Australia: Competition For Class Action Control

Last Updated: 27 May 2008
Article by Gareth Horne

The litigation funding industry in Australia has experienced significant change and development in recent times as it attempts to define its role in the domestic legal market. In our publication of 4 September 2006 (Litigation Funding: In the Public Interest) we commented on the High Court of Australia's ruling in Campbells Cash & Carry Pty Limited v Fostif Pty Limited [2006] HCA 41 (Fostif) which provided significant momentum for development and regulation of the litigation funding industry. In our subsequent publication of 25 July 2007 (Litigation Funding: Redefining the Boundaries) we reported on the interlocutory judgment in P Dawson Nominees Pty Ltd v Multiplex Limited [2007] FCA 1061 (Dawson v Multiplex) in which the Federal Court of Australia identified economic benefits in restricting class membership of class actions to exclude "free-riders" ie. "persons who make no direct or indirect contribution toward the costs of the action".

Increased competition

Decisions such as Fostif and Dawson v Multiplex have fuelled class actions in Australia and the demand for litigation funding. The experience of Wotton + Kearney in several shareholder class actions has been that litigation funding is becoming prevalent to the extent that it may be considered the "norm" in class actions brought by aggrieved investors. This increase in demand has brought with it increased opportunities for international litigation funders to compete in the market.

Against the backdrop of increasing competition between law firms and litigation funders to conduct class action claims on behalf of aggrieved investors, the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) also appears to be seeking a more proactive role in large investor claims. Under section 50 of the Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act 2001 (Cth) ASIC has the authority to pursue civil legal action on behalf of investors if it is deemed to be in the "public interest". ASIC recently announced that it would exercise that authority by commencing class action proceedings on behalf of aggrieved investors seeking damages arising from the collapse of the Westpoint Group.

Competing Centro proceedings

The clamber to act for and fund shareholders in class actions may leave the Federal Court of Australia with a dilemma. On 9 May 2008 aggrieved investors commenced proceedings against Centro Retail Limited, Centro MCS Manager Limited, Centro Properties Limited and CPT Manager Limited (collectively known as Centro). Maurice Blackburn Lawyers are acting for the plaintiffs in those proceedings which are backed by the Australian litigation funder IMF (Australia) Ltd (IMF). It is expected that separate but almost identical proceedings will be commenced shortly against Centro by another group of aggrieved shareholders represented by Slater & Gordon Lawyers with the financial support of the US-based Commonwealth Legal Funding (CLF).

It seems unlikely that either Maurice Blackburn / IMF or Slater & Gordon / CLF will want to cede control of the Centro proceedings in circumstances where each group of players is seeking to strengthen its role in the domestic class action and litigation funding markets. If that is the case then it appears that the Federal Court of Australia may be required to consider whether one of the Centro proceedings should be stayed, and if so, to make a difficult determination as to which proceedings should take priority. Alternatively, the Court may choose to consolidate the Centro proceedings. If the two proceedings are consolidated the Court may still be required to determine which law firm and litigation funder will retain the decision-making "control" of the consolidated proceedings.

Australian approach to competing proceedings

There is very limited authority in Australia on the Court's approach to competing proceedings. The issue was briefly considered in Johnson Tiles Pty Ltd v Esso Australia Ltd [1999] FCA 56. In his judgment Merkel J held that there was no "first come first served" rule in respect of representative proceedings commenced under Part IVA of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) (the Act). In other words, subsequent proceedings will not automatically take a back seat simply because they were not filed first. His Honour added that the Federal Court of Australia has power under the Act to direct which representative proceedings are to continue if there are multiple proceedings concerning the same subject matter. Merkel J did not however elaborate on the factors that the Court will consider in making that direction.

Legislative guidance in the US

In the absence of clear judicial guidance on the issue in Australia it is useful to look to the US experience. Unsurprisingly there are a number of US decisions relating to the determination of which group of investors within a single proceedings should be selected by the Court to act as the lead plaintiff(s) with effective "control"

of the proceedings. Those decisions have been guided by section 78u-4(3) of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act 1995 (US) (PSLRA) which provides that the court will appoint a "lead plaintiff" (including in consolidated proceedings) who is the "most capable of adequately representing the interest of class members". Section 78u-4(3) includes a rebuttable presumption that the most adequate plaintiff is the plaintiff with "the largest financial interest in the relief sought by the class".

Rule 23(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 1938 (US) (FRCP) provides guidance on how class Counsel should be selected. It identifies several factors to be considered by the court in making that determination including but not limited to:

  • The work Counsel has done in identifying or investigating potential claims in the action;
  • Counsel's experience in class actions and complex litigation;
  • Counsel's knowledge of the applicable law; and
  • Counsel's resources which are available to represent the class.

Appointing lead plaintiffs in the US

The legislative guidance provided by the PSLRA and FRCP in the United States has assisted the Courts in making a determination as to who should "control" proceedings on behalf of a class of plaintiffs. This judicial discretion provided by the PSLRA and FRCP has not surprisingly led to exceptions. This was highlighted by the decision of the Court in Laperriere v Vesta Insurance Group (1998) U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23619. In that case the Court decided that the lead plaintiff would be decided "by a coin toss, to be conducted in the courtroom" on the basis that the Court was unable and/or unwilling to decide between competing plaintiff groups, each of which could more than adequately represent the plaintiffs. The parties agreed to serve as co-lead plaintiffs before the coin toss took place.

The concept of appointing co-lead plaintiffs with equal votes in the decision making process was adopted in Re Oxford Health Plans, Inc.

Securities Litigation (1998) 182 F.R.D. 42 (Re Oxford). In his judgment Brieant J held that it was in the best interests of the class to have co-lead plaintiffs because it would:

"...allow for pooling, not only of the knowledge and experience, but also of the resources of the plaintiffs' counsel in order to support what could prove to be a costly and time-consuming litigation."

The Federal Court's dilemma

Under Section 22 of the Act the Federal Court of Australia has the power to ensure that multiplicity of proceedings is avoided. Order 29 rule 5 of the Federal Court Rules 1979 (Cth) also provides the Court with the discretionary power to consolidate proceedings where common questions of law or fact arise.

However it seems that the Federal Court of Australia would have some difficulty however in justifying a legal basis to prefer one litigation funder and/or law firm to represent lead plaintiffs in the Centro proceedings to the exclusion of their "competitors", or alternatively to choose which proceedings to stay.

The solution?

It remains to be seen whether the parties agree of their own accord to consolidate the Centro proceedings and agree to share "control" with co-lead plaintiffs. In the absence of such an agreement the Court may be left in the position of having to justify a preference for one litigation funder and law firm over the others in deciding to stay one of the proceedings. That would be particularly difficult in circumstances where both law firms have experience in representative proceedings and significant financial backing from litigation funders.

To avoid making that decision the Federal Court of Australia may seek to consolidate any related Centro proceedings and follow the approach adopted in Re Oxford of appointing co-lead plaintiffs. The decision, if made, would further redefine the rapidly changing class action and litigation funding landscape in Australia. This issue highlights the growing need for legislative intervention to regulate the litigation funding industry and to provide the Courts with some guidance (and litigants with some certainty) in dealing with issues arising in funded litigation.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Mondaq Advice Centre (MACs)
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.