the application of section 35, being that a judge 'must make a comparison of the culpability of the acts of the parties causing damage and, thus, to the relative blameworthiness and relevant causal potency of the negligence of each party'.

Here, Justice Young stated that it was clear that, of the various wrongdoers, the most morally blameworthy was Caradonna who orchestrated the fraud. Flammia had played a significant, but relatively minor part. As to percentages, Justice Young was 'guided' by the previous decisions of the NSW Supreme Court in Ginelle Finance Pty Ltd v Diakakis [2007] NSWSC 60, in which His Honour Justice Hoeben found the proper apportionment was 90% to the fraudster and 10% to the solicitor, and to an almost identical result in Chandra v Perpetual Trustees Victoria [2007] 13 BPR 24, 675 (per Bryson J).

Hunt & Hunt was determined liable for 12.5% of the loss, on the basis that they were retained to protect the client from what actually happened. Caradonna as the 'major contributor' was apportioned liability of 72.5%, and Flammia's a little more than Hunt & Hunt at 15%.

Although contribution claims are not available to parties whose liability has been limited by proportionate liability, that party can make a cross-claim seeking a full indemnity for their apportionment of the loss. Hunt & Hunt had issued a cross-claim against Flammia asserting misleading and deceptive conduct in purportedly witnessing Vella's signature. This cross-claim succeeded in this instance (for what it was worth).

The final point of note in this matter is in relation to damages and the claim for the lost principal plus interest. As to interest, Mitchell Morgan had sought to recover interest at the rates it charged under the mortgage. The subject loan was for two months at a rate of 78% per annum, reduced to 54% per annum for prompt payment!

The Court would not accept interest at this rate, ordering interest pursuant to section 100 of the Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) from the date of payment out of the moneys. The Court applied a stringent approach to what is required to prove a claim for interest as damages. It is the plaintiff who bears the onus of establishing the loss of interest, which is not presumed to arise from the mere withholding of money.


The Vella decision highlights the fact solicitors must take care in the routine application of standard form documents and processes, without applying an independent consideration to the particular facts of a case.

For professionals generally (and those who insure them) the decision is positive, insofar as it restates the Courts' willingness to apportion a significant proportion of the claim to a 'fraudster' or 'more culpable party'. The case also shows that even where a proportion of the claim is allocated to the professional party involved, the apportionment may be further reduced by the use of an 'indemnity' cross-claim.

Phillips Fox has changed its name to DLA Phillips Fox because the firm entered into an exclusive alliance with DLA Piper, one of the largest legal services organisations in the world. We will retain our offices in every major commercial centre in Australia and New Zealand, with no operational change to your relationship with the firm. DLA Phillips Fox can now take your business one step further − by connecting you to a global network of legal experience, talent and knowledge.

This publication is intended as a first point of reference and should not be relied on as a substitute for professional advice. Specialist legal advice should always be sought in relation to any particular circumstances and no liability will be accepted for any losses incurred by those relying solely on this publication.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Mondaq Advice Centre (MACs)
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.