Australia: NSW Planning Law Reforms – The Real Implications

Last Updated: 18 April 2008
Article by Anthony Whealy

The most significant reforms to NSW Planning Laws since the introduction of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act in 1979 are now only a month or two away. In this update, we explore a number of critical consequences of the planning reforms which do not appear to have been recognised in the media coverage (or government announcements) surrounding the proposed reforms to date.

In our December 2007 update (to view click here), gadens lawyers described the proposed planning reforms, following the release of a Discussion Paper released by the State Government in November 2007. Broadly, the reforms will:

  • fast-track the making of Local Environmental Plans for the rezoning of land, by introducing an up-front "gateway" assessment to determine whether the proposal should proceed.
  • alter the development application assessment process so that it is tailored to the size and scale of the proposed development. This includes the introduction of new approval authorities other than local councils.
  • reform the system of developer contributions in NSW by overhauling section 94 of the Act, and making councils accountable for expenditure of all funds levied.
  • increasing the use and uptake of 'exempt' and 'complying' development (development needing no development application at all) - interestingly, 'complying development' will now include development that does not in fact comply with the nominated criteria.
  • reforms to certification of development.

The NSW Government last week released a Draft Exposure Bill setting out the proposed legislation. It seems certain that the reforms will be implemented in an incredibly short time-frame, with Planning Minister Frank Sartor having said recently that he expects the Bill to be tabled in parliament next month and for it to be passed in June 2008. Public consultation on the Exposure Bill is only open until 24 April 2008 - again, a very short period.

Although the proposed reforms have received wide coverage, they are generally being described in most quarters as procedural reforms to speed up the planning-approvals process and to customize those processes to suit the scale of development proposed. However, we believe that there are a number of critical consequences of the reforms which go well beyond matters of procedure, and which demand close scrutiny. Some of the issues we have identified are:

Councils Set To Lose Substantial Power And Control Over 'Bread And Butter' Development Applications

About 95% of all DAs in NSW relate to single residential dwelling houses, and it is proposed that in relation to this category of development (all single dwelling houses, regardless of their cost, and all other residential work up to a capital value of $1 million), applicants will be able to have council decisions reviewed by an outside consultant to be known as a 'Planning Arbitrator'. They will be chosen by the State Government, not the councils. Applicants who are unhappy with a decision of a council will be able to have the decision reviewed by a Planning Arbitrator and, where a council has not made a decision within a short timeframe (probably 30 days but the detail is not disclosed), applicants can automatically put the application over to a Planning Arbitrator. The costs will be nominal (a few hundred dollars). Applicants will be able to amend their DA plans when the matter goes to an Arbitrator. That Arbitrator then must determine the application within a timeframe that is yet to be disclosed, but the Discussion Paper released in November indicated that it would be 14 days. That is an incredibly tight timeframe given that the Arbitrator will not be familiar with the matter, and the DA plans may have been amended in any event. There is no requirement that neighbours or objectors be involved in the arbitration or notified of it. Lawyers are not permitted to be involved. In short, it will be a very fast decision by an outside consultant. Importantly, only applicants may appeal against a decision of an Arbitrator (an appeal is to the Land and Environment Court).

This is obviously very good news for applicants as it means that they can lodge a DA with a council, seek review of the "deemed refusal" within a very short timeframe (probably 30 days) at minimal cost, which takes the matter out of the hands of the council. The Arbitrator then must make a decision within a very tight timeframe, possibly with amended DA plans that have not been notified to neighbours or objectors, and if the applicant is unhappy with the Arbitrator's decision they can appeal to the Land and Environment Court, whereas the council cannot.

This sets up a situation where many decisions in a local government area will be taken out of the hands of the local council and the council will have no right of appeal against the decision of the Arbitrator.

Interestingly, Councils must pay the Arbitrators, and must indemnify them for any costs orders made if an applicant successfully appeals against the Arbitrator's decision in the Land and Environment Court. The council may not even wish to defend the Arbitrator's decision, but the council will be liable for any costs orders made in the applicant's favour. In addition, it will be a criminal offence for a council not to assist an arbitrator by producing relevant documents on request or making staff available on request.

This really is a breathtaking loss of power and control to councils in relation to a category of development which, as mentioned above, amounts to about 95% of all DA's in NSW.

Attempt To Prevent Legal Challenges Looks Set To Backfire

There is an express intention in the planning reforms to limit legal appeals and challenges. For example, applicant and developer appeal rights will be slashed down from 12 months to 3 months.

However in circumstances where Planning Arbitrators must make a decision within such a short timeframe, - probably 14 days - there are bound to be legal errors. Lawyers cannot attend to address the Arbitrator on legal issues relating to a decision, for example on the correct legal interpretation of a planning requirement under the Act or under a Council's Local Environmental Plan. In those circumstances, the result is likely to be that decisions made by Arbitrators (when they approve a DA) will be susceptible to legal challenge in the Land and Environment Court by dissatisfied neighbours, objectors and even by Councils. Such action is available under s.124 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979.

At present these types of challenges are made against councils, however councils are generally far less prone to legal error, as they may take time to consider applications carefully, and to obtain legal advice where necessary. Lawyers can attend council meetings and advise councils as required. Planning Arbitrators will not have that luxury and their decisions may well be prone to legal error, opening the floodgates for potential s.124 actions.

There is however a proposed provision excusing Arbitrators from any personal liability in relation to their decisions. Therefore, where an invalid decision is made and the decision is overturned, applicants will have no ability to recover damages (delay costs and the like) against the arbitrator.

It also seems likely that objectors will, for the first time, be given a right of appeal to the Land and Environment Court against the approval of certain residential development. However we are not told when these rights would arise (the detail is left to the Regulations), but it appears that it will apply where significant breaches of numerical planning controls are proposed (a figure of 25% breach has been mentioned).

Lapsing Of Development Consents

At present, a development consent cannot lapse (expire) if it is "physically commenced" within a certain time frame specified in the consent (generally 3 to 5 years). This requires only that some physical works (relating to the consent) be carried out before the lapse date. However the planning reforms now propose that even where that has already occurred, the development consent will expire if the work has not been "substantially commenced" within a further 2 years. This is a much more difficult threshold, requiring far more comprehensive works to be carried out. Importantly, this has the potential to catch out a lot of developers and landowners who may have development consents where physical commencement has occurred but the consent has otherwise been left in abeyance without "substantial" commencement of works. For those people, even the additional 2 years that is proposed beyond the ordinary lapse date may already have expired or may be nearing expiration. In those cases, unless they are aware of this proposed planning reform, they may lose the ability to carry out the development.

Example: Developer / landowner has a consent requiring commencement within 3 years. It was issued 5 years ago. Developer carried out physical works prior to the 3 years and obtained legal advice and / or Council signoff confirming that physical commencement is achieved. Developer now has a more valuable site because it can be sold with the development consent for future owner to build. However, the new planning reforms will mean that "substantial" works had to be carried out within 2 years after the original 3 year lapse date (5 years in total). That is now. Therefore the consent lapses now as "substantial" works have not been carried out. Developer / owner simply lose their development consent.

This amendment does expressly apply to old development consents - there is no savings or transitional provision to protect those consents.

Approval via new DA may no longer be permissible at all on the land, depending on the current zoning and planning controls.

Costs In Land And Environment Court Proceedings

Another stated intention of the legislation is to deter developers and applicants from taking Land and Environment Court appeals.

Applicants in appeals often amend their plans along the way, to respond to and overcome concerns or issues raised by the Council or objectors. This has generally been said to be an acceptable practice, because it leads to a better planning outcome for the site. The two most recent Chief Judges of the Land and Environment Court (Preston and McClellan) have emphasised that planning appeals should not reflect an adversarial system of winners and losers. Rather the goal should be to achieve an acceptable outcome for a site in terms of what building or use is approved. The process of amending plans to respond to concerns of councils or residents in the locality is an appropriate means of achieving that.

However the planning reforms aim to deter applicants from amending plans by introducing a new rule that where an applicant elects to amend its plans in any significant way, it must automatically pay the entire legal costs of the council. Although it is not clear, it seems that this means the costs must be paid on an indemnity basis - meaning whatever costs the Council has incurred, whether or not they are reasonable, they must automatically be paid by the applicant / developer. For example if Council uses 3 senior barristers in Court, their costs must all be paid. Indemnity costs are awarded very rarely indeed in any Court - generally only where one party's conduct has been reprehensible. They are almost never awarded in the Land and Environment Court. Rather, costs are awarded from time to time, but only on a "party / party" basis, meaning an assessment is made as to what costs were reasonably incurred, and the unsuccessful party pays those reasonable costs only.

Generally at present, where an applicant amends plans, the costs payable are only "costs thrown away", meaning wasted costs as a result of Council now having to look at new plans.

The proposal to award automatically all costs of the proceedings on an indemnity basis means that applicants will rarely agree to amend a proposal to achieve a better outcome, unless they have deep pockets indeed. Complaints of councils and objectors will be ignored and argued in Court. We will almost certainly see a significant shift back to a highly adversarial system where there is only a win or a loss, but no compromise other than where an applicant has significant financial resources.

Alternatively, applicants may be able to amend just prior to lodging an appeal. Advice on this will be needed.

Compulsory Acquisition Of Land For Profit

The planning reforms will allow the Minister to compulsorily acquire land (at fair market value) and on-sell it to other developers to use/ develop "whether for profit or otherwise". The only limitation on this extraordinary power is that the land must be acquired in connection with "urban renewal proposals" or "urban land releases" and result in a "net public benefit". None of those terms are defined. In short, we believe this means the Minister may acquire land compulsorily, on-sell it to developers to subdivide and build upon for profit and, arguably, the resulting increase in housing density will result in a "net public benefit" because of the need for increased housing stock in NSW. Landowners beware.

Minister To Protect Certain Decisions He Makes From Any Legal Challenge

The Planning Reforms go to the unusual lengths of preventing any legal challenge whatsoever against certain decisions where the Minister has not followed the legal procedure provided for in these very reforms. In those cases, the reforms actually prevent any legal challenge, even expressly overriding challenges on the grounds of "procedural fairness" and "natural justice". Challenges on those grounds are almost always available, reflecting the deeply entrenched principle that everybody is entitled to procedural fairness and that decision makers are bound by the laws of natural justice. In this case, the Planning Reforms seek expressly to set the Minister free of those entrenched obligations. It is a highly unusual level of protection for an administrative decision-maker.



Anthony Whealy

t (02) 9931 4867




Natalie Bannister

t (03) 9252 2507


The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Mondaq Advice Centre (MACs)
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.