Australia: Third party payments, voidable preferences and the Quistclose trust

Last Updated: 18 July 2017
Article by BRI Ferrier


In preference proceedings under section 588FA, Corporations Act, or section 122 Bankruptcy Act, liquidators or trustees in bankruptcy seeking to recover alleged preferential payments made to a creditor prior to the debtor's winding up or bankruptcy, will often learn that payments to the creditor have been made by a third party as opposed to the debtor prior to the debtor's winding up or bankruptcy.

In these circumstances the creditor may be in a position to argue that the payments received from the third party arose from a Quistclose trust emanating from the dealings between the debtor and the third party making the payment. The objective of the creditor in relying on the existence of a Quistclose trust will be to deny the trustee in bankruptcy or liquidator the right to recover the payments received as unfair preferences.

Recently the Federal Court in Rambaldi v Commissioner of Taxation (2017) FCA 567 had occasion to consider whether third party payments in that case could be pursued by a trustee in bankruptcy under section 122 Bankruptcy Act where the payments involved were made by the third party in circumstances giving rise to a Quistclose trust.

Before reviewing the decision of the Court in this case it will be useful to reflect on the reasons why the Quistclose trust may lend itself to a creditor seeking to challenge the preference recovery proceedings being pursued by a trustee in bankruptcy or liquidator.

Third party payments and the Quistclose trust

In commercial transactions a trust relationship may arise where A (the debtor) instructs B (the lender) from B's funds to pay C (a creditor of A) a sum of money which is not to become part of the property of A, and which is to be used exclusively for the purpose of paying C. The trust relationship arising in these circumstances is known as a Quistclose trust.

While the payment from B to C results in the extinguishment of A's debt to C the arrangement will also usually give rise to a loan agreement between A and B in respect of B's payment to C. Notwithstanding the loan agreement between A and B in these circumstances the essential intention of A and B is that the funds under B's control are held by B on trust for C and never become part of the property of A.

A possible outcome of the resulting Quistclose trust is that the payment from B to C will not constitute an unfair preferential payment from A to C recoverable from C by a trustee in bankruptcy or liquidator in the event that A subsequently proceeds into bankruptcy or liquidation. This is the issue that arose for consideration in the Rambaldi case.

Rambaldi (Trustee) v Commissioner of Taxation (2017) FCA 567, 25/5/2017


  • On 18 March 2014 the Commissioner presented a creditor's petition against the estate of Ms Alex.
  • On 1 June 2014 Ms Alex entered into a Loan Agreement with Quality Australia Investments (QAI) under which QAI agreed to lend Ms Alex (and a company of which she was the sole director and shareholder) monies to satisfy Ms Alex's income tax debt, the subject of the petition.
  • Clause 4 of the Loan Agreement provided that Ms Alex must only use the loan for the purpose presented to QAI, namely, the payment of Ms Alex's income tax debt and her solicitor's fees.
  • Under an authority to pay executed by Ms Alex she authorized and directed QAI to pay the monies to the Commissioner by way of bank cheque.
  • On 7 July 2014 the Commissioner received the bank cheque which was applied in payment of the income tax debt owed by Ms Alex.
  • On 8 December a sequestration order was made against the estate of Ms Alex and the trustees were appointed.

The issues

The only issue arising in the case was whether the loan money from QAI was property of Ms Alex, this being an express requirement under section 122, Bankruptcy Act. The trustees in bankruptcy contended that the loan money was property of Ms Alex paid by QAI at her direction. The Commissioner contended that the loan money was not property of Ms Alex but rather was held on a Quistclose trust for payment to the Commissioner. Moreover, if for any reason the payment to the Commissioner failed the funds were to be repaid to QAI.

The decision

The Court found that the intention of the parties was to be gathered from the written Loan Agreement, and concluded that the parties intended there to be a Quistclose trust created under which Ms Alex would not hold the funds at all. The Court observed:

"The machinery adopted by the parties only serves to confirm that they did not intend that the loan money would become the property of Ms Alex ... The purpose of the parties was express, namely, that the money was to be used only for the payment to the Commissioner and the solicitors." (para 46)

As a result of the loan funds being held on a Quistclose trust, the funds did not become the property of Ms Alex. It is an express requirement of a preference recovery under section 122, Bankruptcy Act that the funds received by the Commissioner were paid from Ms Alex's property. Given that this was found by the Court not to have occurred, the funds paid were not recoverable by the bankruptcy trustees as a preferential payment.

Implications of the decision

It is apparent that this decision has significant consequences for trustees in bankruptcy seeking to avoid pre-bankruptcy preferential payments. If third party payments are implemented in circumstances similar to this case then the creditor of the bankrupt in receipt of third party payments may feel confident that the trustee in bankruptcy will have difficulty establishing that the creditor was in receipt of preferential payments within the terms of section 122 Bankruptcy Act as presently drafted.

Does the decision in Rambaldi apply to unfair preference recoveries under section 588FA, Corporations Act?

As observed above Rambaldi is a bankruptcy case concerned with the operation of section 122, Bankruptcy Act. In the context of a company in winding up, unfair preference recoveries are pursued by the liquidator under section 588FA of the Corporations Act, which, in important respects, is expressed in terms different to section 122, Bankruptcy Act.

In particular section 588FA when describing the elements of an unfair preference refers to a "transaction" to which "the company and the creditor are parties" and pursuant to which the creditor received from the company more than the creditor would receive in the winding up.

In view of the different terminology employed in section 588FA the question arises whether a third party payment pursuant to a Quistclose trust amounts to a "transaction" in satisfaction of section 588FA.

In Commissioner of Taxation v Kassem (2012) FCAFC 124 the Full Federal Court in referring to the "plain language of section 588FA(1)" clearly suggests that the requirements under section 122, Bankruptcy Act that were determinative of the decision in Rambaldi are not present in section 588FA. The Full Court observed:

"There is nothing in section 588FA(1) which expressly incorporates as a requirement for an unfair preference that the transaction must result in the diminution of the debtor's assets." (para's 59-60).

Moreover at (para 56) the Full Court accepted that "in each case the court must look to the transactions between the parties in a way which accords with commercial realities ... it is the objective purpose, in a business sense, of the whole transaction that must be considered."

Similarly in the earlier case, Re Emanuel (No 14) Pty Ltd: Macks v Blacklaw & Shadforth Pty Ltd (1997) FCA 667 the Full Federal Court when commenting on payments to a creditor under a Quistclose trust observed that:

"All that a trust finding would do would be to change the machinery employed by the parties in extinguishing (the company's debt to its creditor)."

In summary, the above cases involving unfair preference recoveries in a winding up clearly suggest that section 588 FA, Corporations Act is primarily concerned with whether the parties were instrumental in bringing about a transaction that generated a preferential effect. More specifically, as observed by the Court in Re Emanuel (No 14) Pty Ltd, a payment by a third party under a Quistclose trust at the direction of the company debtor is in reality a particular way of constituting the company and its creditor as parties to a "transaction" in satisfaction of section 588FA.

Concluding comments

The Rambaldi case is an important decision with respect to Quistclose trusts, third party payments and preference recoveries in the bankruptcy context. The case provides a means of ensuring that third party payments to a creditor will not in the circumstances of the case be recoverable as preferential payments in the subsequent bankruptcy of the debtor.

However, as observed above, in the context of winding up different considerations arise in view of the express terms of section 588FA, Corporations Act enabling the courts to avoid the outcomes of the Rambaldi decision.

Once again we are encountering different outcomes depending on whether the debtor is a bankrupt or a company in winding up. Such distinctions are always difficult to justify and support calls for unification of bankruptcy and corporate insolvency laws.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions