Australia: High Court decisions to prompt rethink of bargaining strategies

On 6 December 2017, the High Court of Australia (HCA) handed down two decisions that will have far-reaching consequences for the approach taken in bargaining for enterprise agreements and responding to industrial disputes.

In Esso Australia Pty Ltd v Australian Workers' Union [2017] HCA 54 (Esso Australia v AWU), the HCA held that a party negotiating an enterprise agreement cannot engage in protected industrial action where it has previously breached an order in relation to the bargaining.

In Aldi Foods Pty Ltd v Shop, Distributive & Allied Employees Association [2017] HCA 53 (Aldi Foods v SDA), the HCA held that an employer that intends to commence a new enterprise can make a non-greenfields enterprise agreement with its existing employees, even before the new enterprise has commenced operation or the existing employees have performed any work that would fall within the scope of the agreement.

Both of these decisions provide employers with potentially effective new strategies for bargaining and responding to industrial action. In this article, we examine the decisions and the lessons to be drawn.

BACKGROUND: ESSO AUSTRALIA V AWU

The parties in Esso Australia v AWU had been engaged in a protracted round of bargaining at Esso's Longford gas plant and Bass Strait platforms, during which the AWU took protected industrial action.

Esso obtained an order from the Fair Work Commission (FWC) under section 418 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (FW Act), requiring the AWU to stop taking certain action, including organising a restriction on 'the performance of equipment testing, air freeing or leak testing', in the period from 6 March 2015 to 17 March 2015. The AWU breached that order on 6 March 2015.

Section 415(1) of the FW Act provides a broad immunity from suit for a party engaging in protected industrial action. However, industrial action will only be 'protected', and therefore subject to that statutory immunity, if it satisfies a series of common requirements set out in section 413 of the FW Act.

Esso sought a declaration from the Federal Court of Australia (FCA) to the effect that, as the AWU had breached the FWC order, any further action organised by it was not 'protected industrial action', as it could not satisfy the requirement of s 413(5) of the FW Act.

Relevantly, section 413(5) provides that a person organising or engaging in industrial action "... must not have contravened any orders that apply to them and that relate to ... the agreement or a matter that arose during bargaining for the agreement".

Esso also claimed that, as any such action was not 'protected industrial action' subject to the statutory immunity, it amounted to unlawful coercion in breach of sections 343 and 348 of the FW Act.

The AWU argued that section 413(5) only required that it not be in breach of an order that remained in place at the time that it took the protected industrial action under challenge. In this case, the relevant order had expired on 17 March 2015, and as a result, the union should not be prevented from taking protected industrial action after that date.

The AWU also argued that 'coercion' could only be established if Esso could demonstrate that the union knew or intended that its conduct was unlawful, illegitimate or unconscionable at the time of the breach. On this basis, the conduct of the AWU organisers could not have amounted to coercion, as they genuinely believed at the time that they were organising lawful industrial action.

The FCA declined to make the declarations sought by Esso, but found that the AWU had breached sections 343 and 348 FW Act.1 On appeal, the Full Court of the FCA (FCAFC) accepted the AWU's arguments in relation to section 413(5), but did not overturn the finding in relation to coercion.2 Esso appealed to the HCA on the section 413(5) issue, and the AWU appealed on the coercion question.

THE HCA DECISION: ESSO AUSTRALIA V AWU

The HCA held by a 4:1 majority that the requirement in section 413(5) for compliance with orders as a pre-condition for taking protected industrial action is not confined to orders in existence at the time of the proposed industrial action, or which relate to that action.3 The majority found that there is nothing in the language of section 413(5) (a person 'must not have contravened any orders that apply to them') to suggest 'that the order must be one that continues in operation at the time of the proposed protected industrial action, or with which it is still possible to comply at that time'.4

In this case, as the AWU had already breached an order in relation to the proposed enterprise agreement, it could no longer satisfy section 413(5) in relation to any proposed industrial action, even though the relevant order was no longer in place. Any industrial action it took in relation to that bargaining was therefore unprotected.

Further, the HCA held that to establish coercion under sections 343 or 348 of the FW Act, there is no requirement that the party in breach know or intend that the relevant action be unlawful, illegitimate or unconscionable. It was enough to establish that the party took the relevant action against another person with intent to negate that person's choice.5

In any case, the AWU could not point to any evidence that the officials involved in organising the industrial action in this case honestly believed that the relevant bans were of a kind that fell within the concept of protected industrial action.6 Therefore, the AWU's industrial action amounted to unlawful coercion.

BACKGROUND: ALDI FOODS V SDA

In Aldi Foods v SDA, Aldi was in the process of establishing a new distribution centre in South Australia. It sought expressions of interest in working at the new distribution centre from its existing employees at other centres. Eventually 17 employees accepted offers of employment.

Aldi negotiated and made an enterprise agreement with the 17 existing employees, before construction of the distribution centre had been completed or those employees could begin work at the centre.

The FWC approved the enterprise agreement that had been made, and the SDA appealed that decision.

As the distribution centre was still under construction at the time the enterprise agreement was made, meaning there were no employees performing work covered by the enterprise agreement during the bargaining, the SDA contended that the enterprise agreement should have been made as a 'greenfields agreement' under section 172(2)(b) of the FW Act.

The SDA also argued that the enterprise agreement did not pass the 'better off overall test' (BOOT), one of the key requirements for FWC approval of a proposed agreement.

The Full Bench of the FWC (FWCFB) rejected the SDA's appeal.7 The SDA then appealed to the FCAFC, which found that the enterprise agreement could not have been made by any employees 'covered by' the enterprise agreement, as no employees could be 'covered' until the agreement had entered into operation. 8

The SDA also successfully argued that it was not open to the FWCFB to hold that the enterprise agreement had passed the BOOT, because the FWCFB had not engaged in a proper comparison between the proposed agreement and the relevant modern award. Instead, it had relied on the existence of a 'top-up clause' in the enterprise agreement, which granted employees a right to payment of any shortfall between the enterprise agreement and the relevant modern award, to hold that employees would be 'no worse off' under the enterprise agreement when compared with that award.

Aldi appealed to the HCA.

THE HCA DECISION: ALDI FOODS V SDA

On appeal, the joint judgment of six justices of the HCA9 focused on the distinction at sections 52 and 53 of the FW Act between when an enterprise agreement 'covers' an employee, and when it 'applies' to an employee.10

Their Honours held that once the enterprise agreement was made, the employees that had made it were accurately described as being 'covered' by it, even though it would not actually 'apply' to them until they started work at the new distribution centre. The employees 'covered by the agreement' – and therefore able to vote in relation to it – were those employees who would eventually work at the distribution centre after its construction.11

According to their Honours: 'a non-greenfields agreement can be made with two or more employees, so long as they are the only employees employed at the time of the vote who are to be covered by the agreement. It does not matter that the agreement may, in due course, come to apply to many more employees'.12 The fact that a greenfields agreement could also have been made for the new distribution centre was 'beside the point'.13

The HCA also upheld the FCAFC's conclusion that the FWCFB had erred in relying on the 'top-up' clause to find that the agreement passed the BOOT. The 'top-up' clause only entitled employees to a payment equal to the modern award, and would not leave the employees 'better off overall'.14 The FWCFB could therefore not rely on the clause to support a finding that the enterprise agreement passed the BOOT.

As a result, the HCA ordered the FWCFB to reconsider the application to approve the enterprise agreement, in light of the clarification of the proper operation of the BOOT.15

WHAT ARE THE IMPLICATIONS FOR EMPLOYERS?

Both of the decisions discussed above will have a number of significant consequences for employers, in particular those engaged in bargaining for a new enterprise agreement:

  • employers will have an even stronger incentive to seek FWC or court orders during bargaining, including orders that unprotected industrial action stop and good faith bargaining orders (as any breach of such orders will prevent unions from being able to organising or take further protected industrial action);
  • unions that have engaged in industrial action subsequent to a breach of a relevant order – even where they genuinely believed it at the time to be protected industrial action – may be liable for any harm suffered as a result of the action, and/or for coercion in breach of sections 343 or 348 of the FW Act;
  • employers will have greater flexibility in reaching enterprise agreements for new enterprises. Rather than having to negotiate a greenfields agreement with a relevant union, employers can now reach an enterprise agreement with existing employees who will later be employed in the new enterprise, so long as they will be 'covered by' the enterprise agreement in that role.

The decisions in both Esso Australia v AWU and Aldi Foods v SDA will provide employers with expanded tools for reaching enterprise agreements that work most effectively for their workforces and for responding to potential industrial action. Employers should carefully consider their industrial bargaining strategies in light of these developments.

Footnotes

1Esso v AWU (2015) 253 IR 304.

2 Esso v AWU (2016) 245 IR 39.

3 Esso Australia Pty Ltd v Australian Workers' Union [2017] HCA 54 at [1] and [29]-[53].

4 Ibid, [41].

5 Ibid at [61] and [63].

6 Ibid, [63].

7 TWU v Aldi Foods Pty Ltd (2016) 255 IR 248.

8 SDAEA v Aldi Foods Pty Ltd (2016) 245 FCR 155.

9 Gageler J agreed in a separate judgment.

10 Aldi Foods Pty Ltd v Shop, Distributive & Allied Employees Association [2017] HCA 53 at [73]-[75].

11 Ibid at [77].

12 Ibid at [82], referring to CFMEU v John Holland Pty Ltd (2015) 228 FCR 297.

13 Aldi Foods Pty Ltd v Shop, Distributive & Allied Employees Association [2017] HCA 53 at [81].

14 Ibid at [94] and [96].

15 Ibid at [104].

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Chambers Asia Pacific Awards 2016 Winner – Australia
Client Service Award
Employer of Choice for Gender Equality (WGEA)

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions