Australia: Footpath Falls - Should Highway Authorities Be Concerned?

Last Updated: 5 August 2008
Article by Graham Armstead

The Survival of Non Feasance

In 2001 the High Court decided in Brodie –v– Singleton Shire Council and Ghantous –v– Hawkesbury City Council that the non feasance defence should no longer be available to highway authorities. This occurred decades after it was abolished in other common law jurisdictions. At the time there were serious concerns that this could expose highway authorities to a flood of litigation. As a result the defence was restored in Victoria by the Transport (Highway Rules) Act 2002. That particular piece of legislation was intended to be an interim measure pending the rationalisation of laws relating to highway authorities in Victoria. This rationalisation took place with the implementation of the Road Management Act 2004.

The Road Management Act introduced certain statutory defences based upon reasonable care and compliance with reasonable policies along with section 102 of the Road Management Act which in some ways effectively operates as an extension of the non feasance principle. It states:-

"102. Limitations on liability of road authority

1. Subject to this section, a road authority is not liable in any proceeding for damages, whether for breach of the statutory duty imposed by section 40 or for negligence, in respect of any alleged failure by the road authority –

  1. to remove a hazard or to repair a defect or deterioration in a road; or
  2. to give warning of a hazard, defect or deterioration in road.

2. Sub-section (1) does not apply if, at the time of the alleged failure, the road authority had actual knowledge of the particular risk the materialisation of which resulted in the harm.

3. For the purposes of sub-section (2), the road authority is to be taken to have had actual knowledge of the particular risk if it is proven in the proceedings that the deterioration in the road had been reported in writing to the road authority under section 115."

As will be seen from the above, the defence provided by section 102 does not apply if actual knowledge existed of the risk that caused the harm. Sub-section 3 goes on to say that a report in writing to the Road Authority constitutes actual knowledge. However, it does not exclude the possibility of actual knowledge having been obtained by other means. What these other means may be remains unclear. Similarly it is not clear who has to acquire the relevant knowledge.

To date there have been no decisions in Victoria dealing with this particular issue. However, there have been three recent decisions in the New South Wales Court of Appeal that may provide us with some guidance.

Section 45 of the Civil Liability Act (New South Wales) states:

1. A roads authority is not liable in proceedings for civil liability to which this part applies for harm arising from a failure of the authority to carry out road work, or to consider carrying out road work, unless at the time of the alleged failure the authority had actual knowledge of the particular risk the materialisation of which resulted in the harm.

2. This section does not operate:

  1. to create a duty of care in respect of a risk merely because a roads authority has actual knowledge of the risk, or
  2. to affect any standard of care that would otherwise be applicable in respect of a risk.

3. In this section:

  1. carry out road work means carry out any activity in connection with the construction, erection, installation, maintenance, inspection, repair, removal or replacement of a road work within the meaning of the Roads Act 1993.
  2. roads authority has the same meaning as in the Roads Act 1993."

Section 45 of the Civil Liability Act is of a similar nature to section 102 of the Road Management Act. In particular, these provisions allow a defence in situations where a highway authority has failed to undertake road work which has arguably resulted in an injury. In both cases the defence does not apply if the "road authority had actual knowledge of the (particular) risk". In North Sydney Council –v– Roman 2007 (NSWCA 27) the majority of the Court of Appeal decided that the defence was directed to those persons within the authorities organisation whose function it was to carry out road work or consider carrying out road work. In dissent, McColl JA thought that the term actual knowledge should encompass "the knowledge of those persons who, acting within the scope of their duties, learn of the particular risk under an obligation to report it as part of the road authorities system of maintaining the roads under its jurisdiction."

It had been thought the High Court would provide some guidance as to which was the preferable approach. However, Roman's case was ultimately settled before the High Court had an opportunity to consider the issue. Accordingly, when the same issue came before the New South Wales Court of Appeal again in both Angel –v– Hawkesbury City Council and Blacktown City Council –v– Hocking the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of New South Wales directed that the appeals in both these cases be heard by a bench of five justices to ensure consistency in decision making.

Surprisingly, after having gone to the time and effort of constituting a court of appeal comprising 5 justices of appeal, the situation has yet to be clarified. In Angel –v– Hawkesbury City Council the Court decided that regardless of which test was applied from Roman's case, the Council had actual knowledge of the risk hence the statutory exclusion did not apply.

In Blacktown City Council –v– Hocking, all of the judges decided that there was no evidence of negligence on part of the Council either in relation to the construction or inspection of a damaged Telstra pit. Accordingly, there was no need to consider whether or not the defence in section 45 may have applied. The only judge to consider the issue was Tobias JA, who in dissent agreed that there was insufficient evidence to suggest the Council had been negligent in failing to detect that a pit was defective at the time the footpath was constructed. However, he thought that the Council should have been able to detect that the pit was hazardous and that the Council had actual knowledge of the risk which meant that the defence provided by section 45 of the Civil Liability Act (the equivalent to our section 102 of the Road Management Act) did not apply. In reaching this conclusion he said that he preferred the opinion of the dissenting member of the Court in Roman's case. This means that he thought that once a council officer with a duty to inspect roads and report their observations of particular risks to those responsible for repairing the road or considering whether the road should be repaired became aware of the risk "actual knowledge" had been acquired. Accordingly the defence created by section 45 of the Civil Liability Act would no longer be available.


While the law is not settled in New South Wales and there have been no decisions of the Supreme Court in Victoria, we doubt that the restrictive interpretation of the exclusion to the operation of section 102 of the Road Management Act will apply in Victoria. We suspect that in all likelihood the Victorian Court of Appeal will prefer the approach taken by McColl JA in Roman –v– North Sydney Council and Tobias JA in Blacktown City Council –v– Hocking. This means that the section 102 defence will not operate in those circumstances where a Council acquires knowledge of a risk through its normal system of inspection and that knowledge would normally be reported to those officers responsible for repairing the roads or footpaths or those officers responsible for making decisions as to whether repairs should take place.

Further Comments

In Angel –v– Hawkesbury City Council the New South Wales Court of Appeal decided that a tripping hazard caused by a concrete slab on a footpath being 4 – 5cms higher than an adjoining slab was not an obvious hazard because it was obscured by a shadow cast by a nearby tree. In some ways this is inconsistent with earlier decisions and in particular the Victorian Court of Appeals decision in Boorondarah City Council –v– Cattanach. This may be an indication that courts will adopt a more sympathetic approach towards pedestrians than they have exhibited in the last few years.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Mondaq Advice Centre (MACs)
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.