Australia: AU$25 million criminal cartel conviction for liner shipping operator

Last Updated: 3 September 2017
Article by Nathan Cecil
Most Read Contributor in Australia, September 2018

Global shipping line Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha (NYK) has been found guilty of criminal cartel conduct and fined AU$25 million.

This is the first criminal cartel prosecution and conviction in Australia since the introduction of criminal cartel liability in 2009, and the second highest penalty ever imposed under Australian competition laws. We have previously summarised the prosecution here.

The criminal cartel conduct

The Court found that there were five shipping lines party to the cartel provisions the subject of the prosecution, each of them major shipping lines involved in the car carrier trade. A similar charge has been entered against K Line and the ACCC has advised that it is continuing to investigate the conduct of the other lines involved.

The unlawful conduct related to fixing freight rates, bid rigging and customer allocation in respect of shipping services supplied to ten major vehicle manufacturers and covering shipments from India, Thailand, Japan, Indonesia, North America and Europe during 2010-2012.

The Court found that "it is likely that the anti-competitive effect of the offending conduct resulted in higher freight rates on the subject shipping routes to Australia" and "this was an extremely serious offence against Australia's laws prohibiting cartel conduct".

The Court noted that the shipping lines were involved in a number of vessel sharing agreements which covered scheduling and operational matters, not including pricing, all of which were lawful.

The Court also noted that three of the shipping lines were party to a conference agreement registered under Part X of Australia's Competition and Consumer Act and which provided certain exemptions from the Australian cartel provisions. That conference agreement permitted the lines concerned to "agree on freight rates, referred to as tariffs, for the supply of shipping services on routes from Japan, Korea, China, Taiwan, Hong Kong, Borneo and the Philippines to Australia". As such, pricing conduct under that registered conference agreement was lawful and not the subject of the charges.

The Court found that since at least February 1997, NYK and a number of other lines were party to an arrangement or understanding by which they agreed not to seek to alter their existing market shares or otherwise win existing business from each other and which contained provisions by which the participants would:

  • share information about and agree on freight rates and freight rate changes and agree collectively to submit bids and enter into awarded contracts on the basis of those rates, with the purpose, effect or likely effect of directly or indirectly fixing, controlling or maintaining freight prices
  • share information about requests for and agree on how they would collectively respond to bids and submit bids and enter into awarded contracts on the basis of those bids, with the purpose or effect of controlling which bid was likely to be successful
  • agree to allocate customer or potential customers on particular routes, with the purpose or effect of lessening competition as between the lines for those customers and routes.

The Court noted that NYK had implemented a program of competition law and cartel compliance education and training, but this failed to cause the relevant employees to cease communicating with each other on pricing issues.

Further, the Court found that in 2011, NYK Senior Management were informed of the likelihood that employees were communicating with other lines on pricing, which would contravene Japanese anti-trust law. The Court found that, as a result, NYK resolved that:

  • any such pricing communication between lines should be conducted at a Manager level or above only; and
  • such communications should not be documented in any way.

Cooperation and rectification

When notified of the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission's (ACCC) investigation into the conduct in 2012, NYK immediately offered to cooperate fully with the ACCC and did so throughout the period of the investigation.

NYK pleaded guilty to the charge, after having been found guilty of similar breaches in Japan, US and South Africa, facing ongoing cartel prosecution in Chile and being involved in cartel prosecution in China (but being awarded immunity for its information and cooperation).

NYK gave detailed evidence from very senior representatives as to its contrition and the extensive steps that it had taken to ensure that similar conduct did not occur again, including establishing a Compliance Executive Committee which, along with NYK senior management, independent directors and external lawyers, monitored NYK's competition law compliance.

Penalty

The maximum penalty was AU$100 million.

After weighing up the severity of the conduct against NYK's contrition, cooperation and remedial conduct, the Court held that the appropriate penalty was AU$25 million, but warned that this incorporated "a global discount of 50% for NYK's early plea of guilty and past and future assistance and cooperation, together with the contrition inherent in the early plea and cooperation: meaning that but for the early plea and past and future cooperation, the fine would have been $50 million".

Lessons learned

At least from an Australian perspective, much of the wrongful conduct could have been excused if NYK and the other lines with whom it was cooperating had registered their agreement under the Australian competition laws. Australian competition laws currently exempt vessel sharing agreements and discussion agreements from anti-competition sanctions, as long as those agreements are first registered and notified to the representative importer/exporter bodies (and see our following article). The Court noted that NYK was a party to such a registered conference agreement (vessel sharing and discussion agreement) in respect of some of its trades and that no complaint or prosecution had been brought in respect of any conduct under that conference agreement, as it was exempt from prosecution.

The case also highlights the critical importance of having in place a comprehensive and rigorous competition law compliance framework, with a quality assurance or compliance performance monitoring and rectification component. NYK did have in place a comprehensive training and compliance framework. However, it was not effectively being monitored to ensure that it was being followed in practice. Equally important, when it was uncovered that non-compliant conduct was taking place, rectification action to avoid it continuing to happen into the future was not taken.

Finally, the case demonstrates that when a breach has occurred, the best approach is to cooperate with the authorities, rather than try and misdirect them during any investigation. NYK's open cooperation and willingness to review it compliance framework once the issue was raised by the authorities resulted in a discount on the penalty that would otherwise have been imposed on it of AU$25 million!

The future of liner shipping cooperation in Australia

Part X of the Competition and Consumer Act permits competitor shipping lines to obtain exemption from competition laws for conduct which would otherwise be considered anti-competitive.

The exemptions from prosecution permit competitor lines to engage in administrative, scheduling, capacity, cost/profit pooling, bid and pricing coordination. In order to obtain the exemptions, cooperating lines must register their vessel sharing or discussion agreements with the Registrar of Liner Shipping, notify them to the representative importer/exporter bodies and undertake good faith negotiations with those bodies in relation to service levels and any fixed pricing components.

However, that framework is about to change.

After years of sustained criticism of the justification and benefits of permitting such cooperation, the Australian Government has recently passed legislation which will repeal the Part X regime and replace it with some form of block exemption regime. This change is expected to be implemented in 2018. The body which will set the limits of and administer the block exemption regime is the ACCC, which has been the most vocal critic of the Part X regime for decades.

The ACCC is yet to commence industry consultation on the structure and extent of the block exemption which it will eventually issue. One of the central issues is whether the Australian block exemption will permit merely administrative, scheduling and capacity coordination (commonly classed as vessel sharing agreements) or also permit cost/profit pooling and pricing coordination (commonly classed as discussion agreements). What is certain, especially in light of the ACCC's recent criminal cartel prosecutions (see our above article) is that the ACCC is actively targeting cartel cooperation in the shipping sector.

Any cooperation activity falling outside the block exemption will be subject to Australian competition laws and the ordinary and rigorous notification or approvals process if parties do wish it to continue.

The Australian situation forms part of a rising tide of reconsideration of the justification and benefits of competition law exemption for liner shipping conferences. On this front, we have no doubt that the ACCC will be closely monitoring developments in jurisdictions which are grappling with the same issues, in particular:

  • Hong Kong, which has just issued its decision to grant a five year liner shipping block exemption for vessel sharing agreements, but not for discussion agreements; and
  • New Zealand, which is expected to introduce a block exemption for liner shipping, after having first resolved to remove all competition law exemptions for liner shipping entirely. The Government's position was amended after both Shipper and Carrier interests expressed the need to retain some form of permitted cooperation in order to ensure the continued viability of reliable shipping services.

What this means for you

The final scope of the Australian block exemption will have a significant impact on the conduct of liner shipping cooperation for services to/from Australia. Regardless of the final form that the block exemption takes, it will mark a significant shift from the current regime and require substantial commercial and compliance adjustment from the ground up.

From a commercial perspective for international shipping companies, consistency and commercial certainty are often valued above all else. If the Australian block exemption was substantially more restrictive than the competition law regimes of other countries connected to the Australian trade, this could cause complication and uncertainty over how shipping lines conduct their business in those other jurisdictions.

It is essential that any shipping lines trading to/from Australia take an active role in the debate on the shape of the Australian block exemption, both through their representative bodies and independently.

All lines should ensure that they are on the ACCC's consultation radar and that they file considered submissions once the public consultation period opens. Anecdotal evidence suggests that Australian Shipper interests likewise don't want a block exemption regime which constrains shipping lines from cooperating fully on all matters of administrative, scheduling and capacity coordination. Those Shipper interests should be encouraged to file supporting submissions.

This publication does not deal with every important topic or change in law and is not intended to be relied upon as a substitute for legal or other advice that may be relevant to the reader's specific circumstances. If you have found this publication of interest and would like to know more or wish to obtain legal advice relevant to your circumstances please contact one of the named individuals listed.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Nathan Cecil
 
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions