Australia: Limelight Issue No.66: CTP insurance policy

On 23 March 2017, the Supreme Court of Queensland handed down its decision in favour of the CTP insurer in a landmark case involving the catastrophic injury of a young man in a motor accident.

The case turned on the identity of the driver of the insured vehicle at the time of the accident, with the young man (plaintiff) and his parents asserting that it was the father who was driving, in circumstances where the CTP insurance policy did not respond if the plaintiff was the driver.

After an 8-day liability-only hearing and a thorough deliberation on the competing forensic and medical evidence presented to determine the identity of the driver of the vehicle, the Court found that the plaintiff was the driver.

Facts

On 25 September 2013, the plaintiff and his family were on an outing on Stradbroke Island. The plaintiff, who was 17 and not licensed to drive, was permitted to drive the family vehicle (the SUV) on this day. Whilst driving, the plaintiff failed to keep the SUV on the correct side of the road and was catastrophically injured in a near head-on collision with an approaching vehicle.

The driver of the other vehicle was unable to assist in identifying the driver of the SUV. All he could attest to was that he had seen both the plaintiff and his father in the rear cabin of the SUV within a couple of minutes after the accident.

It was agreed by all first responders who attended the collision scene that there was confusion in the aftermath and difficulty in communicating with the plaintiff and his family, who were Taiwanese.

Attending police identified that SUV's airbag had been deployed in the collision and what appeared to be blood was present on the airbag.

Relevantly, the driver's seatbelt was in the buckled position and the seat laid back. It was thought by police that the driver had not been wearing the seatbelt but instead it had been clipped in place to stop the warning beep that vehicles emit to prompt a driver to buckle up.

The police sought to identify the driver and DNA samples were later taken from the plaintiff and his father for testing. A Scenes of Crime Officer obtained a swab from the airbag.

The DNA samples were compared with the swab and the blood found on the airbag was found to be that of the plaintiff. The plaintiff would later decline to be interviewed by police.

No mechanical defects were identified through vehicle inspection of the SUV.

Injuries

The plaintiff sustained spinal injuries, which were later diagnosed as an unstable fracture of the cervical spine at C6/7; partial spinal cord contusions; a partial tetraplegia from C7 downwards; and maxillofacial and dental alveolar fractures.

The father had no visible injuries, but was later treated for potential spinal injuries. He then said his hand had sustained cuts.

Insurance claim

The plaintiff and his mother lodged notices of claim with the CTP insurer of the SUV, asserting that the father was the driver of the SUV at the time of the collision.

The CTP insurer made payments pursuant to these claims, including rehabilitation costs for the plaintiff and a settlement amount to the mother; however, it later contended that the plaintiff was the driver at the time of the collision and that the payments should therefore be returned, given that the CTP policy did not respond to the plaintiff's claim, and issues of contributory negligence arose relating to the mother's claim, if the plaintiff was the driver.

Proceedings

The plaintiff issued proceedings against his parents and the CTP insurer.

The pleading on which the plaintiff eventually relied alleged that the collision was caused by the negligence of his father as the driver of the SUV. On that basis, the plaintiff pleaded against the CTP insurer that, as a passenger, he should be covered by the CTP policy.

The CTP insurer defended the claim on the basis that the father was not driving the SUV at the time of the collision; it was instead the plaintiff and that, by reason of the plaintiff's conduct in driving without being the holder of a driver's licence or a learner's permit, he was wholly responsible for his injuries or 100% contributorily negligent, so that the CTP insurer had no liability to him.

The CTP insurer also counterclaimed for recovery of the payments made to the plaintiff and members of his family on the basis those payments were induced by the deceit of the plaintiff and the mother in falsely claiming the father was the driver of the SUV at the time of the collision.

Plaintiff's Case

The plaintiff and his mother gave evidence that, at the time of the collision, he was in the rear of the vehicle with his two younger siblings and sitting directly behind his father, who was driving.

The father, while present in court for the duration of the hearing, was not called to give evidence for the plaintiff's case.

The plaintiff submitted that the DNA evidence was circumstantial and there was an entirely reasonable explanation why his blood was on the airbag, notwithstanding his assertion that he was sitting in the rear of the SUV, as well as the positioning of the driver's seat and seatbelt after the collision.

The plaintiff also submitted that it was inherently unlikely that the father, within a very small window of time, would have had the foresight to remove the plaintiff from the driver's seat into the rear of the SUV to avoid anyone observing the plaintiff as the driver.

The plaintiff led evidence from a neurosurgeon, who proffered the opinion that the plaintiff's injuries could have occurred as either the driver or backseat passenger.

An expert engineer called by the plaintiff undertook an assessment of the safety devices in the SUV to determine their likely effectiveness in a collision of this nature and whether the plaintiff's and father's injuries were consistent with either being the driver.

The engineer concluded the fact the driver's airbag had deployed reduced the likelihood the driver would suffer facial injuries of the nature sustained by the plaintiff. He equated facial injuries to head/neck injuries.

The plaintiff also relied on evidence of a DNA forensic biology consultant to cast doubt on the accuracy of the collecting and analysis of the blood samples for DNA comparison.

Insurer's Case

The CTP insurer's case was mounted on the preponderance of evidence pointing to the fact the plaintiff was the driver.

The medical and biomechanical evidence relied upon by the CTP insurer from a neurosurgeon and an oral and maxillofacial surgeon, supported a conclusion that the plaintiff's facial and dental injuries, together with his spinal injuries, were wholly consistent with the plaintiff's face having been struck by the deployed airbag whilst having been unrestrained in the driver's seat.

As a consequence of the plaintiff having been unrestrained, he sustained a hyper-extension injury to his spine when his unrestrained body moved forward at the time of impact and his face struck the airbag.

The lowering of the driver's seat was consistent with the removal of the plaintiff from that seat into the rear compartment.

The blood found on the airbag was the plaintiff's and consistent with a person bleeding from facial and dental injuries. It was inconsistent with splattering, which may have occurred had an injury occurred in the rear of the SUV. There were no swipe or wipe marks or other evidence of transfer from another source.

The CTP insurer also relied on the opinions of a specialist in forensic medicine and pathology and the forensic scientist who had originally been responsible for analysing the DNA.

The CTP insurer further submitted that the father did not suffer injuries that would have resulted in significant bleeding.

Decision

Justice Boddice accepted the blood found on the driver's deployed airbag was the plaintiff's. The more salient issue was how it came to be there.

His Honour found the evidence of the plaintiff and his mother was unreliable and not credible. He considered both were evasive. Neither had provided an explanation for the presence of the plaintiff's blood on the airbag. There was otherwise no direct evidence that the plaintiff's blood had been deposited on the airbag from another source.

After a meticulous review of the evidence, his Honour was satisfied that, on the balance of probabilities, the driver of the SUV at the time of the collision was the plaintiff.

The CTP insurer was therefore successful in its defence and on its counterclaim.

Gilchrist Connell acted for the CTP insurer

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions